Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Corvette / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tire Pressure Monitor

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Luke - 17 Aug 2005 19:30 GMT
I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I had
my tires rotated, and now the display for the tire pressure is wrong. It
reports the pressure for the back tires as the front tires. The Cadillac
dealer wants $15 to "recalibate" the system, but I'd like to do myself. I
believe this system is identical to the one of the Corvette. Does anyone
know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
advacne.
Charles Spitzer - 17 Aug 2005 19:51 GMT
>I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I had
>my tires rotated, and now the display for the tire pressure is wrong. It
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
>advacne.

does it say how to do this in your owners manual?
Shep - 17 Aug 2005 20:59 GMT
Luke I may be a dummy here but aren't the front and rear tires a different
size and shouldn't be rotated?
>I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I had
>my tires rotated, and now the display for the tire pressure is wrong. It
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
>advacne.
Bruce Chang - 17 Aug 2005 21:36 GMT
> Luke I may be a dummy here but aren't the front and rear tires a different
> size and shouldn't be rotated?

Just checked the Cadillac website and it appears all the wheels are the same
size.

Here's a website I found on reprogramming your wheel pressure sensors.

-Bruce
Shep - 17 Aug 2005 21:40 GMT
Bruce, thanks for clearing that up, got lazy and didn't reasearch ,it I
assume you mean the tires as well are the same size.

>> Luke I may be a dummy here but aren't the front and rear tires a
>> different size and shouldn't be rotated?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> -Bruce
Bruce Chang - 17 Aug 2005 21:43 GMT
> Bruce, thanks for clearing that up, got lazy and didn't reasearch ,it I
> assume you mean the tires as well are the same size.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>> -Bruce

Yeah, that is correct.  Tires and wheels are the same, didn't mention any
different offsets.

Here's the link, by the way.. duh..

http://www.hunter.com/pub/undercar/TECHLINK/
sdlomi2 - 18 Aug 2005 14:03 GMT
> > Bruce, thanks for clearing that up, got lazy and didn't reasearch ,it I
> > assume you mean the tires as well are the same size.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> http://www.hunter.com/pub/undercar/TECHLINK/

   Nice information, Bruce; I'd never seen exactly how they work, altho'
I've bought & sold quite a few that had them--even had a couple of sets of
tires replaced on 'vettes using the system.  Thx,  s
Luke - 17 Aug 2005 21:42 GMT
Bruce,

Thanks for your help, but the website link didn't show up. Could you repost
please? Thanks.

>> Luke I may be a dummy here but aren't the front and rear tires a
>> different size and shouldn't be rotated?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> -Bruce
Dad - 17 Aug 2005 23:14 GMT
>I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I had
>my tires rotated, and now the display for the tire pressure is wrong. It
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
>advacne.

   Here's the scoop... the main item you need to re-calibrate (actually

it's "program the sensors" in the service manual lingo) the sensors is a

magnet to engage sensors during the training sequence.  The GM tool is J

41760, but maybe a decent powered magnet with a horseshoe shape or hole in

it would suffice??? I use 2 stick magnets in the shape of a "V" and just set
it over the stem.

Make sure vehicle has been stationary for at least 2 minutes.

1 - Ignition on

2 - Press RESET to clear all IPC messages from DIC

3 - Press and release OPTIONS, scroll til IPC is blank

4 - Press and hold DIC RESET for 3 seconds

5 - Press OPTIONS again until TIRE TRAINING message is displayed

6 - Press RESET until IPC LEARN L FRONT TIRE to begin programming

7 - Install J 41760 over left front valve stem (I guess you could try a

hefty magnet now)

8 - The horn will sound indicating LF sensor is programmed

Notice - if after 15 seconds the horn doesn't sound, remove and reinstall

tool on stem. This may have to be done up to three times in some instances.

9 - IPC will direct you to LEARN R FRONT TIRE, R REAR TIRE, then L REAR

TIRE.

Programming Cancellation:

1. Programming mode will cancel if any of the following conditions are met:

   - program mode exited through DIC

   - ignition turned off

   - all four sensors programmed

   - TPM program mode for 2 minutes with no sensors learned

2. If cancelled with less than 4 codes stored, the receiver will only accept

the codes programmed up to that point.

There you have it, good luck.

Nice to have that Cadillac powered correctly.

Signature

Dad
05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd

Luke - 18 Aug 2005 15:14 GMT
Thanks for the instructions, but I'm not exactly sure what the IPC and DIC
are. I assume I need some kind of hand held scan tool in addition to the
magnet?

>>I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I
>>had my tires rotated, and now the display for the tire pressure is wrong.
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
>
> Nice to have that Cadillac powered correctly.
Jon - 18 Aug 2005 00:29 GMT
Should be in your owner's manual.  If you don't have the manual do a
search on the web. I've done it with a magnet on my Corvette but you
have to know how to get to it in the computer options on your dashboard
first.

> I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I had
> my tires rotated, and now the display for the tire pressure is wrong. It
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
> advacne.
Barb - 18 Aug 2005 01:40 GMT
You must have a real low life money hungry moron for a dealer.  We've
had the very same thing happen twice.  When we went back to the dealer
the service greeter appologized profusely.  He then got some kind of a
little hand held device and within two minutes had them all back in
sync.

We're I you, I'd do a couple of things.

1)  If you get a form from the folks who do polls on service
satisfaction, fill it out and rip your dealer apart.

2)  I'd call Cadillac directly, 1 800 458 8006 or if you're in Canada
the number is 1 800 263 3777  ( for French speaking it's 1 800 263 7854
)

Your expereince is simply unacceptable.
Bruce Chang - 18 Aug 2005 16:19 GMT
> You must have a real low life money hungry moron for a dealer.  We've
> had the very same thing happen twice.  When we went back to the dealer
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Your expereince is simply unacceptable.

I was under the impression that the dealer didn't do the tire rotation.
shiden_kai - 18 Aug 2005 23:48 GMT
> You must have a real low life money hungry moron for a dealer.  We've
> had the very same thing happen twice.  When we went back to the dealer
> the service greeter appologized profusely.  He then got some kind of a
> little hand held device and within two minutes had them all back in
> sync.

You might be right if the dealer had performed the rotation, at our
dealership, resetting the tire pressure monitor is part of the rotation,
but we do charge extra.  If the op got the tires rotated somewhere,
why on earth should a dealership have to recalibrate his TPM for
free?

Ian
Don Schmidt - 19 Aug 2005 00:30 GMT
My Cadillac dealer doesn't do rotations or tire repair. We have a local tire
dealer, Les Schwab's who fixes flats and rotates wheels for free.  When I
get my wheels rotated, my next stop is the Cadillac dealer who reprograms
the pressure monitors for free.

I'm a 20 customer with this dealer. 'Don't know if this makes a difference.

Signature

Don
Vancouver, USA

>> You must have a real low life money hungry moron for a dealer.  We've
>> had the very same thing happen twice.  When we went back to the dealer
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Ian
shiden_kai - 19 Aug 2005 04:50 GMT
> My Cadillac dealer doesn't do rotations or tire repair. We have a
> local tire dealer, Les Schwab's who fixes flats and rotates wheels
> for free.  When I get my wheels rotated, my next stop is the Cadillac
> dealer who reprograms the pressure monitors for free.

Can't be much of a Cadillac dealer if they don't do rotations or
tire repairs.  We are a Cadillac dealer and we do "everything" on
Cadillacs.  We don't send a Cadillac anywhere for anything.
In your case, they probably have a deal with the tire dealer to
do that work, and as such they will reprogram the monitors for
free.  All that work is usually done under the Cadillac warranty
anyway.  Totally different scenario from what I was talking about.

Ian
Don Schmidt - 19 Aug 2005 12:51 GMT
Nope, on the deal with the tire company.  They rotate and repair anyone's
car for free.

The dealer probably figures there isn't any money in rotations and tire
repair.

Anyway, it works for are locale.

Signature

Don
Vancouver, USA

>> My Cadillac dealer doesn't do rotations or tire repair. We have a
>> local tire dealer, Les Schwab's who fixes flats and rotates wheels
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Ian
PJ - 19 Aug 2005 16:11 GMT
>>My Cadillac dealer doesn't do rotations or tire repair. We have a
>>local tire dealer, Les Schwab's who fixes flats and rotates wheels
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Ian

Our Cadillac dealer recently closed down frame, body & paint and
converted the square footage into additional service bays for lube,
drive train, suspension and brakes.  They hand out a list of "referral"
body shops.  Tire rotation during a lube job used add $18.  This last
time it was $31.  The sensor recal is part of the job.

Our Chevy dealer now sublets all Corvette body and paint and 'stands by'
(whatever that means) the work done by the sublet.  Service advisors at
both dealerships complain that there is too much "dead time" waiting for
body parts, for paint to dry etc.  The profit per square foot (and I
assume service advisor commission) is better with the jobs they've kept.

Both dealerships are cramped for service space and parking space.

PJ
G - 20 Aug 2005 05:04 GMT
Why?  Simply because it's a Cadillac



>> You must have a real low life money hungry moron for a dealer.  We've
>> had the very same thing happen twice.  When we went back to the dealer
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Ian
shiden_kai - 21 Aug 2005 07:30 GMT
> Why?  Simply because it's a Cadillac

Typical Cadillac attitude.  "I bought a Cadillac,
therefore everything must be done for free, forever
and ever.....amen!"

We deal with those types of customers all day long
unfortunately.  Of course, the tiniest leak that "must"
be fixed under warranty is quickly ignored when the
Cadillac owner becomes responsible for it.  As is
everything else.

Ian
KjunRaven - 21 Aug 2005 14:58 GMT
"shiden_kai" <v-l-m@hotmail.com> wrote in news:dcVNe.75780$vj.25597
@pd7tw1no:

>> Why?  Simply because it's a Cadillac
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Ian

nodding in agreement...simular to many vette owners that ive dealt with
that feel they must be 1st in line no matter when they drive in. always was
entertaining! not a cut to cadi owners but the line has been kinda pushed
to middle class of luxury cars with the onslaught of asian lux. cars....it
was nice to see them come out with a p/u tho. helps keep lincoln
honest.......AIMHO, kjun
Luke - 25 Aug 2005 19:39 GMT
Since I started this debate, here's my 2 cents. The dealer in question has
done all waranty work, maintance, and repairs on both my CTS and Escalade.
This amounts to thousands of dollars in revenue over the past few years. I
don't have the attitude that everything should be free; the dealer's in
business (like me) to make money and I have no problem paying for labor and
parts. However, as previous posts prove, this is a simple 2 minute job that
doesn't require any parts. Considering how much business they had from me, 2
minutes of a tech's time, without charge, seems to be a reasonable request.

> "shiden_kai" <v-l-m@hotmail.com> wrote in news:dcVNe.75780$vj.25597
> @pd7tw1no:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> was nice to see them come out with a p/u tho. helps keep lincoln
> honest.......AIMHO, kjun
RicSeyler - 03 Sep 2005 22:11 GMT
Of course it is Luke..
I was the Assistant Service Manager for Mitchell Motors Cadlliac for a
few years,
and if I heard that from one of my Service Writers, he would of gotten
reprimanded.
In my experience Cadlliac owners in general are very loyal to their
Dealerships for the
desirable Customer Pay jobs if the warranty work period was satisfactory...

Now I don't know about the new customer base sport sedan owners and Lux
SUV's.
But the Joe that owned a Coupe/Sedan DeVille, Eldorado was very very loyal
if they got treated right under the warranty period.

> Considering how much business they had from me, 2
>minutes of a tech's time, without charge, seems to be a reasonable request.
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
>  

Signature

Ric Seyler
Online Racing: RicSeyler
GPL Handicap 6.35
ricseyler@SPAMgulf.net
http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler
remove -SPAM- from email address
--------------------------------------
"Homer no function beer well without."
- H.J. Simpson

Windcat - 30 Aug 2005 14:48 GMT
   If the op got the tires rotated somewhere,
> why on earth should a dealership have to recalibrate his TPM for
> free?
Because they might want to sell me another car? Oh I forgot,
they don't make any money selling the things  -- just
servicing them.
I'm convinced GM deliberately designs systems so complicated
 they can force you to come back to dealers to have them
serviced. Owners can't even perform routine maintenance
anymore because it requires special tools or filters/parts
available only at the dealer.  Really disgusting and one
reason I've stopped having anything done except an
occasional oil change because I don't keep the things past
warranty anyhow.
lab~rat - 30 Aug 2005 15:39 GMT
>    If the op got the tires rotated somewhere,
>> why on earth should a dealership have to recalibrate his TPM for
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>occasional oil change because I don't keep the things past
>warranty anyhow.

Are you serious?  That's not true in the least.
--
lab~rat  >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
shiden_kai - 30 Aug 2005 23:02 GMT
>> If the op got the tires rotated somewhere,
>> why on earth should a dealership have to recalibrate his TPM for
>> free?

> Because they might want to sell me another car? Oh I forgot,
> they don't make any money selling the things  -- just
> servicing them.

Right!  That's certainly what we do at our dealership...hang
around waiting for do things for free so "you might" buy
another car.  People like you won't be happy anywhere
anyways....so you might just as well bugger off.

> I'm convinced GM deliberately designs systems so complicated
>  they can force you to come back to dealers to have them
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> occasional oil change because I don't keep the things past
> warranty anyhow.

How very ethical of you!  Just pass your un-maintained vehicle
onto the next poor shmuck eh?

Ian
Bob I - 31 Aug 2005 02:09 GMT
Humm, and what "routine maintenance" requiring special tools are you
talking about? Oil change? Nope. Air filter check? Nope. Bet you haven't
 even read the owners manual. What a yutz!

>    If the op got the tires rotated somewhere,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> and one reason I've stopped having anything done except an occasional
> oil change because I don't keep the things past warranty anyhow.
BDragon - 31 Aug 2005 04:40 GMT
Hey guys.  People in here have been voicing their opinions and disagreeing
for a long, long time without having to call each other names.  It's been
pretty nice that way.

> Humm, and what "routine maintenance" requiring special tools are you
> talking about? Oil change? Nope. Air filter check? Nope. Bet you haven't
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> > and one reason I've stopped having anything done except an occasional
> > oil change because I don't keep the things past warranty anyhow.
shiden_kai - 01 Sep 2005 01:03 GMT
> Hey guys.  People in here have been voicing their opinions and
> disagreeing for a long, long time without having to call each other
> names.  It's been pretty nice that way.

Yutz?  That's fairly tame in the newsgroups.  Of course, maybe
you own the newsgroup that you are talking from and have your
own set of rules.

Ian
BDragon - 01 Sep 2005 01:55 GMT
> > Hey guys.  People in here have been voicing their opinions and
> > disagreeing for a long, long time without having to call each other
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Ian

Whatever you're used to Ian.  Any name calling is pretty sophomoric.  Most
of us just yak about Corvettes, and I guess occasionally get under someone's
saddle with something about a Cadillac, which I think is what upset you.
People come an go, but yes, this is a pretty civil group.  Hope you enjoy it
since it is usually much different than many others.
shiden_kai - 01 Sep 2005 03:02 GMT
> Whatever you're used to Ian.  Any name calling is pretty sophomoric.
> Most of us just yak about Corvettes, and I guess occasionally get
> under someone's saddle with something about a Cadillac, which I think
> is what upset you. People come an go, but yes, this is a pretty civil
> group.  Hope you enjoy it since it is usually much different than
> many others.

I didn't respond with the "yutz" comment, was more just responding
to your response.  Usually, the only thing that gets my goat is the
enormous number of  people that imagine far more items on their
cars ought to be repaired for free.

I'm only here because of the cross posts.  Guess I'll trim out the
Corvette group.  Nice cars, but I have to work on the things during
the day, so it's just another car to me.  Though I did just take an
06 ragtop out for a spin yesterday.....I really...really...like the new
Corvettes.  They look better, drive better, feel better....and did I
mention they look better?  Unfortunately, GM has managed to
make them even more difficult to work on.  We have one (06) in
the shop getting something done to the left fuel tank sending unit.
The whole rear drivetrain has to come out, just to get the fuel
tank in and out.  Oh well, winter is coming and we usually don't
see the Corvettes until spring and summer.

Ian
Dad - 01 Sep 2005 03:59 GMT
> I'm only here because of the cross posts.  Guess I'll trim out the
> Corvette group.  Nice cars, but I have to work on the things during
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Ian
Strange, how many 06 Corvettes does your dealer have? I didn't think they
were on the road yet????

Signature

Dad
05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd

PJ - 01 Sep 2005 05:30 GMT
=- - - - - -  - snip -----------

> I didn't respond with the "yutz" comment, was more just responding
> to your response.  Usually, the only thing that gets my goat is the
> enormous number of  people that imagine far more items on their
> cars ought to be repaired for free.

---------------  snip

> Ian

Good practice here is:  Never tell anyone where you keep your goat!

PJ
BDragon - 02 Sep 2005 00:39 GMT
I know the comment wasn't your's, Ian.  Sorry to see you go, if you do.

> > Whatever you're used to Ian.  Any name calling is pretty sophomoric.
> > Most of us just yak about Corvettes, and I guess occasionally get
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Ian
shiden_kai - 02 Sep 2005 06:47 GMT
> I know the comment wasn't your's, Ian.  Sorry to see you go, if you
> do.

I wouldn't worry, I was never really "here" anyway.

Ian
John S. - 19 Aug 2005 13:55 GMT
> I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I had
> my tires rotated, and now the display for the tire pressure is wrong. It
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
> advacne.

A tire pressure sensing system that needs recalibration with tire
changes seems like a lot of bother and expense.  A much simpler, less
expensive and more reliable option would be a good tire pressure gauge
stored on the glove compartment.
Dad - 19 Aug 2005 16:15 GMT
>> I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I
>> had
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> expensive and more reliable option would be a good tire pressure gauge
> stored on the glove compartment.

Good idea, how often do you check your tire pressure? Not a day goes by
while driving do I not see tires that are under inflated, so having that
gage in the compartment does little good unless used. With runflat tires the
side walls are stiff enough that you can't visually "gage" the tire
pressure. Since I like a car to run at peak tune, that includes tire
pressure, it is a simple matter to check them while running down the road. I
check my tire pressure nearly every time I drive the car. It took very
little time to read the correct way to recalibrate the sensors and it takes
less time that checking the pressure with a gage. On a trip through the
Rockies I hit a sharp stone very hard and was able to bring up the tire
pressure and watch it until I was where I could get safely off the road and
out of traffic to check for damage. At that point the cost of the pressure
sensors was cheap to say the least.

Another system I see coming on line looks even better. It senses the
rotating radius of all of the tires, ties into the braking and traction
control system, and if it varies enough it will bring up a "low tire
pressure" message on your DIC. By utilizing the systems already in place and
working with the programming it brings about a very good and inexpensive
warning system.

I miss my Cadillacs - ;-(

Signature

Dad
05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd

John S. - 19 Aug 2005 16:54 GMT
> >> I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I
> >> had
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> >
> Good idea, how often do you check your tire pressure?

How often do I check tire pressure - every time I fill up.  And I'm
able to run the low profile wide tread tires on my car at least 10,000
miles longer than I would otherwise. And I rotate them regularly.

> Not a day goes by
> while driving do I not see tires that are under inflated, so having that
> gage in the compartment does little good unless used.

True, but the same can be said for a pressure monitoring system.  For
many drivers it will probably end up being another check engine light
to be ignored.

> With runflat tires the
> side walls are stiff enough that you can't visually "gage" the tire
> pressure.

Anyone who thinks they can visually estimate 4 or 5 psi pressure loss
with a regular radial tire is kidding themselves.  Sure you can tell if
a tire is at 20 psi when it should be at 35, but by then the damage is
done.  A simple pressure guage is apparently far more reliable that the
built-in pressure sensing systems.  How does the pressure monitoring
system warn the average owner that it needs to be recalibrated to give
a meaningful reading.  That is a serious limitation for most drivers.

> Since I like a car to run at peak tune, that includes tire
> pressure, it is a simple matter to check them while running down the road. I
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> I miss my Cadillacs - ;-(
Dad - 19 Aug 2005 18:40 GMT
>> >> I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently,
>> >> I
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> able to run the low profile wide tread tires on my car at least 10,000
> miles longer than I would otherwise. And I rotate them regularly.

You are rare indeed, seldom if ever have I seen anyone check their tires
when they fill up, but then I've only been driving for 50+ years. How wide
is wide? The 285-35-19 that I run will go way past the estimated mileage as
they show on the tread depth right now for 11,000 and I don't rotate. Even
when I worked in a service station in the early sixties we had to ask if the
customer wanted his tires checked. Very few checked the tires and just a few
had you check the oil.

>> Not a day goes by
>> while driving do I not see tires that are under inflated, so having that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> many drivers it will probably end up being another check engine light
> to be ignored.

So your contention is that those that ignore a trouble message will be using
a tire pressure gage, get real. Very hard to ignore and it don't shut off by
it's self.

>> With runflat tires the
>> side walls are stiff enough that you can't visually "gage" the tire
>> pressure.
>
> Anyone who thinks they can visually estimate 4 or 5 psi pressure loss
> with a regular radial tire is kidding themselves.

Didn't even suggest that anyone could judge the actual pressure in a regular
radial tire by it's looks, my reason for making that statement is because
the runflats don't show any signs of low pressure at all, regardless of the
amount. I see that you have had no experience with a runflat tire and
therefore no experience with a pressure monitoring system.

>Sure you can tell if
> a tire is at 20 psi when it should be at 35, but by then the damage is
> done.  A simple pressure guage is apparently far more reliable that the
> built-in pressure sensing systems.

How do you know that? As far as the accuracy of a hand held tire gage,
forget it. If you take most of them out and check the same tire with
different gages of the same make they will give you varied readings. The
only thing you know is that the pressure is similar in all four tires by
using one gage.

>How does the pressure monitoring
> system warn the average owner that it needs to be recalibrated to give
> a meaningful reading.  That is a serious limitation for most drivers.

Actually the Corvette system seldom needs "recalibrating" if ever, but it
throws a warning if the readings vary considerably between all four tires.
The pressure seems to be monitored very well as checked by an industrial
dial pressure gage with a tire chuck attached, not the $1.97 trash that most
people use. Of the 4 Corvettes I've had with pressure monitors I've
recalibrated them maybe a half dozen time, and all of those were when I was
mounting racing tires on different rims with diffrent sensors and/or
switching back to street tires. After the first time they would set
themselves and not require recalibration because they went to the same
location.

Signature

Life is a waste of time
Time is a waste of life
Get wasted all the time
Have the time of your life

John S. - 19 Aug 2005 19:10 GMT
> >> >> I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently,
> >> >> I
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> customer wanted his tires checked. Very few checked the tires and just a few
> had you check the oil.

Pressure checking is not so rare at least in my area.

> >> Not a day goes by
> >> while driving do I not see tires that are under inflated, so having that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> So your contention is that those that ignore a trouble message will be using
> a tire pressure gage, get real.

Nope, my point is that a pressure warning system is a tool that could
be useful, but will be ignored by many and will become little more than
another expensive automated gadget t ignore or figure out how to switch
off.  A pressure gauge will be as effective an automated warning system
for most drivers.  And it will be a whole lot cheaper.

> Very hard to ignore and it don't shut off by
> it's self.

Unfortunately there are a lot of drivers who have conditioned
themselves to routinely ignore the check engine and engine warning
lamps as well as the text messages that scroll across the dashboard
display.  Like the many people who continue to run out of gas after the
needle has passed into the orange area AND the red warning light has
gone on.

> >> With runflat tires the
> >> side walls are stiff enough that you can't visually "gage" the tire
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> amount. I see that you have had no experience with a runflat tire and
> therefore no experience with a pressure monitoring system.

Quoting you:  ...are stiff enough you can't visually "gage" the tire
pressure.  It is not possible to visually gauge tire pressure with any
reliability under any circumstance period.

> >Sure you can tell if
> > a tire is at 20 psi when it should be at 35, but by then the damage is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> only thing you know is that the pressure is similar in all four tires by
> using one gage.

Really now.  If handheld gauges are that inaccurate then how useful or
accurate can we expect a pressure sensing system to be.  Remember, it
is nothing more than analog sensors rigged to a digital display.  And
how can a driver rely on such a system if it goes out of calibration
with no warning.  I've checked several different handheld gauges and
they are plenty close enough for maintaining reasonably accurate
pressure.

> >How does the pressure monitoring
> > system warn the average owner that it needs to be recalibrated to give
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> themselves and not require recalibration because they went to the same
> location.

Your experience does not appear to be the same as the caddy owner -
strange isn't it.  Come to think of it I have never had a handheld
analog gauge go out of calibration.

> Life is a waste of time
> Time is a waste of life
> Get wasted all the time
> Have the time of your life

That's an "unusual" way of dealing with life, wouldn't you say?
Dad - 19 Aug 2005 20:31 GMT
> Pressure checking is not so rare at least in my area.

I'd have to see that to believe it.

>> >> Not a day goes by
>> >> while driving do I not see tires that are under inflated, so having
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> off.  A pressure gauge will be as effective an automated warning system
> for most drivers.  And it will be a whole lot cheaper.

Ah yes, it is cheaper and the pressure monitering system will be very hard
to remove cheaply from any car that is built with it in the system. I assume
that you will not buy a car after the required pressure sensors are in the
2010 models? Actually seems like your point is that you're cheap and the
government can't change that by mandating pressure sensors. By the way they
are also trying to get the runflats mandatory are you going to resist that
also or just the pressure sensors?

>> Very hard to ignore and it don't shut off by
>> it's self.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> needle has passed into the orange area AND the red warning light has
> gone on.

Wow, you got that down pat, I've never seen that orange area or the red
light, what happens next? You are still suggesting these people will use a
tire gage over reacting to a warning light?

>> >> With runflat tires the
>> >> side walls are stiff enough that you can't visually "gage" the tire
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> pressure.  It is not possible to visually gauge tire pressure with any
> reliability under any circumstance period.

Now come on, is it the thumpty thump that tells you a tire is flat? Or, big
question here, can you see that the rim is very close to the ground or the
tire has a much larger bulge in the side, (runflat not included), than do
the others on the vehicle? Actually you can see it, you can hear it, you can
feel it, and last but not least, you can smell them when they go flat, all
of this is under certain conditions of course.

>> >Sure you can tell if
>> > a tire is at 20 psi when it should be at 35, but by then the damage is
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> they are plenty close enough for maintaining reasonably accurate
> pressure.

Did you ever hear about offsets for tweaking the accuracy of the interface
between a electronic component and its sensor? My assumption is that if a
system goes out with no warning that it is the same as any other aspect of
life, you deal with it. Why do you think they go out without warning, I
don't remember that being the issue? Nothing was said about that, only when
his tires were rotated and the revenue enhancement guru kicked in.

>> >How does the pressure monitoring
>> > system warn the average owner that it needs to be recalibrated to give
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> strange isn't it.  Come to think of it I have never had a handheld
> analog gauge go out of calibration.

You should use it more, but then close is good enough as you seem to think.
All of our analog gages were calibrated on a regular basis and they do/did
fail, but then I dealt with precision gages and if you do it would surprise
me. My direct reference was to the Corvette as it is cross posted, I would
expect you to realize that. In reality the Cadillac owner was talking about
them wanting an added cost figure for resetting his sensors. My first reply
was how to do it yourself. You are the one that is fixated on the
usefulness/value of the pressure monitoring system.

>> Life is a waste of time
>> Time is a waste of life
>> Get wasted all the time
>> Have the time of your life
>
> That's an "unusual" way of dealing with life, wouldn't you say?

Can be and if that's the way you might choose to live, that is your choice.

Signature

Life is a sexually transmitted condition that is always fatal.

John S. - 20 Aug 2005 10:46 GMT
> > Pressure checking is not so rare at least in my area.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> are also trying to get the runflats mandatory are you going to resist that
> also or just the pressure sensors?

Nope, didn't say that did I would stop buying cars now did I.  Truly an
asinine statement for you to make wasn't it.

I was also stating the obvious - that there are a lot of drivers who
routinely ignore important information fed to them via the dashboard.
Just because the latest warning system has to do with tires is no
reason to believe their behaviour will change one whit.

> >> Very hard to ignore and it don't shut off by
> >> it's self.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> light, what happens next? You are still suggesting these people will use a
> tire gage over reacting to a warning light?

What happens next should be obvious.  The engine stops.  I can't tell
you the last time I ran out of gas, but there are plenty of people who
do.  As I've restated several times now those people will ignore useful
information provided them no matter the subject.  I can't tell you
why...maybe unlike you and me they don't appreciate the consequences of
ignoring warning messages. Will they use a tire pressure gauge if it is
in the glove compartment - most likely not.  But having an unused
analog gauge in the glove compartment is a whole lot cheaper than an
unused analog tire pressure monitoring system installed in the car.

> >> >> With runflat tires the
> >> >> side walls are stiff enough that you can't visually "gage" the tire
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> feel it, and last but not least, you can smell them when they go flat, all
> of this is under certain conditions of course.

Unfortunately it is the thumpty thump or the loss of steering control
will be the first warning sign most drivers will heed.  Wish driver
behaviour was more defensive, but in my experience most drivers react
to the consequences of problems rather than anticipating them.

> >> >Sure you can tell if
> >> > a tire is at 20 psi when it should be at 35, but by then the damage is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >> only thing you know is that the pressure is similar in all four tires by
> >> using one gage.

If you don't believe what should be obvious, just try a blind test.

> > Really now.  If handheld gauges are that inaccurate then how useful or
> > accurate can we expect a pressure sensing system to be.  Remember, it
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> >
> Can be and if that's the way you might choose to live, that is your choice.

It would appear to be your choice in responsible lifestyle given that
it appeared at the end of your post.

> --
>
> Life is a sexually transmitted condition that is always fatal.
Bob I - 25 Aug 2005 15:17 GMT
A couple of items that seem to be in confusion here.
1. The caddys need to know which sensor is reporting from what corner,
hence the reprogramming requirement on a rim relocation.
2. The vette\caddy system is accurate to pounds pressure while the abs
derived system is only proportionally accurate. In other words it
comparing 1 tires rotating distance against the other tire. If you think
about the amount of pressure loss needed to be useful as a "tool" then
it's pretty much only usefull in warning of immnent disaster, not tire
pressure monitoring.(they are talking about being able to detect a 20%
loss of tire pressure as a usefull indicator)

>>>>I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I
>>>>had
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>>
>>I miss my Cadillacs - ;-(
John S. - 25 Aug 2005 16:10 GMT
> A couple of items that seem to be in confusion here.
> 1. The caddys need to know which sensor is reporting from what corner,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> pressure monitoring.(they are talking about being able to detect a 20%
> loss of tire pressure as a usefull indicator)

I don't know much about the Public Citizen group, but the concerns they
raise are enough to make me wonder how useful tire pressure information
will be if the thresholds are as low as they describe.  I'm also
concerned about a statement by that group that the systems do not have
to work with replacement tires. And apparently the final rule says the
systems need not measure tire pressure until a motorist has been
driving between 30 and 60 miles per hour continuously for 20 minutes.
If true, TPMS with that threshold of operation would be useless in most
urban/suburban highway settings.

It sounds like there will be little consistency in tire pressure
information between car manufacturers because of the exceptions
permitted under the rule.

See this link - what do you think:
http://www.citizen.org/autosafety/nhtsa/tread/tpms/index.cfm
William H. Bowen - 19 Aug 2005 18:30 GMT
>Another system I see coming on line looks even better. It senses the
>rotating radius of all of the tires, ties into the braking and traction
>control system, and if it varies enough it will bring up a "low tire
>pressure" message on your DIC. By utilizing the systems already in place and
>working with the programming it brings about a very good and inexpensive
>warning system.

Some of the manufacturers (Pontiac is one that comes to mind on the
Bonneville) are already using such a system: it is easy to do on a car
with ABS because you already have rotational sensors at each wheel -
all you need is the proper software code to process the information
and display it (uou look for differential in the number of pulses per
mile from the ABS wheel sensora, which tanslates to a difference in
diameter of the tires from one side to another, the theory being that
most of the time not all tires are low on air pressure at the same
time)..

Unfortunately, the NHTSA doesb't think such a speed sensor system is
accurate enough - in a new safety mandate they haded down a few months
ago that, if memory serves me correctly takes effect in 2010, that
will require tire pressure monitoring on all cars. The NHTSA has
specifically said that rotation sensor-based systems will NOT be
acceptable.

>I miss my Cadillacs - ;-(

I feel your pain - I miss my old Cadillac too. But lordy the new ones
are so butt-ugly - last decent looking Cadillac was the
last-generation Seville. I would not take a CTS if someone gave me
one.

Regards,
 Bill Bowen
 Sacramento, CA
Dad - 19 Aug 2005 18:50 GMT
snip
> Unfortunately, the NHTSA doesb't think such a speed sensor system is
> accurate enough - in a new safety mandate they haded down a few months
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Regards,
>  Bill Bowen
Even at my age my butt looks better than the CTS. My last Seville STS was a
sad disappointment. Had it less the a year, still waiting for them to make
something exciting again. May have to get a Z06 after the price gougers get
done and just drive 2 Corvettes.

Signature

Life is a sexually transmitted condition that is always fatal.

Dave - 19 Aug 2005 21:18 GMT
> Good idea, how often do you check your tire pressure? Not a day goes by
> while driving do I not see tires that are under inflated, so having that
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> working with the programming it brings about a very good and inexpensive
> warning system.

This system is already in use. I first saw it on the 97 Grand Prix. It
was the same on my 2000 Grand Prix and is in place on my 2005 Grand
Prix. Just a simple system that uses the abs wheel sensor to detect a
difference in the rotational speed of the wheel compared to the others.
I suppose if all tires were low to the same degree it wouldn't detect
it. Had it warn of a low tire (nail) once so I guess it works.

Dave
WI
Mike Levy - 19 Aug 2005 22:48 GMT
>>> I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I
>>> had
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
>I miss my Cadillacs - ;-(

My mom's 2000 Regal has that low tire light system.  The one that
utilizes the ABS and TC system.  Not sure if my new car, a 2006 Grand
Prix, will have the actual pressure displayed or just a low tire
warning...
Vandervecken - 19 Aug 2005 17:26 GMT
John -

The tire pressure warning system is a necessity on these cars because
their run-flat tires do not "feel" flat enough when deflated (or just
underinflated) to warn *all* drivers.

Given the need for the system it's certainly nice that it tell me which
tire needs attention.

If the system is to report which tire needs attention, then the car must
be able to distinguish between the four pressure reporting widgets. The
two ways to do this are to build four identical transmitters and four
different receivers (one near each tire), or to give the transmitters an
ID code and use a single receiver. The latter is cheaper, simpler, and
more reliable. It also lets GM use the existing RF receiver already
there for the keyless entry system. This isn't cheapness, it's just good
engineering.

If the transmitters have ID codes, then the receiver must know which
transmitter is where on the car. Thus the need for recalibration if the
tires are rotated. It all stems from good decisions.

On the Corvette - at least on the C6 - it's a moot point anyhow, since
all four tires and wheels are different and rotating them would not work
out to advantage.

-- V
ZÿRiX - 21 Aug 2005 15:49 GMT
So we are a caddy forum now?
Man I have learned more about cadilac in the last few days...

Hmmmm vette or caddy?

Signature

ZÿRiX  (<>..<>)

I have a 2004 Cadillac CTS-V (w/ Corvette Z06 LS-6 engine). Recently, I had
my tires rotated, and now the display for the tire pressure is wrong. It
reports the pressure for the back tires as the front tires. The Cadillac
dealer wants $15 to "recalibate" the system, but I'd like to do myself. I
believe this system is identical to the one of the Corvette. Does anyone
know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
advacne.
Dad - 21 Aug 2005 16:12 GMT
> So we are a caddy forum now?
> Man I have learned more about cadilac in the last few days...
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
> advacne.

Bound to happen since they are made in the same plant. ;-) (sic)

Signature

Dad
05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd

Don Schmidt - 21 Aug 2005 17:17 GMT
It appears the thread has been cross posted.

Signature

Don
"Some mornings it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps."

> So we are a caddy forum now?
> Man I have learned more about cadilac in the last few days...
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
> advacne.
shiden_kai - 21 Aug 2005 18:06 GMT
> So we are a caddy forum now?
> Man I have learned more about cadilac in the last few days...
>
> Hmmmm vette or caddy?

Well the Caddy XLR and the Vette are very
close to each other once you get under the skin.

Ian
aliber - 23 Aug 2005 06:38 GMT
> So we are a caddy forum now?
> Man I have learned more about cadilac in the last few days...
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
> advacne.
aliber - 23 Aug 2005 06:38 GMT
> So we are a caddy forum now?
> Man I have learned more about cadilac in the last few days...
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
> advacne.
aliber - 23 Aug 2005 06:47 GMT
you need a special wieless tool to wake up your tire sensor, when you
want to retate your tire position. that is a big problem for existing
TPMS. because even tire maintain shop, they don't has this tool. it is
very expensive, especially each car brand model has different tools. so
even tire maintain shop they are not willing to buy it.

there is a one way you can rotate your tire. take back your wheel in
correct location. and only change your tire (wheel can not be changed,
becasue the tire sensor had monted in the wheel), because the OEM TPMS
has no this new function for reconize seosor ID locatoin. so you only
can do this way for DIY.

Try Orange TPMS (www.orange-electronic.com), Orange TPMS can be easy
DIY to rotate your tire from front to rear or from right to lefe side
and without any tool. that's a reason Orange TPMS is popular in TPMS
market. you also can download their manual from their website.
if you have any questoin for TPMS, you also can write email to Orange
Electronic Co.Ltd. they are willing to help everybody for TPMS issue.
aliber - 23 Aug 2005 06:55 GMT
the only one way for your DIY is put back your tire in correct way.
then take off the tire only (wheel cannot be changed the location,
because the tire sensor had monted in the wheel), then change tire
location only, not wheel.

actually, they has a special wireless tool to wake up your tire, but
the tool is not so cheap, and every car brand has differnet code tools,
and these OEM sensor supplier has no technology for re-location
function for without tool.
therefor, even tire manitain shop, they hate that job for location
tire.

Try Orange TPMS (www.orange-electronic.com), they has this function
inside, thus, if you want to rotate your tire location, you just change
it ans normal, their receiver will be auto catch the new ID and
locatoin of tire. that is a new technology.

if you have any question in TPMS, you can just write them an email.
they are willing to answer you any TPMS questions.

> So we are a caddy forum now?
> Man I have learned more about cadilac in the last few days...
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> know how to recalibrate the tire pressure monitoring system? Thanks in
> advacne.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.