Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Malibu / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Gas Mileage for my Maxx LT

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
davidb1835@gmail.com - 24 Jun 2006 19:36 GMT
To all you Malibu Maxx lovers:

I am one also. Great family car with teenage kids and their adult sized
legs.

However, I am disappointed with the gas mileage for my Malibu Maxx LT
(3500 V6 engine). I had been told that it takes a while for a car to
break in and that I should expect less efficiency for the first several
thousand miles. But I've been in the car almost a year and I've driven
it over 10,000 miles at this point. And now I want some answers -- or
at least some thoughts from this group.

I read that people are seeing 22/23 mpg overall. I try to drive
conservatively and I rarely get better than 18 mpg on my 10 mile
city-street commute -- even if I warm up the car. My wife, on the other
hand, accelerates toward stop signs and she typically gets 15 mpg. She
is up on the interstate more than I am so I expected better despite her
lead-foot.

I want to rule out a couple of things.

(1) I haven't properly measured gas mileage on a couple of full tanks
of gas. I've been relying on the computer's real-time fuel efficiency
read-out. Do you folks find the computer accurate? (Hopefully it's not
and I'm making something out of nothing.)

(2) Are my expectations out of whack? This car has a lot of power for
its size? Am I wrong that others are getting 22/23 overall mpg?

(3) Third, am I right that the 3.5L V6 is the only engine available in
this car? Or do I have a suped-up version of the Maxx?

So otherwise, can anybody recommend anything that I can check out?
Maybe something's wrong with the computer-controled systems? Anybody
else experience this type of fuel efficiency?

Thanks for your comments!

-David
ace - 24 Jun 2006 21:46 GMT
first test the actual mileage by the old fashioned way, second, have
the dealer look at it, third, if you want advice from some current
owners, head over to www.malibuclub.ca, there are atleast one owner
there of the new bu's and plenty of old bu's, the new bu owner says he
gets atleast 29 in the city and 35 on the highway.  Also, try
www.unitedmalibus.com
jgassaway@yahoo.com - 25 Jun 2006 14:48 GMT
I have a 2005 Malibu LSV6, and I get 22-23 in the city.  I've gotten
32-34 on the highway.

Justin
> first test the actual mileage by the old fashioned way, second, have
> the dealer look at it, third, if you want advice from some current
> owners, head over to www.malibuclub.ca, there are atleast one owner
> there of the new bu's and plenty of old bu's, the new bu owner says he
> gets atleast 29 in the city and 35 on the highway.  Also, try
> www.unitedmalibus.com
qiman13@hotmail.com - 27 Jun 2006 21:03 GMT
You should stick with things that the DOT actually verified as working
to
reduce smog and increase gas mileage.

Even the Florida EPA verifies increased gas mileage using this stuff.
8 to 27% increase depending on the cars they tested.

You can use this: http://www.rxp-gas-kicker.com

> To all you Malibu Maxx lovers:
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> -David
WhiteFox - 19 Jul 2006 14:14 GMT
David,

I have a 2004 Malibu Maxx LT and since the day I purchased it, 25,543
miles ago, I've got about 34 Highway, 22 City. Though I was disapointed
that I had to change the brake pads and rotars at 25,000 miles - but
this is because I have a heavy breaking foot.

WhiteFox

> To all you Malibu Maxx lovers:
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> -David
Cy Welch - 19 Jul 2006 23:43 GMT
> David,
>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>>
>> -David

I have also seen many of the electronic fuel mileage things give
incorrect overall results.  I almost always fill the tank when adding
fuel and get my mileage by the number of miles traveled for the amount
of gas I put in.  I mean, my 89 Camaro gets 17 or better around town,
and it's heavier, older and has a bigger engine.  In my humble opinion
(OK so maybe it's not so humble) the only true measure of actual fuel
mileage is to divide the miles driven driven on the tank by the amount
of fuel added in gallons.  Anything else is smoke and mirrors.  Now, a
computer could do that, but as far as I know, that is not how they
actually do it.  Look at the IRC and Nascar cars, their computers are
supposed to calculate how much fuel is left and they get it wrong all
the time because they are not really tracking all the variables.  I
believe that most computers just track current mileage rate at the
moment and then average them.  That might be right sometimes, but mostly
they are going to be "sort of right" rather than actually accurate.

Signature

Cy Welch
89 Camaro RS 5.0 TBI
98 Passport
03 Malibu

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.