Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Advice on saftey cones vs saftey triangles?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
me@privacy.net - 09 Jan 2006 22:08 GMT
I need to buy some kind of reflecting cones or
triangles for my car

I see they have collapsible cones now.

Curious if there are better as they can be seen in all
directions whereas the triangles are directional?
plainoldmechanic - 10 Jan 2006 01:01 GMT
you gotta be kidding me!.............if your question is:

can cones be seen from all directions, while triangles can only be seen
from 2 directions, would the cones offer more protection for my stalled
vehicle?

don't take a rocket scientist to figure that sh.t out does it?
me@privacy.net - 10 Jan 2006 14:53 GMT
>you gotta be kidding me!.............if your question is:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>don't take a rocket scientist to figure that sh.t out does it?

No but looking for someone who actually owns some cones
and has used them
Steve W. - 10 Jan 2006 15:28 GMT
The problem with the collapsibles is that when they are COLD they tend
to crack.  Want a more usable item, very visible. Use flares.

Signature

Steve Williams

> >you gotta be kidding me!.............if your question is:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> No but looking for someone who actually owns some cones
> and has used them
Lawrence Glickman - 10 Jan 2006 19:21 GMT
>The problem with the collapsibles is that when they are COLD they tend
>to crack.  Want a more usable item, very visible. Use flares.

I've used flares, but you need something to stick them in *wood*, or
lay them out flat like the State Police do, except on a snowy road,
that can be a problem.

The burn time of flares is limited, but it is probably the BEST idea,
with backup being triangles and cones and whatever else you can set
up, including flashing lights.

Lg
clifto - 11 Jan 2006 02:24 GMT
>>The problem with the collapsibles is that when they are COLD they tend
>>to crack.  Want a more usable item, very visible. Use flares.
>
> I've used flares, but you need something to stick them in *wood*, or
> lay them out flat like the State Police do, except on a snowy road,
> that can be a problem.

You also need to give them a nice, plush, padded cushiony place to live,
or over time the bumps will turn them into white powder all over your
storage compartment.

Signature

       If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
          my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

Lawrence Glickman - 11 Jan 2006 03:48 GMT
>>>The problem with the collapsibles is that when they are COLD they tend
>>>to crack.  Want a more usable item, very visible. Use flares.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>or over time the bumps will turn them into white powder all over your
>storage compartment.

I had to use some on a busy expressway coming back from Mass. to upper
NY State, at dusk.  The stream of traffic was relentless.  It felt
like being in the middle of a shark attack, waiting for one of them to
take you out.  Not Fun.

So I lit off some flares, burning holes in my clothes because spray
comes off them in the wind and they go right through.  Then I tried to
set them in the tarmac, but that was damn near impossible to do.  The
nail wouldn't go in with hand pressure alone, and if I hit the thing,
it would certainly break.

Ergo: recommendation:

Make a triangle out of 2x4 lumber, and drill holes at the angles just
large enough to hold flare nails.  That way nothing tips over, or
blows over.  I haven't done this yet myself, but...will get to it.

NY State Police came to my rescue and helped me get going again.
Those flares saved my Life?  Highly probable.  Considering the speed
and density of the traffic, and the *twilight* factor.  If you have to
carry them in a *gym bag* make sure it is waterproof, and roll them up
in towels or something so they don't get broken.

Lg
Steve W. - 11 Jan 2006 03:28 GMT
Get the ones with wire stands. 30 minute ones, then make a nice storage
tube for them out of some 6" pvc pipe.

Signature

Steve Williams

> >The problem with the collapsibles is that when they are COLD they tend
> >to crack.  Want a more usable item, very visible. Use flares.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Lg
Lawrence Glickman - 11 Jan 2006 04:19 GMT
>Get the ones with wire stands. 30 minute ones, then make a nice storage
>tube for them out of some 6" pvc pipe.

GOOD idea!

(added to notebook)
Daniel J. Stern - 10 Jan 2006 21:09 GMT
> I need to buy some kind of reflecting cones or triangles for my car
>
> I see they have collapsible cones now.
>
> Curious if there are better as they can be seen in all directions
> whereas the triangles are directional?

The answer to "Which is better?" is "Whichever has the highest coefficient
of retroreflectivity over the widest range of angles". That is, which
device reflects more light back to its source through the widest range of
angles. Which means a less-retroreflective cone isn't as good as a
more-retroreflective triangle. You really only need these devices to be
visible from one main direction, that is the direction of traffic along
the road upon which you've stalled.
me@privacy.net - 10 Jan 2006 22:12 GMT
>The answer to "Which is better?" is "Whichever has the highest coefficient
>of retroreflectivity over the widest range of angles". That is, which
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>visible from one main direction, that is the direction of traffic along
>the road upon which you've stalled.

Good analysis!

Thanks Daniel!

Id say the triangles have it over the cones per your
analysis above
Daniel J. Stern - 10 Jan 2006 22:49 GMT
>> The answer to "Which is better?" is "Whichever has the highest
>> coefficient of retroreflectivity over the widest range of angles". That
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> devices to be visible from one main direction, that is the direction of
>> traffic along the road upon which you've stalled.

> Id say the triangles have it over the cones per your analysis above

I might not have made myself clear. What I was trying to convey is that
*either* could be better, depending on the quality and specifications of
the specific cones and triangles being compared. There are some good
triangles on the market, and there's a great deal of low-quality trash.
Try to find something that's E-marked; that is, it has the (E) approval
marking on it. That will guarantee at least an adequate level of
performance and durability. When I wanted some triangles for my own
vehicles, I got 'em from a large-lots auto parts surplus place,
Tran-Steer, phone 905-850-0402, for (I think) $10/ea. Extremely nice
quality, E-marked folding triangle with wide, weighted base, in compact
storage case. Originally made for OEM installation in European-market Ford
vehicles. Tran-Steer is local to me, so I just drove 25 minutes up the
highway and picked them up, but they have an in-house shipping department
so phone orders are accepted.

DS
Lawrence Glickman - 10 Jan 2006 22:58 GMT
>>The answer to "Which is better?" is "Whichever has the highest coefficient
>>of retroreflectivity over the widest range of angles". That is, which
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Id say the triangles have it over the cones per your
>analysis above

Depends on where you live.
Example:  I live in deep snow country.
What that means, is within 60 seconds of setting up reflective
triangles on the freeway, if they haven't been blown over by trucks
going by, they are covered in road mud and slush, therefore, now
invisible.

If there is a strong wind blowing, ditto, off they go.

Stick with long-burning flares if you really want to improve your
odds.  Then again, even police cruiser with their LIGHTS ON get hit by
drunk motorists.  So nothing is a guarantee of safety, except leaving
the roadway altogether, which may not be possible.

30 minute flares are the _minimum_ I would recommend.  If you can get
longer burning ones than that, get em.  Because the day or night you
need to use them, your life will depend on them.

As you can see from above, triangles are easily trashed by heavy truck
traffic and slushy roads.  Cones are next best.  Flares are best of
all.  Flares are what the State Police use.  If flares are their
choice, they are also my choice.

Lg
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.