Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Corvette / December 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

changing crossfire C4 to carburation

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Art - 02 Dec 2007 21:50 GMT
I need just a little advice about changing from crossfire fuel injection to
a carburated engine on a 1984 C4.

The intake and carburator shall be Edelbrock.  My question is I have been
told that I can continue to use the HEI distributator, is this possible?  If
it is I only have to change intake, carb and linkage, is this correct also.

thanks for any help.

Art
'Key - 02 Dec 2007 22:43 GMT
>I need just a little advice about changing from crossfire
>fuel injection to
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Art

been there, done that...

actually you will be getting away from most of the computer
and emissions.
(hope you know where you can get an inspection)
you will be changing a lot more than just the HEI
distributator, intake, carb and linkage.
the stock exhaust manifold is set up for the smog pump and
the cross-fire.
you will have to modify the exhaust manifold, plugging up a
number of holes that will no longer be needed.
you will also have hood clearance problems with the intake
and carburetor and will have to use a short intake.
the breather element will have to be very short.
Edelbrock has a short breather for their carbs. it not that
good of a breather though, but without a custom made
breather, its the only choice.
an Edelbrock carb is really the only choice you will have. a
Holly carb is too tall...
(you do have the choice of adding a hood-scoop)
you will be better off keeping the crossfire.
I found out later that my cross-fire could have been
modified to become better then it was.
I wish I would have gone that route !

g'luck
Signature

'Key
=====

Art - 03 Dec 2007 03:02 GMT
Thanks Key, but my options are very limited, the crossfire intake has a
crack and must be replaced, I replaced the exhaust manifolds a long time ago
with short headers and have removed most of the unecssary stuff. Edelbrock
has recommended a #2101  intake along with a #1406 600 cfm carb which they
advised will fit under my hood without alterations,  I enjoyed the cross
fire, but do not have a lot of options.  The ignition is a major problem
with me as I have never 'messed' with them and cannot find any procedures on
how to change over to carb from cross fire.

Thanks for any additional assistance you can offer.

Art
> >I need just a little advice about changing from crossfire
> >fuel injection to
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> 'Key
> =====
bmckeenospam@9.netxcom.com - 05 Dec 2007 20:14 GMT
>Thanks Key, but my options are very limited, the crossfire intake has a
>crack and must be replaced, I replaced the exhaust manifolds a long time ago
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>> 'Key
>> =====

Just have the manifold welded.  Would be a lot less money and work.
Refinish King - 06 Dec 2007 19:09 GMT
You can buy crossfire intakes at swap meets,

I'm sure if you do a Google search, you can find one. Also, call Jones
Enterprises @ 570-644-0777 in Coal Township, pa.

He had an 82 Camaro, with a spare one.

I hope this helps.

RK

>>Thanks Key, but my options are very limited, the crossfire intake has a
>>crack and must be replaced, I replaced the exhaust manifolds a long time
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>
> Just have the manifold welded.  Would be a lot less money and work.
pj - 03 Dec 2007 02:44 GMT
> I need just a little advice about changing from crossfire fuel injection to
> a carburated engine on a 1984 C4.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Art

The '84 HEI only had 'limp home' advance built into the module...not
intended to provide any performance.

You'll need some scheme for advance (vacuum and/or centrifugal), like
the earlier HEIs had.
--
pj
Art - 03 Dec 2007 03:05 GMT
Thanks pj, are you recommending changing the entire distributator to an
earler one (example a distributator from a 78 'vette that had carburation)
and add vacuum advance unit to the engine.  Will the tach and other
instrumentation work if I do that?  What else must be done to accomplish the
changeover?

I appreciate any additional insight you might be willing to give me.

Thanks,
Art
> > I need just a little advice about changing from crossfire fuel injection to
> > a carburated engine on a 1984 C4.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> --
> pj
pj - 03 Dec 2007 16:06 GMT
> Thanks pj, are you recommending changing the entire distributator to an
> earler one (example a distributator from a 78 'vette that had carburation)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> Art

Suggestion is: don't do this.  Instead, take a look at Wayne's post
and build a shopping list to restore the Crossfire.

Also, try a post for Crossfire improvement suggestions in the C4 Scan
and Tune Forum:  < http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zeroforum?id=82 >.

Maybe I'm reading the situation wrong but, think you're looking for
'off-road' experience where emission control is not an issue.

I think the carb conversion will make for more complications, more $$,
less rear-wheel horsepower, and more fuel consumption.  OTOH, a new cam,
redoing the hood profile to accommodate a larger intake etc. etc.

There is a tach signal from those old distributors but it's a pulse from
the 12-volt module.  Your current tach signal comes from the ECM and
it's a digital signal.

Another distributor issue is the weak advance curves in the 77-79 HEIs.
You'd be starting out from square zero, building an advance curve.
Ten years ago, I rebuilt my '79 HEI -- mess of red oxide inside and
lower end had suffered a lube failure.  Expect most salvage distributors
to look the same.

hth

--
pj
WayneC - 03 Dec 2007 04:54 GMT
> I need just a little advice about changing from crossfire fuel injection to
> a carburated engine on a 1984 C4.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Art

http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/pts/494076053.html
http://tinyurl.com/2dz3yg
http://tinyurl.com/22ehsm
http://tinyurl.com/2bx6p9
http://tinyurl.com/2786hd
http://www.crossfire.homeip.net/cftest/policy.asp
The Reverend Natural Light - 03 Dec 2007 20:31 GMT
> I need just a little advice about changing from crossfire fuel injection to
> a carburated engine on a 1984 C4.
>
> The intake and carburator shall be Edelbrock.  My question is I have been
> told that I can continue to use the HEI distributator, is this possible?  If
> it is I only have to change intake, carb and linkage, is this correct also.

Carb/intake won't fit under the hood.
Your HEI distributor won't work at all.
Fuel pressure is too high.
4+3 manual won't work.
Converter lockup won't work.
TV cable won't work.
Cruise control won't work.
Not U.S. emission legal.
Less power.
More gas.

If you've given up on the Cross Fire, have you considered upgrading to
TPI fuel injection?

Raid a junkyard Camaro or Firebird (look for '85 or '86) for all the
hard parts.  Add a PPI wiring harness, new injectors, and a booster
fuel pump.  The existing sensors in the car will wire right in (even
the wire colors are the same) and the new computer will work with the
transmission.

You'll get more power and better gas mileage.  It should be legal just
about anywhere (not sure about California).  Parts match and it will
look stock.

Or, perhaps a 2-barrel TBI intake from a late model small-block would
adapt.  It would be better than a carb.
Refinish King - 04 Dec 2007 05:25 GMT
What's wrong with the crossfire,

That you want to butcher the car by removing it?

RK

>> I need just a little advice about changing from crossfire fuel injection
>> to
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> Or, perhaps a 2-barrel TBI intake from a late model small-block would
> adapt.  It would be better than a carb.
'Key - 04 Dec 2007 05:34 GMT
> What's wrong with the crossfire,
>
> That you want to butcher the car by removing it?
>
> RK

he already stated his crossfire intake has a crack.
news:SkK4j.27806$JD.11198@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net

Signature

'Key
=====

The Reverend Natural Light - 04 Dec 2007 17:58 GMT
> What's wrong with the crossfire,
>
> That you want to butcher the car by removing it?

I was trying to talk someone out of bolting on a carb and a hood
scoop.  That would doom the car to a junkyard.
Refinish King - 05 Dec 2007 00:02 GMT
I agree!

Sorry for the misunderstanding.

RK
>> What's wrong with the crossfire,
>>
>> That you want to butcher the car by removing it?
>
> I was trying to talk someone out of bolting on a carb and a hood
> scoop.  That would doom the car to a junkyard.
Billy Ryman - 04 Dec 2007 02:04 GMT
Your biggest problem is going to be the ECU, not the HEI distributor.

Your removing a lot of stuff that the ECU needs to inputs from, mainly items
that do not exist with a carb. The ECU is set up for TBI not a carb. Biggest
show-stoppers items are TPS, IAC, and MAP

Code after code after code will be set if you can even get it to run without
the above.
Art - 05 Dec 2007 02:35 GMT
wow, seems everyone is against it but i have seen several here in the
southeast that appear to be running fine with  a carburator.  I may have to
strip out the dash and replace with standard gauges, but the trans should
perform ok, i guess what i am doing is dropping back 4 years in technology
but necessary to keep it running.  I have seen many cars built with a 350
and running without a lot of electronic additions, the '84 was a very
primitive computer and most everything can be bypassed i think.  I don't
think I have any alternative ways at this point.

> Your biggest problem is going to be the ECU, not the HEI distributor.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Code after code after code will be set if you can even get it to run without
> the above.
Billy Ryman - 05 Dec 2007 03:11 GMT
Actually the '84 vette was state of the art for it's time. The rest of GM's
line-up was sporting closed loop carb systems.

Conversion to carb can be done, but it requires an awful lot of bypassing
and removing of controls. As one poster commented, the transmission is an
electronic 700R4. It has no provision for a TV cable as used on other GM
models.

At this point with the ECU pretty much having to be by-passed, I have no
idea how it would effect the LED dash or the rest of the instrumentation.

Man, I wouldn't want to attempt what you want to do.

Good Luck!
WayneC - 05 Dec 2007 03:21 GMT
All this over a crack in an intake manifold... are you nuts?!!

> wow, seems everyone is against it but i have seen several here in the
> southeast that appear to be running fine with  a carburator.  I may have to
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> without
>> the above.
CardsFan - 05 Dec 2007 14:22 GMT
> All this over a crack in an intake manifold... are you nuts?!!

I couldn't agree more.  I presume this person puts no dollar value
whatsoever on the (vast) amount of time that is going to be spent effecting
all of these changes and then getting it to run decent.

AJM
'93 Ruby coupe, 6 sp (both tops)

>> wow, seems everyone is against it but i have seen several here in the
>> southeast that appear to be running fine with  a carburator.  I may have
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> without
>>> the above.
Ric Seyler - 05 Dec 2007 20:56 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>'93 Ruby coupe, 6 sp (both tops)
>  

Plus the diminished value of the car afterward........

>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
>  

Signature

Ric Seyler
Online Racing: RicSeyler
GPL Handicap 6.35
ricseyler@SPAMgulf.net
http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler
remove -SPAM- from email address
--------------------------------------
"Homer no function beer well without."
- H.J. Simpson

Billy Ryman - 07 Dec 2007 16:22 GMT
Hey, all you can do is point out the pitfalls and disadvantages to the
fellow. I agree that a cracked manifold doesn't warrant what he wants to do,
but he seems to have his mind set on it. In effect what he'll be doing by
completing this "retro-fit" is reducing any market or intrinsic value of the
car to nothing,.... plus he's going to spend a couple thousand in parts &
labor to arrive at this end result.

Not to criticize, just my opinion.
Refinish King - 08 Dec 2007 04:16 GMT
Pitfalls as follows:

Modifying the transmission detent cable, and making a bracket.

Changing over to a HEI distributor, providing he has the clearance.

Wiring issuse, Codes setting for missing components.

Emissions, my daughters and grandchildren breath the air hr will mess up.

Cam issues, i.e..: Stumbling, hesitation and all that good sh.t.

Gearing, the rear is most like lower than a carbureted car.

I'm too disgusted to go on and tired.

RK
> Hey, all you can do is point out the pitfalls and disadvantages to the
> fellow. I agree that a cracked manifold doesn't warrant what he wants to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Not to criticize, just my opinion.
Elbert - 05 Dec 2007 06:02 GMT
I would be all over a conversion if it were my car. where you going to
find the parts for a 1984 crossfire (something that was very limited
production).  

Other poster said this car has a electronically controlled 700R4...is
this true on a 1984 model car? Since I'm not a corvette nut I don't
know but that does not sound right.  You have the lockup converter
controlled by wire but I don't think this thing shifted by wire
(correct me if someone knows for sure)

Unless you have a pristine car and want to retain the stock engine....
I would basically trash the fuel and intake setup. Install an old
school HEI distributor (like came on a 78 z-28) you can buy a good
rebuilt unit from NAPA. Find out what low profile dual plane intake
and carb setup + air filter will clear the hood. Do away with computer
controls....etc...  Now this based on living where emissions controls
are lax or non-existent.

If you live where you have strict emissions controls... I would look
for a good tuned port motor out of a later model z-28 to swap over.

There are a number of companies that make all kind of stand alone
wiring harnesses for projects just like this.  Of course you would
have to know how to work on the car and have good basic mechanical
knowledge of the vehicle and any donor vehicle.

All around road manner and good power....I would be looking for a
tuned port setup to use (GM OEM Stuff) not aftermarket. I would look
to buy a complete engine assembly out of a wreck.

Maybe something out of a 02 Z-28 or even a LT-1 engine out of caprice
or road master would be good.

crossfire to me would be a pain in the a.s to screw with, given the
opportunity to get a new motor with a lot better fuel injection setup.

Was a crossfire not something like to mini-throttle body type injector
setups.  I would go with a more modern fuel injection setup any day
over crossfire.  You can buy entire engine assemblies + ecm + wirining
harness for $1,500 or so.

Seems to me that even the corvette used a transmission in the 1984
year that worked of either  kickdown cable or TV cable.   Unless the
84 has the odball trans mount setup I would change that too, and go
with a more modern version of the 700R4 with TV cable. Does the 84
have the oddball trans mount setup?

If under strict emission controls, you better check the rules on
engine swaps in your area to make sure what you can do in order to
pass emissions / inspection, othewise you may be up the creek.

If you get a complete engine assembly then get the wiring harness
and the ECM.  Othewise you'll need to obtain an ECM and can use
a wiring harness from painless.  

Swapping all this would not be an easy job. Don't know if that car had
an "electronic" dash...  and if so does the ECM have any direct
control over the gauages or inputs into the dash.  This would be a big
job to tackle, I would certainly do some research, espically if you
will have to pay someone or even do it yourself.

>wow, seems everyone is against it but i have seen several here in the
>southeast that appear to be running fine with  a carburator.  I may have to
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>without
>> the above.

-----------
Elbert
ask@me.com
The Reverend Natural Light - 05 Dec 2007 19:38 GMT
> I would be all over a conversion if it were my car. where you going to
> find the parts for a 1984 crossfire (something that was very limited
> production).

I'll bet the whole intake and throttle body assembly from a late model
small block TBI engine would work with little modifications.  It's
basically the same as Cross Fire EFI, except both injectors are in one
place instead of opposite ends of the manifold.  Probably uses all the
same sensors.

> Maybe something out of a 02 Z-28 or even a LT-1 engine out of caprice
> or road master would be good.

Beware of the Caprice LTI's.  Not all are 5.7L.  They're all visually
identical, so check the casting numbers.

> Was a crossfire not something like to mini-throttle body type injector
> setups.  I would go with a more modern fuel injection setup any day
> over crossfire.

It's a twin 1-barrel throttle body EFI setup with a throttle body at
each end of the manifold.  It's really not a bad design.  I had an F-
Body with a Cross Fire 5.0L and it was very reliable.

> You can buy entire engine assemblies + ecm + wirining
> harness for $1,500 or so.

There's a '94 Z28 LTI engine on Craigslist in my area for $1200 -
complete.  It's in a running car so all the wiring could be recovered
if someone took the time to do it.  That takes a while but saves the
$500+ for an aftermarket harness.
Refinish King - 06 Dec 2007 19:15 GMT
The ECM fired the injectors at different times,

But, I think the one TB's wires can go to one injector, and the other to the
second injector.

Still a hack job, but plausible.

RK
>> I would be all over a conversion if it were my car. where you going to
>> find the parts for a 1984 crossfire (something that was very limited
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> if someone took the time to do it.  That takes a while but saves the
> $500+ for an aftermarket harness.
Refinish King - 06 Dec 2007 19:13 GMT
It was in the Camaro from 1982!

You and the other guy, should be careful of cigarettes with white dust on
them.

RK

> I would be all over a conversion if it were my car. where you going to
> find the parts for a 1984 crossfire (something that was very limited
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> Elbert
> ask@me.com
Elbert - 07 Dec 2007 01:02 GMT
what was in the camaro from 1982?  the 7004R trans?

>It was in the Camaro from 1982!
>
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
>> Elbert
>> ask@me.com

-----------
Elbert
ask@me.com
The Reverend Natural Light - 07 Dec 2007 18:00 GMT
> what was in the camaro from 1982?  the 7004R trans?

They used the 200-4R for a while, then switched to 700R4.  Don't
remember when.
Refinish King - 08 Dec 2007 04:10 GMT
I don't remember if it was manual or automatic:

Call them at 570-644-0777, ask for Paul.

RK

> what was in the camaro from 1982?  the 7004R trans?
>
[quoted text clipped - 98 lines]
> Elbert
> ask@me.com
Billy Ryman - 10 Dec 2007 02:00 GMT
The crossfire system in the Z-28's only lasted 2 years, In 1984 the LU5
option was dropped and it was back to LG4 and L69 which in 1984 sported
closed loop carbs!!!!!  That system was not the same as the Corvette 1984
version by a far cry (they were the same POS that was installed on the 4
cylinders). It was so poorly designed that the most HP they could get out of
the that 305 was a rated 160!

The TBI's used on the 1984 Corvette would not be used in regular GM
production until late 1986!

Remind us not to send you to the parts store.
Billy Ryman - 07 Dec 2007 16:48 GMT
The Cross-Fire TBI system on the 84 was two GM 200 series TBI's. The same
TBI's that would appear in GM's medium cars and light trucks 3 years later.
Synchronization of the TBI's was done via the ECU. It was a good system,
fuel efficient, and got rid of that massive amount of vacuum lines that
draped the intake manifold, but lacked the kind of performance you want in a
Corvette.

I spoke with a welder the other day and he said that unless the manifold is
broken in half it is not a problem repair it.(In the neighborhood of $100).
A couple years ago he repaired a smashed runner on a SBC manifold for me.
Looked like a factory new manifold when he was done. If you have a skilled
welder with the right tooling he can work wonders.
The Reverend Natural Light - 05 Dec 2007 19:27 GMT
> wow, seems everyone is against it but i have seen several here in the
> southeast that appear to be running fine with  a carburator.  I may have to
> strip out the dash and replace with standard gauges,

I've seen a lot of cars at junkyards that had been converted, usually
because the previous owner didn't understand EFI enough to fix it.  As
soon as emissions inspections come, the car is useless.  Strip the
body for parts and crush the rest.

> but the trans should
> perform ok,

It'll need a standalone controller for the converter lockup.  Such a
device is available.  The TV cable has to hook up to something or
it'll burn up the transmission.  A trans swap isn't an option due to
the driveline beam.

> i guess what i am doing is dropping back 4 years in technology
> but necessary to keep it running.

No it isn't.

> I don't
> think I have any alternative ways at this point.

Fix it right.  It's your car, of course.  You'll do what you want.
'Key - 05 Dec 2007 22:20 GMT
> wow, seems everyone is against it but i have seen several
> here in the
> southeast that appear to be running fine with  a
> carburator.

my 84/c4 runs very well with a carb.
high output coil and wires, hooker headers and free flow
exhaust.
I do wish it were more street legal....

> I may have to strip out the dash and replace with standard
> gauges,

the only thing I did was add a good temp gage because the
old one was broken.
the others gages work fine. the led dash also works fine.

> but the trans should perform ok,

mine does...
Signature

'Key
=====

Albert - 06 Dec 2007 15:39 GMT
'Key is correct.  My 700R4 ('89) uses a TV cable and I believe it didn't
get changed out for electronics until OBD-II was fully implemented,
probably after '92 or '93.  On the '84 the ECU does control the torque
converter lockup clutch and that could be handled by a manual switch.

Question for 'Key.  What are you using for a speedometer?  And, did you
leave the ECU in place to run it?  Reason I ask is that early C4's
divided the mph pulse signal from the transmission by 2, to accommodate
speed signals above 120mph in the computer.  I could be wrong but I
think the 'digital dash' doesn't use the standard GM convention for
pulses per mile.

That said, I'm still not supportive of scrapping the crossfire.  I think
the crossfire will be the least expensive route, both right away and
over the long run--particularly if we see $5 gas.  It will idle better,
year-round, probably perform better and will avoid the hassle of getting
the advance curve squared away.
--
pj

>> wow, seems everyone is against it but i have seen several
>> here in the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> mine does...
The Reverend Natural Light - 06 Dec 2007 18:43 GMT
> On the '84 the ECU does control the torque
> converter lockup clutch and that could be handled by a manual switch.

I recall seeing an aftermarket TCC lockup controller in the Summit
catalog.  It was intended for swapping 700R4's into non computer
controlled cars but would work in this situation.
'Key - 06 Dec 2007 19:51 GMT
> 'Key is correct.  My 700R4 ('89) uses a TV cable and I
> believe it didn't get changed out for electronics until
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> 'digital dash' doesn't use the standard GM convention for
> pulses per mile.

don't personally work on my car. my wrench/friend has done
all the work on my car.
I AM using the stock speedo. my ECU is still in place and
controlls some things but not all.
I don't seem to have any problems with the 'digital dash' .

Signature

'Key
=====
---snip to trim---

Fixitman - 16 Dec 2007 18:27 GMT
> Question for 'Key.  What are you using for a speedometer?  And, did you
> leave the ECU in place to run it?  Reason I ask is that early C4's
> divided the mph pulse signal from the transmission by 2, to accommodate
> speed signals above 120mph in the computer.  I could be wrong but I
> think the 'digital dash' doesn't use the standard GM convention for
> pulses per mile.

On an '84, the speed sensor feeds the digital cluster directly. The ECM is
then fed a speed signal from the cluster. This was apparently done to
simplify operation of the cruise control, which is controlled by the
cluster.

Fixitman
Fixitman - 16 Dec 2007 18:27 GMT
> Question for 'Key.  What are you using for a speedometer?  And, did you
> leave the ECU in place to run it?  Reason I ask is that early C4's
> divided the mph pulse signal from the transmission by 2, to accommodate
> speed signals above 120mph in the computer.  I could be wrong but I
> think the 'digital dash' doesn't use the standard GM convention for
> pulses per mile.

On an '84, the speed sensor feeds the digital cluster directly. The ECM is
then fed a speed signal from the cluster. This was apparently done to
simplify operation of the cruise control, which is controlled by the
cluster.

Fixitman
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.