>> "Jon" <texasrocker1@suddenlink.net> wrote in message news:4af571a3$0$5343
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> with only to start a discussion of choice that he has beat to death
> already???????????...............
Sounds like time to start a clandestine Engine
Number/VIN registry and find a territory with
liberal 'salvage' laws.
Somewhat akin to the military's shortage of a
particular aircraft years ago. Congress wouldn't
authorize any new production to cover attrition
so, if any evidence of a tail number could be
found (one was dragged up from 1800 feet of
ocean), the aircraft was "repaired" and placed
back in service.
--
pj
> Maybe the C1 & C2 but I've never seen a set of parts offered for the
> C3.
I didn't mean a "set" - just that all told you can almost build a car from
the catalogs.
>Still leaves a bad taste in my mouth to call them a "C" anything,
> should be just the C5 and C6. Even that is not on the manufacture's
> paper work if I recall.
Time to get over it. The "C" designations merely "work" for practical
differentiation.
Personally - I see as much difference between a 1953 vs a 1962 as I do
between a 1963 vs a 1982 ; but it still "works" overall.
-W
Dad - 10 Nov 2009 16:08 GMT
>> Maybe the C1 & C2 but I've never seen a set of parts offered for
>> the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> car from
> the catalogs.
OK, sets, or kits if you prefer, are out there for the C1 and C2 but
nothing like that is offered for the C3. Denim, buttons, and rivets
are in a catalog but very few people make their own jeans and even
fewer people look at them as a reason to make their own just because
they're available.
The statement you replied to was............
>> You can build a complete '57 right now from the various parts
>> catalogues
>> like Bob's Classic Chevy Parts and Danchuk.
Your reply........
>I thnk the same goes for a C3.
>Though I'm not sure if anyone is selling frames and birdcages.
Those "catalogues" do offer sub assemblies and parts kits aimed at
building a complete car. That applies to the C1 and the C2 but not the
C3. Those companies come and go quite quickly as the final cost is
more than just a bit prohibitive. That high cost is the main reason
the C3 is not on the short list, it's value is not close enough to the
C1 and C2 to even start the project.