Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Malibu / December 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What is the matter with me?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tama Harbor - 21 Dec 2003 02:55 GMT
After all the problems I have had with my 1999 Malibu...

I feel like buying a 2004 model.

Please help.
Info - 21 Dec 2003 04:36 GMT
Buy a Honda Accord - We have a 1998 Malibu never going to buy another
one.Its Junk! Some of the new compact Chevy cars are Daewoo's.

After all the problems I have had with my 1999 Malibu...

I feel like buying a 2004 model.

Please help.
Tera News - 21 Dec 2003 05:46 GMT
NO ,NO, RESIST! Buy a Honda or Toyota.

> After all the problems I have had with my 1999 Malibu...
>
> I feel like buying a 2004 model.
>
> Please help.
James C. Reeves - 21 Dec 2003 18:23 GMT
| After all the problems I have had with my 1999 Malibu...
|
| I feel like buying a 2004 model.
|
| Please help.

A few points/rules.

o Those that don't learn from history are doomed
  to repeat it.
o NEVER buy the 1st year production run of a
  newly-redesigned model...wait 2-3 years for
  the kinks to be worked out (unless you want
  to be one to help work the kinks out yourself!).

I didn't even keep the 2003 LS model I bought November a year ago.  I
personally wouldn't risk it until the new model is out for a while to see how
it is doing.  Way too risky, in my view.  (I'm speaking from one that was
willing to take a $6K financial hit to get out of the mistake I made).  That's
my advice, anyway.

If you can't wait and need something now, at least take look at the Honda
Accord (ugly looking, but...) or Toyota Camry (nice looking).  They are very
highly rated and I know a lot of people that own them and are very happy with
them.  I personally went with the Chrysler Sebring LXi and have been very happy
with it.  One reason is because my wife has a older Dodge Stratus that has been
a excellent car and is essentallay the same car as the Sebring, so that "sold"
me.
Home - 21 Dec 2003 22:24 GMT
Why, what's the problem(s)?

> | After all the problems I have had with my 1999 Malibu...
> |
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> a excellent car and is essentallay the same car as the Sebring, so that "sold"
> me.
Klinger - 22 Dec 2003 02:33 GMT
I feel the same way. Every review I have read  and saw on PBS has given
the 2004 Malibu a positive review. Its the only production car right now
    to feature a factory installed remote starter. And then there's
something about the Epsilon architecture. Its a lot cheaper than the
Camry or the Accord.

> Why, what's the problem(s)?
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
>>me.
Tera News - 22 Dec 2003 05:37 GMT
Uh, I believe my 97 Malibu was Car and Drivers "Car Of  The Year" and it
still turned out to be a piece of crap! Can't always trust the reviews, they
have NO IDEA how well the car will hold up.

> I feel the same way. Every review I have read  and saw on PBS has given
> the 2004 Malibu a positive review. Its the only production car right now
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> >
> >>me.
James C. Reeves - 22 Dec 2003 23:53 GMT
| Uh, I believe my 97 Malibu was Car and Drivers "Car Of  The Year" and it
| still turned out to be a piece of crap! Can't always trust the reviews, they
| have NO IDEA how well the car will hold up.

So true, the 2003 model got the J.D. Powers "initial quality" award.  The 2003
was the worst car we've ever bought...the wife thought so to.  Uncomfortable
seats, rough-riding, extremely excessive road/wind/suspension noises, weak
engine when climbing mountainous grades at highway speeds 60-70MPH (very good
power at lower speeds though...go figure!) leaked water everywhere when it
rained (until the dealer had it 5-days to seal it back up), very poor mileage
around town 15-18 MPG (but had great mileage on the highway 30-33MPG...go
figure!) etc. etc.  And we've been buying cars since the early 70's...been
through quite a few.  The 2003 was a POS in our opinion.
Brad Clarke - 22 Dec 2003 14:49 GMT
>>I personally went with the Chrysler Sebring LXi and have been very happy
>>with it.  One reason is because my wife has a older Dodge Stratus that has been
>>a excellent car and is essentallay the same car as the Sebring, so that "sold"
>>me.
They will be fine until the famous Chrysler electrical problems start to
hit.
James C. Reeves - 22 Dec 2003 23:55 GMT
| >>I personally went with the Chrysler Sebring LXi and have been very happy
| >>with it.  One reason is because my wife has a older Dodge Stratus that has been
| >>a excellent car and is essentallay the same car as the Sebring, so that "sold"
| >>me.
| They will be fine until the famous Chrysler electrical problems start to
| hit.

Possible.  Been lucky so far perhaps.  :-)
Info - 22 Dec 2003 17:06 GMT
One other thing about GM products. Resale value. A 3 year old Toyota or
Honda will be worth about 80% of its value a Chevy Malibu will be worth less
than 40% over the same time.
You might pay a couple of thousand more for the Honda or Toyota but you get
it back later. Also the parts for the Chevy Malibu are very expensive
compared to the Accord or Camry. Just price out the rear struts on a Malibu.

After all the problems I have had with my 1999 Malibu...

I feel like buying a 2004 model.

Please help.
James C. Reeves - 23 Dec 2003 00:01 GMT
| One other thing about GM products. Resale value. A 3 year old Toyota or
| Honda will be worth about 80% of its value a Chevy Malibu will be worth less
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
|
| Please help.

I agree with the resale value (from personal experience ditching a 2003 model).
But, are you sure about repair/parts costs?  I always heard the GM (and US cars
in general) are the least costly to maintain and repair overall.

On personal knowledge.  My brother just replaced the tranny on his 1997 Caravan
at 100K+ miles plus for about $2K at the Dodge dealer.  A woman that works for
me just had to replace the tranny on her 2001 Acura MDX at 60K miles at the
price tag of $7,200 at a Acura dealer.  Ouch!!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.