Is there any operational efficiency reason why a worn out catalytic
converter should be replaced with a new one versus just a straight
piece of pipe? Quite the cost difference ($200 versus $25) and there
is no emissions testing around here so... TIA for any replies.
Shep - 17 May 2006 14:36 GMT
It is still a federal violation to remove the cat, your choice.
> Is there any operational efficiency reason why a worn out catalytic
> converter should be replaced with a new one versus just a straight
> piece of pipe? Quite the cost difference ($200 versus $25) and there
> is no emissions testing around here so... TIA for any replies.
Al Bundy - 17 May 2006 14:38 GMT
> Is there any operational efficiency reason why a worn out catalytic
> converter should be replaced with a new one versus just a straight
> piece of pipe? Quite the cost difference ($200 versus $25) and there
> is no emissions testing around here so... TIA for any replies.
There are other reasons, but I'll mention one from direct experience.
Those cheap straight pipes don't last very long and you will constantly
be replacing it if you keep the vehicle. Meanwhile, I've seen
aftermarket converters for about $99. You could put one of those on and
be done with it for a very long time.