Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Corvette / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

LT5 questions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Filmophilia@aol.com - 23 Jun 2006 08:06 GMT
I've been researching the LT5 engine from the ZR-1 Vette' but still
have two questions that I can't seem to find answers to, hoping you
guys can help:

1. Are LT5 crate engines available anywhere? GM doesn't list them as
being available for purchase on the Goodwrench site and I simply can't
believe that they aren't capable of building fresh LT5s in case an
owner has a "mishap" bad enough to merit needing a new engine. If I
owned one of the few hundred 95' or 96' model year ZR-1 Chevy built and
couldn't get a replacement engine if neccesary, I'd be pretty pissed.

2. How difficult is it to get the LT5 to drop into non-ZR-1 C4
generation Vettes? And what about swaps into GM full-sized trucks,
F-Bodies or Impalas? The engine was designed to drop into the C4
Corvette platform and fit within the Vette's engine bay so shouldn't
any vehicle that is capable of housing the LT1/LT4 be able to easily
house the LT5? I know that Tim Allen's Impala reportedly required
extensive modification to house the LT5 he had dropped in, but I'm not
understanding why. It seems logical to assume that any vehicle that GM
shipped with a factory installed LT1 or LT4 engine should be able to
accept the LT5 without problem - it's the same physical size, uses the
same bore centers and appears to have an aluminum cast version of the
same block as the LT1/LT4.
Fred C. Dobbs - 23 Jun 2006 14:17 GMT
>I've been researching the LT5 engine from the ZR-1 Vette' but still
>have two questions that I can't seem to find answers to, hoping you
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>owned one of the few hundred 95' or 96' model year ZR-1 Chevy built and
>couldn't get a replacement engine if neccesary, I'd be pretty pissed.

Chevy Did not build these engines, I beleive they were designed by
Lotus ,but they were built by Mercury Marine. They were hand built and
very costly.  Check out the following link for more details.

http://www.zr1netregistry.com/ZR1_about.htm

>2. How difficult is it to get the LT5 to drop into non-ZR-1 C4
>generation Vettes? And what about swaps into GM full-sized trucks,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>same bore centers and appears to have an aluminum cast version of the
>same block as the LT1/LT4.

The mods woud be for the Computer and Fuel supply among others.

It would be more cost effective to order the new LT7 427 crate motor
and  drop that in., than to try and find an LT5.
Dad - 23 Jun 2006 14:53 GMT
> I've been researching the LT5 engine from the ZR-1 Vette' but still
> have two questions that I can't seem to find answers to, hoping you
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> owned one of the few hundred 95' or 96' model year ZR-1 Chevy built and
> couldn't get a replacement engine if neccesary, I'd be pretty pissed.

You haven't researched it enough yet. There are very few complete engines out there because those in
the know bought them up when production halted. Those in the know now have hugh price tags on them,
that's why they are in the know. Plus I doubt that GM would be impressed if you were pissed.

> 2. How difficult is it to get the LT5 to drop into non-ZR-1 C4
> generation Vettes? And what about swaps into GM full-sized trucks,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> same bore centers and appears to have an aluminum cast version of the
> same block as the LT1/LT4.

The top of the engine, heads with cams, makes it wider than the normal engine and Tim Allen can
afford the ridiculous price to do that kind of swap. The design of the C4 and the LT5 was not a drop
in, check out some of the unique parts to get them to fit even though it was built for the C4.

The LT5 was only a passable attempt to make a DOHC, (or should that be DDOHC), engine back in late
'80s financed by the Corvette crowd at an outrageous price. It did give GM the research required to
make the Northstar design that spilled over into the Aurora racing engine but that died also. If you
read the history of the LT5 it was run against a well prepared LT1 engine during the first part of
the record run. The LT1 was pulled early because it was kicking the LT5s a.s, a no-no for public
relations, SALES. The news release played it off that it ended the LT1 run early because it had to
be at a show. Plus the "stock" LT5 was running headers and catless and more under the counter tweaks
than you can count. I fully believe that it is the event that doomed the further use of the LT5 past
a "pay for the test" number of units. They knew then that they had built an orphan that would be
eclipsed by the LS1 that was in the design stages at the time.

The fascination with the LT5 is beyond me other than the "I've got one and you don't" mentality of
some. It never came close to the accomplishments of the C5R or the C6R or even the Z06 with the
tried and true push rod engine. I have little doubt that the present Z06 could better the King of
the hill record that the ZR1 has held for so long but they don't need to in order to sell more cars
per year than the ZR1 did in its life cycle. Even the early '01 Z06 did that on the drag strip and
the present base LS2 can kick them to the corner with simple tweaks.

What every, if that's what you want, go for it, times a wasting. Get out your checkbook and be
prepared to be embarrassed by most Corvettes built today, and those crate engines are available and
fit.

Signature

Dad
05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd

RS - 23 Jun 2006 15:20 GMT
>> I've been researching the LT5 engine from the ZR-1 Vette' but still
>> have two questions that I can't seem to find answers to, hoping you
>> guys can help:

Just Drop this sucker in there.
http://www.bankspower.com/twin-turbo-products.cfm
All purpose built matched blueprinted etc etc. Unless 1100 HP is too scary
Dad - 23 Jun 2006 16:04 GMT
>>> I've been researching the LT5 engine from the ZR-1 Vette' but still
>>> have two questions that I can't seem to find answers to, hoping you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> http://www.bankspower.com/twin-turbo-products.cfm
> All purpose built matched blueprinted etc etc. Unless 1100 HP is too scary

A friend of mine has a 1978 coupe with a Pratt & Whitney ST6-27
turbine producing 880 shaft HP. Built by Andy and Vince Granatelli
using one of the turbines from the Indy racing effort of the late
60's. It was last run at Pratt & Whitney in Montreal at their 70th
anniversary celebration. He's still picking remnants of ZR1's out of
the intake the last I heard.

Go get your November 1979 issue of Motor Trend to read the full story.
It was also featured in the winter 1999 issue of Blue Bars.

Signature

Dad
05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd

PJ - 23 Jun 2006 16:32 GMT
>> I've been researching the LT5 engine from the ZR-1 Vette' but still
>> have two questions that I can't seem to find answers to, hoping you
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> prepared to be embarrassed by most Corvettes built today, and those crate engines are available and
> fit.

Remember too that you have to crowd in a dry sump lube system after you
"drop in" that LT5.
--
PJ
Crabs - 23 Jun 2006 18:36 GMT
<snip>

> The LT5 was only a passable attempt to make a DOHC, (or should that be DDOHC), engine back in late
> '80s financed by the Corvette crowd at an outrageous price. It did give GM the research required to
> make the Northstar design that spilled over into the Aurora racing engine but that died also. If you
> read the history of the LT5 it was run against a well prepared LT1 engine during the first part of
> the record run. The LT1 was pulled early because it was kicking the LT5s a.s, a no-no for public
> relations, SALES.
<snip>

Dad:

Them's fightin' words.
Meet me by the flagpole after school.
I've got a big can o' whoop-a.s that I'll open for you!

I've never heard this urban legend about the LT1 smoking the LT5. I've
got "Heart of the Beast" and it certainly isn't in there.
Got any proof?
Appreciate it.

TomC
90ZR1 #792
Dad - 23 Jun 2006 19:48 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Meet me by the flagpole after school.
> I've got a big can o' whoop-a.s that I'll open for you!

Put your can opener away, the bread and butter C6 can kick your a.s.

> I've never heard this urban legend about the LT1 smoking the LT5. I've got "Heart of the Beast"
> and it certainly isn't in there.

Don't need any proof, they're on the road everywhere. Not an urban legend any more than the old
tired beast is the king. If you were a real Corvette buff you would have read that a long time ago.
If you are as bad at looking up the artical as the ZR1 is at keeping up with my shopping car I could
waste my time and look it up for you.

> Got any proof?
> Appreciate it.
>
> TomC
> 90ZR1 #792
Signature

Dad
05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd
and a ZR1 bicycle. ;-P

Dad - 23 Jun 2006 19:57 GMT
Oops, my bad, just re-read the article and it wasn't a LT1, it was the lowly L-98, March 2nd 1990.

--
Dad
05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd
and a ZR1 bicycle. ;-P
Crabs - 24 Jun 2006 05:22 GMT
> Oops, my bad, just re-read the article and it wasn't a LT1, it was the lowly L-98, March 2nd 1990.

*ouch*
*sheesh*
How was I to know that I'd picked a fight with the schoolyard bully.

I'll just crawl back to my box under the highway overpass and tend to my
wounds.

Dad, you're one mean guy.

TomC
'90ZR1 #792
>  --
>  Dad
>  05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
>  72 Shark Black/Black/4spd
>  and a ZR1 bicycle. ;-P
'Key - 24 Jun 2006 06:18 GMT
>> Oops, my bad, just re-read the article and it wasn't a
>> LT1, it was the lowly L-98, March 2nd 1990.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> TomC
> '90ZR1 #792

he is not mean, he is very knowledgeable.
what am I saying ?
he kill-filed me long ago :-)

Signature

"Key"
=====

Filmophile - 24 Jun 2006 07:45 GMT
I'm not currently at work with any particular project, but the idea of
an LT5 powered vehicle is attractive to me. It's one of the few DOHC
engines Chevy has produced in the last 20 years that wasn't nestled
under the hood of a Cadillac and it's much more like a Ferrari engine
than anything else that's ever been in a production Vette'. And I'm
well aware that Chevy didn't build the engines themselves, but GM, Ford
and Dodge all still have numerous engines available for purchase as OEM
replacements and I figured that there might be some way for ZR-1 owners
to purchase a new engine - if neccesary - through GM.

Where performance is concerned, Lingenfelter can build the LT5 out to
475 Hp and 415 Ft. Lbs without needing to bore and stroke the engine -
a 368 CI version, almost alitre smaller than the Z06's new 7.0 litre
mill, produces 530 Hp and 450 Ft. Lbs. I'm well aware that these aren't
huge numbers by comparison, but under the hood of something like a C4
Corvette, that's more than enough to challenge C5 Z06s and C6 base
models and would make for a hell of a fast car without needing to spend
$50k + on a new C6 or over $70k on a new Z06. Of course the downside is
having to live with the C4's extremely dated interior design and it
doesn't address the braking or suspension upgrades that would be
neccesary to bring the car up to modern capabilities.

But again, none of it is really all that important because I haven't
commited to a particular project yet.
Dad - 24 Jun 2006 18:37 GMT
> I'm not currently at work with any particular project, but the idea of
> an LT5 powered vehicle is attractive to me. It's one of the few DOHC
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> But again, none of it is really all that important because I haven't
> commited to a particular project yet.

Have you had the chance to drive the LT5 or the LS2? The LT5s claim to fame is its RPMs and that
come from some great breathing provided by the valve area. Plus it has less drag/mass in the valve
train. On the other hand that same thing is happening in the LS1, 2, 6, & 7 engines with the uses of
new, lighter materials. They are also taking out the restrictions of air flow, oil flow, as well as
water flow. Each of those advances have made for one quick engine. Computer management of the engine
is so much more refined to get the most out of the new LS engines and it gets better each year.

You have looked at Lingenfelter and what they can do with the LT5 but they do equally as well with
the LS engines without changing the bore or stroke. I realize that the LS2 is 366 CID but that can
be pumped to 500 HP/440 FPT with ease. Then if you choose the 403 CID those figures go to 510 HP/500
FPT for about what an LT5 can cost you.

No way around it the LT5 was an awesome engine, but then so was the L88 in its day. That day is gone
and out of reach financially for most. The present LS engine is a scary engine to drive but is still
streetable for most enthusiasts. Take the time to drive them, they all have their good points. Let
us know what you do, it would be fun to watch a project go together with someone else's money.

Signature

Dad
05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51
72 Shark Black/Black/4spd

Filmophile - 24 Jun 2006 21:48 GMT
Owing to that I can't find a suitable/desireable project for the LT5
and that I'm not overly interested in another LS/LT series swap, I'm
thinking about going back to my original plan, which involved a 1976
Porsche 912E - the plan was/is to do a restoration/upgrade and create a
sort of 912 Clubsport with an emphasis on handling prowess as opposed
to raw speed. Something light, compact and nimble that I can run
through the canyon and/or at SCCA events sounds fun.
Dad - 24 Jun 2006 22:01 GMT
> Owing to that I can't find a suitable/desireable project for the LT5
> and that I'm not overly interested in another LS/LT series swap, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to raw speed. Something light, compact and nimble that I can run
> through the canyon and/or at SCCA events sounds fun.

You could always get Audi to let you test the R8 as they have the R10 doing everything better than
even they thought it would. Strange machine to hear and watch.
PJ - 24 Jun 2006 22:32 GMT
>> Owing to that I can't find a suitable/desireable project for the LT5
>> and that I'm not overly interested in another LS/LT series swap, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> You could always get Audi to let you test the R8 as they have the R10 doing everything better than
> even they thought it would. Strange machine to hear and watch.

Gonna nose in here.  Maybe I'm coming out of my '911-snob bag' but:

I do have high regard for the 'E.' It was a well-engineered comeback for
the 912; however, I think of it as a very 'finely finished' package.
Everything was engineered properly for that 4-banger. Meaningful mods
for handling and modest performance upgrades will come at a high price;
and, when you are finished you'll have a 912E.  Fun to drive but still a
912E with 4-cylinder limitations.

And, I can't resist.... "on a quiet night you can hear a Porsche
r______."  (In all fairness though, Zuffenhausen did have most of the
body and frame preservation issues cured by 1976.)

--
PJ
Filmophile - 27 Jun 2006 08:35 GMT
As a long-time "Porsche-phile" I can understand where you're coming
from. But the 912E really presents itself to me in a positive way. It
had a very reliable, very tuneable fuel-injected VW Type IV motor
combined with the dynamics of the 911 chassis and the class of the
911's interior and body. I forsee the vehicle with the 930's braking
system, an aftermarket suspension system (probably H&R gear), a rebuilt
engine and tranny and an output in the 160-185 Hp range combined with
lightweight front seats, the removal of the rears and the addition of a
911 Clubsport type tail (differentiated from the 930's spoiler by it's
lower, flatter profile and thinner construction). I figure with output
in the near-200 Hp area and a curbweight under 3,000 pounds it should
be quite a hoot, keep in mind it only had 96 Hp as stock.

My first choice was an 88' 911 3.2 coupe with the "Turbo Look" body
(which included the 930's brakes) but I'm thinking it's gonna be a lot
more expensive, especially where the engine is concerned. The Type IV
is inexpensive and easy to work on, compareablly speaking.

> >> Owing to that I can't find a suitable/desireable project for the LT5
> >> and that I'm not overly interested in another LS/LT series swap, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> --
> PJ
Filmophile - 27 Jun 2006 08:16 GMT
I'm a big Audi fan, and was cheering the R10 through all 24 hours of Le
Mans; my father had a 1998 A4 2.8 Quattro (5-speed, sport pack,
purchased new, sold it in 2002) and I'm going to try to get into an A3
3.2 S-Line when I buy my next car sometime in the next 6-12 months. But
I'm planning on leaving it fairly stock, I'll probably blow a wad on a
high end stereo system upgrade and I might be tempted into an H&R
Racing Cup Kit plus upgraded tires, but that's be about it. I want to
have something fun that I can play with on weekends that I can modify
the hell out of without worrying about voiding my warranty. I was
thinking about a B5 platform S4 for awhile but most of them are getting
up in miles and I don't really see the point in buying a four-door
weekend car - if I don't need it as a day to day driver I'd rather have
a coupe.

> > Owing to that I can't find a suitable/desireable project for the LT5
> > and that I'm not overly interested in another LS/LT series swap, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> You could always get Audi to let you test the R8 as they have the R10 doing everything better than
> even they thought it would. Strange machine to hear and watch.
Tom in Missouri - 25 Jun 2006 03:01 GMT
It has that uniqueness that some just have to have.

Here is its predecessor:
http://i17.ebayimg.com/03/i/07/52/af/11_1.JPG

This picture is half of the V8 planned. It is known as a 907.  It is 2.0 L
and 4 cylinders.  In its planned original form, it was going to be 4.0 L V8.
It has a redline of 7000 rpm.  It is also very unforgiving,  Rev one to
7500, and you find how expensive it is.  Maybe not the first time, but
certainly not more than a few.

The original design didn't work for the LT5, because since the original
design went to 4.0 L, and I think allotted for 4.8 L,  there wasn't enough
room to stuff 5.0 L, let alone the 5.7 L they used.

The ZR1/LT5 crowd venomously oppose such talk, claiming it is an all new
design and nothing related to the original, because the main designers claim
that since the original was too small, they had to "start from scratch."

"Starting from Scratch" ion this case was simply moving the bore centers and
a few dimensions.

BTW, it originally came in one of these:

http://i23.ebayimg.com/04/i/07/57/b1/5c_1.JPG

http://i19.ebayimg.com/01/i/07/51/96/22_1.JPG

> I'm not currently at work with any particular project, but the idea of
> an LT5 powered vehicle is attractive to me. It's one of the few DOHC
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> But again, none of it is really all that important because I haven't
> commited to a particular project yet.
Crabs - 23 Jun 2006 18:29 GMT
> I've been researching the LT5 engine from the ZR-1 Vette' but still
> have two questions that I can't seem to find answers to, hoping you
> guys can help:
>
> 1. Are LT5 crate engines available anywhere? GM doesn't list them as
> being available for purchase on the Goodwrench site
<snip>

Yes. There are a few "New Old Stock" crate motors still around, and some
might actually be for sale. There were a only limited number of spare
LT5 engines made.
If you are serious about your project then your research will lead you
to them. Don't expect them to be easy to find or cheap.

> 2. How difficult is it to get the LT5 to drop into non-ZR-1 C4
> generation Vettes?
<snip>
No more difficult than any other engine swap, although the LT5 has
different porportions than a standard small block. There will be tons of
mods necessary to put the LT5 in any car other than a true ZR1.
Only you and your checkbook can decide if it's worth the price.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a BIG ZR1/LT5 fan.
I own one.
It's certainly the coolest looking Corvette engine ever made.
The sad thing is, most people out there have never seen or heard of a
ZR1. Without the hood up, most people wouldn't even know they were
looking at one. Even with the hood up, most people have to ask what it
is. :-(

If all you want is to go fast, buy a crate LS6 engine and stuff it in
whatever car you want. It'll fit right in, no muss, no fuss. If you want
to go faster, toss on a blower and/or NOS.
If you blow it up, no biggie, just drive down to the local Chevy dealer
and open your checkbook.
Will it be pretty? Depends on who's looking at it.
Will it be fast? Damn yes.
Will it beat a ZR1?  Yup. With one arm tied behind it's back.

Good luck on your project.
If your heart is set on a LT5, do your research. Google is your friend.
Your best source of information BY FAR is the ZR1 Net Registry, followed
closely by the ZR1 sub-forum at the Corvette Forum.

Good luck!

TomC
'90ZR1 #792

And what about swaps into GM full-sized trucks,
> F-Bodies or Impalas? The engine was designed to drop into the C4
> Corvette platform and fit within the Vette's engine bay so shouldn't
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> same bore centers and appears to have an aluminum cast version of the
> same block as the LT1/LT4.
Crabs - 23 Jun 2006 18:39 GMT
>If I
> owned one of the few hundred 95' or 96' model year ZR-1 Chevy built and
> couldn't get a replacement engine if neccesary, I'd be pretty pissed.

ZR1s were only produced from '90-'95. No '96.
You'd be pissed.
GM didn't make the motor.

TomC
'90ZR1 #792
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.