Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / General Car Topics / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why don't American drivers drive like Europeans?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
donquijote1954 - 16 Mar 2007 20:54 GMT
On Mar 16, 10:40 am, mcaguit...@comcast.net wrote:
> On Mar 15, 12:36 pm, "donquijote1954"
>
> > I got SUVphobia. It's basically the fear that an SUV can kill you. If
> > they are 16 times more likely to kill you in a car, imagine on a bike
> > --and the driver on the cell!
>
> That contradicts your theory as bicycles being a superior alternate
> form of transportation. With that kind of death rate, it's obviously
> much too risky.

No, it only proves the inferior and primitive law that prevails on our
roads: THE LAW OF THE JUNGLE. If we had THE RULE OF LAW (rules of the
road), then bicycles would be superior, morally at least. But the same
thing applies to every other smaller vehicle out there.

And this is a comment to the article below...

"Why don't American drivers drive like that? Because we are a
snobbish, boorish, rude society that feels that it has the right to do
whatever it wants. If we drove like the Europeans did, this country
would be a better place to live in and there would be less road rage,
anger, fighting and all the other things that our country is known
for, such as fighting unnecessary wars (Iraq) and other things like
that."

Lane discipline... or a lack thereof

This may sound like I'm whining.  I'm not (I hate that sound from
anyone).  But I am complaining.  Because, as drivers -- enthusiast or
otherwise -- we have a problem in this country.

I was rolling down the road the other day with sports car racing ace,
2005 Grand Am champion, and Rolex 24 winner Max Angelelli in the
passenger seat.  Sure it would have probably been more fun the other
way around, but no matter.  He asked, "Why don't drivers mind their
lane here in America?  Why do the slow cars hog the left lane?  It
seems to me that this complicates the traffic.  And why does everyone
get so angry when you flash your lights at them?"  Max maintains homes
in Monaco, Italy, and Florida.  So, besides his obvious driving
credentials, he has experience on roads all over the world.

It seemed a simple question, but one I couldn't answer.  In Europe,
particularly Italy and Germany, there are rules of the road that cover
this.  Trucks and slow cars to the right -- always.  What we would
call the number two lane, in most instances, is for cars only, moving
along at the speed limit or above.  The number one lane, the one we
call the fast lane, but seldom is here -- really is over there,
reserved for those who are passing or really hauling butt.  And
everybody drives by these dictums.  All the time.

more...

http://blogs.motortrend.com/6200177/editorial/lane-discipline-or-a-lack-thereof/
index.html


WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE
http://webspawner.com/users/donquijote

BANANA REVOLUTION (T-shirts to change the world)

http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution
zorba - 17 Mar 2007 03:17 GMT
On Mar 16, 3:54�pm, "donquijote1954" <nolionnoprob...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 16, 10:40 am, mcaguit...@comcast.net wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution

You're kidding, right?  Ever drive in Italy?
lubecki@hotmail.com - 17 Mar 2007 04:50 GMT
> You're kidding, right?  Ever drive in Italy?

I have. Have you? Italian drivers are MUCH better than American
drivers. On the highway they have lane discipline - they drive right
and pass left, and move out of the way very quickly for faster
traffic. In city traffic they have much better situational awareness
than Americans do. There is no comparison. In heavy traffic things can
sometimes look hairy (especially to Americans who don't pay attention
to anything other than what's right in front of them), but everybody
pays attention to what's happening around them and cars merge and
cross paths without problems.

And the biggest difference is that Italian (and other non-US) drivers
aren't a.sholes. Yes, they drive aggressively. But they don't have a
stupid, pointlessly mean attitude like Americans do. An Italian driver
will get in your way if it helps him, but will get out of your way if
he can. An American driver will get in your way just because he's an
a.shole and wants to make you slower, even if it doesn't help him.

American drivers are among the worst in the world. You don't believe
it? Watch this video of an intersection in India:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjrEQaG5jPM
No traffic lights, mixture of pedestrians, bicycles, mopeds,
motorcycles, cars, trucks, buses, etc. But everyone pays attention to
what's going on around them, traffic flows, and there are no
accidents. In a similar situation in the US, there would be an
accident every 10 seconds and somebody would die.

-Gniewko
brink - 17 Mar 2007 04:55 GMT
>> You're kidding, right?  Ever drive in Italy?
>
> I have. Have you? Italian drivers are MUCH better than American
> drivers. On the highway they have lane discipline - they drive right
> and pass left, and move out of the way very quickly for faster
> traffic.

Depends on which part of Italy.  The north is pretty orderly, but get down
south...  say around Naples...  and it's often utter chaos on the roads.
I've never seen anything quite like it as I've not spent much time on
third-world roads...   motorists will literally cruise down the freeway
splitting two lanes, as if it's perfectly ordinary...  shoulder passing...
complete disregard of stoplights...  I'm sure it's just a cultural thing,
that lanes and signals are merely "suggestions" rather than mandates.

brink
Eeyore - 17 Mar 2007 15:43 GMT
> > "zorba" <jimo...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I've never seen anything quite like it as I've not spent much time on
> third-world roads...

Third world ?

Italy's a member of the G7 !

>   motorists will literally cruise down the freeway
> splitting two lanes, as if it's perfectly ordinary...  shoulder passing...
> complete disregard of stoplights...  I'm sure it's just a cultural thing,
> that lanes and signals are merely "suggestions" rather than mandates.

Try India !

Graham
brink - 17 Mar 2007 19:33 GMT
>> > "zorba" <jimo...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Italy's a member of the G7 !

I didn't mean to imply that *Italy* is third world...  I said Italy's roads
were the worst I've personally seen *because* I've not driven in the third
world.

brink
Eeyore - 17 Mar 2007 20:05 GMT
> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> > "zorba" <jimo...@aol.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I didn't mean to imply that *Italy* is third world...  I said Italy's roads
> were the worst I've personally seen

I somewhat suspect you're out of touch.

> *because* I've not driven in the third world.

I've been a a passenger in the third world and you need to be made of stern
stuff to deal with it.

Graham
Victor Velazquez - 19 Mar 2007 14:17 GMT
> I've been a a passenger in the third world and you need to be made of
> stern
> stuff to deal with it.

Especially on account of all the horrendous crash sites one seems to be
always passing.  Throughout east and central Africa, at least, it seemed to
be a fairly constant rate of one smash-up per 5 or so miles.  I wonder if
the brothels every fifty or so miles were helping?  I suspect a lot of
impatient truckers. ;-)
websurf1@cox.net - 17 Mar 2007 05:07 GMT
On Mar 16, 8:50 pm, lube...@hotmail.com wrote:

> > You're kidding, right?  Ever drive in Italy?
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> -Gniewko

If that intersection were in the states, it would be full of wrecks
caused by folks who want to go through at about 50 mph.
The traffic in the video is much slower than green light traffic in
the states.  It looks more like walking in a shopping mall, except
most people are on wheels.

Both systems work, if everyone plays by the local rules.  It likely
doesn't matter which set of rules you use, just make sure everyone
uses the same rules in any particular location.

In the original post:
" What we would call the number two lane, in most instances, is for
cars only, moving along at the speed limit or above. "
I don't know what "speed limit" means there, but here it means that
this is as fast as you can legally go.  Except that it is spottily
enforced because Americans typically have little regard for rules--
social, road, or whatever.

When I was in Italy a while ago, for only a week, I was amazed at the
traffic. It was mayhem.  But it was GENTLE mayhem.  As someone above
observed, it wasn't road rage; it was just whatever worked.  And there
wasn't some batch of speediots going way over the limit, or way over
everyone else.  I didn't see anyone videotaping themselves going two
or three times the posted limit or existing traffic.  They just sort
of drove and parked wherever they needed to to make things work.
Kinda cute, actually.
Matthew T. Russotto - 18 Mar 2007 02:57 GMT
>> You're kidding, right?  Ever drive in Italy?
>
>I have. Have you? Italian drivers are MUCH better than American
>drivers. On the highway they have lane discipline - they drive right
>and pass left, and move out of the way very quickly for faster
>traffic.

Pull the other one, it's got bells on.  Italians treat lanes on roads
like race car drivers treat the lines painted on the course.
Signature

 There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
 result in a fully-depreciated one.

donquijote1954 - 19 Mar 2007 21:22 GMT
On Mar 16, 11:50 pm, lube...@hotmail.com wrote:

> > You're kidding, right?  Ever drive in Italy?
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> -Gniewko

On Mar 17, 3:08 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> "Fred G. Mackey" wrote:
> > Eeyore wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> No need however !

At least in a certain sense...

If American drivers tend their children while driving, chat on the
phone, change their pants (Allstate commercial), watch DVDs, drink
coffee and eat McDonald's and ignore rules of the road they may be the
best drivers around. Or it's simply a mircacle that the carnage is not
worst.
Gus - 17 Mar 2007 03:30 GMT
>snip
It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.
Eeyore - 17 Mar 2007 15:41 GMT
> It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
> you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.

Where's the verb in that sentence ?

Graham
Sherman L. Cahal - 17 Mar 2007 15:57 GMT
On Mar 17, 9:41 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
> > you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.
>
> Where's the verb in that sentence ?
>
> Graham

Gus has cross-posted to MTR previously and his sentences were just as
unreadable.
Gus - 17 Mar 2007 23:57 GMT
> On Mar 17, 9:41 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Gus has cross-posted to MTR previously and his sentences were just as
> unreadable.

What grade did you gradueat? Apparently they didn't teach comprehension.
Eeyore - 18 Mar 2007 00:34 GMT
> >>> It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
> >>> you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> What grade did you gradueat? Apparently they didn't teach comprehension.

Apparently no-one taught you basic grammar.

Graham
Gus - 18 Mar 2007 03:15 GMT
>>>>> It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
>>>>> you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Graham

I was being a smart a.s, dummy.
Sherman L. Cahal - 18 Mar 2007 06:18 GMT
> >>>>> It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
> >>>>> you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I was being a smart a.s, dummy.

Apparently not --
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=DTSxXQ4AAACWIGsFfZCujnim0T2m-wq6
Gus - 18 Mar 2007 06:30 GMT
>>>>>>> It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
>>>>>>> you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Apparently not --
> http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=DTSxXQ4AAACWIGsFfZCujnim0T2m-wq6

I don't really give a damn about your opinion
george conklin - 18 Mar 2007 14:15 GMT
>>>>>>>> It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people
>>>>>>>> and
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>
> I don't really give a damn about your opinion

What about the fact that the European death rate is 13.1 deaths per billion
kilometers traveled.  Using miles, for the USA, it would be about 13 also.
But miles are LONGER than kilometers, so basically the European rate is
higher for the same distance traveled.  Do we really want to increase our
death rate to drive like those in Europe?
Eeyore - 18 Mar 2007 14:52 GMT
> What about the fact that the European death rate is 13.1 deaths per billion
> kilometers traveled.

How about showing where you get 13.1 from when it's clear that the actual average is
close to 8.

Graham
george conklin - 18 Mar 2007 15:23 GMT
>> What about the fact that the European death rate is 13.1 deaths per
>> billion
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Graham

Wrong again.  Pitful.
Eeyore - 18 Mar 2007 17:43 GMT
> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Wrong again.  Pitful.

Your inability to understand mathematics is pitful.

Lets take a simplr but exaggerated example to prove the point. Suppose you have
2 countries with populations of say 100 million and 1 million and all those
drivers cover the same average m ilage.

In the larger country A the death rate per billion km is say 5. In country B the
death rate per billion km is 50.

By your maths the average death rate is 27.5.

Have you seen the flaw now ? The average rate is actually 5.45 in fact.

It's actually
george conklin - 18 Mar 2007 17:55 GMT
>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> It's actually

What drivel.  You don't know what your are talking about so give it up.
Eeyore - 18 Mar 2007 18:50 GMT
> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> What drivel.  You don't know what your are talking about so give it up.

Your arrogance about your incompetent maths is quite astonishing.

I suppose you're yet another example of the failings of the US education system.

FYI, here's how it works. Let's presume an average mileage per driver of 20,000
km ( reasonably accurate).

100 million drivers * 20,000 km (2 trillion driver km)* 5 deaths per billion km
= 10,000 deaths
1 million drivers * 20,000 km (20 billion driver km) * 50 deaths per billion km
= 1000 deaths

Total deaths 11,000. Total km covered 2.02.10^12 km.
Death rate = 11,000/2.02 trillion

= 5.45 per billion.

Graham
george conklin - 18 Mar 2007 19:00 GMT
>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Your arrogance about your incompetent maths is quite astonishing.

  What a mess you make.  I deleted your tripe.
Eeyore - 18 Mar 2007 22:42 GMT
> "Eeyore"wrote
> >
> > Your arrogance about your incompetent maths is quite astonishing.
>
>    What a mess you make.  I deleted your tripe.

You're a complete idiot.

Consider yourself plonked.

Graham
Eeyore - 18 Mar 2007 14:53 GMT
> Do we really want to increase our death rate to drive like those in Europe?

You really are pretty stupid aren't you. You mix up miles and km and don't understand
averages.

Graham
N8N - 19 Mar 2007 14:07 GMT
> >>>>>>>> It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people
> >>>>>>>> and
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> higher for the same distance traveled.  Do we really want to increase our
> death rate to drive like those in Europe?

What about your source for these "facts?"  The countries that most
people typically think of when they think of Europe all have death
rates far below the number you quote.

BTW I think the latest figure I've seen for the US is about
9.something which would work out to closer to 14.5 when expressed on a
per mile basis.

nate
Sherman L. Cahal - 18 Mar 2007 01:21 GMT
> > On Mar 17, 9:41 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> What grade did you gradueat? Apparently they didn't teach comprehension.

Did you mean graduate? You also missed a comma after "apparently" as
well.
Gus - 18 Mar 2007 01:27 GMT
>>> On Mar 17, 9:41 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Did you mean graduate? You also missed a comma after "apparently" as
> well.

I gradueated befur you wz born. sometimes the keys bounc and spelchker
desnt do commas.
Studemania - 18 Mar 2007 20:15 GMT
On Mar 17, 7:41 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
> > you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.
>
> Where's the verb in that sentence ?
>
> Graham

"Been" and "Driven" seem to be two..

How about the driving on that famous vacationers road in Portugal.
Great drivers there.
SilverStude - 18 Mar 2007 22:49 GMT
> On Mar 17, 7:41 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> How about the driving on that famous vacationers road in Portugal.
> Great drivers there.

I didn't read all the preceding stuff, but IMO, Germany and Italy have
the best roads.  One time on A1, south of Trento, I was hauling
southbound, center lane, doing around 100mph and hit a rainstorm.
Traffic never slowed, so neither did I and the amazing thing was that,
the way the roads are built prevents road spray from the rain.   Didn't
even need wipers, due to the speed, it just rolled past the windows.
C. E. White - 18 Mar 2007 22:54 GMT
> I didn't read all the preceding stuff, but IMO, Germany and Italy have the
> best roads.  One time on A1, south of Trento, I was hauling southbound,
> center lane, doing around 100mph and hit a rainstorm. Traffic never
> slowed, so neither did I and the amazing thing was that, the way the roads
> are built prevents road spray from the rain.   Didn't even need wipers,
> due to the speed, it just rolled past the windows.

So how was the road built to prevent road spray?

Ed
SilverStude - 19 Mar 2007 11:46 GMT
>> I didn't read all the preceding stuff, but IMO, Germany and Italy have the
>> best roads.  One time on A1, south of Trento, I was hauling southbound,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Ed

  I later found that the road medium was made very porous and
incorporated a very efficient drain system, both on the sides and under
the pavement. (German origin).   Not sure this was just experimental or
used in certain areas, but it was sure welcome.
Eeyore - 19 Mar 2007 13:03 GMT
> >> I didn't read all the preceding stuff, but IMO, Germany and Italy have the
> >> best roads.  One time on A1, south of Trento, I was hauling southbound,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> the pavement. (German origin).   Not sure this was just experimental or
> used in certain areas, but it was sure welcome.

That has to help reduce accidents.

I think there may be some of that in the UK too. We also have certain junctions
where the road surface is a special high grip compound just in the immediate
vicinity.

Graham
george conklin - 17 Mar 2007 16:23 GMT
>>snip
> It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
> you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.

If we did drive like Europeans, about 20,000 more people would die in the
USA.  You know, there are always people who want to claim that Europe is
better than the USA in anything at all.  It is a cultural error on their
part, but a long-standing one from insecure Americans.  Max Lerner wrote a
book in the 1950s entitled "America as a Civilization," which was new for
its time.  Why?  Because up to that time educated Americans wanted to
vacation in Europe to soak up culture, and college faculities wanted to go
to Europe so they could talk about it in class.  I knew one faculty person
who even kept an apartment in London so she could seem to be more cultured
than the students.  The fatality rate per billion kilometers in Europe as a
whole is 13.1, which would translate out as 20,000 additional deaths for the
USA if we had that rate here.
Eeyore - 17 Mar 2007 17:56 GMT
> If we did drive like Europeans, about 20,000 more people would die in the
> USA.

You're talking out of your rectum.

European drivers obey 'yield' signs and for the most part don't feel obliged to
'race the red'.

As a result we have fewer accidents.

Whereas Americans like to express their Constitutional Rights to ignore Big
Government by ignoring the above. If Americans kill themselves like lemmings by
doing so I can only suggest it's a 'good thing' (tm) as it's likely to reduce
the number of pointless wars you might start by removing some of the candidates
for cannon fodder.

Graham
Studemania - 18 Mar 2007 20:06 GMT
> >snip
>
> It's so obvious to anyone that has been to Europe that these people and
> you have never been there and certainly not driven over there.

I'd lioke to see that race driver cment on drivers in

Portugal

Greece

Spain

Ireland

Cyprus

Malta

Itialy

Nederlands
Gerard H. Pille - 17 Mar 2007 15:31 GMT
> On Mar 16, 10:40 am, mcaguit...@comcast.net wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution

I find it hard to believe americans would behave any different from us europeans.  On both sides
you have people obeying and people disregarding traffic regulations.  The only thing that keeps
the latter in check is the traffic police, of which there aren't enough.

Gerard
Eeyore - 17 Mar 2007 15:53 GMT
> I find it hard to believe americans would behave any different from us europeans.

Americans like to assert their Consitutional Right to be blowhard idiots though.

Graham
Fred G. Mackey - 17 Mar 2007 19:44 GMT
>>I find it hard to believe americans would behave any different from us europeans.
>
> Americans like to assert their Consitutional Right to be blowhard idiots though.
>
> Graham

You don't seem very shy about your right to do that.  I guess you
shouldn't be either - after all, who knows how much longer you'll have it.
pltrgyst - 17 Mar 2007 16:48 GMT
>> Lane discipline... or a lack thereof
>
>I find it hard to believe americans would behave any different from us europeans.  On both sides
>you have people obeying and people disregarding traffic regulations....

True, but the US requires very little driver training (none, actually), so basic
concepts like lane discipline are learned for one multiple-choice test and then
forgotten.

Driving in most parts of Europe is much, much more relaxing than driving here in
the US for just that reason.

-- Larry
george conklin - 17 Mar 2007 17:10 GMT
>>> Lane discipline... or a lack thereof
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> here in
> the US for just that reason.

  I can't believe anyone stating that driving in Europe is relaxing.  You
are kidding, right?

  And it was shown years ago that states which had driver education had no
results to show for it in terms of lower accident rates.  It WAS shown that
insurance companies loved driver ed. because the safter drives self-selected
for it, and thus insurance companies could self-identify those less willing
to take risks.  But the education itself was worthless.
Eeyore - 17 Mar 2007 18:00 GMT
>    And it was shown years ago that states which had driver education had no
> results to show for it in terms of lower accident rates.

You're a trolling IDIOT !

A large part of driving skill is about conflict avoidance.

Graham
pltrgyst - 18 Mar 2007 06:41 GMT
>   I can't believe anyone stating that driving in Europe is relaxing.  You
>are kidding, right?

Hardly.

>   And it was shown years ago that states which had driver education had no
>results to show for it in terms of lower accident rates.  It WAS shown that
>insurance companies loved driver ed. because the safter drives self-selected
>for it, and thus insurance companies could self-identify those less willing
>to take risks.  But the education itself was worthless.

Of course, since there no social reinforcement.

Not to mention that US "driver's education" is trivial and worthless to begin
with. There is nothing for cars anywhere near analogous to the MSF courses.

-- Larry
beowulf - 18 Mar 2007 07:23 GMT
>>   I can't believe anyone stating that driving in Europe is relaxing.  You
>> are kidding, right?

 Not according to mr cahal. His experience over here must have been
after several drops of some of our rather pedestrian spirits.
> Hardly.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> -- Larry
Ted Mittelstaedt - 19 Mar 2007 08:15 GMT
> >>> Lane discipline... or a lack thereof
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> for it, and thus insurance companies could self-identify those less willing
> to take risks.  But the education itself was worthless.

That must have been a LONG time ago.  I recall my parents back in 1983 or so
conned me into taking drivers ed claiming it would lower my insurance rates
when I got my license.  Then when I did get my license it didn't lower rates
at
all.  This was with Allstate. I was extremely pissed.  And the drivers ed
class
was in fact, worthless since most of the time was spent in a 1950's era
trailer
wired up as a driving simulator.

Ted
George Conklin - 19 Mar 2007 15:51 GMT
> > >>> Lane discipline... or a lack thereof
> > >>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Ted

Well, in states where drivers ed is required, then it does not function for
the insurance companies because there is no self-selection process.  It
depends on the state you are in.  However, simulators are used heavily to
train pilots and I see no reason why they should not work to teach you how
to drive.  Could you describe the simulator?  Was it just a bad one?
Eeyore - 19 Mar 2007 16:20 GMT
> However, simulators are used heavily to train pilots

Not for ab-initio training, *no way* !

Simulators are used more for type conversion and checking currency where it's
possible to harmlessly simulate technical failures.

Graham
Ted Mittelstaedt - 21 Mar 2007 05:50 GMT
> > That must have been a LONG time ago.  I recall my parents back in 1983 or
> so
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> the insurance companies because there is no self-selection process.  It
> depends on the state you are in.

At the time it wasn't required (I think it still is not)

> However, simulators are used heavily to
> train pilots and I see no reason why they should not work to teach you how
> to drive.  Could you describe the simulator?  Was it just a bad one?

It was beyond bad.  Picture a standard semitruck trailer.  Inside the
trailer
at the front of the trailer was a movie screen.  Then set at regular
intervals
in the trailer were two rows of car seats, each seat containing a steering
wheel and a dashboard and gas and brake pedal in a kind of a console.

In operation they ran a movie that was basically shot through the front
window of a car that travelled about 30Mph through a series of gentle
turns.  The students sat in the seats, turning the steering wheels to follow
the turns.  Supposedly all the consoles were tied into a teachers console
that would tell the teacher if a particular student was turning their
steering
wheel too hard, or stepping on the gas or brake too hard, etc.  of course
the steering wheels and pedals wern't connected to anything so there was
no mechanical feedback to the "driver" through the wheel or pedals.
The design of the wheels and speedo and dashboard was definitely
early 1960's I remember, as they looked almost exactly like my Dad's
1967 Ford station wagon which he still had at the time.  (damn that
thing was tough)  This class was held in about 1982 if I recall.

We got about 2 weeks of this nonsense before actually sitting in a car
and driving it.  I guess they must have decided they just had to get their
money's worth on renting the damn trailer.

Looking back and thinking about it now I realize how awful the rest of
the class was.  For example one part we were given a map and told
to draw a route from one address to the other through the city.  Of
course as high school students who wern't drivers nobody had the
foggiest idea of what they wanted done.  I myself drew a line that
ran straight through the city on one of the major E/W arterials and
got a C on it.  I wasn't until later that I realized they were probably
looking for a more circumspect route that took the major freeways.
And it wasn't until much, much later than that I realized my original
route was probably the best because the damn freeways half the time
are plugged with accidents and congestion. (at least these days they are)
Needless to say the "teachers" did not explain to anyone what
constituted a good map and what constituted a bad one.

Another time on one of the actual driving sessions they took us to a
suburb that was under construction (no houses built yet) and had us
drive through the streets dodging manhole covers.  Which was a
pretty serious issue because the builders had only got the first layer of
asphalt down and each manhole was sticking up about 4 inches from
the road surface.  I guess they were too cheap for the more usual
orange plastic cones.  All of the cars were dealer-supplied I am sure
if the dealers knew that they were risking a $1000 suspension repair for
side swiping a 4 inch high iron manhole they would have freaked.

There was NO practice on driving on anything other than hard dry
pavement. No skid testing.  They didn't even have us run the vehicle up to
45Mph or so in a parking lot and slam on the brakes as hard as we
could to demonstrate how easy it is to lose control during a panic
stop. No discussion of the difference between a snow tire, all season
radial, etc.  Despite that this is a pretty rainy state during the winter.
No discussion of what constitutes a necessity kit (rope, flares, etc.)
No discussion or training on how to make a safe stop on a freeway,
or what to do if your car abruptly loses power, no discussion on how
to calculate mileage, or check speedometer timing using highway
mileposts, I could go on and on and on.

The whole thing was a complete scam designed to scam money out
of parents who didn't want to be bothered to teach their kids to drive.
Which it did perfectly.  But the people that put the thing on were in
my view as guilty of negligence as you can imagine and should have been
taken out and shot.

What that whole thing taught me was how NOT to do driver training
and it will be quite different with my own kids once they are of age for
it.

Ted
George Conklin - 21 Mar 2007 13:26 GMT
> > > That must have been a LONG time ago.  I recall my parents back in 1983
> or
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
> There was NO practice on driving on anything other than hard dry
> pavement. No skid testing.

  Almost no drivers know how to get out of a skid.  I used to use the
church parking lot full of snow to practice on skids, but my wife had fits,
saying I was embarrassing her no end.  People just don't "do" things like
that, she told me.  She is still annoyed I did that 20 years later, and
mentions it from time to time.  But it sure was good practice.  When I got a
van with anti-lock brakes, I also tried them out in a snow-covered parking
lot.  They worked well there, but poorly on gravel, making stopping times
longer even if 1 wheel was all that was skidding.

They didn't even have us run the vehicle up to
> 45Mph or so in a parking lot and slam on the brakes as hard as we
> could to demonstrate how easy it is to lose control during a panic
> stop.

  That would have been a good idea, but see above.

No discussion of the difference between a snow tire, all season
> radial, etc.  Despite that this is a pretty rainy state during the winter.
> No discussion of what constitutes a necessity kit (rope, flares, etc.)
> No discussion or training on how to make a safe stop on a freeway,
> or what to do if your car abruptly loses power, no discussion on how
> to calculate mileage, or check speedometer timing using highway
> mileposts, I could go on and on and on.

  Well, I never had driver's ed myself.  My father let me get my license
and then forbid me (forever) from driving any of his cars because he said,
"I won't pay the insurance."  That was a lifetime position, although he did
buy me a car when one of mine broke down once about 25 years after I was
married.  It helped us out.

> The whole thing was a complete scam designed to scam money out
> of parents who didn't want to be bothered to teach their kids to drive.
> Which it did perfectly.  But the people that put the thing on were in
> my view as guilty of negligence as you can imagine and should have been
> taken out and shot.

  Your experiences were bad, no doubt.

> What that whole thing taught me was how NOT to do driver training
> and it will be quite different with my own kids once they are of age for

> it.
>
> Ted
Eeyore - 17 Mar 2007 17:58 GMT
> >> Lane discipline... or a lack thereof
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Driving in most parts of Europe is much, much more relaxing than driving here in
> the US for just that reason.

You can for the most part expect other drivers to behave intelligently !

Graahm
donquijote1954 - 19 Mar 2007 21:39 GMT
> I find it hard to believe americans would behave any different from us europeans.  On both sides
> you have people obeying and people disregarding traffic regulations.  The only thing that keeps
> the latter in check is the traffic police, of which there aren't enough.

True. But I think here in the States is more about collecting money
than actually improving the situation. You know, they --the collection
industry-- only cite you for speed (but you go to a lawyer that drops
the points for a certain fee) or they cite you for DUI, which is a
REAL MONEY MAKER. So other factors (LANE DISCIPLINE or CELL-PHONE use)
are ignored, since they really keep THE ACCIDENT INDUSTRY going (tow
truck, ambulance, more lawyers, medical, body shop, insurance, rental
car, new car, etc, etc).

Here's some novel way in which the collection industry works...

"A lot of the drivers complained about the method, calling it
entrapment"

'Leprechaun' Tickets Speeding Florida Drivers

Speeding and aggressive drivers in Orange County needed more than the
luck of the Irish to avoid a traffic citation on Thursday.

The "leprechaun" also held a sign reading, "Watch your speed or it
will cost you your pot of gold."

Motorcycle units stopped violators and issued the traffic citations
after being informed by the "leprechaun" via radio. Officials said
they issued about a ticket per minute.

A lot of the drivers complained about the method, calling it
entrapment

"I think that's just ridiculous," a deputy said. "The (leprechaun)
didn't force anybody to speed."

Orange County sheriff's deputies said the laser gun enabled the on-
duty "leprechaun" to clock a vehicle long before the driver would see
him.

In the past, Orange County sheriff's deputies have targeted speeding
motorists while dressed as an elf, the Grinch and a man waiting for a
bus.

"We do this sort of thing a lot on holidays," Orange County sheriff's
spokesman Jim Solomons said.

http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=1&id=35325
donquijote1954 - 20 Mar 2007 21:34 GMT
(in response to my post about collection)

'You don't get to face your accuser. You're supposed to be able to
facoe your accuser, but when your accuser is a camera, you can't.
Yeah, I know I'm on the other side of the issue than judges. Happens
to me a lot.

Also, in our area at least, the idea was about collection not about
reducing speeding. Seems that the camera program at red lights was too
effective in actually reducing the dangerous driving habit of running
red lights and wasn't pulling in enough money any longer so the
program was discontinued. Crazy. I liked it in a perverse way because
a camera could no longer accuse my car (not the driver by the car
because the ticket went to the owner of the vehicle regardless of who
was driving) of running a red light, but still evidence of a crazy
world.

I have a poster from The Tick up in my family room. It says, "You're
not going crazy. You're going sane in a crazy world." Yep. That
fictitious lunatic soliloquist is on to something.'
donquijote1954 - 20 Mar 2007 22:00 GMT
Yet another T-shirt in the collection "T-shirts to change the
world"...

"If we can do better than a car, then we should consider new
alternatives. From the bike to electric vehicles, we want to show we
care. Make it a real sense of pride."

http://www.zazzle.com/product/235812058937983596
brad2971@msn.com - 17 Mar 2007 15:37 GMT
On Mar 16, 1:54 pm, "donquijote1954" <nolionnoprob...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 16, 10:40 am, mcaguit...@comcast.net wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution

Mr. Angelelli, it is because here in the United States, we consider
the LLB to be as much of a taxpaying citizen as you. And in certain
areas, that LLB is more than likely to show their (legally owned)
rifle to you to emphasize that point further.

If you ever wondered why Keep Right Except to Pass laws have been
ineffective....
Bob - 18 Mar 2007 02:08 GMT
> On Mar 16, 1:54 pm, "donquijote1954" <nolionnoprob...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
> If you ever wondered why Keep Right Except to Pass laws have been
> ineffective....

Because they are not enforced!!

Bob
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 18 Mar 2007 02:08 GMT
In America (or more precisely, the USA) driving is considered to be a
God given right. I'm sure it says something to that effect in Genesis.
In Europe (although this is changing slowly), driving is a privilege.
Upon demonstrating a certain level of incompetence, courts have no
problem with yanking someone's license for an extended period of time.

Unfortunately, things are changing in Europe. To expand the market for
cars and related products, lawmakers have been pressured to lower the
bar in terms of ability and admit more people to the pool of drivers.
They have also been pressured to be more forgiving of incompetence and
to return marginal drivers to the road.

Because of this, it will become necessary for institutions like the
German autobahns to adopt more conservative speed limits and other rules
so that the less capable drivers don't become a hazard when mixed with
faster traffic.

Signature

Paul Hovnanian     mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Great minds discuss ideas,
average minds discuss events,
small minds discuss people.

Bob - 18 Mar 2007 02:39 GMT
> In America (or more precisely, the USA) driving is considered to be a
> God given right. I'm sure it says something to that effect in Genesis.
If this was a right, you would get a DL upon birth. It is a privilege
(unless you ask the driver going down the road at 90 in a 45 on a
suspended or revoked license).

> In Europe (although this is changing slowly), driving is a privilege.
> Upon demonstrating a certain level of incompetence, courts have no
> problem with yanking someone's license for an extended period of time.
When they get around to it (sarcasm), MVA suspends/revokes drivers for
their violations. Problem is, most of the time they drive anyway.

> Unfortunately, things are changing in Europe. To expand the market for
> cars and related products, lawmakers have been pressured to lower the
> bar in terms of ability and admit more people to the pool of drivers.
> They have also been pressured to be more forgiving of incompetence and
> to return marginal drivers to the road.
Hummm. Sounds like the US.

Bob
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 19 Mar 2007 04:15 GMT
> > In America (or more precisely, the USA) driving is considered to be a
> > God given right. I'm sure it says something to that effect in Genesis.
>
> If this was a right, you would get a DL upon birth. It is a privilege
> (unless you ask the driver going down the road at 90 in a 45 on a
> suspended or revoked license).

They might as well print one up at birth and keep it on file until one
reaches 16. There doesn't appear to be anything along the lines of a
serious skills test that would eliminate the worst of the crop.

Likewise, there isn't much of a move to retest anyone (except for the
elderly) in the event they are cited for violations frequently enough.
In fact, being unaware of what one is doing on the road seems to be a
sort of defense against certain violations. Ask a cop if they are more
likely to ticket someone who knew what their speed was vs someone who
claimed, 'I had no idea I was going that fast'. Personally, I'd much
rather get the clueless driver off the road.

Signature

Paul Hovnanian     mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Deja fubar: The feeling that you've made the same mistake before.

Ted Mittelstaedt - 19 Mar 2007 08:19 GMT
> > > In America (or more precisely, the USA) driving is considered to be a
> > > God given right. I'm sure it says something to that effect in Genesis.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Likewise, there isn't much of a move to retest anyone (except for the
> elderly) in the event they are cited for violations frequently enough.

Very true.  If you get multiple tickets you can get an administrative
suspension
but they do not retest.  However the driving test is a joke to pass anyhow
so it wouldn't matter.

Ted
George Conklin - 19 Mar 2007 15:53 GMT
> > > In America (or more precisely, the USA) driving is considered to be a
> > > God given right. I'm sure it says something to that effect in Genesis.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> claimed, 'I had no idea I was going that fast'. Personally, I'd much
> rather get the clueless driver off the road.

 Execept that unless the speed is really excessive, it is interrupting the
traffic flow which is most dangerous.  Your speed can drift upwards, no
doubt about it.  But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting, this is what they should ticket
for.  If it takes a radar gun to find an offense, then that is kind of
worthless law enforcement.

Further, cops patrol the interstates heavily, where accident rates are
lowest, by about half.  They avoid patrols on the most dangerous roads.
Eeyore - 19 Mar 2007 16:22 GMT
> But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
> with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting,

Tailgating.

> this is what they should ticket for.

The above behaviour is very rarely seen in Europe.

Graham
Fred G. Mackey - 20 Mar 2007 01:37 GMT
>>But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
>>with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting,
>
> Tailgating.

Ooh - he misspelled a word.  Thanks for clearing that up.  How would us
uneducated, obese, retards on this side of the pond ever know what he
was talking about?

>>this is what they should ticket for.
>
> The above behaviour is very rarely seen in Europe.

This is pure speculation, but perhaps it's because such behavior would
probably result in a ticket.
Eeyore - 20 Mar 2007 01:43 GMT
> >>But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
> >>with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> This is pure speculation, but perhaps it's because such behavior would
> probably result in a ticket.

Unlikely actually since there aren't that many traffic cops. That kind of stupid
aggressive driving is just generally disapproved of here.

Graham
George Conklin - 20 Mar 2007 11:45 GMT
> > >>But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
> > >>with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Graham

  I wonder if this man has ever driven in Europe?
Eeyore - 20 Mar 2007 15:02 GMT
> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>    I wonder if this man has ever driven in Europe?

France, Belgium, Germany Sweden and Norway.

Graham
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 23 Mar 2007 23:35 GMT
> > But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
> > with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The above behaviour is very rarely seen in Europe.

Because the left lane is generally available for passing. There's no
excuse for it in Europe.

Signature

Paul Hovnanian     mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Opinions stated herein are the sole property of the author. Standard
disclaimers apply. All rights reserved. No user serviceable components
inside. Contents under pressure; do not incinerate. Always wear adequate
eye protection. Do not mold, findle or sputilate.

Eeyore - 24 Mar 2007 17:20 GMT
> > > But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
> > > with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Because the left lane is generally available for passing. There's no
> excuse for it in Europe.

I agree. It strikes me as totally insane that the US allows passing on either
side. It's the precise opposite of decent 'lane discipline'.

Graham
N8N - 24 Mar 2007 17:24 GMT
On Mar 24, 12:20 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> > > > But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
> > > > with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Graham

It wasn't always that way.  It used to be that passing on the right
was prohibited, but at some point along the line (before I became
aware of such things) those laws were quietly dropped.  Why the
logical step of simply stepping up enforcement of LLB's wasn't done
instead, I couldn't say.  All I know is we apparently chose wrong.

It is interesting to note that passenger side rear view mirrors
weren't particularly common prior to the 1970's.  Coincidence?

nate
Stephen Cowell - 24 Mar 2007 18:48 GMT
>> > > But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
>> > > with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> either
> side. It's the precise opposite of decent 'lane discipline'.

Having experienced both, it is an interesting subject
for discussion.  Many other disciplines in Europe
affect the totality of the issue... left exits, for instance
(right, in UK case)... they abound in US motorways.
This would complicate, if not negate, the possibility
of supporting a Universal Non-Undertaking Law.
Absence of roundabouts contributes... really, a
completely different philosophy of the road.
Read:  infrastructure is built cheaper in US.

The reductio-ad-absurdum for the UNUL occurs
when traffic is backed up... you are forced to the
fast lane, instead of toward the exit ramps (no left
exits, remember?).  Instead of *all* lanes backing
up, only the fast lane backs up, and the buffering
capacity of the motorway is reduced by at least half
to two-thirds.  You should *see* the glares queue-
breakers get!

Besides, I think US-icans *like* jockeying for lane
positions... look at NASCAR.
__
Steve
'06 FXDI
.
George Conklin - 24 Mar 2007 22:07 GMT
> > > > But if you are weaving in and out passing cars all the time
> > > > with frequent lane changes + tailgaiting,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Graham

In NC it is legal to pass on either side, and unfortunately no law favoring
keeping to the right.  It can be highly annoying.
Gus - 18 Mar 2007 02:45 GMT
> In America (or more precisely, the USA) driving is considered to be a
> God given right. I'm sure it says something to that effect in Genesis.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> so that the less capable drivers don't become a hazard when mixed with
> faster traffic.

Evidently you think that all rights arise from the benevolence of the
State!!!! In which case they would be privileges. Do you fell that you
should be the one to give out the privileges to drive???
Eeyore - 18 Mar 2007 13:22 GMT
> In America (or more precisely, the USA) driving is considered to be a
> God given right. I'm sure it says something to that effect in Genesis.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> so that the less capable drivers don't become a hazard when mixed with
> faster traffic.

Fortunately in Btitain I've seen no such trend. In fact there's a distinct move
to improve the quality and scope of driving tuition and the test gets ever
tougher.

Graham
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 19 Mar 2007 04:06 GMT
> > In America (or more precisely, the USA) driving is considered to be a
> > God given right. I'm sure it says something to that effect in Genesis.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> to improve the quality and scope of driving tuition and the test gets ever
> tougher.

Britain seems to be leading the way pushing stuff like satellite
surveillance for all vehicles and other such nonsense.

Signature

Paul Hovnanian     mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Power corrupts.  And atomic power corrupts atomically.

Eeyore - 19 Mar 2007 10:26 GMT
> > > In America (or more precisely, the USA) driving is considered to be a
> > > God given right. I'm sure it says something to that effect in Genesis.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Britain seems to be leading the way pushing stuff like satellite
> surveillance for all vehicles and other such nonsense.

Which is nothing to do with the above.

In fact all there has been so far is talk about tracking. The public doesn't want it
and any political party espousing it isn't likely to get voted into power.

Graham
tedkaz24@hotmail.com - 24 Mar 2007 22:40 GMT
On Mar 16, 2:54 pm, "donquijote1954" <nolionnoprob...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> And this is a comment to the article below...
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> for, such as fighting unnecessary wars (Iraq) and other things like
> that."

Boils down to the ease of getting a DL in the US vs. Eur. Add in
spotty enforcement and you have to many yahoos behind the wheel.

Ted Kaz
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.