Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ford PU, inline 6 info??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve - 24 Nov 2005 15:40 GMT
I'm in the market for a full size PU and considering a Ford F-150, inline 6,
automatic w/OD..

I presently have a '88 S-10 2.8L 5spd and tow a single axle equipment
trailer for my import tractor and equipment. The truck has nearly 200,000
mile and is getting tired..

Does the late '80s early '90s F-150 have fuel injection and is that
automatic capable of towing a 3000# load??

(what year did Ford switch the F series trucks over to fuel injection?? And
is it throttle body or port injection??)

Any opinions or experiences would be appreciated.

Steve
lugnut - 25 Nov 2005 03:46 GMT
>I'm in the market for a full size PU and considering a Ford F-150, inline 6,
>automatic w/OD..
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Steve

The F150 first used EFI on the '85 5.0L engines.  The 300
six became EFI in 1987.  The 5.8L V8 was not EFI until
later.  The Ford F series always used port injection.  It
was switched from batch firing to SEFI as the years went by
depending on the power train config.  The 300 six will
handle a 3000# tow easily as long as you ar in no hurry when
accelerating.  It has better bottom end torque than the 5.0L
but, the 5.0L catches up pretty quick and holds it further
up the rpm range.  I have had both over the years.  I find
the 5.0L more to my liking because of it's better
acceleration in the mid range.  The 5.0L also get the same
or better fuel mileage.  Both have outstanding reliability
in my experience.  Either will handle your compact tractor
easily.  I highly recommend a trailer with brakes and a good
adjustable controller if you don't already have that.

My current 5.0L has 207k miles on it.  It uses aboput a
quart of oil between 5k changes, has good even compression,
the timing chain is still tight (I checked it a few months
ago when I had to replace the oil pan gasket which is a
common failure in '90's Ford engines) and it still maintains
60 psi oil pressure hot and idleing with 10w30 Havoline in
it.   The trans has been down twice - once for converter
shudder which is common in the early E4OD and again to
replace the front seal when I had it out to replace the oil
pan gasket and rear seal in the engine.  

IMHO, if you need a reliable work truck, Ford is as good as
any out there over the long haul.  I can say this after
having had the Toyotas, Nissans, C****'s and a couple of
Dodges over the years.

Lugnut
Steve - 25 Nov 2005 15:44 GMT
Thanks for the encouraging reply.

My trailer does have brakes, however, of  half doz. F150s that I have looked
at, only one had a hitch receiver and brake controller. Hence, my concern
about the ability of this truck to pull and stop a load.

I also liked the idea of having an OD for economy when not pulling the
trailer. I'd take the OD with automatic or stick. Don't seem to find OD on
current models anymore.

My S-10 has been a good truck and being 4X4 I have had the advantage of the
low range in the transfer case to pull up steep grades with the
trailer/tractor in tow. I seldom need the 4X4 for traction.

Thanks again.

Steve

>>I'm in the market for a full size PU and considering a Ford F-150, inline
>>6,
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> Lugnut
Kevin Bottorff - 25 Nov 2005 17:55 GMT
> Thanks for the encouraging reply.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> trailer. I'd take the OD with automatic or stick. Don't seem to find
> OD on current models anymore.

almost everything even remotely current has OD. they just don`t make a
big deal about it anymore as it is expected now.  KB

> My S-10 has been a good truck and being 4X4 I have had the advantage
> of the low range in the transfer case to pull up steep grades with the
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>>
>> Lugnut

Signature

ThunderSnake #9  Warn once, shoot twice
460 in the pkup, 460 on the stand for another pkup
and one in the shed for a fun project to yet be decided on

lugnut - 25 Nov 2005 18:29 GMT
IIRC, all of the F series has a pigtail under the center of
the dash to connect your brake controller.  The connection
at the rear is made by installing an adapter for the trailer
into the factory harness connector at the rear of the truck.
It just snaps in.  Hoppes make a good one as well as others.
You can find the adapters online with a little searching.
Hitch receivers are easy to come by as all of the F series
had the same frame width from about 1973 thru 1996.  I do
not know about the frame width on the later models - they
may still be the same animal.  Just get one you like.  You
can find a decent one for about $100US.  Keep in mind that
towing with OD in a manual trans is pretty much a no-no
unless you don't mind replacing input bearing when you ignor
proper shifting.  With an automatic, you simply let it do
it's job unless it starts "hunting".

Lugnut

>Thanks for the encouraging reply.
>
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>>
>> Lugnut
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.