> ---snip---
>
> well "Cool Jet",
> if you want to give your 2¢ ? that's fine,
> this is an open forum.
Key, thanks for giving me your blessing to post my 2¢ in this open
forum. I didn't realize I needed your consent though. By the way, if
you read the charter, it's not an open forum for SPAM.
> but you are not the speaker for the entire group.
Nor do I portend to be the speaker for the entire group. Just the ones
who don't like to be bombarded with SPAM every time your friend Steve
posts his maeningless drivel, just so he can post his link again.
Strangely enough, from your past posts, I thought you also disliked
SPAM. I must be confusing you with someone else who has spoken out
against SPAM in the past.
> you certainly are not speaking for me.
Nor would I ever be tempted too. I don't share your views on SPAM.
> if you don't like seeing someone's post ?
> (mine included)
> simply kill-file them and be done with it.
Rather than share your apathy Key, I like to point out to SPAMMERS that
I don't like their SPAM. If you don't like to see me asking SPAMMERS to
stop SPAMMING, you would appear to know your options.
> my2¢
and mine ;-)
Cool Jet
'Key - 02 Jan 2006 23:36 GMT

Signature
"Key"
'Key wrote:
> ---snip---
>
> well "Cool Jet",
> if you want to give your 2¢ ? that's fine,
> this is an open forum.
Key, thanks for giving me your blessing to post my 2¢ in
this open
forum. I didn't realize I needed your consent though. By the
way, if
you read the charter, it's not an open forum for SPAM.
> but you are not the speaker for the entire group.
Nor do I portend to be the speaker for the entire group.
Just the ones
who don't like to be bombarded with SPAM every time your
friend Steve
posts his maeningless drivel, just so he can post his link
again.
Strangely enough, from your past posts, I thought you also
disliked
SPAM. I must be confusing you with someone else who has
spoken out
against SPAM in the past.
> you certainly are not speaking for me.
Nor would I ever be tempted too. I don't share your views on
SPAM.
> if you don't like seeing someone's post ?
> (mine included)
> simply kill-file them and be done with it.
Rather than share your apathy Key, I like to point out to
SPAMMERS that
I don't like their SPAM. If you don't like to see me asking
SPAMMERS to
stop SPAMMING, you would appear to know your options.
> my2¢
and mine ;-)
Cool Jet
'Key - 02 Jan 2006 23:42 GMT

Signature
"Key"
'Key wrote:
> ---snip---
>
> well "Cool Jet",
> if you want to give your 2¢ ? that's fine,
> this is an open forum.
Key, thanks for giving me your blessing to post my 2¢ in
this open
forum. I didn't realize I needed your consent though. By the
way, if
you read the charter, it's not an open forum for SPAM.
> but you are not the speaker for the entire group.
Nor do I portend to be the speaker for the entire group.
Just the ones
who don't like to be bombarded with SPAM every time your
friend Steve
posts his maeningless drivel, just so he can post his link
again.
Strangely enough, from your past posts, I thought you also
disliked
SPAM. I must be confusing you with someone else who has
spoken out
against SPAM in the past.
> you certainly are not speaking for me.
Nor would I ever be tempted too. I don't share your views on
SPAM.
> if you don't like seeing someone's post ?
> (mine included)
> simply kill-file them and be done with it.
Rather than share your apathy Key, I like to point out to
SPAMMERS that
I don't like their SPAM. If you don't like to see me asking
SPAMMERS to
stop SPAMMING, you would appear to know your options.
> my2¢
and mine ;-)
Cool Jet
looks like you missed my point.
the spam had nothing to do with my point.
I too don't like SPAM. I also do NOT know Steve.
the only thing I was responding to was that you appeared to
be talking for the group.
--
"Key"
Cool Jet - 03 Jan 2006 04:02 GMT
> Cool Jet
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> --
> "Key"
Key, I did indeed miss your point. I mistakenly thought you were
defending Steve's SPAMMING and responded accordingly. My apology if I
gave the impression that I was speaking on anyone's behalf, other than
my own. The new wave of SPAMMERS p's me off by posting absolute
drivel, just so they can print a link to their websites. This Steve
Horrillo guy posts the same nonsense in several automotive groups that
I subscribe to and always with a link to his real estate websites,
thinking that he is sneaking his SPAM past the various groups. My
apology also for ripping on you. I think we're on the same side of the
SPAM issue.
'Key - 03 Jan 2006 05:35 GMT
>> Cool Jet
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> side of the
> SPAM issue.
ok, my bad too..
we are "on the same side of the SPAM issue".
happy new year to you & yours..

Signature
"Key"
Steve Horrillo - 05 Jan 2006 03:41 GMT
> This Steve
> Horrillo guy posts the same nonsense in several automotive groups that
> I subscribe to and always with a link to his real estate websites,
> thinking that he is sneaking his SPAM past the various groups
That's BS. Those sites are for Realtor training and Realtor recruiting. Who
in a car goup would be interested? My sig is the same wherever I post.
Crying wolf as you are doesn't help reduce spam, it just ruins the
credibility of people with legitimate complaints. Choose your battles more
carefully and don't be such a crybaby. If I'm the biggest fish you have to
fry I feel sorry for you.

Signature
Warmest regards,
Steve Horrillo, Realtor / C.Ht. =^..^=
http://BrokerAgentTraining.com http://over100percent.com
Cool Jet - 05 Jan 2006 07:27 GMT
> > This Steve
> > Horrillo guy posts the same nonsense in several automotive groups that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> That's BS. Those sites are for Realtor training and Realtor recruiting. Who
> in a car goup would be interested? My sig is the same wherever I post.
Er . . . Steve, those are links to websites, not signatures. Quit
trying so hard to rationalize your indiscretions!
> Crying wolf as you are doesn't help reduce spam, it just ruins the
> credibility of people with legitimate complaints. Choose your battles more
> carefully and don't be such a crybaby. If I'm the biggest fish you have to
> fry I feel sorry for you.
Steve, crying wolf may not reduce SPAM, but alerting the SPAMMER that
they are SPAMMING helps when the SPAMMER is too, shall we say, stupid
to even realize that they are SPAMMING in the first place. Oh, and I
have never accused you of being a "big Fish" Steve. Au contraire, you
are a very small fish in a very big pond. Perhaps it's that aspect of
your inferiority complex that compels you to SPAM in the first place.
> --
> Warmest regards,
>
> Steve Horrillo, Realturd / C.Ht. =^..^=
> http://BrokeAgentWithTrainingWheels.com http://justover10percentsuccessful.com
Steve Horrillo - 05 Jan 2006 15:12 GMT
> Steve, crying wolf may not reduce SPAM, but alerting the SPAMMER that
> they are SPAMMING helps when the SPAMMER is too, shall we say, stupid
> to even realize that they are SPAMMING in the first place. Oh, and I
> have never accused you of being a "big Fish" Steve. Au contraire, you
> are a very small fish in a very big pond. Perhaps it's that aspect of
> your inferiority complex that compels you to SPAM in the first place.
My business is local. There's an almost zero chance of getting an actual
custome. I have all the business I can handle by word of mouth. If it's spam
then you can get my isp to shut me down. Fact is, it's not in violation of
any TOS agreement or even netiquette. So just crawl back under the porch and
let corvette the discussion continue.
You've wasted enough of everone's time. Get a life then have a nice life.
BYE

Signature
Warmest regards,
Steve Horrillo, Realtor / C.Ht.
http://BrokerAgentTraining.com http://over100percent.com
'Key - 05 Jan 2006 19:29 GMT
>> Steve, crying wolf may not reduce SPAM, but alerting the
>> SPAMMER that
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> under the porch and
> let corvette the discussion continue.
---snip---
agree Steve, they are NOT spam !
links in signatures have always been excepted in every n/g
that I have ever been to.
g'day to ya

Signature
"Key"
"To the world you may be one person,
but to one person you may be the world"
'Key - 05 Jan 2006 19:25 GMT
>> > This Steve
>> > Horrillo guy posts the same nonsense in several
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> signatures. Quit
> trying so hard to rationalize your indiscretions!
"Cool Jet",
have to go along with Steve on this one.
a link that's in a signature is part of the signature.
its excepted as such in every n/g that I have ever been to.
it doesn't matter that the link points to.
no pun intended

Signature
"Key"
"To the world you may be one person,
but to one person you may be the world"
Cool Jet - 05 Jan 2006 22:25 GMT
> "Cool Jet",
> have to go along with Steve on this one.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> "To the world you may be one person,
> but to one person you may be the world"
I appreciate your feedback Key, but there's certainly evidence that
others consider it SPAM. Dad for example, who I have a lot of respect
for has killfiled Steve. PJ presented strong evidence of same in the
string entitled "OT: Is a sig considered spamming". I guess the
question has to be asked is why or if Steve would want to alienate
other group members by doing something some members find offensive.
Time will tell I guess. But either way, I shant rant anymore.
'Key - 06 Jan 2006 03:16 GMT
>> "Cool Jet",
>> have to go along with Steve on this one.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Time will tell I guess. But either way, I shant rant
> anymore.
well, I still haven't seen any evidence.
its not evidence just because a few (well respected folks)
post their opinion the opposite way.
also,
PJ posted his opinion. it wasn't backed up anything
official.
again, no pun intended

Signature
"Key"
"To the world you may be one person,
but to one person you may be the world"