Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Camaro / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

89? w/2.8 fixed intake leak but now back together, no fire

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
HotRod53 - 21 Mar 2005 07:56 GMT
I got the intake leak all fixed up, got all of the valves adjusted,
made darn sure that when #1 was on top that the rotor pointed to #1
wire, I rolled the motor over with the coil wire off to circulate the
new oil to flush some contaminates, the coil arced from the post to
the intake so I?m sure that I had spark (then I pulled the coil input
wires). Once I changed the oil and put the coil wires on, it sounded
like it coughed up through the intake maybe once. I can hear the fuel
pump coming on, but does it take some time to fill the fuel rail
again? Everything looks right but no fire, any suggestions from you
guys who have done these 2.8s before?
gorrilla - 22 Mar 2005 01:05 GMT
>I got the intake leak all fixed up, got all of the valves adjusted,
> made darn sure that when #1 was on top that the rotor pointed to #1
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> again? Everything looks right but no fire, any suggestions from you
> guys who have done these 2.8s before?

You didn't get the pushrods mixed up did you?
HotRod53 - 22 Mar 2005 02:55 GMT
> >I got the intake leak all fixed up, got all of the valves
> adjusted,
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> You didn't get the pushrods mixed up did you?

No, I made sure that all pushrods and rockers went back exactly where
thay came from. Do I need to build fuel pressure before it will start.
I have been cranking it and it sounds like fuel and air gurgling into
the fuel rail. I actually got a small putt out of it so far.
gorrilla - 22 Mar 2005 05:29 GMT
> > >I got the intake leak all fixed up, got all of the valves
> > adjusted,
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> I have been cranking it and it sounds like fuel and air gurgling into
> the fuel rail. I actually got a small putt out of it so far.

usually all you need to do is turn the key on for a few seconds, turn the
key off and let it sit for a few seconds and then cycle the key again.  this
usually primes it well enough.  You can also un-plug the distributor and
crank for a few.  If you have been cranking on it for a while I would
suspect you have primed the system and something else is wrong.
I know you said you made darn sure that when number one was on top the rotor
was pointing to number one, but you could be 180 off.  It needs to be top of
the compression stroke (both valves closed).  Distributors can be kind of
tricky.  Several times I have been quite sure I was doing it right and still
some how managed to be wrong.  And just for future knowledge, the reason I
asked about the push rods was because the intake and exhaust rods are
different lengths.  if you mix them up it will bend valves.  The only GM
engines that I know of that are like this are the 60 degree V6s.  2.8, 3.1
and the late model 3400.  There may be more, but I'm not sure.
HotRod53 - 23 Mar 2005 00:01 GMT
>  > > "HotRod53" <UseLinkToEmail@AutoForumz.com>
> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
> V6s.  2.8, 3.1
> and the late model 3400.  There may be more, but I'm not sure.

Gorilla, you have apoint there, maybe I am 180 degrees off.
Unfortunately these 2.8s are a pain and you can?t remove the valve
covers to look at the valves once the intake and fuel rail is back on.
I have rolled this motor over and nothing hits, I hope that it means
that everything is OK. I knew about the different push rod lengths and
I made sure to remove/install everything exactly where it came from.
However, my son put the last of them in and I told him how important
that it was, I assume that they are all correct. I did pull #4
pushrods and compare them at one time, they looked the same to me
unless they are real close in length that you wouldn?t notice it. What
is a good way to be sure that I?m on the right stroke at this stage?
Cyrus Welch - 23 Mar 2005 00:42 GMT
>  > "HotRod53" <DoNotEmail@AutoForumz.com> wrote in message
>  > news:1_507670_156e1087d6279f40ad95c7a28eeec127@autoforumz.com...
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
> unless they are real close in length that you wouldn’t notice it. What
> is a good way to be sure that I’m on the right stroke at this stage?
It's easy really.  Just pull the #1 plug and blip it around (short taps
of the starter as you don't want to go too fast) and when the pressure
pushes your finger out of the hole (oh yeah, put your finger in the hole
while you do this) your one the compression stroke.  Now line up the
timing mark, and get the distributer in the right position and it should
be good.
HotRod53 - 23 Mar 2005 02:57 GMT
"cywelch" wrote:
> &nbsp;>  > "HotRod53" &lt;DoNotEmail@AutoForumz.com&gt; wrote
> in message
[quoted text clipped - 156 lines]
> it should
> be good.

Gorilla, I got disgusted and pulled the whole top off of the motor
again. After verifying everything, cylinder #1 was on the compression
stroke and the distributor is pointing to #1 as it was supposed to be.
I called a friend of my fathers who used to be a Chevy mechanic. He
told me that the info that I got from the manual on tightening the
valves may be incorrect. They say spin the pushrod and tighten the
rocker until it quits spinning, then add 1 1/2 turns. I know that this
gives me an adjustment that is tighter than it was when I removed it.
I counted the turns just in case and every rocker nut was 12.5 - 13
turns in. He thinks that the valves are too tight and they aren?t
closing causing it not to fire. What do you think about the tightening
proceedure?
69CamaroSS - 23 Mar 2005 03:41 GMT
> "cywelch" wrote:
> > &nbsp;>  > "HotRod53" &lt;DoNotEmail@AutoForumz.com&gt; wrote
[quoted text clipped - 170 lines]
> closing causing it not to fire. What do you think about the tightening
> proceedure?

I thought you said they were the crank down rockers ? We said before if you
needed to know how to adjust them just ask. The procedure is simple if they
are adjustable...
It should be about 1 turn but it has to be checked at the right time. You
want approx. .100" preload on the lifters. If you need the order to adjust I
can look it up and post it.
gorrilla - 23 Mar 2005 04:19 GMT
> "cywelch" wrote:
> > &nbsp;>  > "HotRod53" &lt;DoNotEmail@AutoForumz.com&gt; wrote
[quoted text clipped - 170 lines]
> closing causing it not to fire. What do you think about the tightening
> proceedure?

I thought we determined the 89s did not require adjusting?   Maybe I am
wrong, but I thought it was a torque spec.  If I am wrong and they do
require adjusting then it is possible that they are too tight.  This would
cause it to not run, and pop out the intake, and the exhaust for that
matter.  I know all of the early nineties and up are just torqued down to,
if I remember right,  26 pound feet.  Sometimes I find that when getting
frustrated with a car that wont start I forget to look at the basics.  My
suggestion is this:  Forget what you have done so far.  Including the
intake, for now.  You need 3 things for the engine to run.  You need
fuel/air, compression and spark.  Find out what you don't have.  If you have
spent any time cranking this thing over you could probably pull a plug and
at least smell fuel if the injectors are firing.  remember that is just a
quick check.  what I like to do for checking spark is to disconnect AT the
plug and stick an old plug in the wire and open up the gap another .030 inch
or so.  take a jumper wire and ground it on the hook looking electrode.
have a helper crank the engine over as you hold it by the wire, not the
plug, you don't want to get zapped.  Also make extra double sure there is no
standing fuel around from checking fuel pressure or disconnecting lines.
With if fairly dark you should see spark jump the gap.  The reason for
opening up the gap is that spark may jump the specified gap and still be
weak.  If it can't jump .060 or .080 then you don't have enough spark.  If
you are going to do much of your own engine work you really need to get a
compression tester.  I would at least get one from SEARS,  a junk one from
an auto parts store would work maybe once.  In my experience at least.  If
your valves are too tight you should notice too little psi on the gauge or
not holding any pressure.  I guess a massive vaccum leak would cause a
no-start.  Let me know what you find after this.
69CamaroSS - 23 Mar 2005 22:45 GMT
>> "cywelch" wrote:
>> > &nbsp;>  > "HotRod53" &lt;DoNotEmail@AutoForumz.com&gt; wrote
[quoted text clipped - 199 lines]
> massive vaccum leak would cause a no-start.  Let me know what you find
> after this.

Don't forget..... fuel/air, compression, spark..... including timing....
spark is no good at the wrong time. If it's 180 out it'll pop and sputter...
to be repetative make sure it is up on the compression stroke at TDC and
pointing towards #1 ... Also double check the plug wires are on correctly..
(in right order)..
HotRod53 - 24 Mar 2005 01:02 GMT
> &nbsp;>> "cywelch" wrote:
> &nbsp;&nbsp;>> > HotRod53 wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 129 lines]
> on correctly..
> (in right order)..

When I pulled it apart for the second time I found that the fuel rail
was full, so I have fuel. I rolled the motor to the compression stroke
of #1, plug wires were right. I have spark because it will jump from
the coil to the intake with no coil wire. The rockers are adjustable,
and believe me I have adjusted them 100 times already. I set it on #1
and follow the correct order-Exhaust 1,2,3 - intake 1,5,6..then roll
it to #4 and do the rest. The manual said tighten the rocker until the
push rod will not spin, then add 1.5 turns. I have been told by two
mechanics that this is too tight and the valves are not closing.
Unfortunately with a 2.8, you cannot remove the valve covers without
removing the intake plenum and fuel rail to adjust them with the motor
running. Today I was told to adjust out the lash and add 3/4 to 1
turn. I don?t know anything at this point excapt that I?m really
beginning to dislike 2.8?s LOL!
gorrilla - 24 Mar 2005 04:08 GMT
> > &nbsp;>> "cywelch" wrote:
> > &nbsp;&nbsp;>> > HotRod53 wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 144 lines]
> turn. I don't know anything at this point excapt that I'm really
> beginning to dislike 2.8's LOL!

Well at this point with out being there to see it for myself I don't know
what else to tell you.  I guess I would try the 3/4 to 1 turn thing.  Lots
of luck.  Let me know what you find out in the end.
69CamaroSS - 24 Mar 2005 15:22 GMT
>> > &nbsp;>> "cywelch" wrote:
>> > &nbsp;&nbsp;>> > HotRod53 wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 148 lines]
> what else to tell you.  I guess I would try the 3/4 to 1 turn thing.  Lots
> of luck.  Let me know what you find out in the end.
Hopefully you didn't bend any valves. By having the 12-13 turns after
touching you would have put over 1" of preload which would probably open the
valve up to 1.5" with ratio of the rocker calculated in (once they pump up,
1 turn give approx. .100" preload). If you have a compression gauge I would
use it and see if any of the cylinders have real low compression.
As far as the 1 turn we replied a few times with that info...
P.S.   I think, the aluminum head uses the crank down cast heads use
adjustable.
HotRod53 - 26 Mar 2005 01:04 GMT
> &nbsp;>> "69CamaroSS" wrote:
> &nbsp;&nbsp;>> > "gorrilla" &lt;bpollock80@cox.net&gt; wrote
[quoted text clipped - 514 lines]
> heads use
> adjustable.

69CameroSS, I would like to see what you show as a proceedure, All I
have found so far is take out the lash and add 1.5 turns.

Before I ever cranked the motor, I rolled it over with a socket and
nothing hit, so hopefully I don?t have any bent valves. A couple of
times while adjusting the second set of valves I rolled the motor with
a socket and felt a tight spot which obviously was a valve.
Fortunately I never hit the key. It seems like the adjustment is very
critical, just the slightest bit overtightening and that valves will
hit.

These are cast heads, I guess thats why they are adjustable. When I
said 12-13 turns, that was all of the way to the end of the stud. In
other words, I counted from the factory adjustment until the nut fell
off the stud. The lock nut doesn?t even begin to lock on the shaft
until turn #6.

You cant remove the valve covers on these 2.8s without removing the
intake plenum and the fuel rail, thats why I want to be sure that
these things are adjusted correctly before I button it up for the
third time. I thinking of adjusting out the lash and giving it 1/2 to
3/4 of a turn.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.