Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Corvette / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

05 C6 Victory Red paint problem

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mr_scott - 08 Aug 2006 14:05 GMT
Bought an '05 C6 from dealer in April of '05 here in Maine. Stored it
Oct-June, got it detailed in June at the dealership where they found
"environmental" damage to the paint that GM won't cover after 12 months.
They pushed an aftermarket coating "Touch of Class" that I bought, TOC
offered me $600 to buff the car. Any suggestions. Anyone else with this
problem? Dealer passing the buck... Buyer beware of Marc Motors in Sanford
ME.
Dad - 08 Aug 2006 15:28 GMT
> Bought an '05 C6 from dealer in April of '05 here in Maine. Stored it
> Oct-June, got it detailed in June at the dealership where they found
> "environmental" damage to the paint that GM won't cover after 12 months. They
> pushed an aftermarket coating "Touch of Class" that I bought, TOC offered me
> $600 to buff the car. Any suggestions. Anyone else with this problem? Dealer
> passing the buck... Buyer beware of Marc Motors in Sanford ME.
BS! Somebody is loading your drawers big time. My guess is that unless it is
kept in a bubble all of its life there will be environmental damage. What the
hell is that? You've been had.
mr_scott - 14 Aug 2006 16:26 GMT
So what should I do? GM won't answer the calls anymore. Sue?
>> Bought an '05 C6 from dealer in April of '05 here in Maine. Stored it
>> Oct-June, got it detailed in June at the dealership where they found
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> is kept in a bubble all of its life there will be environmental damage.
> What the hell is that? You've been had.
Shane - 14 Aug 2006 16:43 GMT
What exactly is this "environmental damage" that they say is wrong w
your paint

--
Shan

------------------------------------------------------
--------- AUTOMOTIVE-USENET.COM ---------
-----------------------------------------------------
PJ - 14 Aug 2006 22:35 GMT
> What exactly is this "environmental damage" that they say is wrong w/
> your paint?

Over the last decade there have been some specific paints that have been
susceptible to "environmental damage."  I had a white '96 that developed
speckles from atmospheric fallout.  GM gave everyone one free refinish
since some of those failures may have been triggered during transport.
Mil-yellow was susceptible to UV damage and owners had to sign a waiver
for a couple of model years of that color.  I had a Guards Red 911 that
reacted to the seams in the bra that the dealer sold as a Porsche
accessory.  Porsche America and the dealer both kissed me off.

First thing is to check the service bulletins on that color.  Another
question, is TOC a Chevvy approved supplemental finish on new cars?

Signature

--
PJ
'89 Hookercar '02 e-blu coupe

mr_scott - 16 Aug 2006 20:24 GMT
The paint has barely noticeable divits about dime sized in many different
spots on the car where the clear coat appears to have "peeled". Under a
magnifying glass the dealer says it's trough th clear coat. The paint
doesn't seem to be bothered, but there are spots on my Lexan top and
Headlamp and tail lamps as well that won't come out. And BTW: GM regional
manager says he won't touch it because TOC was put on, the dealer never
mentioned that to me while trying to sell me the stuff. If  TOC went on the
inside of the car as well, not just the outside, how could it be a paint
sealer??. I am wondering if something was wrong with the TOC they put on the
car, but I could never prove it. Maybe litigation through the State? Really
bummed and am damned sure not going to buy GM ever again if this doesn't get
fixed soon. "Makes ya wanna cry man...", I love this car.

> What exactly is this "environmental damage" that they say is wrong w/
> your paint?
Yeni Penny - 15 Aug 2006 20:15 GMT
Environmental damage is another word for acid rain, bird poop, etc.
It's not a defect in the paint which would be warrantable.  It is an
outside factor that has damaged the paint which is not warrantable.

This distinction is very clearly laid out in your owner's manual.  It
very clearly states that environmental damage is not a warrantable item,
but in the interest of customer satisfaction, Chevrolet(GM) will correct
such damage during the first 12 months of ownership.  The dealership is
merely telling you what the Chevrolet(GM) policy is.  They aren't trying
to blow smoke up your butt as you allege.

Touch of Class is an aftermarket paint sealant.  It has no connection to
GM nor Chevrolet, but is sold by many new car dealerships as an inflated
package.  It is good stuff, but doesn't perform miracles.  It is a paint
sealant.  No more, no less.  By itself, it will not correct any
environmental damage.  Buffing the paint is the usual method of removing
mild acid rain and mild damage from bird poop.  The TOC is merely to
seal and help protect against future damage.

$600. for a buff and TOC application is pretty much a ripoff.
RicSeyler - 15 Aug 2006 23:08 GMT
My dealership tried that on me one time when I had the car in for a
fender bender
(err cracker lol), got it back and there was a rough feel and very small
debris on one side.....
They hollered Environmental Damage...... I went to my shop got out a 25x
Loupe and lo
and behold it was metal shavings embedded into the paint, from some
dumbass doing grinding
and the sparks hitting the paint. You could see the rusted metal and the
small burn around each
shaving, and they all were in one direction..... <clears throat> not
from the top... LOLOL
They had to completely cut and seal the car after I proved my case to
the Service Manager.

>Environmental damage is another word for acid rain, bird poop, etc.
>It's not a defect in the paint which would be warrantable.  It is an
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>  

Signature

Ric Seyler
Online Racing: RicSeyler
GPL Handicap 6.35
ricseyler@SPAMgulf.net
http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler
remove –SPAM- from email address
--------------------------------------
"Homer no function beer well without."
- H.J. Simpson

Yeni Penny - 15 Aug 2006 23:49 GMT
Quote:My dealership tried that on me one time when I had the car in for
a fender bender
(err cracker lol), got it back and there was a rough feel and very small
debris on one side.....
They hollered Environmental Damage...... I went to my shop got out a 25x
Loupe and lo
and behold it was metal shavings embedded into the paint, from some
dumbass doing grinding
and the sparks hitting the paint. You could see the rusted metal and the
small burn around each
shaving, and they all were in one direction..... <clears throat> not
from the top... LOLOL
They had to completely cut and seal the car after I proved my case to
the Service Manager.Unquote

It troubles me that a reputable(maybe they weren't) dealership bodyshop
wouldn't get the electronic loupe that any decent shop has and confirm
or deny the condition you described.  BTW, "rail dust" from transport
isn't usually considered environmental damage.  However, it's rarely
present on a Corvette since they are usually delivered by truck
transport rather than rail.
mr_scott - 16 Aug 2006 20:30 GMT
The paint has barely noticeable divits about dime sized in many different
spots on the car where the clear coat appears to have "peeled". Under a
magnifying glass the dealer says it's trough th clear coat. The paint
doesn't seem to be bothered, but there are spots on my Lexan top and
Headlamp and tail lamps as well that won't come out. And BTW: GM regional
manager says he won't touch it because TOC was put on, the dealer never
mentioned that to me while trying to sell me the stuff. If  TOC went on the
inside of the car as well, not just the outside, how could it be a paint
sealer??. I am wondering if something was wrong with the TOC they put on the
car, but I could never prove it. Maybe litigation through the State? Really
bummed and am damned sure not going to buy GM ever again if this doesn't get
fixed soon. "Makes ya wanna cry man...", I love this car.

> Environmental damage is another word for acid rain, bird poop, etc.
> It's not a defect in the paint which would be warrantable.  It is an
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> $600. for a buff and TOC application is pretty much a ripoff.
PJ - 23 Aug 2006 02:55 GMT
> The paint has barely noticeable divits about dime sized in many different
> spots on the car where the clear coat appears to have "peeled". Under a
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>>
>> $600. for a buff and TOC application is pretty much a ripoff.

I just re-read the Warranty on my '02 (page 12).  That 12/12000 applies
to "atmospheric" effects -- sounds very much like "environmental
damage."  For the '02 there's no limitation on paint colors as there was
in 1989 or 1996.

If applying TOC voided that warranty then it's reasonable that TOC or
the dealer repair any paint damage, replace the clear coat and do the
job right.

--
PJ
'89 Hookercar '02 e-blu coupe
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.