Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Camaro / July 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

differences between ss and lt1

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
garrison - 28 Jul 2004 05:53 GMT
im new to the camaro scene so if anyone could help me out even though i
might seem stupid... im looking at 4th gen. camaros and wanted to konw the
differences between an lt1 and a ss. is the lt1 engine faster or would it
be smarter to go with the ss? thank you
SgtSilicon - 28 Jul 2004 06:41 GMT
Wrong comparisons.  "SS" is a trim level and LT1 is an option code
describing a specific motor type.  The Z28 and SS trim levels were
optioned with a V8 engine (as opposed to V6).  Before 1999 that V8 was
an LT1 (a 5.7 liter displacement).  From 1999 - 2002 it the V8 was an
LS1 (also a 5.7 liter displacement, but almost completely redesigned
and more powerful than an LT1).  I might be slightly mistaken about
which year they switched from LT1 to LS1 but the rest is pertinent.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:53:00 -0400, "garrison"
<bakodabro@hotmail.com> wrote:

>im new to the camaro scene so if anyone could help me out even though i
>might seem stupid... im looking at 4th gen. camaros and wanted to konw the
>differences between an lt1 and a ss. is the lt1 engine faster or would it
>be smarter to go with the ss? thank you
GLK9MM - 28 Jul 2004 12:54 GMT
> Wrong comparisons.  "SS" is a trim level and LT1 is an option code
> describing a specific motor type.  The Z28 and SS trim levels were
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>differences between an lt1 and a ss. is the lt1 engine faster or would it
>>be smarter to go with the ss? thank you

I believe 1998 the LS1 was avail in the F-body.  (1997 in the vette)
The LS1 has more upper end hp, but the LT1 (and LT4) both have more low
end torque if my memory serves me correctly.

    Martin
    '01 Formula -    MTI Air Box Lid, K&N Filter, Hurst-6,
            SLP Cold Air Induction & Smooth Intake Bellow
            Corsa Catback w/Premium Tips
    '83 V45 Magna
SR-71 - 29 Jul 2004 05:45 GMT
You're exactly right about the LS-1 appearing in '98 F-bodies and '97
Vette's.  You're also right about the LT-1 producing more low-end
torque (peaks about 2500 RPM) while the LS-1 delivers more HP on the
top-end.

With street tires at the track I've found the low-end torque to be a
disadvantage because it's difficult to get the radials to "hook-up".
All that low-end torque hitting the rear wheels before the weight
shifts back onto them yeilds a lot of spinning off the line and a bark
as the car shifts to second.  I've still turned-in a 13.9 quarter mile
with cheap street radials.

I've ordered a set of Nitto 555's that I hope will shave-off a few
tenths and actually let me take advantage of the LT-1 low-end torque
off the line.  Hopefully I'll find-out next week!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.