> You need to get the engine apart to see how much damage there is.
That just made things more confusing.
I'm not a forensic scientist but I couldn't see any damage. I
couldn't even see where the valves knocked any crud off the pistons or
vice versa. Turning the cam shaft, all the valves _looked_ like they
were seating properly.
The pistons have indentations machined into their tops to accomodate
the valves when they are open. Open at the right time or any time, I
do not know. But the depth of these wells plus the head gasket
thickness is just about the same distance as the maximum extension --
at least _after_ the timing failure -- of the open valves past the
head seating surface.
So maybe it is a non interference engine. Or maybe it was a non
interference engine before 1/16" of crud formed on the pistons.
I measured the clearances as closely as I could, to ~ 1/32", and
figured it wouldn't make much sense to design an interference engine
with a pressure ratio of 8:1 when you could have a non interference
engine with a pressure ratio of 7.95:1
Finally I checked the valve "lash", the distance between the valve
stem and the rocker arm when the valve is closed, and all measured
0.027".
All this indicates a non interference engine.
Yet I suddenly have zero compression.
Before I removed the timing belt I checked the timing marks on both
the crank shaft and the cam shaft and they were both on top dead
center at the same time.
> Better yet, change the belt when you're supposed to.
Actually it was the tensioner pully bearing that probably failed
first. Had the belt failed first the tensioner would still be
rolling.
Nevertheless I either knew or, as the lawyers say, "should have known"
that all the dust storms we've been having out here in the SW desert
destroy machinery. I'm almost afraid to look at my air filter.
Yesterday a local Auto Zone store had an ad on the door:
"Replace your tensioner and extend your timing belt life."
I thought, "yea, NOW they tell me. I bet they don't run these ads in
the Pacific Northwest."
Bret Cahill
Jeff DeWitt - 06 May 2007 17:21 GMT
Bret, it really sounds like your valve timing is 180deg off. You say
the timing marks are both at TDC, did you check a manual to see if you
had them lined up right? If both marks were at the top of their
pulley's and the marks are supposed to be next to each other that would
do it.
Jeff DeWitt
>>You need to get the engine apart to see how much damage there is.
>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill - 06 May 2007 19:41 GMT
> Bret, it really sounds like your valve timing is 180deg off.
Maybe it's off 120 degrees.
The cam sproket was designed for several different engines and has
three different marks 120 degrees apart and can fit on the shaft 3
different ways.
On several previous t-belt or seal or head gasket replacement jobs I
never thought about the sproket being on the cam shaft properly but
just used the kinematics to determine timing.
The sproket was probably on wrong and since I never took it off this
time around, I assumed it was on correct and didn't bother checking
the position of the valves as before.
Bret Cahill