Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / General Car Topics / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Spring Mounted Retractable Piston Head

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bret Cahill - 10 Jul 2006 22:03 GMT
The goal is to clear all the exhaust gas from a 4 stroke cylinder.  The
piston would be ringed as usual but mounted on springs that would
compress at just a little more than back pressure.

On the compression and power strokes the pressure would cause the
piston to bottom out for conventional operation, i. e., head space and
compression ratio.

On the exhaust stroke, however, the piston would extend to expell all
the gas.

They've done so much in reciprocating something like this has probably
already been done.

Bret Cahill
aarcuda69062 - 11 Jul 2006 15:04 GMT
In article
<1152565414.612188.218810@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,

> The goal is to clear all the exhaust gas from a 4 stroke cylinder.  

It is?

Then why do they meter it back in thru the EGR valve?
cselby@mts.net - 11 Jul 2006 17:26 GMT
>The goal is to clear all the exhaust gas from a 4 stroke cylinder.  The
>piston would be ringed as usual but mounted on springs that would
>compress at just a little more than back pressure.

If the springs are compressing then the piston is not going up all the
way and the objective is lost.   And more moving parts mean more
things to break.

>On the compression and power strokes the pressure would cause the
>piston to bottom out for conventional operation, i. e., head space and
>compression ratio.

On the first hiccup, the piston  would would hit the head.  On the
intake stroke the crank is rotating down and the piston is momentarily
not.  Less than efficient.

>On the exhaust stroke, however, the piston would extend to expell all
>the gas.

Engine speed will likely keep the springs compressed on up strokes and
in tension on down strokes, except for that last little bit where the
piston hits the head or goes down too far and hits the crank.   The
shock load on the springs would fracture then very soon and this
becomes a high maintenance engine.

>They've done so much in reciprocating something like this has probably
>already been done.

Filling and clearing the cylinders  quicker is done with blowers and
turbos - at a cost.

>Bret Cahill

Any relation the Popular Mechanics Cahill who wrote some pretty goofy
and slanted auto articles back in the day of mouse milk?
Bret Cahill - 11 Jul 2006 20:22 GMT
Someone was worried about CO2 mixing with steam to form acid in the 6
stroke Crower cycle engine.  Instead of a radiator Crower uses diesel
fuel injectors to inject water in the 5th stroke for internal cooling
as well as another power stroke.  Crower provides cams for racing so it
was easy for him to convert an off the shelf engine to a "6-stroke."

The engine basically alternates between an Otto cycle and some kind of
steam cycle.  Power drops a little but efficiency and cost
effectiveness increases.  RO water is only pennies/gallon.

Supposedly you can run the engine in your lap and it will only feel
warm, not hot.

The problem above arose if the water was condensed and recycled which
is how CO2 became an issue.  Someone thought the acid would get
concentrated and eat up the engine.

I was wondering if anyone ever tried a completely clear the exhaust
gases from any engine, 2 or 4 stroke.

> >The goal is to clear all the exhaust gas from a 4 stroke cylinder.  The
> >piston would be ringed as usual but mounted on springs that would
> >compress at just a little more than back pressure.

> If the springs are compressing then the piston is not going up all the
> way and the objective is lost.   And more moving parts mean more
> things to break.

On the compression and power strokes the pressure would cause the
piston to bottom out for conventional operation, i. e., head space and
compression ratio.

> On the first hiccup, the piston  would would hit the head.

The piston would have limiting stops either way.

> On the
> intake stroke the crank is rotating down and the piston is momentarily
> not.  Less than efficient.

It's only about 10% of the stroke length, depending on the compression
ratio..

> >On the exhaust stroke, however, the piston would extend to expell all
> >the gas.

> Engine speed will likely keep the springs compressed on up strokes and
> in tension on down strokes, except for that last little bit

It's not important where it extends on the exhaust stroke, just as long
as it does it before top dead center.

> where the
> piston hits the head or goes down too far and hits the crank.   The
> shock load on the springs would fracture then very soon and this
> becomes a high maintenance engine.

I can believe that might be an issue.

> >They've done so much in reciprocating something like this has probably
> >already been done.

> Filling and clearing the cylinders  quicker is done with blowers and
> turbos - at a cost.

> >Bret Cahill

> Any relation the Popular Mechanics Cahill

Was his name "Cahill"?

Bret Cahill
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.