Any thoughts on buying a Dodge or Toyota minivan that was a rental
vehicle? I have to assume that from mile zero the thing was not
properly "broken in" according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
I like to keep vehicles until they are basically worthless, so is this
a bad idea?
Shep - 25 Jan 2006 15:57 GMT
The other issue is fo 20k basically nothing is done to these rentals and
generally people that drive them don't care, an off lease car is a better
bet against a rental.
> Any thoughts on buying a Dodge or Toyota minivan that was a rental
> vehicle? I have to assume that from mile zero the thing was not
> properly "broken in" according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
> I like to keep vehicles until they are basically worthless, so is this
> a bad idea?
Scott Dorsey - 25 Jan 2006 16:10 GMT
>The other issue is fo 20k basically nothing is done to these rentals and
>generally people that drive them don't care, an off lease car is a better
>bet against a rental.
It depends a lot on the rental place. Some take care of cars. Others
change the oil without changing the filter to save a couple bucks. None
of them will properly break-in engines, though.
--scott

Signature
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
John S. - 25 Jan 2006 16:04 GMT
> Any thoughts on buying a Dodge or Toyota minivan that was a rental
> vehicle? I have to assume that from mile zero the thing was not
> properly "broken in" according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
> I like to keep vehicles until they are basically worthless, so is this
> a bad idea?
Whether it is a good deal depends on the condition, price and miles.
Remember that rental cars usually have a custom mix of features, so you
probably won't get cruise control although you will probably get the
basic trip/engine/compass digital display and a decent interior.
Rentals get a lot of stop and go driving so expect that the interior
will show a bit of wear. Chances are the basic maintenance has been
kept up to manufacturers standards but don't expect anything more.
Ask about mechanical and body repair history. If the price is right go
for it, but don't get into a bidding war at the auction.
Are the off-rentals sold directly to the public or sent to auction.
I've seen ex-rentals on dealer lots.
Timothy J. Lee - 25 Jan 2006 18:48 GMT
>Are the off-rentals sold directly to the public or sent to auction.
>I've seen ex-rentals on dealer lots.
Both. Some rental car companies (e.g. Hertz) offer at least some of their
used rental cars directly to the public. But plenty of ex-rental cars are
found as "late model low mileage" used cars on dealer lots. Some dealers
indicate prominently in newspaper ads that they are ex-rentals, as if it
were a good thing (why would it be a good thing if it were an ex-rental car
that the rental car company itself did not feel confident to offer to the
public on its own lot?).

Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.
John S. - 25 Jan 2006 20:24 GMT
> >Are the off-rentals sold directly to the public or sent to auction.
> >I've seen ex-rentals on dealer lots.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> that the rental car company itself did not feel confident to offer to the
> public on its own lot?).
Personally I would not be interested because I know such cars can
accumulate a lot of wear and I expect my cars to run correctly. For
some the low price could be enticing.
Alex Rodriguez - 25 Jan 2006 17:53 GMT
>Any thoughts on buying a Dodge or Toyota minivan that was a rental
>vehicle? I have to assume that from mile zero the thing was not
>properly "broken in" according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
>I like to keep vehicles until they are basically worthless, so is this
>a bad idea?
Depends on the rental agency that owned the vehicle. The big chains usually
take good care of their cars. Ask to see service records before you buy and
inspect the car carefully.
------------
Alex
Keep YerSpam - 25 Jan 2006 18:58 GMT
> Any thoughts on buying a Dodge or Toyota minivan that was a rental
> vehicle? I have to assume that from mile zero the thing was not
> properly "broken in" according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
> I like to keep vehicles until they are basically worthless, so is this
> a bad idea?
My wife used to work at the GM plant in Fremont, CA - this was in the
early 1990s. We got an employee's discount on cars because of this. We
went to a local dealer and picked out a 6 month old 1994 Chevy Corsica
w/ 3L V6 that was a return from Alamo rental. It had about 12k on it,
was squeaky clean and was a very god deal so we bought it. These cars
aren't Chevy's flagship or anything, but they're not bad cars and the
engines are reliable. It's basically a Baretta with 4 doors.
This car was traded off for our Mitsubishi after 4 years w/ less than
100k on it. It burned oil like nobody's business despite us changing the
oil every 3000 miles w/ a new filter every time like clockwork. The
electric windows were troublesome and it was developing an electrical
'personality'.
I assume this is because it was never broken in. Rental agencies get
brand new cars, tear the plastic off the seats and send them out with
the next customer in line. At trade-in that car was worth less because
the title is forever branded as a 'rental car'. If you drive your cars
into the ground, that doesn't matter much, but I bet you won't likely
get as much as you want out of it before that happens.
I don't think you'd be much worse off buying a former taxi - and that's
not good unless you really like working on drivelines.
Good luck,
- JJ
Eric Edwards - 25 Jan 2006 23:48 GMT
>I assume this is because it was never broken in. Rental agencies get
>brand new cars, tear the plastic off the seats and send them out with
>the next customer in line.
Do you expect non-rental cars to be treated differently?
Sure, there will be the occasional car babied by an anal retentive
enthusiast, but I would expect most 1st owners to just get the the car
and drive. Even among enthusiasts, there is radical disagreement on what
proper break-in procedure is. At least rental cars should have good
maintenance records. I wouldn't buy one that didn't.
Perhaps rentals are the McDonalds of used cars. They may not be the
best there is but you know what you are getting.

Signature
Photos and travelogues from Africa and Southeast Asia: http://www.exile.org
M.M. - 26 Jan 2006 01:25 GMT
> ...
> Perhaps rentals are the McDonalds of used cars. They may not be the
> best there is but you know what you are getting.
That's pretty much the way I look at it. If you're careful you can get a
pretty decent vehicle at a decent price. And if I can't have a shiny new
M5, I may as well drive something cheap...
Scott Dorsey - 26 Jan 2006 15:11 GMT
>> ...
>> Perhaps rentals are the McDonalds of used cars. They may not be the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>pretty decent vehicle at a decent price. And if I can't have a shiny new
> M5, I may as well drive something cheap...
You will never, never find an ex-rental vehicle with a manual transmission.
That strikes them out for me right there.
--scott

Signature
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Keep YerSpam - 26 Jan 2006 20:45 GMT
> Sure, there will be the occasional car babied by an anal retentive
> enthusiast, <<<snip>>>
LOL!
Anal retentive Enthusiasts don't buy boring cars like Chevy Corsicas.
The Corsica was made for rental agencies. Cheap, simple and on the low
side of midsized. Visibility out all the windows like nobody's business
and a low hood front so you can see the ground almost right in front of
you. Supposedly reliable too if taken halfway decent care of. Chevys are
sometimes boring cars but they're usually known for reliability if
nothing else.
I'm just basing my opinion about rental returns not on mechanical
theory, but on my personal experience buying 'new' cars vs. a returned
rental with very low miles (about 12k) that looked for all in the world
like it was in fantastic shape on the dealer's lot. Any modern V6 engine
that's taken care of should last well past 100k before it noticably
burns oil. Heck make that over 200k, we're not talking about 50s Ford
Flatties.
The following cars were bought new, driven & regularly serviced by the
same person (my wife):
1979 Ford Mustang 4cyl Cobra Turbo - went over 240k w/ no problems,
traded in for ...
1986 Ford Escort 2.4L (IIRC) 4cyl - almost 300k before throwing a rod,
never did burn oil... Sold for parts.
1994 Chevy Corsica 3L V6 (rental return w/12k on it) - burned oil @ more
than 1 qt/1200 miles with only 92k on it. Traded in on ...
1999 Mitsubishi Galant 3L V6 - Currently @ 165k, runs fine no oil burning.
My current driver is a 92 Chevy Astro V6 with 170k on it (bought it
used), burning no oil & going strong so the Corsica's oil use isn't 'a
Chevy thing'. I've never had a Chevy that burned as much oil as the
rental car so soon in it's life. I've had probably 50 cars or more in
the last 32 years of driving and since I'm primarily a professional
musician I usually log about 100k~150k/year on cars. I've bought both
new & used, driven the crap outta them and have only seen one newish one
fart out on me so fast - and that was the rental return.
Granted, I'm not an ASE certified mechanic, but I know a little about
the mechanicals in cars:
http://jeffgross.com/willys <--- my current project
Buy a rental car if you like. Enjoy it. Take care of it - anal or
otherwise. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see you posting here in a
couple years about problems you're having with it.
Cheers,
- Jeff G
"Screw me once, shame on you
- screw me twice, shame on me"
ZZ - 25 Jan 2006 19:42 GMT
> Any thoughts on buying a Dodge or Toyota minivan that was a rental
> vehicle? ...
I've bought several cars from Hertz...three Mazda Proteges and a Taurus.
Except for the Protege that my daughter totalled, they have all been
trouble-free (and it was fine too for as long as we had it). They were
all about a year old with around 25K miles on them. They looked and drove
like new cars. They come with the balance of the factory warranty which
Hertz extends for a year after purchase...I guess in case you run over
the 36K miles...and of course they offer extended warrantees. All the
service records are available and they seem to have been well taken care
of. The sales guys are not on commission and it's all very low pressure.
The prices are usually less than wholesale...the 2004 Taurus was about
$9000 plus the usual tax, etc, the Mazdas were around $8K, IIRC. The 99
Protege is on its third teenage driver and is still going strong at close
to 100K miles. Only thing other than usual maintenance was a window
regulator. The others have also been dead reliable. All their cars have
about the same option package (auto/air/cruise/CD/small or midsized
engine) and the colors are limited but for the money, I think they're a
great deal. As always, YMMV...
HLS@nospam.nix - 25 Jan 2006 22:53 GMT
I would much prefer to buy a 'program' car to a rental.
Program cars, IIUC, are like leases to corporate accounts, and
are more likely to be treated well. You can get good prices, and
often, a reasonable warranty period.
joutlaw - 25 Jan 2006 23:35 GMT
I wouldn't buy one personally.
I agree with Jeff Foxworthy, "Anything that has been driven that hard, by
that many people... I don't wanna stick my key in it." FWIW
> Any thoughts on buying a Dodge or Toyota minivan that was a rental
> vehicle? I have to assume that from mile zero the thing was not
> properly "broken in" according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
> I like to keep vehicles until they are basically worthless, so is this
> a bad idea?
blur - 26 Jan 2006 01:55 GMT
I manage a Firestone and we maintain a fleet of enterprise vehicles
from the local branch. 3-4 per day. Almost all fleet companies will
not do any maintenance unless it fixes a specific drivablilty issue.
I realize that not all the maintenance is done at my location but on
average we see the a car twice before its shipped off to auction. In
one instance we had a car come in at 19,000 miles for an oil change and
the oil came out like sludge. A bit concerned I called the fleet
manager and found out that this was the cars second oil change. (The
guy almost crapped his pants.) This may have been an isolated
incidence, however, unless you can get the maintence records, it will
be a gamble whether you get on that is in good shape or not.
Do yourself a favor and buy a Toyota if you do decide to go that route.
Chris
budhicks1 - 26 Jan 2006 15:39 GMT
If you look into a rental you should have it checked thoroughly. I have
a couple of friends that bought the rentals and haven't had any
problems. I also think it "obviously" depends on who drove it
previously.

Signature
budhicks1
http://www.automotiveforums.com
LoLo - 27 Jan 2006 00:19 GMT
You know what some renters say: " A rent car can do anything "
> Any thoughts on buying a Dodge or Toyota minivan that was a rental
> vehicle? I have to assume that from mile zero the thing was not
> properly "broken in" according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
> I like to keep vehicles until they are basically worthless, so is this
> a bad idea?