Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

alignment at NTB......casters?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dakotacaster@yahoo.com - 28 Jan 2006 01:07 GMT
Brought my 98 dodge dakota pickup into NTB for new tires and alignment
(the latter costs $70).   I read over the printout afterwards and
notice that only the toes and cambers (front tires) were adjusted or
changed.....I asked why the casters were not adjusted, even though they
are out of the proper range (according to printout), and the front desk
guy said he didn't think they could be adjusted (I didn't talk to the
alignment guy because the place was closing that night....I'll probably
go back...but first I want to become a little informed before doing
that).     Drove the truck home and it handles quite well,  but ......
still think they were probably just cutting corners (?).     I do
remember the same thing happening about 5 years ago...NTB said
something to the effect that "not good to adjust the casters....can
throw off the toe"  (or something vaguely similar to that).
p.s. Left caster is 4.9 but the correct range is: 2.5 to 3.5
      RIGHT caster:  same as above

Actually, i don't know if they did a good job with the camber and toe,
because they certainly didn't move the numbers anywhere into the CENTER
of the correct ranges, although they did put everything into the
correct ranges (but on the "edges" of the range, in some cases, if you
know what I mean).
eschoendorff@yahoo.com - 28 Jan 2006 03:41 GMT
> Brought my 98 dodge dakota pickup into NTB for new tires and alignment
> (the latter costs $70).   I read over the printout afterwards and
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> correct ranges (but on the "edges" of the range, in some cases, if you
> know what I mean).

Sounds lilke you got yourself a "toe & go," where (IIRC) they basically
adjust toe and thrust angle and that's pretty much it.
Imknotright - 28 Jan 2006 05:39 GMT
FYI I DEFINATELY AM NOT DEFENDING NTB

Caster is not adjustable on most vehicles nowadays, although I am not sure
about yours. Trucks usually are adjustable. On most it is a difficult
adjustment & not done by alot of techs unless absolutely necessary.

Caster is not a tire wearing angle & usually adjusting goes on a case by
case basis. If it is equal from side to side & not severely over spec it
is usually left as is. If it is under spec there is more chance of
drivability issues & should be adjusted.

Now to what may have actually happened. Some alignment machines save
caster readings from previous cars put on the rack if you dont fully back
out of the program. The alignment tech may not have even measured it
because it takes extra time to measure caster.

Lastly, if your not happy with the other readings (camber & toe) bring it
back. tell them you want it right. Or fib a little & tell them it isn't
driving right.
blur - 29 Jan 2006 23:53 GMT
Most of the time (98%) the caster and SIA readings are used by
bodyshops to determine if there are bend or broken suspension
components or frame issues.  As far as I know only a few vans and light
trucks actually have adjustments, and the ones that do require special
kits.
If you push your hand up against the tire while its on the alignment
machine it would change the toe and camber reading.  NTB could have put
all the adjustments right in the middle for you but the second you
drove out they would have all been slightly different.  So why spend
the time to do so?
And as for telling them the car isn't driving right, if the tech has
any brains at all he'll ask you to drive with him to show him the
problem.  Don't waste their time unless you actually have a problem.

Chris
Comboverfish - 30 Jan 2006 12:43 GMT
> FYI I DEFINATELY AM NOT DEFENDING NTB
>
> Caster is not adjustable on most vehicles nowadays, although I am not sure
> about yours. Trucks usually are adjustable. On most it is a difficult
> adjustment & not done by alot of techs unless absolutely necessary.

On virtually any truck that has adjustable camber, the caster is
adjusted the same way.  It is not more difficult to do one than the
other.  It is somewhat difficult to get all four readings on both sides
to be near perfect, but fairly easy to get them all well within spec.

Toyota MDT in MO
Steve - 30 Jan 2006 17:08 GMT
> FYI I DEFINATELY AM NOT DEFENDING NTB

For good reason

> Caster is not adjustable on most vehicles nowadays, although I am not sure
> about yours. Trucks usually are adjustable. On most it is a difficult
> adjustment & not done by alot of techs unless absolutely necessary.

I wouldn't call it "difficult." You just have to know what you're doing.
 Adjusting caster usually affects camber and toe, so you have to do
some thinking about how to get both caster and camber in spec
simultaneously. It also may be desirable to let caster be out of spec a
little if getting it in the zone results in a poorer camber setting,
because camber is more critical to handling and tire wear. That's not to
say that caster isn't important- it has a big effect on "positive
center" steering feel and steering wheel self-return to center behavior.
Toe is the final setting and is the one that is independent of the others.

Frankly, I wouldn't expect any more out of a meat-grinder operation like
NTB. Its kinda like the old 'never order shrimp at the waffle house'
philosophy.
dakotacaster@yahoo.com - 31 Jan 2006 02:50 GMT
> > FYI I DEFINATELY AM NOT DEFENDING NTB
>
> For good reason
Its kinda like the old 'never order shrimp at the waffle house'
> philosophy.

Hey, good analogy!   Seriously, though, based on all the different and
divergent responses, I'm inclined to just leave it the way it is,
because the truck handles beautifully now.      (But then again,
people with high cholesterol may also feel great,  but ten years later
their dead.....is that a useful analogy here?)
Steve - 31 Jan 2006 17:04 GMT
>>>FYI I DEFINATELY AM NOT DEFENDING NTB
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> people with high cholesterol may also feel great,  but ten years later
> their dead.....is that a useful analogy here?)

Nah. If it handles well enough and you're happy with the on-center feel,
then the caster being a bit out of spec isn't going to cause any long
term problems. Conversely, you can pick camber and toe settings that
will give you an INCREDIBLE road feel and wonderful handling... but will
chew up a set of tires in 10,000 miles.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.