> I paid off my car loan and recieved the State of California Certificate
> of Title which says I am the Registered Owner. The Bank has signed the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> My question is: has this already been done by the bank? (It's a large
> bank).
Almost certainly not. That costs money (not much, compared to the price
of the vehicle, but it's still an entry put in the books with red ink
instead of black) and I highly doubt that your bank, no matter how big,
nice, freindly, etc, is going to pay for it.
> On the title it says I am the "Registered Owner" is that the same as
> having the title in my name?
No. Name on title and name on registration can be different. For
instance, I'm given reason to believe that a blind man in California can
OWN a car (his name on the title), but not REGISTER it (his name on the
registration, which is what it takes to make it legal to put it on the
road) because a registration can only name a licensed driver.
In any event, the name of the entity on the title takes priority in any
sort of dispute between title and registration.
Hie thee to the DMV and get the new title. As long as you leave things
"As is", the bank is still legally part-owner of your car in the eyes of
the DMV, and will remain so until you give the DMV their fees to remove
the bank from the title (It all boils down to "DMV wants some money, and
they'll get it by fair means or foul")

Signature
Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - New Email policy in effect as of Feb. 21, 2004.
Short form: I'm trashing EVERY E-mail that doesn't contain a password in the
subject unless it comes from a "whitelisted" (pre-approved by me) address.
See <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd/main/contact.html> for full details.
ian.johns@gmail.com - 24 Apr 2005 22:17 GMT
But no where on this Title form does it say the bank is the owner. The
only "owner" term on the whole document has my name as the "Registered
Owner". The bank is listed under the lien section and they have signed
it and released it.
Don Bruder - 25 Apr 2005 01:04 GMT
> But no where on this Title form does it say the bank is the owner. The
> only "owner" term on the whole document has my name as the "Registered
> Owner". The bank is listed under the lien section and they have signed
> it and released it.
<shrug> Have it your way...
I'd be getting the fresh title.

Signature
Don Bruder - dakidd@sonic.net - New Email policy in effect as of Feb. 21, 2004.
Short form: I'm trashing EVERY E-mail that doesn't contain a password in the
subject unless it comes from a "whitelisted" (pre-approved by me) address.
See <http://www.sonic.net/~dakidd/main/contact.html> for full details.
ian.johns@gmail.com - 26 Apr 2005 19:57 GMT
I talked to the DMV and having possession of the Title with me as the
Registered Owner and the bank having signed the lien release gives me
the ownership of the vehicle.
In the computer system of the DMV they will still show a lien against
the car (which is in disagreement with the actual paper Title).
I could submit my Title to the DMV and they will change their computer
system record however they will take 2-4 weeks and keep possession of
the Title during that. I am exporting the car and importing into
Canada next week. Canada needs to see a document showing me as the
owner of the vehicle with no liens against it. This document does
that.
If I lose the Title document I will definitely have some issues but as
long as I don't lose it between now and when I import the car into
Canada I should be fine.
sdlomi2 - 04 May 2005 17:32 GMT
> I talked to the DMV and having possession of the Title with me as the
> Registered Owner and the bank having signed the lien release gives me
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> long as I don't lose it between now and when I import the car into
> Canada I should be fine.
Having worked in selling used cars in SC, your ideas cover the way it
works here. And as you said, 'as long as you don't lose the title'... Even
then, the orignal lienholder can help you get a duplicate title with the
lien released by providing, with the ap'n for dup. title, a proper
"satisfaction of lien" form. Also, if you sell it as it now stands, when
the new purchaser applies for regis. and title, the new title comes back
showing him as reg'd owner and with no lien showing.
One heads up to watch for: selling to another country MAY enter new
worms into the mix. If that be a probability, DB's idea eliminates any
chance for "worms" in that ordeal as well as many other possibilities.
HTH, s