Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / Maintenance and Repair / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Chrysler Transaxles

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
fiveiron@webtv.net - 04 Apr 2006 13:51 GMT
Are they prone to more trouble than other makes?

mho

vfe

 
Scott Dorsey - 04 Apr 2006 14:10 GMT
>Are they prone to more trouble than other makes?

Some are.  Others aren't.
--scott

Signature

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Steve - 04 Apr 2006 19:01 GMT
> Are they prone to more trouble than other makes?
>
> mho
> vfe
>    

In general, no. One particular model (the A-604 or 41TE) was rushed to
production in 1989 and had a LOT of problems for several years. Anything
from the mid 90s onward is pretty comparable to other manufacturers,
though IMO ALL front-drive transaxles are inherently a little more
trouble-prone than rear-drive automatic transmissions. Just based on
reading auto newsgroups, I'd guess that the Honda Odyssey might be the
current problem-child of automatic transaxles. That's what happens when
a vehicle porks up to 4000+ pounds in a single re-styling :-p
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.