>> > Hi, can someone post a link to a photograph or 3 of a Ford Escort
>> > MkIII Hatchback, preferably no later than 1995
>> No.
>>
>> Because the MkIII Escort was replaced by the MkIV around 1986.
>> http://www.feoc-uk.com/modules.php?name=Escort_Info
>>
>> 1995 would be MkV.
> Thanks a lot, I'm sure Mr Stone will be grateful:
> http://www.ismichaelstoneguilty.org/
Sorry - I'm confused? Why would I care what pondscum like that thinks?
Or are you saying that your question had something to do with that hideous
mess of a website?
Dr Zoidberg - 20 Jun 2006 08:35 GMT
>>>> Hi, can someone post a link to a photograph or 3 of a Ford Escort
>>>> MkIII Hatchback, preferably no later than 1995
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Or are you saying that your question had something to do with that
> hideous mess of a website?
I'm guessing he believes that this will help prove the innocence of the scum
in question

Signature
Alex
Piece by piece the penguins have taken my sanity
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk
Adrian - 20 Jun 2006 10:40 GMT
> I'm guessing he believes that this will help prove the innocence of
> the scum in question
Mmm.
M'lud, this photo of a beige Escort scrounged from the Internet *proves* he
couldn't have done it...
Dr Zoidberg - 20 Jun 2006 10:46 GMT
>> I'm guessing he believes that this will help prove the innocence of
>> the scum in question
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> M'lud, this photo of a beige Escort scrounged from the Internet
> *proves* he couldn't have done it...
Well thats me convinced.
Case closed

Signature
Alex
Piece by piece the penguins have taken my sanity
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk
gazzafield - 20 Jun 2006 10:47 GMT
>>> I'm guessing he believes that this will help prove the innocence of
>>> the scum in question
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Well thats me convinced.
> Case closed
I don't usually put on the wooly minded liberal head but it has made me
think when the man has not been found guilty in court. Twice.
Adrian - 20 Jun 2006 10:59 GMT
> I don't usually put on the wooly minded liberal head but it has made me
> think when the man has not been found guilty in court. Twice.
Eh? He HAS been found guilty. Twice. He won his first appeal, because a
witness admitted to lying. He was retried, and was found guilty even
without that evidence. He's appealed again and lost that appeal.
Are you thinking of Sion Jenkins?
gazzafield - 20 Jun 2006 15:45 GMT
>> I don't usually put on the wooly minded liberal head but it has made me
>> think when the man has not been found guilty in court. Twice.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Are you thinking of Sion Jenkins?
Yes. Oops.