> I guess you didn't have a clue what I'm trying to say. You must be an idiot!
> Read the rest of the story, I didn't say the older one was cheaper, I said
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> ----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.pronews.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
> ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
My point was the older vehicle was way over priced for being a year old and
31,000 miles on it (only $3700 less than the new one cost me). The other
thing I was telling about is the dealers right around me (within 50 miles)
would not come close to the price a dealer that I never did business with
did. I got a price a couple months ago from a local dealer for $19,300 and
these people give a price of $16,200, quite a difference! Hope this clears
everything up. I am very aware that the older the car is the cheaper it is,
and also the more miles the cheaper. Although my '55 chevy cost me more than
the cars most people drive everyday. I was trying to help some other people
out with telling them where the cheaper dealer is. I didn't think I would be
getting some "smart" comments! I probably bought and sold more cars in a
couple of years than most people buy in their lifetime, so I don't need any
"lessons" about which cars are cheaper.
On Apr 1, 10:26 pm, "Doug Adams" <adams...@wcnet.org> wrote:
> I guess you didn't have a clue what I'm trying to say. You must be an
> idiot!
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> >100,000 Newsgroups
> ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
You original posting is a bit confusing and hard to tell what your
point is.
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
80 Knight - 03 Apr 2008 04:11 GMT
You will have to excuse "Mike Hunt", Doug. His head is firmly stuck up his
a.s. Don't pay any attention to what he says. No one else does. And
congratulations on the truck! Be sure to write up a review and post it,
letting us know how it holds up over time.
> My point was the older vehicle was way over priced for being a year old
> and 31,000 miles on it (only $3700 less than the new one cost me). The
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> Newsgroups
> ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
80 Knight - 03 Apr 2008 04:15 GMT
Oh, I forgot to add that "Goshi" is (along with "Jim Higgins") the resident
Troll, so pay no attention to him either.
> My point was the older vehicle was way over priced for being a year old
> and 31,000 miles on it (only $3700 less than the new one cost me). The
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> Newsgroups
> ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
cselby@mts.net - 03 Apr 2008 06:51 GMT
To valid the point somewhat. I went a local dealer looking for a
dodge caravan. Got quoted $22k plus my car as trade. Took a weekend
trip to Toronto and dropped into dealer there. Was quoted $18K - no
trade. Both quotes on a dodge grand caravan 3.0L v6 with air and AAB
package- no other toys.
P
>My point was the older vehicle was way over priced for being a year old and
>31,000 miles on it (only $3700 less than the new one cost me). The other
>thing I was telling about is the dealers right around me (within 50 miles)
>would not come close to the price a dealer that I never did business with
>did. I got a price a couple months ago from a local dealer for $19,300 and
>these people give a price of $16,200, quite a difference!