Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / General Car Topics / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2005 Megane.  Auto Locking Doors?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Craig Parsons - 26 Feb 2005 15:50 GMT
Hi Folks,

   I have a 2005 (54 plate) UK spec Renault Megane 1.9dCi Expression, and
am wandering if there is anyway to make the ECU automatically lock the doors
when the car moves off.

   On my old Focus you could do this by moving the key in a certain order.
Anyone with any ideas?

Thanks.

Craig

PS:  Yes, I am too lazy to press the lock button every time!!
David Thornber - 26 Feb 2005 18:08 GMT
>Hi Folks,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>    On my old Focus you could do this by moving the key in a certain order.
>Anyone with any ideas?

IIRC, it goes as follows on the Laguna.  The Megane is probably the same
or similar:

Insert the card in the slot but do not start the engine.
Press and hold the 'lock' side of the interior central locking switch
until you get some kind of acknowledgement (either a beep or voice,
depending on spec.)

De-activation is the same, except that you hold the 'unlock' side of the
switch.
Signature

David Thornber

Pete Smith - 26 Feb 2005 18:37 GMT
> >Hi Folks,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >    On my old Focus you could do this by moving the key in a certain order.
> >Anyone with any ideas?

Is there any way of turning this _on_ for a Mondeo Mk 3?

Many of the existing "Focus Hacks" work for the Mondeo, specifically the
Instrument Cluster diagnostic mode.

Pete.

Signature

NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be bounced to you
Remove the news and underscore from my address to reply by mail

Craig Parsons - 26 Feb 2005 22:28 GMT
Hi All,

   Thanks for your prompt postings, I'll give it a try when I go out
tomorrow.

   Pete, if your Mondeo has the GEM module (does the locking/keys), then
the key sequence to turn it in should be the same.  Details are at
http://www.torquesteer.co.uk/store/detail.php?itemID=f54fadb01bab43601e200b.
Otherwise go on eBay and buy a copy of the ford TIS CD.  Its the CD the
dealers use and has all the manuals... thats how I found it.

Craig.

>> >Hi Folks,
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Pete.
Pete Smith - 27 Feb 2005 19:06 GMT
> >> >Hi Folks,
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > Is there any way of turning this _on_ for a Mondeo Mk 3?

>     Pete, if your Mondeo has the GEM module (does the locking/keys), then
> the key sequence to turn it in should be the same.  Details are at
> http://www.torquesteer.co.uk/store/detail.php?itemID=f54fadb01bab43601e200b.
> Otherwise go on eBay and buy a copy of the ford TIS CD.  Its the CD the
> dealers use and has all the manuals... thats how I found it.

Ah, interesting. I'll give it a go. Thanks.

FWIW, I've got the TIS. I could buy it for £1.50 on a CDR on Ebay, which is
obviously not kosher, so I just downloaded it instead!

Pete.

Signature

NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be bounced to you
Remove the news and underscore from my address to reply by mail

Stuart - 02 Mar 2005 00:33 GMT
>Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Craig.

Can't you just lock the doors by pushing the drivers door interior
handle in .I do this in my Mondeo so that it locks the boot
...otherwise the boot remains unlocked while driving along ...
Stuart
Pete Smith - 02 Mar 2005 19:21 GMT
> >Hi All,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> handle in .I do this in my Mondeo so that it locks the boot
> ...otherwise the boot remains unlocked while driving along ...

That's not quite the same.

It's like having auto lights, wipers, dim-dip mirror, volume control etc.
Yes, you can do them all yourself, but it's more fun if the car does it for
you!

Pete.

Signature

NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be bounced to you
Remove the news and underscore from my address to reply by mail

Bob Mc - 28 Feb 2005 10:16 GMT
> Hi Folks,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>     On my old Focus you could do this by moving the key in a certain order.
> Anyone with any ideas?

Can someone explain to me why one should want to have
the doors locked while the car is moving?
I can understand it stopping at lights or so, in case of getting attacked,
but if the doors are locked, how much longer does it take to get you out
after an accident?

Signature

Bob Mc
(der Brit in der Schweiz)

David Thornber - 28 Feb 2005 11:19 GMT
>Can someone explain to me why one should want to have
>the doors locked while the car is moving?
>I can understand it stopping at lights or so, in case of getting attacked,
>but if the doors are locked, how much longer does it take to get you out
>after an accident?

The idea is that the doors lock as soon as you drive away, and don't
unlock again until you open one of the doors.  The whole point is that
they remain locked when you stop at lights or in traffic.  It takes no
time at all to get out of the car - the interior door handles aren't
locked, and all of the exterior door handles unlock automatically as
soon as one of the doors is opened from the inside.

It might take longer for someone to get you out of the car in the event
of an accident, although I'd be surprised if the system didn't
automatically unlock in the event of a severe impact.  Besides, the door
locks are the least of your worries in a severe smash.  I once had to
help someone out of the boot of their Fiesta because it was the only
door that would still open after the car had rear-ended a van.

I switched my car's auto locking system on when I got it about 2.5 years
ago, and it's never caused a serious inconvenience.  The only time it
ever catches me out is if I stop to pick up a passenger.  I almost
invariably forget to press the unlock button, leaving them tugging on
the door handle until I've pressed it.
Signature

David Thornber

Bob Mc - 28 Feb 2005 11:32 GMT
> >Can someone explain to me why one should want to have
> >the doors locked while the car is moving?
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> invariably forget to press the unlock button, leaving them tugging on
> the door handle until I've pressed it.

Hmmm.
My thoughts are that you know in advance when you're stopping and
you can see if it's potentially dangerous.
I would guess that the great majority of driving pauses are not at dangerous
places, anyway.
Accidents, on the otherhand, happen accidentally and locked doors
are just one more complication on the way to saving life.
After living in Manchester, London, Dortmund, D?sseldorf, Paris, Zurich
and various smaller towns and never having been mugged
and after having various accidents (my or not my fault),
I will leave my doors unlocked for safety.

Signature

Bob Mc
(der Brit in der Schweiz)

David Thornber - 28 Feb 2005 12:30 GMT
>My thoughts are that you know in advance when you're stopping and
>you can see if it's potentially dangerous.
>I would guess that the great majority of driving pauses are not at dangerous
>places, anyway.
>Accidents, on the otherhand, happen accidentally and locked doors
>are just one more complication on the way to saving life.
Well each to their own I suppose.  If you really believe that you can
spot every potentially risky situation and remember to lock and unlock
the doors each time, then I suppose the system is redundant in your
case.

>After living in Manchester, London, Dortmund, Düsseldorf, Paris, Zurich
>and various smaller towns and never having been mugged
>and after having various accidents (my or not my fault),
>I will leave my doors unlocked for safety.

You've lived in Manchester?  I take it you've driven down Regent Road in
Salford then.  It's not been so bad the last few years, but at one point
you'd regularly see the kids there waiting for an opportunity to steal
from standing traffic.  There'd be the look-out, standing balanced on a
mountain bike, looking into the cars for stuff worth nicking, and the
runner's who'd actually do the grab and leg it.  A colleague had his bag
nicked off the back seat of his car on Regent Road in exactly these
circumstances.

The same kids would actually 'case' your car while you were filling up
with petrol at the Mobil garage on the same road:  Blatantly walking
past and having a good look inside while you're standing there with the
pump nozzle in your hand.  Presumably, if there was anything worth
having, there'd be a brick through your window while you went to pay.
They've knocked that garage down now.
Signature

David Thornber

Bob Mc - 01 Mar 2005 07:13 GMT
<snip>

> >After living in Manchester, London, Dortmund, D?sseldorf, Paris, Zurich
> >and various smaller towns and never having been mugged
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> having, there'd be a brick through your window while you went to pay.
> They've knocked that garage down now.

OK. I haven't driven through M'cr since 1978, but, as I said -
if I see a potentially dangerous situation, there's nothing to stop me
locking up - BTDT didn't see a T-Shirt.
I also don't think a locked door stops a brick through the window, does it?

Signature

Bob Mc
(der Brit in der Schweiz)

James C. Reeves - 28 Feb 2005 23:12 GMT
> Hmmm.
> My thoughts are that you know in advance when you're stopping and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> and after having various accidents (my or not my fault),
> I will leave my doors unlocked for safety.

  o  Locked doors are statistically less likely to "spring
      open" during a collision, dumping unrestrained
      contents and occupants out.
  o  Most manufacturer's locks "unlock" several seconds
      after a collision has been sensed.  It's usually
      explained in the owner manual.
Bob Mc - 01 Mar 2005 07:17 GMT
<snip my rubbish>

>    o  Locked doors are statistically less likely to "spring
>        open" during a collision, dumping unrestrained
>        contents and occupants out.

seat belts? who cares about contents?

>    o  Most manufacturer's locks "unlock" several seconds
>        after a collision has been sensed.  It's usually
>        explained in the owner manual.

Yeah, but why bother?
At 80 on the motorway or 50 on an A-road _nobody's_ going to open the door
from the outside!
They can't catch me - I drive zigzag!
Pete Smith - 28 Feb 2005 19:29 GMT
> > Hi Folks,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> but if the doors are locked, how much longer does it take to get you out
> after an accident?

None, because door locks are fail-safe. Even if the power's out, pulling the
door handle will unlock the door.

The only time this won't happen, is if the doors are deadlocked, and in an
accident, they're un-deadlocked as a matter of course.

If the doors auto-lock, and you have an accident, and they deadlock
themselves, I'd be 99% sure that they'd have deadlocked themselves even if
they were unlocked.

I only did it because I enjoy tinkering. Forget a whale tail spoiler, I
think auto-locking doors are much cooler.

Pete.

Signature

NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be bounced to you
Remove the news and underscore from my address to reply by mail

fob - 28 Feb 2005 19:52 GMT
bonjour,
en cas d'accident, les portes se d?verrouillent automatiquement, il ni a
donc pas de danger de rester bloquer.
le verrouillage se fait ? partir d'une vitesse de 7 km/h.
il est toutefois possible d'annuler cette fonction.
cordialement
bob

> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Pete.
Guy King - 28 Feb 2005 20:14 GMT
The message <422375de$0$25038$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr>
from "fob" <rton@wanadoo.fr> contains these words:

> en cas d'accident, les portes se d?verrouillent automatiquement,

Provided you can trust the ECU to work properly.

Signature

Skipweasel.
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was Aardvark.

Bob Mc - 01 Mar 2005 07:23 GMT
> The message <422375de$0$25038$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr>
> from "fob" <rton@wanadoo.fr> contains these words:
>
> > en cas d'accident, les portes se d?verrouillent automatiquement,
>
> Provided you can trust the ECU to work properly.

Perzackerly!
I am a software developer and it is said in out trade
that there is _no_ software in the world without errors!

Signature

Bob Mc
(der Brit in der Schweiz)

David Thornber - 01 Mar 2005 07:53 GMT
>> The message <422375de$0$25038$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr>
>> from "fob" <rton@wanadoo.fr> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>I am a software developer and it is said in out trade
> that there is _no_ software in the world without errors!

10 PRINT "Hello World"
20 GOTO 10

I've never known a bug in that one.

ECU software is going to be a lot closer to the complexity of 'Hello
World' than it is to Microsoft Office.  Things like unlocking the doors
in the event of an accident are a simple case of "If this happens, then
do this" - forget a full blown ECU, you could do it with the most basic
of PIC's, or probably even with a couple of transistors and relays.
It's only really part of the ECU's job because it makes sense from a
production cost point of view to have one unit handling all the tricks
and gizmos.  Even if it's busy, I'm sure the ECU can find time to check
an impact sensor several times a second and unlock the doors if
required.  There's even bound to be a watchdog timer to reboot the ECU
if it freezes.

I can still see where you're coming from, and maybe a better logical
solution would be something that locks the doors when the car drops
below a certain speed and unlocks them again when a certain speed is
reached.  I can see this being the best of both worlds, but the constant
clunking of the central locking would get irritating after a while.

BTW:  The brick through the window was presumably the trick at the
petrol station while the car was unattended.  The 'stuck in traffic'
trick was to identify something worth nicking on the passenger or back
seat, run up, open the door, grab the item and leg it.

Signature

David Thornber

Guy King - 01 Mar 2005 08:06 GMT
The message <U0wR5gBX+BJCFwqT@thornber.demon.co.uk>
from David Thornber <nospam@thornber.demon.co.uk> contains these words:

> 10 PRINT "Hello World"
> 20 GOTO 10

Hah! Bloody rays!

Signature

Skipweasel.
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was Aardvark.

Bob Mc - 02 Mar 2005 08:24 GMT
> 10 PRINT "Hello World"
> 20 GOTO 10
>
> I've never known a bug in that one.

Yes there is!!!!!!!
It's an endless loop and that means you can't use the processor
for anything else until the batterie runs out!
??}

Signature

Bob Mc
(der Brit in der Schweiz)

Guy King - 01 Mar 2005 08:05 GMT
The message <38ijjnF5mg4msU1@individual.net>
from "Bob Mc" <bob.mcminn@g_DEL_mail.com> contains these words:

> I am a software developer and it is said in out trade
>  that there is _no_ software in the world without errors!

10 Print "Hello world"
20 GOTO 10

Signature

Skipweasel.
In the beginning was the word.
And the word was Aardvark.

Ben Blaney - 01 Mar 2005 08:32 GMT
>The message <38ijjnF5mg4msU1@individual.net>
>from "Bob Mc" <bob.mcminn@g_DEL_mail.com> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>10 Print "Hello world"
>20 GOTO 10

Surely that's not software; it's code.

Signature

Ben Blaney

Stuart - 02 Mar 2005 00:30 GMT
>> The message <422375de$0$25038$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr>
>> from "fob" <rton@wanadoo.fr> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Perzackerly!

Perzackerly ....Is that not outside Liverpool.???...lol
Stuart
Bob Mc - 02 Mar 2005 08:26 GMT
> Perzackerly ....Is that not outside Liverpool.???...lol

Prolly is.
VBG

PS: Why is your font bigger than anyone elses?
I thought my reader defined the font in text-only mail!

Signature

Bob Mc
(der Brit in der Schweiz)

Stuart - 02 Mar 2005 11:28 GMT
>>> The message <422375de$0$25038$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr>
>>> from "fob" <rton@wanadoo.fr> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Perzackerly ....Is that not outside Liverpool.???...lol
>Stuart

Nah,it's actually Fazackerley ..lol

The font looks same as yours .It is 8
Stuart
Bob Mc - 01 Mar 2005 07:21 GMT
> > Can someone explain to me why one should want to have
> > the doors locked while the car is moving?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> None, because door locks are fail-safe. Even if the power's out, pulling the
> door handle will unlock the door.

From the inside and then only if you're conscious and cosmos mentis.

> The only time this won't happen, is if the doors are deadlocked, and in an
> accident, they're un-deadlocked as a matter of course.
>
> If the doors auto-lock, and you have an accident, and they deadlock
> themselves, I'd be 99% sure that they'd have deadlocked themselves even if
> they were unlocked.

I didn't even know that car doors have this possibility.

> I only did it because I enjoy tinkering. Forget a whale tail spoiler, I
> think auto-locking doors are much cooler.

That's an good reason!

Signature

Bob Mc
(der Brit in der Schweiz)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.