Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / December 2005
Should I buy a Prius?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Henry - 29 Nov 2005 09:58 GMT I am thinking about buying a Prius.
I know that it doesn't pencil out dollarwise, but it would be nice to be able to use the carpool lane (I am in CA).
Anyone want to save me from bad decision?
Another question: Are HID headlights worth it the bux, compared to modern halogens? I am middle aged and would like to be able to see better at night.
Henry
* - 29 Nov 2005 12:40 GMT Henry <doREMoOVEtTHIS2@earthlink.net> wrote in article <PCVif.2411$Hk1.1900@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> I am thinking about buying a Prius. > > I know that it doesn't pencil out dollarwise, but it would be nice to be > able to use the carpool lane (I am in CA). > > Anyone want to save me from bad decision? Nope!
Looks to me as though you've already made a decision - even though, by your own admission, the math doesn't work - and are simply seeking affirmation to your flawed, twisted, "carpool lane" logic..........
.....that, or some sort of imaginary scapegoat which will allow you to say, "Some idiot on the Internet said it was a good car....."
....when you know from what has already been published, and you have already read, that they are NOT good cars, nor are they a good buy....HOV lanes notwithstanding.
> Another question: Are HID headlights worth it the bux, compared to > modern halogens? I am middle aged and would like to be able to see > better at night. Not to me they're not - since my experience with them is usually on the receiving end of a pair that have not been correctly aimed by their idiot owners......especially the ones that have been installed upside-down by the IO, blinding you with high-beam-aim while on low-beam.
I can state without fear of contradiction that HID headlights actually make it *harder* for my own personal set of middle-aged eyes to see at night.........
B. Peg - 29 Nov 2005 14:05 GMT > "Henry" wrote: >I am thinking about buying a Prius. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > halogens? I am middle aged and would like to be able to see better at > night. Forget what the sticker on the car says about its mileage. The average seems to be 43 to 48 mpg, with much depending on the gas quality such as winter verses summer mixes (higher ethanol in winter makes their mileage drop around 10% to the 43 mpg figures). The fuel mixtures seem to differ by states as well which accounts for much of the discrepancy in the car's mpg figures.
About their durability, seems the Canadian taxi cab companies are moving to them as they did save their companies hundreds of dollars (monthly!) in maintenance and fuel costs. One driver logged over 200,000 miles in year with virtually no problems. Warranty for the battery is moot since, in California, the warranty is something like 10 years or 120,000 miles since they determine it as part of the emission control system. The change from ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) to HV motor is indistinguishable while driving and can happen literally hundreds of times just on the way to work. No shifting either. System is very well thought out. Oh, all driver controls such as the steering wheel, gas pedal, and even brake pedal are fly-by-wire controls. Majority of braking is by the HV motor. Pretty ingenious in that the fly-by-wire brake pedal tells the computer the amount of deceleration needed and feeds the ECM info to the electric motor to allow the deceleration force. The final 5-7 mph is by the electrically-assisted hydraulic brakes which should allow for longer brake pad service life.
The HOV issue. This is only good for up to the year 2008, beyond that who knows? Also, some county highways (not federal or state) with the HOV lanes forbid the Prius with solo driver on them even with the $8 sticker. Note, too, that there is a set number of stickers available (California set the number at 75,000) so the longer you wait, who knows if you'll get one?
The feature list on the vehicle is great with their integrated Bluetooth phone system and GPS navigational system which will boost the car's base price by $6K. Their Smart Key system cannot be beat, which makes it a very difficult car to steal short of a flat-bed hauler. Just don't lose a key fob else it will cost you dearly. The new '06 models added leather seats and a rearview camera integrated into the NAV console. The non-US models have auto parallel parking as well (part of the fly-by-wire capabilities). There is a demo, in Japanese however, on the web of it in action.
Their HID lights are auto-leveling based on the sensor on the rear axle, if that were what its called, unit. They seem to gain brightness in a few seconds of turning on, maybe to save the lamps from voltage surge? They will shut off automatically when the driver's door opens. They have that familiar bluish tint.
A buyer's warning would be the surcharges various dealers are charging which range from MSRP to $6000 over, and the highest seem to be in the Los Angeles area. One advantage, if you call it that, is that the resale value has been high, much as was/is the state of Harley-Davidson motorcycles in the resale market. The wait times can be excessive though.
I'd check out the Prius forums for more facts like Priuschat.com or Priusonline.com. Good luck.
B~
Comboverfish - 29 Nov 2005 20:32 GMT > About their durability, seems the Canadian taxi cab companies are moving to > them as they did save their companies hundreds of dollars (monthly!) in > maintenance and fuel costs. One driver logged over 200,000 miles in year > with virtually no problems. Miles or kilometers?
> The change from > ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) to HV motor is indistinguishable while > driving and can happen literally hundreds of times just on the way to work. I can distinguish it.
> Oh, all driver > controls such as the steering wheel, gas pedal, and even brake pedal are > fly-by-wire controls. There is a difference between steer-by-wire and electric power assist. The Prius has the later.
> Majority of braking is by the HV motor. Pretty > ingenious in that the fly-by-wire brake pedal tells the computer the amount > of deceleration needed and feeds the ECM info to the electric motor to allow > the deceleration force. The final 5-7 mph is by the electrically-assisted > hydraulic brakes which should allow for longer brake pad service life. The real benefit here is the regenerative current to the HV battery. The HV motors are "instructed" to become generators during braking and save the IC engine (and gasoline) from performing this task. As a bonus, brake pads could conceivably last the life of the car with mostly highway driving.
Toyota MDT in MO
M. MacDonald - 29 Nov 2005 21:29 GMT : "Comboverfish" write in message: : [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] : : Miles or kilometers? I found the MSN News link: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8839690/
It was 200,000 MILES in 25 months. Still, not too bad, eh?
Mack
Daniel J. Stern - 30 Nov 2005 17:35 GMT > About their durability, seems the Canadian taxi cab companies are moving to > them as they did save their companies hundreds of dollars (monthly!) in > maintenance and fuel costs. Around here (Toronto) I see exactly zero hybrid taxicabs.
> One driver logged over 200,000 miles in [25 months] with virtually no > problems. Grand, but that tells us nothing about the long-term durability of the traction battery in terms of *age*. My officemate just had to have a new traction battery in his '03 Honda Civic hybrid.
DS
Don Stauffer - 29 Nov 2005 15:07 GMT > I am thinking about buying a Prius. > I know that it doesn't pencil out dollarwise, but it would be nice to be [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Henry Why do you think it might be a bad decision? Even if you break even or less, you are doing your part to fight against high petroleum prices and cut down the emission of greenhouse gases. When my current car needs replacement I am very seriously considering a Prius. Of all the hybrids I currently see on the market, I think Toyota has done the best job of engineering the Prius.
HLS@nospam.nix - 29 Nov 2005 15:54 GMT > Why do you think it might be a bad decision? Even if you break even or > less, you are doing your part to fight against high petroleum prices and > cut down the emission of greenhouse gases. When my current car needs > replacement I am very seriously considering a Prius. Of all the hybrids > I currently see on the market, I think Toyota has done the best job of > engineering the Prius. My son recently bought a Honda hybrid for himself, the Insight (sp?) maybe. He claims to have gotten an indicated mileage, more or less checked with GPS, in excess of 80 mpg.
His wife already has the large Honda hybrid, and it is a very smooth and nice car. She typically gets in the range of 48 mpg, maybe more if her foot is sore.
The HOV lane seems to have been an attraction in their case too.
In the long run, I would expect the maintenance costs to overwhelm the gas savings, but time will tell.
Masospaghetti - 30 Nov 2005 21:12 GMT >> I am thinking about buying a Prius. >> I know that it doesn't pencil out dollarwise, but it would be nice to [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > I currently see on the market, I think Toyota has done the best job of > engineering the Prius. You may be fighting against high petroleum prices...but hybrids at this point still do not make economical sense for the consumer OR the economy, they are subsidized by the government so that Toyota does not lose money on them. It costs Toyota more than the $20k to manufacture the car, but the government eats the rest. Not a good thing. The added complexity of the hybrid components also mean that theres more stuff to break.
And I dont know if it's just me...but I feel safer with a mechanical link between the brake pedal and the brakes than "brake-by-wire". Just my two cents.
If you want to save fuel economically, get a Civic HX (36/44 mpg) or a turbodiesel.
Pete C. - 30 Nov 2005 22:05 GMT ...
> And I dont know if it's just me...but I feel safer with a mechanical > link between the brake pedal and the brakes than "brake-by-wire". Just > my two cents. What current production vehicle has a true "mechanical" connection between the brake pedal and the brakes? The hydraulic connection is not really what I would consider a "mechanical" link. That is why you have the cable operated parking / E-brake as backup. If the "brake-by-wire" system also has the cable parking / E-brake it's pretty comparable.
Pete C.
Don Stauffer - 01 Dec 2005 15:10 GMT > ... > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Pete C. Isn't the Prius a dual brake system? Doesn't the use of brake engage "generator" mode but also apply hydraulic pressure to regular brakes? If generator mode fails, don't you STILL have regular hydraulic + friction brakes?
Pete C. - 01 Dec 2005 18:37 GMT > > ... > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > generator mode fails, don't you STILL have regular hydraulic + friction > brakes? I don't know. I don't have a Prius and have no intention of purchasing one.
If it applies "real" brakes at the same time with the MG mode, then it is throwing away potentially recoverable energy as heat in the brakes.
The hybrid setup really produces a false economy by using an under powered gas engine and forcing drivers to adopt a different driving style. The electric motor is supposed to help the under powered gas engine get the vehicle going using energy recovered from braking.
If you have been a good driver on a conventional vehicle and learned to watch the traffic ahead and let compression braking do the majority of your braking thereby minimizing the use of the service brakes and make modest acceleration when traffic starts then there will be minimal energy available to be recovered from braking and little advantage to the electric boost on startup and you will will little benefit from a hybrid system. You will also have seen optimal mileage from your conventional vehicle, making the hybrid appear to be an even worse value.
Those who race up to stopped traffic before slamming on the brakes and floor it when traffic starts will of course will have experienced terrible mileage on a conventional vehicle and will also see the most apparent benefit from a hybrid system as there will be significant energy to recover from braking and significant need for the electric boost on startup.
Pete C.
JazzMan - 02 Dec 2005 01:55 GMT > The hybrid setup really produces a false economy by using an under > powered gas engine and forcing drivers to adopt a different driving > style. The electric motor is supposed to help the under powered gas > engine get the vehicle going using energy recovered from braking. I strongly suggest you do some googling on "volumetric efficiency" and "pumping losses" so you can understand the misunderstanding you have about smaller engines as used in hybrids. Also, look up "regenerative braking".
Hybrids get better mileage, that's a fact. It's hard to fake using less gas to drive longer distances, LOL!
JazzMan
 Signature ********************************************************** Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net. Curse those darned bulk e-mailers! ********************************************************** "Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry **********************************************************
Pete C. - 02 Dec 2005 02:59 GMT > > The hybrid setup really produces a false economy by using an under > > powered gas engine and forcing drivers to adopt a different driving [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > the misunderstanding you have about smaller engines as > used in hybrids. Also, look up "regenerative braking". I'm well aware of those things, but my points still stand.
> Hybrids get better mileage, that's a fact. It's hard to > fake using less gas to drive longer distances, LOL! Hybrids get better mileage on the surface, but it comes from far less capability and forcing different driving styles in large part. A comparable weight conventional vehicle with an appropriately sized engine, driven in a fuel conscious manner will get quite similar mileage.
Pete C.
> JazzMan > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry > ********************************************************** B. Peg - 02 Dec 2005 13:50 GMT > "Pete C." wrote: > Hybrids get better mileage on the surface, but it comes from far less > capability and forcing different driving styles in large part. A > comparable weight conventional vehicle with an appropriately sized > engine, driven in a fuel conscious manner will get quite similar > mileage. Not so in my experience. My older car had roughly the same size engine as the Prius but the mpg difference is greater. Old Saturn gave me around 27 mpg; Prius is delivering 43 mpg now in the winter (was 47 mpg in summer with less ethanol to mix). The efficiency of the old dinosaur engine was around 18% and mostly due to friction losses. I still drive with a lead foot although I'm now in the "Trying to raise my mpg game" mode.
The coupling of the electric motor with its greater efficiency (lower frictional loss) with that of the less efficient gas engine has raised that older dinosaur engine efficiency of 18% to something far greater, plus the lack of idling fuel losses and richer warm-up losses (the Prius has a hot-water thermos that holds the engine heat for approximately 3 days and pumps in back into the cold engine at startup). These are not directly controlled by the driver's abilities between a older engine design and a hybrid. It's more of a maximizing of losses that were present in the older vehicle designs.
B~
Pete C. - 02 Dec 2005 14:19 GMT > > "Pete C." wrote: > > Hybrids get better mileage on the surface, but it comes from far less [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > less ethanol to mix). The efficiency of the old dinosaur engine was around > 18% and mostly due to friction losses. Your experience supports my points as explained below.
> I still drive with a lead foot > although I'm now in the "Trying to raise my mpg game" mode. This is exactly why you see a difference as I noted in a previous post. The hybrid systems main benefit is that it helps to cover bad driving style, not that it significantly raises efficiency under good driving style.
If you were to try driving both vehicle using a fuel conscious driving style i.e. using compression braking well before stopped traffic to minimize braking, and making more gentle starts you would see the MPG gap narrow considerably. Try the same comparison using a current comparable conventional car and the MPG gap would be even smaller due to the efficiency gains in the gas engine over those from a few years back.
Without what is essentially "bad" driving style, the hybrid system has significantly fewer opportunities to add energy o the batteries and significantly less need to the electric boost at startup. What energy it is able to recover and reuse during light load driving is largely offset by the extra weight of the battery pack and reduced capacity compared to the small conventional car.
> The coupling of the electric motor with its greater efficiency (lower > frictional loss) The electric motor itself has lower friction losses (only a couple friction points), but the generator mode efficiency and battery charging losses need to be factored in along with the resistive losses in the MG controller making the overall electric MG system efficiency considerably less than the motor efficiency would imply.
> with that of the less efficient gas engine has raised that > older dinosaur engine efficiency of 18% to something far greater, plus the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > B~ The last few points you make, idling losses and warm-up losses are both technologies that can and have been applied to conventional systems as well and are not really part of the hybrid system which I have been referring to. If you applied them to a conventional small car and compared the MPG to a hybrid under fuel conscious driving style the MPG difference would all but disappear and you would still have the reduced capacity on the hybrid.
The bottom line is that absent bad driving style and when taking all the factors into account, the hybrid systems produce far less of an increase in efficiency than they MPG numbers and hype would imply.
Pete C.
Don Stauffer - 02 Dec 2005 14:43 GMT .
> The hybrid setup really produces a false economy by using an under > powered gas engine and forcing drivers to adopt a different driving > style. The electric motor is supposed to help the under powered gas > engine get the vehicle going using energy recovered from braking. > >. A properly designed hybrid should not require any change in driving style. There is a big disparity in normal autos between the peak hp required and the average. In a proper hybrid the IC engine should be sized for the average power required, the electric should make up the difference between the average and peak. Result should be same performance.
BTW, driving style has a lot to do with milage obtained in a conventional car. People were screaming about price of gas last month, but no one seemed to drive any differently. No one slowed down to speed limits, and so many folks seem to prefer to drive right up to a red light and brake heavily, rather than coast up to (or through light when it does change green. I'd love to have a buck for every guy who zoomed around me when I backed off and coasted, then cut back in front of me to stop at light. I'd approach the light at 20 or 30 mph, but had to almost stop 'cause that guy was starting from a dead stop and making me almost stop too. :-( What is the big advantage about getting to the light in time to sit there for ten seconds, then start from a dead stop?
Pete C. - 02 Dec 2005 17:43 GMT > . > > The hybrid setup really produces a false economy by using an under [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > sized for the average power required, the electric should make up the > difference between the average and peak. Result should be same performance. Good in theory, and works well on the new diesel-electric yard engines in rail yards, but doesn't translate well into a consumer auto.
> BTW, driving style has a lot to do with milage obtained in a > conventional car. People were screaming about price of gas last month, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > stop too. :-( What is the big advantage about getting to the light in > time to sit there for ten seconds, then start from a dead stop? Which is exactly what I mentioned, that the hybrids derive much of their apparent economy by compensating for bad driving style, not from true efficiency.
I've been driving my truck in the fuel economy style for years and I'm quite sure I'd get much worse MPG if I drove using the gas pedal as an on-off switch like some people do.
Pete C.
Don Stauffer - 03 Dec 2005 15:32 GMT .
> Good in theory, and works well on the new diesel-electric yard engines > in rail yards, but doesn't translate well into a consumer auto. .
Ah! I think maybe you do not understand hybrid theory. The electric drive Diesel is NOT like a hybrid car. The locomotive has no STORAGE capability. So the Diesel IC component must be sized for the PEAK HP requirement. If there were no storage battery, the hybrid car would indeed be limited in performance to size of the IC engine, but the storage battery provides this 'load leveling'.
The steam cars were the same way. The limiting HP was the boiler HP, not the engine HP, which was often well above capability of the boiler. The steam race cars had phenomenal performance in short races, but would "run out of steam" in longer events. But then, I race car has a duty cycle where the average power required is much closer to peak requirement than for normal passenger car driving. Yeah, a hybrid would not be able to cruise Autobahn at 100+ speeds for long distances, but for US driving it is okay.
Pete C. - 04 Dec 2005 00:11 GMT > . > > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > indeed be limited in performance to size of the IC engine, but the > storage battery provides this 'load leveling'. I think you've missed the latest developments in locomotive technology. I specified the new *yard* engines, the ones that only do switcher duty in rail yards. These engines normally run 24 hours a day, idling a good 60% of the time.
There is a new breed of them that have smaller diesel gensets and do indeed have a battery bank. The genset is sized for about 50% of the necessary capacity so that it charges the batteries during that 60% idle time which results in the same performance for the intermittent yard duty, with much less fuel consumption and emissions.
This technology does not work for regular long haul engines, at least not yet, because they do not have enough idle time to recharge.
> The steam cars were the same way. The limiting HP was the boiler HP, > not the engine HP, which was often well above capability of the boiler. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > not be able to cruise Autobahn at 100+ speeds for long distances, but > for US driving it is okay. The current generation of hybrids are really only of any use in mostly city driving. Outside the city they don't perform very well.
Pete C.
JazzMan - 04 Dec 2005 04:16 GMT > > . > > > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > The current generation of hybrids are really only of any use in mostly > city driving. Outside the city they don't perform very well. Good thing that the vast majority of the population lives inside urban and surburban (read "city) areas, eh? Of course, a hybrid would be unable to use it's advantages in a long drive across Kansas flatland, but then again a combine would be completely useless in urban Los Angeles. :)
Regenerative braking plus being able to use the engine's powerband more efficiently are the key to hybrids getting better gas mileage. That's basic physics, provable fact.
BTW, locomotives are pretty much useless on American inner city freeways as well. LOL!
JazzMan
 Signature ********************************************************** Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net. Curse those darned bulk e-mailers! ********************************************************** "Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry **********************************************************
Pete C. - 04 Dec 2005 05:55 GMT > > > . > > > > [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > drive across Kansas flatland, but then again a combine would > be completely useless in urban Los Angeles. :) Dunno, perhaps it could help flatten that wasteland.
> Regenerative braking plus being able to use the engine's > powerband more efficiently are the key to hybrids getting > better gas mileage. That's basic physics, provable fact. CVTs use the engines power band more effectively and are far less complex and expensive than the hybrid systems. With proper driving technique there is little braking to regen from as well.
> BTW, locomotives are pretty much useless on American inner > city freeways as well. LOL! That must be why there are commuter rail lines down the middle of most of those city freeways huh?
Pete C.
> JazzMan > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry > ********************************************************** Don Stauffer - 04 Dec 2005 16:36 GMT > The current generation of hybrids are really only of any use in mostly > city driving. Outside the city they don't perform very well. > > Pete C. Well, I don't own a Prius, and magazine road tests these days seldom test for top speed. Okay, you Prius owners, how fast have you driven your cars on the highway?
Comboverfish - 02 Dec 2005 21:49 GMT > Isn't the Prius a dual brake system? Doesn't the use of brake engage > "generator" mode but also apply hydraulic pressure to regular brakes? If > generator mode fails, don't you STILL have regular hydraulic + friction > brakes? As previously posted regarding regen braking: The real benefit here is the regenerative current to the HV battery. The HV motors are "instructed" to become generators during braking and save the IC engine (and gasoline) from performing this task (of keeping the HV battery charged). As a bonus, brake pads could conceivably last the life of the car with mostly highway driving.
What this means is that the energy that is absorbed by the MGs on deceleration accounts for a great deal of your braking in the Prius and other hybrids. The brake system *is* brake-by-wire, but with quite a bit of backup measure built in, including a massive capacitor pack incase of electrical failure. The actual disc brake system can stop the car just as hard as any other vehicle's system, but it is regulated to assist the regenerative braking and therefore offers much longer pad life.
Toyota MDT in MO
Don Stauffer - 01 Dec 2005 15:08 GMT .
> You may be fighting against high petroleum prices...but hybrids at this > point still do not make economical sense for the consumer OR the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > complexity of the hybrid components also mean that theres more stuff to > break. .
Which government, US or Japan? If Japanese are subsidizing it, that doesn't bother me at all. I have never heard of anyone saying US government is subsidizing Toyota.
John S. - 01 Dec 2005 16:48 GMT > . > > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > doesn't bother me at all. I have never heard of anyone saying US > government is subsidizing Toyota. I agree. The OP may be thinking tax credits for buying alternative fuel vehicles somehow flow to the car maker. Of course they don't, although they do create an artificial demand for hybrids by lowering the price for consumers.
Masospaghetti - 02 Dec 2005 00:29 GMT >>. >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > although they do create an artificial demand for hybrids by lowering > the price for consumers. I had heard that the US government subsidized all hybrid vehicles to get them into the market early, before they could be self-sustained. What I was talking about was independant of the tax credits. I can't verify it though, i heard it a while back.
JazzMan - 02 Dec 2005 01:52 GMT > >>. > >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > was talking about was independant of the tax credits. I can't verify it > though, i heard it a while back. Though there may be a tax credit for buying a hybrid, similar to the various tax credits many others get for various reasons including the oil industry that gets billions, most people who buy a hybrid do so for the principle and could easily afford a similarly priced non-hybrid car from other makers, or even more expensive models of cars and trucks. I can see the makers selling the hybrid with a reduced profit margin, that could be called a subsidy I guess, but the benefit to the maker is better PR plus actual experience building and maintaining a fleet of hybrids. In the long term that experience will pay off, just like the experience with computerized injection has paid off.
Any makers that aren't aggressively developing hybrid and EV platforms will soon find themselves sinking in the slow lane, yet again.
JazzMan
 Signature ********************************************************** Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net. Curse those darned bulk e-mailers! ********************************************************** "Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry **********************************************************
Help! - 04 Dec 2005 16:53 GMT >I think Toyota has done the best job of >engineering the Prius. Since they WERE the ONLY one that engineered the Prius... no doubt they did the best job.
rantonrave@mail.com - 29 Nov 2005 20:03 GMT > I know that it doesn't pencil out dollarwise, but it would be nice to be > able to use the carpool lane (I am in CA). [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > modern halogens? I am middle aged and would like to be able to see > better at night. I had a Prius and got rid of it because I drove just 8,000 miles a year. I traded it with someone who drove over 36,000/year was getting killed on gas. But I liked the Prius a lot, and I don't think it's an unreasonable choice if you need a hatchback, even if you don't drive enough to justify its extra cost (about 35,000+/year). The best 4-door hatch seems to be the Mazda 3. I'm disappointed with the Matrix because it's such a gas hog.
HIDs are a waste because it's incredibly expensive to replace the assemblies, which are also favorites among thieves (you may want to ask your insurer what HIDs cost to cover). Just get brighter conventional lamps.
John S. - 29 Nov 2005 20:53 GMT > I am thinking about buying a Prius. > > I know that it doesn't pencil out dollarwise, but it would be nice to be > able to use the carpool lane (I am in CA). You will pay a premium over a comparably sized full gasoline engine car. A Corolla will easily get in the high 30's mpg, so it is difficult to justify paying a premium for a Prius that will get even better milage. It will take several years of driving the Prius to generate enough savings in gasoline to offset it's higher initial price.
I think these cars are too new to know what the long term maintenance costs will be. That battery pack will eventually have to be replaced, and the car uses some sophisticated (read expensive) systems to switch between power plants.
> Anyone want to save me from bad decision? Sure. I was amazed at the number of people that paniced when gas hit $3.00 a gallon this year. They were literally standing in line at the Toyota and Honda dealerships begging for soemone to take deposit money and be put on the waiting list.
> Another question: Are HID headlights worth it the bux, compared to > modern halogens? I am middle aged and would like to be able to see > better at night. Try driving the car. On my Volvo the HID lights provide excellent low beam lighting for in-town driving. On the road high beams do not put out nearly as much light as a standard halogen system. Consequently objects down the road are dimly lit at best. And HID lights have a very sharp lighting cutoff that makes driving in hilly country a challenge - the road ahead will suddenly disappears into darkness.
> Henry Ad absurdum per aspera - 29 Nov 2005 22:32 GMT > It will take several years of driving the Prius to generate enough savings in > gasoline to offset it's higher initial price. The time and aggravation saved by being allowed to solo in the carpool lane seems to be a big factor among the Prius owners of my acquaintance. Back to the cash basis, some of them might also save a few dollars per workday in bridge tolls, as some areas reduce or eliminate tolls for certain vehicles that have hybrid power, run on alternative fuels, or are otherwise distinguished in the mileage and/or emissions departments.
These factors might be smaller or even irrelevant to other potential buyers, even in the same urban area. For sure, it is my highly unscientific anecdotal impression that in cities without HOV lanes or tolls to be exempt from, you just don't see as many hybrids.
Caveat lector: Be sure of local laws before choosing a particular model of hybrid or jumping into the car-pool lane all alone. Different states have different policies on who gets to do what and where!
Cheers, --Joe
* - 30 Nov 2005 15:46 GMT Ad absurdum per aspera <jtchew@california.com> wrote in article <1133303540.513271.307820@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...
> > It will take several years of driving the Prius to generate enough savings in > > gasoline to offset it's higher initial price. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > alternative fuels, or are otherwise distinguished in the mileage and/or > emissions departments. ......and, there is a movement on to start taxing ALL vehicles by the mile (using a device that feeds your driving info directly to a government agency) as opposed to fuel taxes. This was specifically targeted towards the vehicles that use much less fuel - paying less taxes - yet still use the roads much the same as a conventionally-fueled vehicle that pays fuel tax.
John S. - 30 Nov 2005 17:30 GMT > > It will take several years of driving the Prius to generate enough savings in > > gasoline to offset it's higher initial price. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > unscientific anecdotal impression that in cities without HOV lanes or > tolls to be exempt from, you just don't see as many hybrids. I have read of more than one jurisdiction that is considering removing the special treatment hybrid cars get in carpool lanes. Allowing single driver hybrids in carpool lanes defeats the purpose of those lanes.
Ted Mittelstaedt - 01 Dec 2005 09:07 GMT > I have read of more than one jurisdiction that is considering removing > the special treatment hybrid cars get in carpool lanes. Allowing > single driver hybrids in carpool lanes defeats the purpose of those > lanes. And defeats the purpose of even having a hybrid to begin with. The reason is to save fuel, but a conventional car that has 2 people saves more gas than 2 hybrids each with 1 person.
Ted
John S. - 01 Dec 2005 15:00 GMT > > I have read of more than one jurisdiction that is considering removing > > the special treatment hybrid cars get in carpool lanes. Allowing [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Ted Exactly. For example the Toyota Corolla costs less, holds more and gets milage that is only marginally poorer than the Prius. I don't understand it, but I do know the carpool lanes are jammed with cars these days and there are more than a few single driver hybrids out there.
JazzMan - 02 Dec 2005 01:47 GMT > > I have read of more than one jurisdiction that is considering removing > > the special treatment hybrid cars get in carpool lanes. Allowing [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > is to save fuel, but a conventional car that has 2 people saves more gas > than 2 hybrids each with 1 person. Ahhh, if only it was possible for everyone to live their life in pairs. In my case, nobody at works lives anywhere near me, and I can't afford to live anywhere near any of my workmates. Carpooling isn't an option for me. Also, FWIW there are no carpool lanes anywhere near my normal driving routes, so the only benefit a Prius offers is saving fuel, plus the intangible but no less valuable benefit of being able to stick it to OPEC.
JazzMan
 Signature ********************************************************** Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net. Curse those darned bulk e-mailers! ********************************************************** "Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry **********************************************************
rudyxhiebert@yahoo.com - 30 Nov 2005 03:31 GMT There is the possibility that the rumor is true about states taxing hybrid vehicles. I think it would be foolish for governments to "punish" people who are taking initative to reduce emissions and fuel consumption. If you take care of your car, it shoudl be cost effective. RH
* - 30 Nov 2005 15:49 GMT rudyxhiebert@yahoo.com wrote in article <1133321467.558584.119960@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...
> There is the possibility that the rumor is true about states taxing > hybrid vehicles. I think it would be foolish for governments to > "punish" people who are taking initative to reduce emissions and fuel > consumption. If you take care of your car, it shoudl be cost effective. > RH I suspect you are referring to the tax-by-mile movement wherein ALL vehicles using public highways would be taxed by the mile as opposed to the amount of fuel used (fuel taxes).
I see this as a fair and equitable way to pay for highway maintenance by ALL the vehicles that use the roads.
Now, if we can only get the bicyclists paying their fair share of road taxes for using the roads - yet NOT necessarily following the rules of the roads.
Roger Blake - 30 Nov 2005 16:18 GMT > I see this as a fair and equitable way to pay for highway maintenance by > ALL the vehicles that use the roads. I do not see it as "fair and equitable" to have one's movements continuously tracked by government via some kind of sputnik. No way would I install such a gadget in my car, and I would hope most people in this country would have enough sense to "just say no" to such a thing. (My vehicle gets about 14 mpg so I'm already paying plenty of fuel taxes.)
 Signature Roger Blake (Subtract 10 for email.)
M. MacDonald - 30 Nov 2005 17:15 GMT : > I see this as a fair and equitable way to pay for highway maintenance by : > ALL the vehicles that use the roads. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] : enough sense to "just say no" to such a thing. (My vehicle gets about 14 mpg : so I'm already paying plenty of fuel taxes.) I also see a lot of traffic lanes being changed to "Bike Only Lanes" where some bicyclist group - who pays no road tax - lobby and, subsequently, make the surface streets downtown become a gridlock due to one traffic lane being squeezed out for two opposing-flow bicyclist lanes (of which I rarely see one using "The Lane"). Then they argue for better street cleaning to prevent a flat from a goats-head sticker. All tax free for the bicyclist.
Tax the damn bicyclist as well since they also use the crumbling roadways and pay no tax on the asphalt they use.
Taxing a hybrid because it uses less fuel makes conservation a joke.
Mack
Roger Blake - 30 Nov 2005 22:18 GMT > Taxing a hybrid because it uses less fuel makes conservation a joke. I have no interest in hybrids. If someone else wants to buy into those pregnant roller skates and their Rube Goldberg drivetrains that's entirely their business.
First thing that needs to be done is to weed out corruption and pork to reduce road maintenance costs. (Though I would not hold my breath waiting for that one.) Then raise the gas tax enough to cover the remaining shortfall.
I would much rather pay a little more for gas than put up with the kind of massive and continual invasion of privacy that is being proposed as an alternative.
 Signature Roger Blake (Subtract 10 for email.)
Ted Mittelstaedt - 01 Dec 2005 09:13 GMT > rudyxhiebert@yahoo.com wrote in article > <1133321467.558584.119960@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > I see this as a fair and equitable way to pay for highway maintenance by > ALL the vehicles that use the roads. No it ain't because heavier vehicles (SUV's vans, big trucks, etc.) wear the road surface more than lightweight vehicles. To make a per-mile tax fair you need to also change the tax rate for heavier vehicles.
In any case, semi-trucks put hundreds the amount of wear on the roads that a car does but do not pay higher taxes in proportion to the amount of damage they do to the road. So to make a per-mile tax fair you need to take on the trucking lobby and raise taxes on trucks because what is going on now amounts to a subsidy of the trucking industry by the rest of the vehicles on the road.
Ted
Ad absurdum per aspera - 01 Dec 2005 15:09 GMT > There is the possibility that the rumor is true about states taxing > hybrid vehicles. That would be silly (though of course many silly things advance into law, or regulation that has the force of law, if citizens don't stay alert -- not to mention laws and rules that make sense within their context but might not get examined from a wider perspective and tested against strategic goals).
Hybrid cars that I'm familiar with run on gasoline or other taxable fuels at all times -- they just aren't necessarily burning it at any given moment. Electric cars are the ones that don't feed fuel taxes into that revenue stream -- that, and cars running on ersatz or homemade fuels.
Pending the development of a remarkably better battery technology, though, pure electrics seem to be in the deep shadows of other technologies, and it's hard for me to get too worked up about the handful of people willing to dive restaurant dumpsters and cook up biodiesel in their toolshed...
Of course, if the mainstream fleet, powered by taxed motor fuels, achieved remarkably better mileage, there would be a reduction in taxes, but we should have such problems!
As for congestion, I don't know about all states, but if memory serves, California built in escape clause (no pun intended and probably not much of one achieved) allowing them to withdraw HOV-lane exemptions for such vehicles if the carpool lane turns into a single-passenger morass of hybrids and alt-fuel vehicles. Some or all states also take it upon themselves to define the exempt models -- hybrids that don't meet emissions or mileage goals, which would mostly be big'uns, might not get the magic sticker.
Last time I checked, there was also an unresolved state-vs.-Federal sitzkreig on the whole subject of whether allowing HOV lane exemptions for gasoline powered hybrids of any sort ought to be at the discretion of the states (the Federal authorities wanted to restrict it to truly alternative-fuel or zero-emissions vehicles).
Cheers, --Joe
Daniel J. Stern - 30 Nov 2005 17:36 GMT > Another question: Are HID headlights worth it the bux, compared to > modern halogens? I am middle aged and would like to be able to see > better at night. The halogen lamps in the Prius are well designed, but if nighttime vision is important to you, then get the HIDs. On that particular car, they are also a well-designed unit and give better performance than the halogen lamps. The "target of thieves" comment applies primarily to people who buy cars made by Nissan.
cowartmisc1@yahoo.com - 07 Dec 2005 16:04 GMT <<I am thinking about buying a Prius. I know that it doesn't pencil out dollarwise, but it would be nice to be able to use the carpool lane (I am in CA).>>
Since using the carpool lane is your only stated requirement, all you need is a small motorcycle or a large scooter - cost is about $3k - $6k. They will give even better mileage than a Prius.
John Cowart
M. MacDonald - 07 Dec 2005 17:05 GMT : <cowartmisc1@yahoo.com> wrote: : <<I am thinking about buying a Prius. I know that it doesn't pencil out [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] : need is a small motorcycle or a large scooter - cost is about $3k - : $6k. They will give even better mileage than a Prius. Not in my experience. My Prius gets better mileage than any motorcycle I've owned (and still do) with an engine sufficient to drive on the freeway.
Mack
cowartmisc1@yahoo.com - 07 Dec 2005 17:27 GMT <<My Prius gets better mileage than any motorcycle I've owned (and still do) with an engine sufficient to drive on the freeway.>>
The Honda Rebel 250cc is freeway legal, and seems to get about 70mpg per http://www.epinions.com/content_180679249540, which is slightly better than the Prius.
The Bajaj Chetak (http://www.bajajusa.com/scooters.htm) is *technically* freeway legal, and gets 110mpg, although I would not want to drive the California freeways on a 150. A 250 like the Honda would be much better for keeping up with traffic.
John Cowart
JazzMan - 08 Dec 2005 01:40 GMT > : <cowartmisc1@yahoo.com> wrote: > : <<I am thinking about buying a Prius. I know that it doesn't pencil out [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Not in my experience. My Prius gets better mileage than any motorcycle I've > owned (and still do) with an engine sufficient to drive on the freeway. Not to mention windshield wipers, a heater and A/C system, room for groceries and/or passengers, a trunk, spare tire and jack, and crash protection.
Of course, running a sportbike through the twisties has a superior element of fun than a Prius. :)
JazzMan
 Signature ********************************************************** Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net. Curse those darned bulk e-mailers! ********************************************************** "Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry **********************************************************
B. Peg - 08 Dec 2005 02:37 GMT > "JazzMan" wrote: >> Not in my experience. My Prius gets better mileage than any motorcycle [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Of course, running a sportbike through the twisties has > a superior element of fun than a Prius. :) How true.
As Mack mentioned earlier in the thread, my bikes don't get as good of mileage either. The H-D R.K. gets about 38 mpg and the BMW gets about same to maybe 40 mpg on the highway. Our Prius gets around 45mpg on the highway. Dunno, but it sure is odd the car gets better mpg's - and it has a larger engine than either of the two-cylinder bikes do. If I also factor in maintenance costs of the bikes over that of the car, the car (er, Prius) wins hands down (damn motorcycle tires are expensive and just don't last for me, maybe 1/5 the mileage of a car tire - not to mention the cost$ of BMW bike service$!).
B~
|
|
|