Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hooking up dual igition coil.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sam Nickaby - 14 Feb 2006 09:22 GMT
I came across this dual coil and dual ignition module kit. The price is
around a thousand dollar. This sound way too expensive. I want to build
one for my own vehicle but I not sure if the secondary output of the two
coils should be tied together. For instance, if I tie the secondary port together
would I achieve a bigger spark? I would need some help on this part. How
should I hooked this up so that it'll work reliably?

http://www.quickcar.net/ign_sys/ign_sys.html

Thanks
TE Cheah - 14 Feb 2006 11:50 GMT
| dual ignition module kit
must be for @least 8 cylinders

| around a thousand dollar.
1 can buy 2 separate sets for less. No detail of coil ( # of turns ),
circuit ( inductive, capacitive discharge ), output voltage & ampere
graph, input ampere needed.
Bobscar - 15 Feb 2006 21:07 GMT
The Ford Escort HCS 1.1 & 1.3 litre engine uses a double dual output
distributorless system. In these systems one cylinder will be on firing
stroke with the other cylinder on its exhaust stroke. The Escort is
wired so that cylinders 1&4 fire together with cylinder1 firing
cylinder4 exhaust. Cylinders 2&3 fire together on the alternate period
of the ignition module operation. The firing order is 1-2-4-3.
Therefore cylinder 2 will be ready to fire after cylinder 1.
1F-2C-4E-3I.

       1E-2F-4I-3C.

        1I-2E-4C-3F.

        1C-2I-4F-3E.

        1F-2C-4E-3I. and so on again.

Bobscar.
cyberzl1@yahoo.com - 15 Feb 2006 21:46 GMT
> The Ford Escort HCS 1.1 & 1.3 litre engine uses a double dual output
> distributorless system. In these systems one cylinder will be on firing
> stroke with the other cylinder on its exhaust stroke. The Escort is

Wasted Spark ignition system.  Common on a lot of engines.

This isn't what the OP is asking about.  What he referenced is a dual
plug/dual ignition system.  But as another poster asked, what for?
Unless you are racing and have a real need for redundancy it will buy
you almost nothing.  This also requires a head that has two spark plug
holes.  This buys one redundancy and the added benefit of two flame
fronts in the cylinder.

The OP wants to have two coils discharge into a single plug.  There is
absolutely nothing to be gained by doing this.  I can think of a lot of
complications in attempting to do this, with nothing to be gained
except a lot of RFI and probably a few electrical shocks.
TE Cheah - 16 Feb 2006 07:14 GMT
 1 aussie tv program ( Beyond 2000 ) had filmed a spark plug made
by scientists in Israel, which uses an * principle : [i] +ve electrode
is shaped as a needle [ii] -ve electrode is a round cylinder extended
from this plug's mounting thread ( which spins into & grips engine's
cylinder head ), has 2 8mmØ holes ( 1 on each opposite side of this
-ve electrode's cylinder ) to enable a side-view of sparks.
 When electrons jump from +ve to the round edge of -ve electrode
, an * is produced : * pushes ignited fuel toward piston & ignites
fuel vapour just above piston ( furthest from +ve electrode ) faster
than ordinary combustion can, & so produce a faster burn & more
torque than ordinary combustion can.
 Has any1 seen such a plug on sale ?  Has any racer modified his
plugs like this ?
rspartacus@gmail.com - 16 Feb 2006 13:17 GMT
>   1 aussie tv program ( Beyond 2000 ) had filmed a spark plug made
> by scientists in Israel, which uses an * principle : [i] +ve electrode
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>   Has any1 seen such a plug on sale ?  Has any racer modified his
> plugs like this ?

You mean similar to this one?
http://www.hoppenmotorsport.com/Spark_Plugs.jpg

If not what is different than this?
spamTHISbrp@yahoo.com - 16 Feb 2006 18:04 GMT
I don't think he means those plugs.

What he's describing sounds like its designed to have some sort of a
'jet' produced that will shoot towards the piston.

Having trouble picturing the setup, but I am familiar with the
principle the described plugs are supposed to be exploiting.

Dinna think the effect will be large, though.

Dave
TE Cheah - 16 Feb 2006 18:10 GMT
mysterios ( Mr know all ) get no info fr me
Dan_Thomas_nospam@yahoo.com - 16 Feb 2006 23:39 GMT
>The OP wants to have two coils discharge into a single plug.  There is
>absolutely nothing to be gained by doing this.

  It's sometimes used on auto engines converted for aircraft use,
where there's no possible or practical way of installing a second plug
in the head. In those systems, there's a plastic block for each plug
wire attached to the firewall, and two inputs from the distributors
into each block. Inside the block, there are three electrodes in close
proximity but not touching, and the spark from each coil jumps from its
electrode to the plug wire electrode. Often one system is turned off
since it's only there for redundancy, not a hotter spark. Airplanes
don't fly well if the ignition quits, so a second spark source is
handy.
     Wiring coil outputs in parallel doesn't raise spark voltage but
might increase the current a bit if both are timed *exactly* the same,
which is unlikely. Two plugs will increase power if done right. It does
in an aircraft engine. Two flame fronts raise the pressure a little
faster than one, but we're also talking pretty big combustion chambers
compared to an auto's.
       Dual ignition retrofits sound to me to be one of those
snob-value things that does little more than make money for the
aftermarket goodies guys.

    Dan
HLS@nospam.nix - 14 Feb 2006 12:46 GMT
> I came across this dual coil and dual ignition module kit. The price is
> around a thousand dollar. This sound way too expensive. I want to build
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Thanks

What kind of race car do you have?
None?? Dont waste your money.
steamer - 14 Feb 2006 17:01 GMT
    --Still working on the flame thrower, eh? Maybe you could find some
more input at the pyro tribe? That's where I've been learning how to do this
sort of thing..

Signature

       "Steamboat Ed" Haas         :  Woohoo! Cheney sez    
       Hacking the Trailing Edge!  :  lawyer season's open!
                  http://www.nmpproducts.com/intro.htm
                  ---Decks a-wash in a sea of words---

Steve - 14 Feb 2006 18:49 GMT
> I came across this dual coil and dual ignition module kit. The price is
> around a thousand dollar. This sound way too expensive. I want to build
> one for my own vehicle but I not sure if the secondary output of the two
> coils should be tied together.

Good grief.

Like I said in another thread... put DOWN the harbor freight crimp tool
and step AWAY from the car. You're gonna hurt yourself.

Or at least learn HOW dual ignition works before you start trying to
hack one together!!!
DGoncz@aol.com - 17 Feb 2006 07:34 GMT
> I came across this dual coil and dual ignition module kit. The price is
> around a thousand dollar. This sound way too expensive. I want to build
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Thanks

>From that site:

125° Celsius cross linked Polyethylene Insulated Wire

I say it's bogus. Who needs wire that's rated slightly above boiling
water? Give me silicone!

I had a central spark plug in my Derbi DS 50 so I broke off the
electrode, added a stainless ball electrode to the piston, and sparked
from plug to piston. I can't say if  it actually made the bike faster
but it was a clean concept and a fun project. With a higher tension
system it might have made some improvement, but then hotter sparks
usually do, don't they?

Doug Goncz
Replikon Research
Falls Church, VA 22044-0394
steamer - 17 Feb 2006 17:05 GMT
    --Hey that's neat if a little weird! Wouldn't it dissipate the
charge thru the engine that way?

Signature

       "Steamboat Ed" Haas         :  Woohoo! Cheney sez    
       Hacking the Trailing Edge!  :  lawyer season's open!
                  http://www.nmpproducts.com/intro.htm
                  ---Decks a-wash in a sea of words---

DGoncz@aol.com - 21 Feb 2006 09:39 GMT
Hey, there Ed.

Yes, the whole engine is one big ground block.

Doug Goncz
Replikon Research
Falls Church, VA 22044-0394
cyberzl1@yahoo.com - 21 Feb 2006 15:56 GMT
> I had a central spark plug in my Derbi DS 50 so I broke off the
> electrode, added a stainless ball electrode to the piston, and sparked
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Replikon Research
> Falls Church, VA 22044-0394

Woudn't this restrict your ignition timing to always have to be very
near TDC?

I guess it would depend on how long the crank arm was and how much
travel there is in 20-30* or crank movement at the top of the arc.

JW
DGoncz@aol.com - 22 Feb 2006 13:05 GMT
JW asked if the piston electrode limited timing to near TDC.

Well, 2-strokes have timing near TDC, I think. 4-strokes use advance.

But still, with a gap of 0.30 conceivable, and a crank arm throw radius
of, say, 3 inches, that's 100:1.

Now, the cos function is changing near 0 at around 1:100 per degree.

So, yes, it does seem that one degree of throw could limit spark to
very near TDC.

Does anyone disagree? I am not so experienced working this type of
thing out.

My little 2-strok
HLS@nospam.nix - 23 Feb 2006 13:44 GMT
<DGoncz@aol.com> wrote in message .

> Does anyone disagree? I am not so experienced working this type of
> thing out.
>
> My little 2-strok

I haven't done the math, but intuitively I see no other way than that the
spark has to be rather near TDC when using this sort of configuration.

On a lot of little 2 and 4 stroke cycle engines, the timing is static and
there
is no advance provision as they are intended to be run in a rather narrow
rpm range.

Advance would be desirable on either type of engine if you wanted to
optimize the performance over a wider rpm band.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.