Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NPR "Car Talk" never discusses NEW CAR epidemic flaws!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
misterfact@yahoo.com - 22 Nov 2005 18:19 GMT
Wonder why we never hear about epidemic flaws in NEW cars on National
Public Radio's CAR TALK. (cartalk.com)

Is the show more interested in hiding new car epidemic flaws from the
public  (to protect the interests of manufacturers), than it is warning
car buyers?!

 misterfact@yahoo.com
Ed White - 22 Nov 2005 19:38 GMT
If they spent all their time talking about new car flaws they'd never
get to the entertaining stuff. The program is all about entertaining
people. Heck, the flaws in the Toyota products alone would take two or
three hours a week. I'd rather listen to the fun stuff than how Priuses
stop dead for no reason, or why the front wheels fall off Tundras.

Ed
Bret Ludwig - 22 Nov 2005 22:29 GMT
> If they spent all their time talking about new car flaws they'd never
> get to the entertaining stuff. The program is all about entertaining
> people. Heck, the flaws in the Toyota products alone would take two or
> three hours a week. I'd rather listen to the fun stuff than how Priuses
> stop dead for no reason, or why the front wheels fall off Tundras.

You can be dead nuts certain there is an economic component to this
reticence.
C. E. White - 23 Nov 2005 00:01 GMT
>> If they spent all their time talking about new car flaws they'd never
>> get to the entertaining stuff. The program is all about entertaining
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You can be dead nuts certain there is an economic component to this
> reticence.

Well they don't run ads. They do have a newspaper column and they do get
vehicles from manufacturers to test drive. However over the years they said
enough bad things about enough different cars on the radio program, that I
doubt they are afraid of discussing how crappy new Toyotas are. They have
car tests of a sort at http://www.cartalk.com/content/testdrives/ .Of
course, they liked them all......They also have a survey feature where some
people say some bad things about most cars (even Hondas), see
http://www.cartalk.com/content/survey/lookup.html .I even tried their car
recommendation feature. It showed me the cars I'd really like to have, not
the one I'd actually buy...

Ed
HLS@nospam.nix - 23 Nov 2005 02:10 GMT
> . Heck, the flaws in the Toyota products alone would take two or
> three hours a week. ¨

> Ed

What ARE you talking about, Ed... I thought the Toyota was the
standard of cutting edge technology.????
JazzMan - 23 Nov 2005 01:13 GMT
> Wonder why we never hear about epidemic flaws in NEW cars on National
> Public Radio's CAR TALK. (cartalk.com)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>   misterfact@yahoo.com

It's an entertaining weekend radio show. Dude, just change
the channel.

You are an idot. Yes, an idot.

JazzMan
Signature

**********************************************************
Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net.
Curse those darned bulk e-mailers!
**********************************************************
"Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of
supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to
live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry
**********************************************************

C. E. White - 23 Nov 2005 05:53 GMT
>> Wonder why we never hear about epidemic flaws in NEW cars on National
>> Public Radio's CAR TALK. (cartalk.com)
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> It's an entertaining weekend radio show. Dude, just change
> the channel.

Well it is more than that. They have a newspaper column, a web site, they
rerun segments of the show on Sirius as fillers, they sell stuff, etc., etc.

Like most people in the car reporting biz, they tend not to say really bad
things about cars too often. They certainly aren't as bad a Motor Trend
(Vega - Car of the Year, need i say more). They do actually say bad things
about some cars when people call the radio show, and they do have certain
pet brands (they are constantly recommending Subarus). They also seem to
have a running feud with Jetta drivers......

I find the program very entertaining. So, even if they are getting paid off,
why should I care? I never worry that almost anything I watch on TV is
influenced by advertisers. I've never heard the Tappet Brothers (Tom and
Ray) claim to be unbiased. In fact I think they often admit to being
unencumbered by the thought process (or something like that).

On a similar subject, sort of - do any of you people watch House on Fox. I
enjoy the program. I find it interesting that they actually acknowledge the
support of several prominent manufacturers of medical equipment at the end
of the show. I wonder if they aren't drumming up business for some of the
more elaborate equipment. Personally I would like a shot at the turntable
thing they had a few episodes back (the manufacturer was clearly identified
at the end of the show). Or for that matter, how about all the Dell monitors
that show up on lots of shows. I wonder who decides that they need to shoot
the scene over the back of a monitor. Most of us cubicle rats have the
monitor backs against a wall where you can't see it. Do you think the Miami
police ride around in Hummer H2s? I hope not. And I see the agents on NCIS
(and a number of other shows), are suddenly driving new Dodge Chargers.

Ed
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 23 Nov 2005 04:46 GMT
> Wonder why we never hear about epidemic flaws in NEW cars on National
> Public Radio's CAR TALK. (cartalk.com)
>
> Is the show more interested in hiding new car epidemic flaws from the
> public  (to protect the interests of manufacturers), than it is warning
> car buyers?!

Because:

1. They offer repair advice. New car faults are covered by warranty.

2. If it was a design flaw you were concerned about, the only thing they
could advise you to do is to think more carefully before buying your
next car.

Signature

Paul Hovnanian     mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
When I was in high school, I remember boys and girls slept
together all the time. We called it algebra class. -- Jay Leno

John S. - 23 Nov 2005 18:21 GMT
> Wonder why we never hear about epidemic flaws in NEW cars on National
> Public Radio's CAR TALK. (cartalk.com)
>
> Is the show more interested in hiding new car epidemic flaws from the
> public  (to protect the interests of manufacturers), than it is warning
> car buyers?!

Which epidemic flaws or epidemic of flaws are you talking about.  Which
cars.  Given your use of a medical term, I don't suppose you are
linking new cars to the spread of the Avian flu epidemic are you?
misterfact@yahoo.com - 28 Nov 2005 17:03 GMT
> > Wonder why we never hear about epidemic flaws in NEW cars on National
> > Public Radio's CAR TALK. (cartalk.com)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> cars.  Given your use of a medical term, I don't suppose you are
> linking new cars to the spread of the Avian flu epidemic are you?

What hidden epidemic flaws in new cars am I talking about?! You must
be kidding!
All you have to do is look at the past record of hidden epidemic flaws
in new car-to know that it is happening all the time! Hidden flaws are
usually those which show up just AFTER the warranty expires.
John S. - 28 Nov 2005 18:11 GMT
> > > Wonder why we never hear about epidemic flaws in NEW cars on National
> > > Public Radio's CAR TALK. (cartalk.com)
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> in new car-to know that it is happening all the time! Hidden flaws are
> usually those which show up just AFTER the warranty expires.

WHICH EPIDEMIC FLAWS IN WHICH CARS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!!!

I've owned new cars for the past 35 years and have yet to notice an
epidemic of flaws.  Actually the overall quality, reliability and
sophistication of cars has gotten much better.

Could it be that you are one of those rare people who perpetually see
darkness when everyone else sees daylight?  Or possibly just another
troll looking to be fed.
misterfact@yahoo.com - 29 Nov 2005 23:15 GMT
> WHICH EPIDEMIC FLAWS IN WHICH CARS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!!!
>
> I've owned new cars for the past 35 years and have yet to notice an
> epidemic of flaws.  Actually the overall quality, reliability and
> sophistication of cars has gotten much better.

How about the over 100,000 Saturns that went off the assmbly line into
showrooms with casting flaws in the cylinder head. (causes cylinder
head to crack-usually just after warranty expires)!?
Daniel J. Stern - 30 Nov 2005 17:32 GMT
> How about the over 100,000 Saturns that went off the assmbly line into
> showrooms with casting flaws in the cylinder head. (causes cylinder head
> to crack-usually just after warranty expires)!?

You'll forgive me if I have trouble coming up with much sympathy for those
dumb enough to buy a Saturn or other piece of GM trash.
Marv Soloff - 30 Nov 2005 20:21 GMT
You are forgiven. Generous Motors looks like it is going the way
of Hudson and Studebaker (and none too soon).

Regards,

Marv

>> How about the over 100,000 Saturns that went off the assmbly line into
>> showrooms with casting flaws in the cylinder head. (causes cylinder
>> head to crack-usually just after warranty expires)!?
>
> You'll forgive me if I have trouble coming up with much sympathy for
> those dumb enough to buy a Saturn or other piece of GM trash.
Nate Nagel - 30 Nov 2005 21:43 GMT
Hudson hung around as AMC for quite a few years, until being bought out
by Chrysler (of course they promptly killed off everything but Jeep,
which was really a Kaiser brand) but IMHO the Studebaker analogy is very
apt; GM is getting destroyed by their labor costs relative to their
(foreign) competition, just as Studebaker was getting killed by their
higher labor costs (and also lower volume) than Ford and GM.  The only
difference I see is that Studebaker's products were appealing, if not
popular, up until the end - IMHO GM's products are far more popular than
they are appealing (at least to me.)

nate

> You are forgiven. Generous Motors looks like it is going the way
> of Hudson and Studebaker (and none too soon).
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> You'll forgive me if I have trouble coming up with much sympathy for
>> those dumb enough to buy a Saturn or other piece of GM trash.

Signature

replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

gfulton - 30 Nov 2005 22:20 GMT
> Hudson hung around as AMC for quite a few years, until being bought out by
> Chrysler (of course they promptly killed off everything but Jeep, which
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>> You'll forgive me if I have trouble coming up with much sympathy for
>>> those dumb enough to buy a Saturn or other piece of GM trash.

I guess it's like arguing religion, this hatred shown here for GM. People
seem to get very polarized about this.  The most reliable cars I've owned in
my life have all been made by GM.  I'm 56 and have owned plenty of all sorts
and in many foreign countries when I was younger.  They have just simply
held up better for me than anything else.  And, yes, after I read that all
the UAW members who will shortly be laid off will still be paid their
salaries, it's very likely that GM will fold.  I don't see how any company
can stand to be raped by a union contract that way.  I'm a union member,
Intl. Assoc. of Machinists, and hard pro-union, but what the UAW has done to
GM here is unconscionable.  The men I work with, and myself, have a hard
time believing GM ever signed onto this.  It'll be like seeing a good old
and steadfast friend die. Just my opinion and worth what you're paying for
it.

Garrett Fulton
John S. - 30 Nov 2005 17:41 GMT
> > WHICH EPIDEMIC FLAWS IN WHICH CARS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!!!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> showrooms with casting flaws in the cylinder head. (causes cylinder
> head to crack-usually just after warranty expires)!?

Even if those numbers are correct they are hardly an automotive
epidemic my friend.
misterfact@yahoo.com - 28 Nov 2005 17:25 GMT
Wonder why we never hear about epidemic flaws in NEW cars on National
Public Radio's CAR TALK. (cartalk.com)

Is the show more interested in hiding new car epidemic flaws from the
public  (to protect the interests of manufacturers), than it is warning

car buyers?!

 misterf...@yahoo.com

Note: Misterfact has been BANNED from posting messages on Car Talk
bulletin boards for daring to pose the above question!
John S. - 28 Nov 2005 18:12 GMT
> Wonder why we never hear about epidemic flaws in NEW cars on National
> Public Radio's CAR TALK. (cartalk.com)
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Note: Misterfact has been BANNED from posting messages on Car Talk
> bulletin boards for daring to pose the above question!

That's good news.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.