Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / General Car Topics / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

smog check HC question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
nutso fasst - 09 Aug 2006 00:46 GMT
Hello.

I replaced cat converter 2 yrs ago to bring down HC in wife's 81 VW
Scirocco. Now the car's failing due to high HC again. Results:

15mph, 1807rpm
HC max: 162  - HC meas: 149
CO max: 1.09 - CO meas: 0.27
NO max: 1227 - NO meas: 983

25mph, 1938rpm
HC max: 132 -  HC meas: 172  FAIL
CO max: 1.09 - CO meas: 0.27
NO max: 1227 - NO meas: 791

The car is used exclusively for short trips except was driven about 15-20
miles on the freeway before the test. It has over 250K miles, and uses about
1qt oil every month (not sure how many miles, no exhaust smoke in normal
driving though).

Question: I put a bottle of Techron in the tank. Is there a chance running
that out on the freeway would clean up the test results, or is a new cat the
answer?

Also: what effect does Techron have on a smog test? Does it all have to be
run out and refueled before testing?

BTW, it's an aftermarket cat, considerably less $ than OEM.

thx,
nf
AviationTech - 09 Aug 2006 10:49 GMT
> Hello.
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> thx,
> nf
  Question. Have you considered having a compression check done on the
engine? If the mileage is as high as you stated, compression might be
quite low and the blowby of oil mist (through the pistion rings where
they mate with the cylinders) from the bottom half of the engine to the
combustion area at dead top center might be quite excessive. Now that
would indeed increase your HC.
  You have an old engine and even the valve stem seals and hydraulic
lifters could also be causing problems. How does it run? Is it a smooth
running engine with plenty of power or not? There are many things you
must consider. A refurbished engine is what I would be leaning towards
after checking the Cat Converter for blockage and corrosion and
rebuilding the carburator.
   If you are mechanically inclined checking the compression is
something that you could easily do yourself. Checking the blow by is
something best left to the garage as they have the setup with
compressed air required to  test the engine health. Swapping out an
engine in a Scirocco is not difficult, especially if yours is an 8
valve engine.I presume your 81 Scirocco is an 8 valve engine. 16 valve
engines were from 1986 on in the US versions.  A decent mechanic can
swap out your engine in 3 hours including mounting the gearbox you have
with the refurbished engine. I love VW's. I have owned a Super Beetle,
2 Sciroccos, A VW pickup with a 2.0 liter 16 valve engine and currently
own a Passat with a 1.9 TDI engine.

Good luck!!
nutso fasst - 09 Aug 2006 16:31 GMT
>    Question. Have you considered having a compression check done on the
> engine? If the mileage is as high as you stated, compression might be
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> after checking the Cat Converter for blockage and corrosion and
> rebuilding the carburator.

Thanks for the reply.

Car's currently running smooth with good power. It's an FI engine, no carb.
My mechanic never did a compression check and I don't have a compression
tester. Plugs don't foul and smoke is only visible when accelerating.

The first time it needed a new CAT to pass smog was in 98, then again in 04.
And now, only about 2.8K miles later, it seems to need one again. My
mechanic suggested running a tank with Techron, because the most typical
trip for this car is less than 3 miles (about 1200mi/yr). I've got to get
past the smog check and can't afford big $ now.

Basically, I'm looking for feedback as to whether there's any hope a long
drive with Techron could get the CAT working again or otherwise lower HC,
and how Techron mix still in the tank will affect a smog check.

And any other suggestions how to get under-load HC from 172ppm to under 132.

nf
AviationTech - 10 Aug 2006 11:25 GMT
> Thanks for the reply.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> nf

   Since your car has been driven for only short trips, carbon will
accumulate on the heads of the pistons and around the valve faces on
the cylinder head. What I used was the extra strength chevron additive
with techroline and a long drive (@200 miles round trip) with bursts of
high speed. My 1992 Corrado SLC had been sitting in my folks driveway
for almost 1 year (I live overseas in the Netherlands) and not driven.
I was quite worried about the old premium gas in the tank. My Corrado's
VR6 engine perfomed flawlessly and it passed the Georgia smog check
easily.  Occasional long drives are needed to keep your fuel system and
intake/exhaust system healthy.

   I would expect that your spark plugs have some carbon buildup as
well. Try changing out your spark plugs and air filter before the drive
and oil w/ oil filter change before you go in for your smog check.
There are some additives sold in parts stores that state that they
guarantee a pass on the smog check. Do a little research onlilne before
you buy as the small bottle of additive is not inexpensive.

   If I remember correctly,your car ( my second rocco was an 85 model)
has an O2 sensor located in the header downpipe of the exhaust system
that might need to be changed.Just look for the wire that goes down to
the exhaust from the engine. There is a description of a resistance
test (with a multimeter) to verify the sensor's operation, in the VW
shop manual for the scirocco. Normally if your O2 sensor fails, the
mileage will drop down, the engine will run rich and the car won't run
as smoothly as normal.  By the way, there should be zero visible smoke
under acceleration for a healthy fuel injected engine. If the smoke is
colored blue you have bad rings( read engine rebuild  time) and if it
is colored white you have a fuel injection (easier to solve) problem.
The seals for the injectors become brittle with age and heat. Faulty
injector seals will cause problems with the mixture delivered to the
affected cylinder. It is easy to break the seals, so unless you know
what you are doing, leave the job to your mechanic. I have no idea what
your mechanical skills or level of gasoline engine knowlege is. I hope
that I have not overdone the amount of information that I have given
you.  Is your mechanic a VW guy or not? If he is or is an ASE certified
mechanic, he should be easily able to diagnose the problem. Did you
tell him about the smoke under acceleration? I hope for your $$$ sake
that the smoke is not blue.
AviationTech - 10 Aug 2006 12:04 GMT
> > Thanks for the reply.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> tell him about the smoke under acceleration? I hope for your $$$ sake
> that the smoke is not blue.

I just looked through my library and found my Bentley Scirocco book. It
covers 1985-1993. The correct smoke colors to look for are Blue-gray
(cylinder head and piston or piston ring problems) / Blue-gray and or
white steam in exhaust (cylinder head gasket failed, Warped or cracked
cylinder head or cracked cylinder block) / Black smoke - (Rich air/fuel
mixture).
nutso fasst - 11 Aug 2006 01:29 GMT
>     Since your car has been driven for only short trips, carbon will
> accumulate on the heads of the pistons and around the valve faces on
> the cylinder head. What I used was the extra strength chevron additive
> with techroline and a long drive (@200 miles round trip) with bursts of

I added a bottle of Techroline to about 9gal gas in the tank. Today I went
for a 200 mile drive. Ambient temp 90-100F. From about 500ft to >4000ft
above sea level with one very steep grade. The first 100 miles was kept in
4th gear, with speeds 60-75mph. Return trip (mostly downhill) a mix of 4th
and 5th, speeds 65-80mph. Uphill oil temp read as high as 160F. Downhill
120-125F. Water temp well within normal. Occasionally floored accelerator to
above 80mph. Driver side window was open. Fuel mileage was almost 32 mpg.
Oil consumption was a bit more than 1 pint (freshly changed with - as
always - Castrol 20W-50).

There is a noticeable difference. A slight preignition rattle between
2500-3000rpm is gone. The engine is running better than it has in years.

I checked plugs (2800 miles on them) and they did not look heavily carboned.
Will check again to see if any noticeable change. I've replaced an O2 sensor
previously to pass smog. IIRC a faulty O2 sensor produces a rich mixture
with high CO readings as well as HC. My CO reading is low, but no harm in
checking voltage.

There is currently no visible smoke coming out of the exhaust in normal
driving. (I had previously seen what I think was a mix of carbon and oil
smoke when my wife drove away when engine was cold.)

Now I must decide...take a chance and do free re-test, then pay for CAT and
another test if fail, or go ahead and install new CAT which will almost
certainly pass test. I'm tending to first option, as that will tell me if
the drive with Techroline really did reduce HC.

> you.  Is your mechanic a VW guy or not? If he is or is an ASE certified
> mechanic, he should be easily able to diagnose the problem.

He's a VW mechanic but I haven't given him the car to work on this time
(though he insisted on checking distributor vacuum advance/retard to make
sure both were working after I flunked smog check). He suggested Techroline
and a long drive.

nf
nutso fasst - 11 Aug 2006 22:26 GMT
> I added a bottle of Techroline

Oops, that's not correct. What I added was Techron Concentrate Plus, which
replaced Techroline.
C. E. White - 10 Aug 2006 12:49 GMT
For a feedback controlled, fuel injected engine to fail a smog check with
high HC, you almost certainly have a bad catalytic converter. Since you seem
to be killing them regularly, I am guessing you have other problems. When
was the last time you had your O2 sensor replaced? My '81 Audi called for
routine O2 sensor replacement (every 50,000 miles). On the other hand, the
fact that you don't see any smoke during normal driving despite using over a
quart per 1000 miles (250,000 miles in 25 years = 833 miles/month on
average, and I betting you use it less these days) indicates that maybe the
catalytic converter is working. I would suggest replacing the O2 sensor,
doing an oil change, driving the car for at least 50 miles before the test
to make sure  it is completely warmed up (hot even), and adding a a can of
one of the emmission test additives (see list below).

http://passsmog.com/
http://how-to-pass-smog-test.rxp.com/master.htm
http://www.midwayautosupply.com/detailedproductdescription.asp?21168
http://www.midwayautosupply.com/detailedproductdescription.asp?3026
http://www.smogtips.com/six_things.cfm
http://www.protecusa.com/tbpuragas_emissions_test.htm

There are lots more of these sort of "no-fail" additives at the local Pep
Boys. They might help. Pick one with a gaurantee and you can always get a
refund if it fails again.

Ed

> Hello.
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> thx,
> nf
nutso fasst - 11 Aug 2006 02:02 GMT
Thanks for the reply, Ed.

> For a feedback controlled, fuel injected engine to fail a smog check with
> high HC, you almost certainly have a bad catalytic converter. Since you seem
> to be killing them regularly, I am guessing you have other problems. When
> was the last time you had your O2 sensor replaced?

I believe it was 6000 miles ago.

> fact that you don't see any smoke during normal driving despite using over a
> quart per 1000 miles (250,000 miles in 25 years = 833 miles/month on
> average, and I betting you use it less these days) indicates that maybe the
> catalytic converter is working.

Yes, smoke seems to have disappeared, and yet... so did 1 pint of oil in a
200 mile drive (see my reply to AviationTech). As for monthly miles, car had
210K in 1992 = 253 miles/month avg since. But for the past 5 years it's been
more like 115 miles/month, most commonly for 4-8 mile round trips.

> doing an oil change, driving the car for at least 50 miles before the test
> to make sure  it is completely warmed up (hot even), and adding a a can of
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> There are lots more of these sort of "no-fail" additives at the local Pep
> Boys.

Not here in California. I think there must be a law against making that
claim, as the auto parts stores here only carry gas additives like
Techroline that claim to clean the engine. But I am definitely going to take
your 50-mile ride advice.

nf
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.