Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Plausible Idea?- Titanium Nitride coated crank, rods, valves, etc

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
PedGuyKev - 20 Mar 2006 06:59 GMT
Hi, first time poster on this group.... thought i'd stray away from
some of the other groups/forums/boards and a general audience.

Would it be a plausible idea to have a hard coating done on various
engine internals? If you didn't know, Titanium Nitride is that golden
film stuff you see on drill bits..... The stuff puts an insane hard
coat, reducing friction, wear, making stuff more heat resistant, etc.
Well, I've had this idea lingering in my mind, and I'm not the only
one, but I haven't seen it done.... although one website on the
internet sells TiN coated valves. The coating isn't thick at all.... it
is thin to about .0003", and is known to make mill/lathe/machining bits
last 10times or so longer.

.....So...... Do you guys see any faults with this concept? Surely
pistons can be ceramically coated so heat energy doesn't transfer as
easily, thus less energy wasted..... so could I coat my pistons with
TiN? And the crankshaft, rods, valves, and anyother thing? What I plan
to do it do some crank knifing, taking off factory imperfections etc,
then hard coating them for strength and possible performance gains
(because of less friction, different heat transfer, etc).

Thanks
Stan Weiss - 20 Mar 2006 07:23 GMT
> Hi, first time poster on this group.... thought i'd stray away from
> some of the other groups/forums/boards and a general audience.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Thanks

I do not know which Nitride is used but some high performance
crankshafts have had their journals Nitrided (surface hardened) for many
years.
Stan
Shep - 20 Mar 2006 13:14 GMT
Yup, Hemi and Maxwedge cranks in the 60's.

>> Hi, first time poster on this group.... thought i'd stray away from
>> some of the other groups/forums/boards and a general audience.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> years.
> Stan
cavedweller - 20 Mar 2006 14:21 GMT
> I do not know which Nitride is used but some high performance
> crankshafts have had their journals Nitrided (surface hardened) for many
> years.
> Stan

It isn't a matter of using a certain "nitride".  Nitrogen, adsorbed at
the surface, forms a hard Iron Nitride right at the surface. This is
underlain by a softer gradient layer that contains diffused nitrogen.
The surface is the hardest but the diffused layer provides most of the
benefit for crank endurance.
Stan Weiss - 20 Mar 2006 14:41 GMT
> > I do not know which Nitride is used but some high performance
> > crankshafts have had their journals Nitrided (surface hardened) for many
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> The surface is the hardest but the diffused layer provides most of the
> benefit for crank endurance.

----Original Poster
> Titanium Nitride is that golden film stuff you see on drill bits

The only reason was his golden film. Which I did not remember the last
time I had a nitride crankshaft.
Stan
cavedweller - 20 Mar 2006 16:20 GMT
> > > I do not know which Nitride is used but some high performance
> > > crankshafts have had their journals Nitrided (surface hardened) for many
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> time I had a nitride crankshaft.
> Stan

Silly me not to have perceived that from your post.   :-s
John S. - 20 Mar 2006 15:17 GMT
> Hi, first time poster on this group.... thought i'd stray away from
> some of the other groups/forums/boards and a general audience.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> is thin to about .0003", and is known to make mill/lathe/machining bits
> last 10times or so longer.

The first question that comes to mind is I'm not clear what you want to
accomplish by coating engine parts with that material.  Simply placing
a very hard coating on parts may introduce it's own set of problems.
Extreme hardness in materials can also bring with it a tendency to
shatter and chip.  Does that occur with a Titanium Nitride surface?

Also, how does that material react to material used in bearings.

> .....So...... Do you guys see any faults with this concept? Surely
> pistons can be ceramically coated so heat energy doesn't transfer as
> easily, thus less energy wasted..... so could I coat my pistons with
> TiN?

Once the energy in gasoline has been converted to another form and used
the excess remains as heat and is of little use once the engine reaches
operating temperature.  Why would you want to trap heat in pistons and
other metal surfaces (assuming this mircale material can do anything
like that).

> And the crankshaft, rods, valves, and anyother thing? What I plan
> to do it do some crank knifing, taking off factory imperfections etc,
> then hard coating them for strength and possible performance gains
> (because of less friction, different heat transfer, etc).

You are making a statement that it reduces friction.  How is that done.


> Thanks
Stan Weiss - 20 Mar 2006 15:40 GMT
> > Hi, first time poster on this group.... thought i'd stray away from
> > some of the other groups/forums/boards and a general audience.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Also, how does that material react to material used in bearings.

If you read the other post here you will see nitride on crankshafts has
been used for many years .

> > .....So...... Do you guys see any faults with this concept? Surely
> > pistons can be ceramically coated so heat energy doesn't transfer as
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> other metal surfaces (assuming this mircale material can do anything
> like that).

How do you get heat trapped in pistons from

----Original Poster
>> "Surely pistons can be ceramically coated so heat energy doesn't
>> transfer as easily, thus less energy wasted."

In racing engines pistons and combustion chambers along with valves and
sometime the ports in the heads have a heat barrier installed. This
results in increased HP.
Stan

> > And the crankshaft, rods, valves, and anyother thing? What I plan
> > to do it do some crank knifing, taking off factory imperfections etc,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> > Thanks
John S. - 20 Mar 2006 18:12 GMT
> > > Hi, first time poster on this group.... thought i'd stray away from
> > > some of the other groups/forums/boards and a general audience.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> How do you get heat trapped in pistons from

I have no idea.  I was guessing at what the O.P was trying to say.

> ----Original Poster
> >> "Surely pistons can be ceramically coated so heat energy doesn't
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> >
> > > Thanks
Kruse - 20 Mar 2006 15:36 GMT
The coating isn't thick at all.... it
> is thin to about .0003", and is known to make mill/lathe/machining bits
> last 10times or so longer.
>
> .....So...... Do you guys see any faults with this concept?
> Thanks

Another poster mentioned the hemi cranks from the sixties. I do know
that a lot of industrial manufacturers made hard crankshafts in the
sixties, although I'm not sure of the process or the materials that
they used.

The main problem with hardening a crankshaft is when you want to
rebuild the motor and you have to turn the crankshaft. When you would
undersize the crank you would take away the hardness. A lot of
manufacturers did not recommend this, I guess maybe because they wanted
you to buy their new crankshaft.

If MONEY WAS NO OBJECT, I'd like to see somebody build something like a
titanium crankshaft and test it. Would it work for super high RPMs? I'm
not sure because there probably has to be a small but certain amount of
flexibility in a crankshaft.
Food for thought.....
Stan Weiss - 20 Mar 2006 16:38 GMT
>  The coating isn't thick at all.... it
> > is thin to about .0003", and is known to make mill/lathe/machining bits
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> manufacturers did not recommend this, I guess maybe because they wanted
> you to buy their new crankshaft.

As you said cutting the crankshaft removed the hardened surface and at
that time (do not know about today) there was no place to get one
renitride. I used to get them hard chromed and if they did not need to
be cut to much could get them back to standard this way.

> If MONEY WAS NO OBJECT, I'd like to see somebody build something like a
> titanium crankshaft and test it. Would it work for super high RPMs? I'm
> not sure because there probably has to be a small but certain amount of
> flexibility in a crankshaft.
> Food for thought.....

If you do a web search I think you will find this has been done in a
very high end race engine. The more common thing is titanium connecting
rods.
Stan
cavedweller - 20 Mar 2006 18:25 GMT
> Another poster mentioned the hemi cranks from the sixties. I do know
> that a lot of industrial manufacturers made hard crankshafts in the
> sixties, although I'm not sure of the process or the materials that
> they used.

OE engine folks usually "premiumed" forged crankshafts by adding
journal and journal fillet induction hardening before finishing.

> The main problem with hardening a crankshaft is when you want to
> rebuild the motor and you have to turn the crankshaft. When you would
> undersize the crank you would take away the hardness. A lot of
> manufacturers did not recommend this, I guess maybe because they wanted
> you to buy their new crankshaft.

Not clear to me why an engine rebuild would require turning a crank.  I
would think removing journal material to say, .030" u/s , would be done
by grinding.  Grinding can handle a hardened journal quite nicely and
the hardened depth remaining is still adequate.

> If MONEY WAS NO OBJECT, I'd like to see somebody build something like a
> titanium crankshaft and test it. Would it work for super high RPMs? I'm
> not sure because there probably has to be a small but certain amount of
> flexibility in a crankshaft.
> Food for thought.....

Flexibility?  All metals are elastic to varying degrees.
Stan Weiss - 20 Mar 2006 20:16 GMT
> > Another poster mentioned the hemi cranks from the sixties. I do know
> > that a lot of industrial manufacturers made hard crankshafts in the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> by grinding.  Grinding can handle a hardened journal quite nicely and
> the hardened depth remaining is still adequate.

For me it was racing and a spin bearing. At the time the nitride was
suppose be only a couple of thousands deep / surface hardened.

> > If MONEY WAS NO OBJECT, I'd like to see somebody build something like a
> > titanium crankshaft and test it. Would it work for super high RPMs? I'm
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Flexibility?  All metals are elastic to varying degrees.
cavedweller - 20 Mar 2006 21:15 GMT
> For me it was racing and a spin bearing. At the time the nitride was
> suppose be only a couple of thousands deep / surface hardened.

You mean a "spun" bearing?

Well, nothing's changed. Nitriding is still only a couple of
thousandths deep.  The compound layer on the surface is in the order of
tenths, the diffused layer is "sort of" a couple thou.  If you grind a
journal to clean it up morfe than that, the nitriding is gone.  So
what?  The real benefit from nitriding is in the journal fillets, where
the fatigue cracks usually start.

Leave the fillet alone and you're good.
PedGuyKev - 21 Mar 2006 04:12 GMT
How I plan on adding performance:
1. Removing those imperfections and what not, and knifing the rods.
2. Knifing Crank
3.Lightening pistons
4. Milling the tops of pistons

Titanium nitride comes into play in these ways (theoretically), 1-4
respectively:
1. Removing material from these things is compensated for strength by
the TiN coat. Heat isn't absorbed into the part as much because of the
coating. Surface means it has less friction so oil can glide across it,
and it will spin freerer. Less expansion from heat.
2. Same as reason above.
3. Pistons have always been ceramically coated on top for heat transfer
purposes. Proven increase in performance, so why not use a TiN coating
which has a similar qualitiy? Won't expand as much.
4. Same as 3.

Now they do sell valves with TiN coat, so I'm throwing that into the
mix, as well as other things as I can think of.

Also, it is cheaper to have a whole part coated than just a small
section (so the person won't have to mask parts off). I asked around,
and the prices are relatively cheap, it's just that the minimum order
is at least $300ish, which I'm sure covers most of the expense. Thanks
for the input so far guys.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.