In Canadian units of measure and currency, average gasoline prices
over the last two years are down about a half cent:
June 2002, 77.2
June 2004, 76.8
In American units of measure and currency, gasoline prices over the
last two years are up about 59 cents:
June 2002, 1.41
June 2004, 2.00
http://www.runzheimer.com/corpc/news/scripts/123002c.asp
http://www.energy.gov.on.ca/index.cfm?fuseaction=oilandgas.gasreport
http://www.runzheimer.com/corpc/news/scripts/121802.asp
http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=42069
127.0.0.1 - 16 Jun 2004 19:42 GMT
>In Canadian units of measure and currency, average gasoline prices
>over the last two years are down about a half cent:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>June 2002, 1.41
>June 2004, 2.00
I don't know where you get your info but CDN gas prices are up as much
as outs
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the current email spam attacks my email account is not included,
reply via the newsgroups or ask for a valid email address.
Don Dickson - 16 Jun 2004 20:33 GMT
> In Canadian units of measure and currency, average gasoline prices
> over the last two years are down about a half cent:
> June 2002, 77.2
In mid June 2002 that would have been 0.50 US
> June 2004, 76.8
Now that is 0.56 US
But 76.8 was the June 2004 price for Ontario only. The average Canadian price
was 85.6 or 62.5 US
Also there's something suspicious about the way they calculate prices in that
second reference. When showing Ontario averages they say Toronto East 74.4 and
Toronto West 72.5 but when they do the national average they show Toronto as 80.0
> In American units of measure and currency, gasoline prices over the
> last two years are up about 59 cents:
>
> June 2002, 1.41
> June 2004, 2.00
> http://www.runzheimer.com/corpc/news/scripts/123002c.asp
> http://www.energy.gov.on.ca/index.cfm?fuseaction=oilandgas.gasreport
> http://www.runzheimer.com/corpc/news/scripts/121802.asp
> http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=42069

Signature
Don Dickson
Don Dickson - 16 Jun 2004 20:42 GMT
> > In Canadian units of measure and currency, average gasoline prices
> > over the last two years are down about a half cent:
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> > http://www.runzheimer.com/corpc/news/scripts/121802.asp
> > http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=42069
Also it may not be proper to pick the current date because for whatever reason
gas prices in southern Ontario have gone down 0.10 to 0.18 in the last 2 weeks.
Gas in the Toronto area was all about 0.90 at the beginning of June so who knows
where it will be 2 weeks from now. And when you get into Northern Ontario gas is
still in the 0.95 range.

Signature
Don Dickson
Mark Jones - 16 Jun 2004 21:49 GMT
> Also it may not be proper to pick the current date because for whatever reason
> gas prices in southern Ontario have gone down 0.10 to 0.18 in the last 2 weeks.
> Gas in the Toronto area was all about 0.90 at the beginning of June so who knows
> where it will be 2 weeks from now. And when you get into Northern Ontario gas is
> still in the 0.95 range.
It is entirely possible that prices have dropped that much.
Where I live, prices went as high as $2.099 for regular unleaded
and have dropped back to $1.839 per gallon. Prices went up
real fast and came down real fast.
Brent - 17 Jun 2004 21:08 GMT
> > Also it may not be proper to pick the current date because for whatever
> reason
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> and have dropped back to $1.839 per gallon. Prices went up
> real fast and came down real fast.
Wish I lived there. Prices here (Portland, Oregon) hit $2.32 for regular
unleaded. Currently the best price I can now find is $2.15 per gallon.
Still waiting for them to come back down to the $1.75 per gallon we saw in
January.
Seaweednh - 18 Jun 2004 13:39 GMT
Brent,
Be careful what you wish for. I'm glad I'm not paying Canadian prices, I
believe this is the price per liter of fuel. With 3.785412 liters to the
gallon, their price is not a good deal.
Regards,
Ron
> > > Also it may not be proper to pick the current date because for whatever
> > reason
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Still waiting for them to come back down to the $1.75 per gallon we saw in
> January.
Rudy - 19 Jun 2004 05:20 GMT
> Be careful what you wish for. I'm glad I'm not paying Canadian prices, I
> believe this is the price per liter of fuel. With 3.785412 liters to the
> gallon, their price is not a good deal.
3.78 L X .969/L divide by 1.37 to get 'gallon' price in Canada in US
dollars for comparison = $2.67 Gal. Stick with what you got.
R
Mike Romain - 16 Jun 2004 21:15 GMT
Bull sh.t.
Our gas is up near or over $0.90 per liter now in Ontario Canada.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> In Canadian units of measure and currency, average gasoline prices
> over the last two years are down about a half cent:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> http://www.runzheimer.com/corpc/news/scripts/121802.asp
> http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=42069
Bert Hyman - 16 Jun 2004 21:39 GMT
cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk () wrote in news:6aa1435d.0406161003.196bdf54
@posting.google.com:
> In Canadian units of measure and currency, average gasoline prices
> over the last two years are down about a half cent:
>
> June 2002, 77.2
> June 2004, 76.8
Where'd that number come from?
> http://www.energy.gov.on.ca/index.cfm?fuseaction=oilandgas.gasreport
For June 15:
Canada Average 85.7 cents/Liter

Signature
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@visi.com
Mo-D - 16 Jun 2004 21:50 GMT
> > June 2002, 77.2
> > June 2004, 76.8
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Canada Average 85.7 cents/Liter
Sounds pretty low to me!
Here on Vancouver Island it is around 95.5 and as much as 98.9 in some areas
Take a look at
http://www.gastips.com/
Mo
Tony P. - 16 Jun 2004 22:11 GMT
> cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk () wrote in news:6aa1435d.0406161003.196bdf54
> @posting.google.com:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Canada Average 85.7 cents/Liter
Gack! There are 3.785411784 liters in a gallon. That multiplied * .857 =
$3.24 CDN, or converted is $2.36 a gallon.
That's truly ugly.
Andy in Fink - 16 Jun 2004 22:30 GMT
> In Canadian units of measure and currency, average gasoline prices
> over the last two years are down about a half cent:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> June 2002, 1.41
> June 2004, 2.00
Those are Canadian prices in cents per liter.
The American gas prices are in dollars per gallon
OK about 4 liters per gallon .
That means a US gallon of gas, in Canada, costs about 4 X 77.2 or 3.09
Canadian dollars per US gallon.
One Canadian Dollar is about .72 US dollar
Therefore, a US gallon of gas, bought in Canada, would cost about 2.22 US
dollars. which is
about the right price , allowing for different government tax rates.......
That's not so far out of line, is it.....?????
Now, WHY did gas go up so much faster in the US than in Canada ?
Answer is the same as the TV gives ---- supply and demand.
Demand in higher in US than in Canada ..... (after all, in Canada they use
sled dogs a lot to go to the store)
In the US, we use the car to go across the street to the neighbor's
house....
Same reason that prices are a lot higher in California than in North
Texas......... supply and demand....
( people want to leave California --- people in Texas don't care much about
moving out...... (grin) )
Anyway, I just wanted to screw around with the numbers... Thanks for the
"heads up".......
Andy in Fink, Texas
jitney - 17 Jun 2004 00:03 GMT
It's because we're getting screwed.-Jitney
Ron - 17 Jun 2004 14:58 GMT
> It's because we're getting screwed.-Jitney
Ron - 17 Jun 2004 15:00 GMT
Prices in Hamilton, Ontario yesterday ranged from 69.9 per litre to 71.9 per
litre but in my small town of Port Dover the price was at 83.8 per litre.

Signature
Ron P
Sometimes you're the windshield:)
Sometimes you're the bug:(
rick++ - 17 Jun 2004 16:55 GMT
Canada produces 200% of energy needs and sells the rest.
The US produces 40% its energy needs and buys the rest.
Kindergarten economics.
Jerry Okamura - 17 Jun 2004 19:03 GMT
I dunno. Is the gasoline used in Canada exactly the same formulation as the
US?
> In Canadian units of measure and currency, average gasoline prices
> over the last two years are down about a half cent:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> http://www.runzheimer.com/corpc/news/scripts/121802.asp
> http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=42069
Peanutjake - 17 Jun 2004 19:24 GMT
It is simple.
Canadians don't have former oil company executives in charge of their government.
Bush, Cheney, Rice and GREED are responsible for the price rise.
PJ
Bob Hatch - 17 Jun 2004 19:32 GMT
> It is simple.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> PJ
Sometimes it makes me wonder why some people are allowed to use good oxygen.
Hey Peanuthead, explain your statements please.

Signature
"Your money does not cause my poverty. Refusal to believe
this is at the bottom of most bad economic thinking." --P. J. O'Rourke
http://www.bobhatch.com
Peanutjake - 19 Jun 2004 00:05 GMT
> > It is simple.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >
> > PJ
> Hey Peanuthead, explain your statements please.
Sure, If the current US government was not controlled by those connected to the oil industry they
would have take action to stem the
high prices.
For example;
Prohibit us oil producers from raising prices to world levels.
Stop buying and adding oil to the US oil reserves until world prices came down.
Release a portion of the US oil reserves to the US market.
Temporarily cease exporting Alaska oil to Japan and instead send it to the states.
Tax at a 100% rate all excess profits of US oil companies.
Call for a ban on unnecessary travel on Sundays.
I am sure that other, even better methods than the ones I have suggested could be found if our
government was not controlled by these people..
PJ
Mark Jones - 19 Jun 2004 00:54 GMT
> For example;
> Prohibit us oil producers from raising prices to world levels.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I am sure that other, even better methods than the ones I have suggested could be found if our
> government was not controlled by these people..
You should change you name to PinHead.
Not a single one of your proposals is a good idea.
Don Dickson - 19 Jun 2004 01:48 GMT
> Sure, If the current US government was not controlled by those connected to
> the oil industry they
> would have take action to stem the
> high prices.
Your suggestions would make the government into an economic
dictatorship.
> For example;
> Prohibit us oil producers from raising prices to world levels.
And to be fair to people in other industries, prohibit importing less
expensive foreign goods which benefit the consumer but cause a trade
deficit.
> Stop buying and adding oil to the US oil reserves until world prices came
> down.
And send the stock market into a spin because everyone would be afraid
of the potential disastrous consequences on the US economy of
depleting the reserves and having their buddies in Saudi Arabia decide
to cut production.
> Release a portion of the US oil reserves to the US market.
>
> Temporarily cease exporting Alaska oil to Japan and instead send it to the
> states.
And wonder why other countries might just stop exporting oil to the US
to take advantage of the Japanese market.
> Tax at a 100% rate all excess profits of US oil companies.
Who is going to define "excess"? Those same people just might be in a
position to say that people are taking home "excess" cash and tax it
at 100%.
> Call for a ban on unnecessary travel on Sundays.
Again who get to define "unnecessary"? Why not ban all cars from the
road that aren't carrying at least 4 people. That would cut gas
consumption, reduce air pollution and probably eliminate most rush
hour traffic problems.
> I am sure that other, even better methods than the ones I have suggested
> could be found if our
> government was not controlled by these people..
Yes there is certainly a concentration of people with "oil"
connections heading the government. However they were nominated by the
Republicans because they could win. Maybe the Democrats should toss
out Kerry and recruit a whole bunch of Hollywood actors to run the
country. Seems to work in California. ;-))

Signature
Don Dickson
Mark Jones - 19 Jun 2004 03:13 GMT
> > Call for a ban on unnecessary travel on Sundays.
>
> Again who get to define "unnecessary"? Why not ban all cars from the
> road that aren't carrying at least 4 people. That would cut gas
> consumption, reduce air pollution and probably eliminate most rush
> hour traffic problems.
Going to be kind of hard to fit 4 people in my Corvette.
Don Dickson - 19 Jun 2004 15:00 GMT
> > > Call for a ban on unnecessary travel on Sundays.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > hour traffic problems.
> Going to be kind of hard to fit 4 people in my Corvette.
Then ban Corvettes until they get a back seat. ;-))

Signature
Don Dickson
Peanutjake - 21 Jun 2004 01:40 GMT
> > Sure, If the current US government was not controlled by those connected to
> > the oil industry they
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Your suggestions would make the government into an economic
> dictatorship.
Price controls were used in the US during WW1 and WW2. When the emergency was over the controls
ended.
How else would you fight the dictatorship of the Arab nations?
PJ
James C. Reeves - 21 Jun 2004 02:11 GMT
| Price controls were used in the US during WW1 and WW2. When the emergency was over the controls
| ended.
We were not energy dependent in those days.
| How else would you fight the dictatorship of the Arab nations?
Reduce our dependency on their oil by reducing consumption, producing more at
home and bringing in more oil from Russia.
Geoff Miller - 21 Jun 2004 03:48 GMT
>| How else would you fight the dictatorship of the
>| Arab nations?
> Reduce our dependency on their oil by reducing
> consumption, producing more at home and bringing
> in more oil from Russia.
Oh, great; so we could go from being dependent on
Arab oil to being dependent on Russian oil. I don't
see that as being much of a net gain, given the
diplomatic maneuvering of the last couple of years.
Or we could solve the underlying problem once and
for all by turning the entire Gulf region into an
American-occupied protectorate, as we should've
done a quarter of a century ago. That way we
wouldn't *need* to reduce our consumption.
As my father used to say, would we rather pull the
pro- verbial Band-Aid off all at once -- or one
hair at a time? Hell, if the oil-rich regions of
the Middle East were placed under the American
bootheel, I'd buy a Ford Expedition just for the
symbolic value.
Of course, opening up the Alaska National Wildlife
Refuge to oil drilling would be a step in the
right direction.
Geoff

Signature
Bomb the Arab Street.
Rudy - 21 Jun 2004 08:21 GMT
> >| Arab nations?
> > bringing in more oil from Russia.
What country is the #1 supplier of oil to the US ?
And Down there
V
Canada
idontwantspam@nowhere.com - 21 Jun 2004 19:26 GMT
>> >| Arab nations?
>> > bringing in more oil from Russia.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Canada
I think you want to check your sources. Here is one:
http://urlbee.com?41
hth,
tom
***************** Check Us Out *****************
http://www.CarFleaMarket.com
Bringing back low-cost online car ads to the web!
Peanutjake - 21 Jun 2004 18:37 GMT
> | Price controls were used in the US during WW1 and WW2. When the emergency was
> over the controls
> | ended.
> We were not energy dependent in those days.
Where did you find that lie?
During WW11 gas was rationed. You were allowed 3 gallons a week. The arabs were on the side of the
Nazis and had cut us off. We had to rely on domestic oil.
PJ
idontwantspam@nowhere.com - 21 Jun 2004 19:32 GMT
>> | Price controls were used in the US during WW1 and WW2. When the emergency was
>> over the controls
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>PJ
I though Saudi Arabia was an ally, that's why the Nazi Millitary
campaign in the middle east and northern africa was so strong, to keep
them under control.
I could be wrong, I only have a public school education. ;)
my 2 cents,
tom
**************** http://www.Intertainia.com ***********************************
Our Latest site: http://www.MedicalJobList.com - Hospital Jobs Classifieds.
*******************************************************************************
Peanutjake - 24 Jun 2004 01:23 GMT
> >> | Price controls were used in the US during WW1 and WW2. When the emergency was
> >> over the controls
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >
> >During WW11 gas was rationed. You were allowed 3 gallons a week. The Arabs were on the side of
the
> >Nazis and had cut us off. We had to rely on domestic oil.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> tom
How many Arab countries can you name besides Saudi Arabia?
How many of them were not controlled by the Nazi's during WW11?
How much oil did the US receive from Arab countries during that war?
What letter of the alphabet was on the sticker on your car that permitted you to buy 3 gallons of
gas in 1943?
PJ
nospam@nospam.com - 24 Jun 2004 03:17 GMT
>> >"James C. Reeves" <jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:C8mdnUYilYdLqEvdRVn-vg@comcast.com...
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
>PJ
Wow, didn't see this becoming a pissing contest. Ok, you win. Go
back to your community room and tell everyone else you remember how to
count to three and what letter was on cars in 1943. Might get
yourself some extra apple sauce.
Peanutjake - 25 Jun 2004 01:12 GMT
> >> >"James C. Reeves" <jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> >news:C8mdnUYilYdLqEvdRVn-vg@comcast.com...
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> count to three and what letter was on cars in 1943. Might get
> yourself some extra apple sauce.
It is time for you to go back and finish your public school education.
PJ
Joe Bedford - 17 Jun 2004 20:38 GMT
Because they were way high in 2002 and then came down. Gas in Canada
typically runs 25% more than in the US. Diesel OTOH is less expensive.
> In Canadian units of measure and currency, average gasoline prices
> over the last two years are down about a half cent:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> http://www.runzheimer.com/corpc/news/scripts/121802.asp
> http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=42069
Dave Gresham - 18 Jun 2004 22:32 GMT
I don't know about elsewhere, but today I was able to
buy regular unleaded in the twin cities metro area
of minnesota for $1.73 a gallon.
that was before my $2.00 off coupon for buying
at least 8 gallons.
DM_Callier - 18 Jun 2004 22:43 GMT
> I don't know about elsewhere, but today I was able to
> buy regular unleaded in the twin cities metro area
> of minnesota for $1.73 a gallon.
>
> that was before my $2.00 off coupon for buying
> at least 8 gallons.
$1.759 Denver Metro area yesterday.