Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / General Car Topics / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ford Thunderbird, 1958-1971

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
F.Driberi - 15 Jun 2007 22:50 GMT
Motor Trend - July 1994

Look back over the 100-plus years of automobilia. You won't find a car
that's mirrored the ever-changing American consumer's tastes as closely
as has Thunderbird. What began in '55 as a sporty-looking two-seat
competitor to the Corvette quickly grew into a four-seat luxury machine
and metamorphosed through four separate styling iterations by its 10th
anniversary. A mere 17 years after its debut, Ford's upscale image
leader was nearly 40-inches longer, 1500 pounds heavier. and
considerably more lethargic. Yet, clearly undaunted by its loss of
agility, the big Bird captured more buyers in '72 than in any previous
year.

Throughout its nearly 40-year history, the T-Bird has discovered,
splendored in, ravaged, and forgotten about more marketing niches than
just about any other car on earth. A four-wheeled manifestation of the
American Dream that followed, rather than trying to lead, and literally
grew old with its owners. But, despite its constant search for a new
personality, the Thunderbird name has retained its magic. Like Mustang,
Camaro, and Corvette, Thunderbird is one of the most exciting,
evocative domestic car nameplates of all time.

The complicated T-Bird legacy can be broken down into 11 phases: the
two-seat era ('55-57) http://doiop.com/TBirds_55_56_57 ; four-place
"squarebirds" ('58-60); streamlined "bulletbirds" ('61-63); last of the
convertibles ('64-66); first of the four-doors ('67-'69); the Bunkie
Knudsen http://tinyurl.com/2kjcef make-it-look-like-a-Pontiac era ('70-
71); the Lee Lacocca make-it-even-bigger era ('72-76); oops, OPEC made
us downsize ('77-79); hell, put it on a Fairmont platform and make it
even smaller ('80-82); aero look and turbo power ('83-87); and, brave,
new Bird ('88-94)...

The early Thunder-Fords were all about panache. Hoodscoops, dual
exhausts, and a 292-cubic-inch V-8 marked the '55-57 models as sports
cars, though all but the most feeble of Corvettes could knock the tail
feathers off this cock in short order. Priced at parity with Chevy's
fiberglass roadster (about $3000), the two-seat Ford suffered from
performance anxiety until'57, when a supercharged 312 V-8 arrived.
Packing 300 horsepower, it could run 0-60 mph in 8.0 seconds. But both
Ford and Chevrolet were receiving expensive lessons in marketing. The
masses wanted vehicles that looked like sports cars, but without the
comfort losses of the real thing. While Chevy stuck to its guns with
the slow-selling Vette, Ford wisely obliged the tide.

Now appealing to the luxury-sport buyer, the '58 T-Bird was 2 feet
longer and 750 pounds heavier than the '57 model. It grew two extra
seats, a hardtop coupe bodystyle, and a 352-cubic-inch V-8. Annual
sales rocketed to nearly 38,000 units--a gain of more than 75 percent
from just one year previous, and better than four times the number of
Corvettes pushed out the door that same season. The trend reached its
zenith in 1977, when 318,140 Thunderbirds were produced, eclipsing the
same-year Corvette by over 268,000 units.

That the T-Bird never earned a proper racing credential until it became
Ford's Winston Cup entry in the late '70s didn't matter much to its
fans. The name alone seemed to justify its image as a performance car,
though for most of its life, the prestige Ford was merely an average-
line player with soft suspension, glitzy styling and a hefty pricetag.
While the Corvette of the early '60s was all Martin Milner
http://tinyurl.com/2bau9k , Hot Rod magazine, and cheeseburgers eaten
on the hood, the Thunderbird was Peter Lawford, Esquire, and prime rib.

This Retrospect focuses on the T-Bird's adolescent years...

==========

To be continued...
F.Driberi - 15 Jun 2007 23:29 GMT
> Motor Trend - July 1994

1958-1960 http://doiop.com/TBirds_58_59_60

In automotive circles they were called "squarebirds": the upright, four-
seat body style that was a vast departure from the sleek two-seater of
'55-57. Using new unibody construction techniques borrowed from the '58
Lincoln drawing board, Ford created a car of impressive structural
strength. Full coil-springs were employed in anticipation of an air-
suspension option (it never materialized), a true hardtop model was
added to the line, and the manually folding convertible was replaced by
a power-operated soft-top that retracted into the trunk. A retractable
hardtop model, a la Ford Skyliner http://doiop.com/Skyliner didn't make
it past the early cost-accounting phase.

Motor Trend bestowed Car of the Year accolades on the T-Bird in '58,
commenting: "The new Thunderbird is as comfortable as any American car
today, regardless of size." The only engine choice was a 352-cubic-
inch/300-horsepower V-8, and our vintage test car was equipped with the
optional Cruise-O-Matic transmission. Slogging around nearly 4000
pounds of weight, it ran 0-60 mph in 10.1 seconds; slower than a Vette,
but about on par with other V-8s of the day. By '59, the mammoth 430-
cabic-inch/350-horsepower Lincoln powerplant became a regular T-Bird
option; with 490 pound-feet of torque on tap at a leisurely 2800 rpm, 0-
60-mph times dropped to 8.9 seconds.

"There is no more extraordinary car in the world today than the
Thunderbird." Such was the opening sentence of MT's test (Sept. '60) of
the last of the squarebirds, though concessions were made that it "has
never been the good handling car that drivers expect from a vehicle of
such sporty appearance." Undaunted, our writer beamed that the T-Bird
"has, more than any current domestic car, the spirit and quality that
made the classic roadsters of the '30s such memorable favorites. There
are many cars that will outperform the T-Bird, cost less, deliver more
miles per gallon, carry more passengers, even ride and handle better.
But, somehow, the T-Bird has never been measured by these standards.
The Thunderbird is different, and that is all it has ever had to be."
F.Driberi - 16 Jun 2007 01:42 GMT
> Motor Trend - July 1994

1961-1963 http://doiop.com/TBirds_61_62_63

The three years of "bullet birds" differed from one another only in
minor trim items; the most obvious being the use of four chrome spears
on the rear fenders ('61) three larger rear fender emblems '62), and a
trio of even bigger hash marks relocated to each door ('63). One look
at the frontal styling should confirm what Ford insiders already knew:
Management was considering moving the Thunderbird onto the Lincoln
line. However, the real truth is the number of sales a Lincoln-badged
'Bird could've produced wouldn't have been a third of what the car
could generate as a Ford.

Lee Iacocca was in his second year as Ford Division chief in 1961 and
had captured 24 percent of the domestic market with his strong-selling
products -- cars 1,362,186 total, 73,051 of which were Thunderbirds.
The "longer, lower, wider" theme continued.

Front-wheel drive was considered for production in '61 and again in
'65, but was deemed too complicated, costly, and unappreciated by the
American buyer. The Lincoln V-8 was no longer available, but a new 390-
cubic-inch/300-horsepower Ford motor was introduced, with a triple two-
barrel carburetor option in '62 boosting horsepower to 340. Also new
for '62 was the formal Landau version, which wore a vinyl top and phony
landau-type "S' bars on the rear roof pillars. It sold extraordinarily
well. Gizmos and gadgets abounded in the aeronautic-styled interior,
including a swing-away steering wheel that moved 10 inches to the right
for ease of entry.

To satiate dealer whining over the canceled two-seat ragtop, Iacocca
approved production of the Sports Roadster for '62 and '63. It was
merely a convertible with a fiberglass tonneau that could be affixed
behind the rear seats, thus giving the look of a two-seater. Complete
with faired-in headrests and real wire wheels, this pricey package
($5439 versus $4788 for the regular convertible) had a production of
less than 2000 units during the two-year period. The large tonneau
couldn't be stored in the trunk, nor could much of anything else for
that matter since the top mechanism and spare tire effectively ate up
all luggage space. Once again, form took precedence over function. At
4842 pounds, the Sports Roadster was certainly the heaviest production
car to ride on a 113-inch wheelbase.
F.Driberi - 16 Jun 2007 02:29 GMT
> Motor Trend - July 1994

1964-1966 http://doiop.com/TBirds_64_65_66

Our 1964 Car of the Year award went to the entire redesigned Ford line,
so the T-Bird was again duly honored. the bullet look was abandoned in
favor of a jet-fighter theme, especially emphasized in the cockpit's
feverish use of toggle switches, warning lights, dials, and levers. Our
road-test writer (Feb. '64) noted that ergonomics took a back seat to
styling, commenting: "Our first impression [of the dashboard] was one
of complete confusion."

Exterior styling showcased a longer hood, shorter deck, and the first
of the high-lumen sequential rear turn signals that would become a T-
Bird trademark (and which encouraged the government to enact regulation
limiting brake-light candlepower.

Powered by the carryover 390 V-8 and still sitting atop a mere 113-inch
wheelbase (only 3.7 inches longer than that of Ford's compact Falcon),
the new model's performance and handling hadn't improved. It took 11.2
seconds to reach 60 mph, and 60-0 braking required 174 feet. Fuel
economy ranged from a freeway-cruising high of 14.5 mpg to a hard-
driving low of 8.3. Changes for65 and '66 were mostly cosmetic (hey, an
eight-track tape player!), but front disc brakes became a welcome
option. All the goodies added even more of what the 'Bird needed least--
weight--so Ford replied with an available 428-cubic-inch/360-horsepower
V-8 in '66. This powerplant in the last convertible body style is a
worthy collectible today.

1967-1971 http://doiop.com/TBirds_67_thru_71

As the typical Thunderbird buyer matured, so did the car, and market
surveys confirmed what Iacocca had surmised: The T-Bird no longer
needed a performance image to thrive. Out went the convertible and in
came a formal sedan replete with forward-opening "suicide" rear doors,
a padded vinyl roof, landau bars, and velveteen innards. The two-door
hardtop coupe was actually quite good looking and rode on a 114.7-inch
wheelbase, compared to the sedan's 117.2-inch stretch; its rear-quarter
windows didn't lower, but retracted horizontally into the roof pillars.
All T-Birds took on a more upscale image, with concealed headlamps,
deeply recessed grille, and a suitably impressive wall-o-lights out
back. The unitized-body phenomenon was abandoned in favor of good old'
body-on-frame ride comfort, and the increased showroom response proved
Mr. Iacocca right once again.

The 390 V-8 made way for a new 429 engine to become available in '68
and standard in '69. Though packing 360 horsepower, the Bird was still
far from a tire-burner (0-60 mph in 9.0 seconds.) Times, however, were
changing. Lincoln introduced its own personal luxury coupe, the Mark
III, as an early 69 model, to directly combat the sales success
Cadillac was achieving with Eldorado. Bunkie Knudsen abdicated from
Pontiac to take over Ford Division, and (legend has it) told the T-
Bird's design staff to "make this thing look like a Pontiac." Hence,
the uncharacteristic proboscis of the '70-71 models. Our test report of
the '71 T-Bird (Dec. '70) was titled "Almost a Limousine." That's a
surprising accolade for a car called Thunderbird, and ironic image for
a model that just 15 years earlier was America's only Corvette
challenger.
Steven Stone - 16 Jun 2007 15:59 GMT
Okay.. brave new bird aka MN12 chassis ran from 1988 thru 1997 with
SuperCoupe last year in 1995.

I've had a 67 4 door 390, 85 3.8, and currently a 95 LX 4.6.

The 67 suffered from something Ford/Lincoln still refuses to fix.. high
tech options and black boxes (for the time) that are no where near
reliable after the expiration of the base warranty.

The 67 was a cool ride when it ran. So low to the ground that a pack of
cigarettes barely fit between the ground and the lowest piece under the
floor pan. The dual cardan u joint drive shaft was a fun repair as well
as steering box leaks, vacuum leaks, mechanical sequential taillights,
and wipers run by the power steering pump, prone to stop running every
time you splashed in a water puddle.The plastic power window motor
gears liked to tear themselves up.  

The 85 fox body was a well handling car with heavy duty suspension and
EAGLE ST or GT tires but suffered from easily torn,cracked or rusted
extremely thin sheet metal and a 3.8 v6 that would tend overheat once
past 75,000 miles. I saw it on 4 different 3.8 Fords in the family over
a 10 year period.

The 95 MN12 is a bit beefier. The 4.6 oil filter change is the most
difficult I've seen on a Ford, probably because the car was not
designed with the 4.6 in mind. It's a nice touring car but don't kid
yourself.. it does not have the drive train or brakes needed to support
muscle car power.  I think the last MN12 chassis car was the 98 Lincoln
Mark 8. Weak points for normal drivers are warped front brakes,
electrical wiring failures due to poor routing in the engine
compartment, and tranny failures.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.