Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Driving, Maintenance, Tuning / General Car Topics / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Americans are pigs as far as cars are concerned...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kaleidoscopic Perspectives - 18 Nov 2007 04:58 GMT
Cars today way more than they did in '68, and they have far too much
power!  Who needs a 250 horsepower sedan?  Louis and Clark only had 1
horsepower, and they crossed the USA!

I wish that cars had all less than 150 horsepowers, and they weiged
less than 3300 lbs.  These would be great laws to start off with.
Jeff DeWitt - 18 Nov 2007 17:23 GMT
> Cars today way more than they did in '68, and they have far too much
> power!  Who needs a 250 horsepower sedan?  Louis and Clark only had 1
> horsepower, and they crossed the USA!
>
> I wish that cars had all less than 150 horsepowers, and they weiged
> less than 3300 lbs.  These would be great laws to start off with.

I wish that more people would mind their own damn business.  If you want
to buy a car that weights 3000 lbs and has 100 horsepower you go right
ahead, no one is stopping you.  You should have the same respect for the
rights of people who want to buy bigger, more powerful cars.

Also, did you ever stop to think about WHY cars WEIGH more than they did
in 1968?  It isn't because the automakers wanted to add a bunch of road
hugging weight, a big part of it is equipment required by the
government. In spite of that extra weight and power the average new car
gets much better gas mileage and requires less maintenance than the
average new car in 1968.

Jeff DeWitt
Refinish King - 19 Nov 2007 01:01 GMT
That's right Jeff:

Tell the bitch!

RK
>> Cars today way more than they did in '68, and they have far too much
>> power!  Who needs a 250 horsepower sedan?  Louis and Clark only had 1
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Jeff DeWitt
benteaches@gmail.com - 19 Nov 2007 22:11 GMT
> > Cars today way more than they did in '68, and they have far too much
> > power!  Who needs a 250 horsepower sedan?  Louis and Clark only had 1
> > horsepower, and they crossed the USA!
>
> > I wish that cars had all less than 150 horsepowers, and they weiged
> > less than 3300 lbs.  These would be great laws to start off with.
Cars do *not* weigh more now.
Billions have been spent to lighten cars as much as possible to meet
CAFE standards

Ben

> I wish that more people would mind their own damn business.  If you want
> to buy a car that weights 3000 lbs and has 100 horsepower you go right
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Jeff DeWitt
zzbunker - 18 Nov 2007 21:34 GMT
On Nov 17, 11:58 pm, Kaleidoscopic Perspectives
<zutalors...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Cars today way more than they did in '68, and they have far too much
> power!  Who needs a 250 horsepower sedan?  Louis and Clark only had 1
> horsepower, and they crossed the USA!

  Well, if you didn't notice though, they've since damned the
Colorado Riiver.

> I wish that cars had all less than 150 horsepowers, and they weiged
> less than 3300 lbs.  These would be great laws to start off with.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.