Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Malibu / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Malibu 2004 low quality

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Salvador R. S?nchez Guti?rrez - 07 Feb 2004 04:56 GMT
I've got a Malibu 2004 and I'm quite dissapointed with the quality. Only two
weeks and 300 miles after I bought it, a warning light turned on, so I went
back to the GM dealer and they spent four days only for the diagnosis. The
breaks interruptor seems to be the problem, but it takes three more days to
have the spare part from a plant 50 miles away. I also have a noise in one
wheel and the airbags module (whatever it means) have to be replaced.
I should buy a japanese car, a Honda or a Toyota, and not this american low
quality vehicle (assembled in Fairfax - take care!)

Salvador Sanchez
S C - 07 Feb 2004 13:25 GMT

Malibu 2004 low quality  

Group: alt.autos.chevrolet.malibu Date: Fri, Feb 6, 2004, 10:56pm From:
srsg01@avantel.net (Salvador R. Sánchez Gutiérrez)
I've got a Malibu 2004 and I'm quite dissapointed with the quality. Only
two weeks and 300 miles after I bought it, a warning light turned on, so
I went back to the GM dealer and they spent four days only for the
diagnosis. The breaks interruptor seems to be the problem, but it takes
three more days to have the spare part from a plant 50 miles away. I
also have a noise in one wheel and the airbags module (whatever it
means) have to be replaced. I should buy a japanese car, a Honda or a
Toyota, and not this american low quality vehicle (assembled in Fairfax
- take care!)
Salvador Sanchez

Im kinda confused on what the problem really was....What light came on ?
And why so long for them to diagnose the problem? As far as you bing
upset ....yeah i would too..But the parts that you say they are
replaceing were not assembled in the unitedstates.....As far as Fairfax
does it say it was assembled in Fairfax on the driver door? All cars
import or not will have problems some more than others....I work at a
chevy/honda dealership in south texas near the mexican border...We get
just as many hondas in as we do gm cars....And to make matters worse
most were assembled in mexico and canada....You live near a assembly
plant...where they put them togeather not where they store parts to be
sold for repairs...This is why it will take so long but the dealership
could have it shipped overnight...Id have a talk with the owner of the
dealership ...Just to see what he can do for you...Sounds to me you
really dont have alot of problems as they are making it sound but are
changing out parts because they dont know what it is and they know
warrenty will cover it....ive seen them have probem out of the factory
but not this many....And ive been doing this for a long time....Ask them
for the codes they pulled when they diagnosed the car .....im just
having a hard time believeing there is this much wrong with your
car...This soon.....There are dealerships which  run warrenty
scams...Not saying this one is but something dont sound right....
Steve C
Tama Harbor - 07 Feb 2004 16:55 GMT
Let's not kid each other - the Malibu was a piece of crap in 1999...
And nothing has changed since.

>Malibu 2004 low quality  
Tera News - 07 Feb 2004 18:40 GMT
Uhh, correction, it was a pile of crap in 1997 when they reintroduced it!

> Let's not kid each other - the Malibu was a piece of crap in 1999...
> And nothing has changed since.
>
> >Malibu 2004 low quality
Salvador R. S?nchez Guti?rrez - 07 Feb 2004 17:55 GMT
Thank you for your advice Steve.
The light that came on is one at the left of the tachometer, yellow with a
wrench icon.
Why so long? You won?t believe it. The supervisor of the dealer's service
area said to me that my car was "excessively new" (demasiado nuevo), so the
mechanics haven't had the time to learn about it, and that they lacked the
software they needed to do the scanning. It is obvious that GM is selling
cars without the required training for the staff.
Yes, a decal in the driver?s door says the car was assembled in Fairfax.
I dont't think I will talk to the owner of the dealership because the
impression I have of that business is no good. I'm waiting for the results
and later I am going to write an extensive report for GM president in
Mexico. I cannot argue with the mechanic?s supervisor without risking some
further problems --you know-- and I don?t think that the dealership owner
would even take my call. In this country you better go with with the boss.
I'll take your advice and I will ask for the codes. At least, it can send
the signal that I am not completely naif and that it's not as easy to fool
me.
Just to give you the complete picture: in the owner?s manual you can read
that the radio system must be calibrated at the dealership in order to
function correctly. Well, every time I turn on the radio a message appear in
the screen: "calibrate". When I spoke with the supervisor at the repair
shop, he said: "I've been in this for years and I have never heard about
calibrating the radio, amigo. I think you are wrong", and I have to show him
the owner's manual. Incredible, ain't it? Finally he said: "I asked the
plant about the radio and they said that you just use it, it calibrate by
itself gradually". Absolutely shocking. Back home I faced the mirror asking
myself "do I really look so stupid".
I kept quiet, but once I have my car back they are going to have reasons to
remember me... This is the first Chevrolet in the family, and I guess it?s
going to be the last.
Salvador Sanchez

Im kinda confused on what the problem really was....What light came on ?
And why so long for them to diagnose the problem? As far as you bing
upset ....yeah i would too..But the parts that you say they are
replaceing were not assembled in the unitedstates.....As far as Fairfax
does it say it was assembled in Fairfax on the driver door? All cars
import or not will have problems some more than others....I work at a
chevy/honda dealership in south texas near the mexican border...We get
just as many hondas in as we do gm cars....And to make matters worse
most were assembled in mexico and canada....You live near a assembly
plant...where they put them togeather not where they store parts to be
sold for repairs...This is why it will take so long but the dealership
could have it shipped overnight...Id have a talk with the owner of the
dealership ...Just to see what he can do for you...Sounds to me you
really dont have alot of problems as they are making it sound but are
changing out parts because they dont know what it is and they know
warrenty will cover it....ive seen them have probem out of the factory
but not this many....And ive been doing this for a long time....Ask them
for the codes they pulled when they diagnosed the car .....im just
having a hard time believeing there is this much wrong with your
car...This soon.....There are dealerships which  run warrenty
scams...Not saying this one is but something dont sound right....
Steve C

Malibu 2004 low quality

Group: alt.autos.chevrolet.malibu Date: Fri, Feb 6, 2004, 10:56pm From:
srsg01@avantel.net (Salvador R. S?nchez Guti?rrez)
I've got a Malibu 2004 and I'm quite dissapointed with the quality. Only
two weeks and 300 miles after I bought it, a warning light turned on, so
I went back to the GM dealer and they spent four days only for the
diagnosis. The breaks interruptor seems to be the problem, but it takes
three more days to have the spare part from a plant 50 miles away. I
also have a noise in one wheel and the airbags module (whatever it
means) have to be replaced. I should buy a japanese car, a Honda or a
Toyota, and not this american low quality vehicle (assembled in Fairfax
- take care!)
Salvador Sanchez
S C - 08 Feb 2004 17:06 GMT
Yeah they are trying to pull the blinds over your eyes.....You sometimes
DO have to calibrate the radio...I know the message you talking about
very well....It needs to be reprogrammed through the BCM.......As far as
have the tools to properly diagnose a 2004 ?????????
Cant seem to understand that one.....If they are a dealership and all
they should'nt be selling things they cant fix....The shop seems to be
running a scam operation....And I think your probly not the only one
with this same problem...I surly hope you get what is needed to take
care of this situation...Its things like this that make all of us in
this business look bad..
Steve C

Re: Malibu 2004 low quality  

Group: alt.autos.chevrolet.malibu Date: Sat, Feb 7, 2004, 11:55am From:
srsg01@avantel.net (Salvador R. Sánchez Gutiérrez)
Thank you for your advice Steve.
The light that came on is one at the left of the tachometer, yellow with
a wrench icon.
Why so long? You won´t believe it. The supervisor of the dealer's
service area said to me that my car was "excessively new" (demasiado
nuevo), so the mechanics haven't had the time to learn about it, and
that they lacked the software they needed to do the scanning. It is
obvious that GM is selling cars without the required training for the
staff. Yes, a decal in the driver´s door says the car was assembled in
Fairfax. I dont't think I will talk to the owner of the dealership
because the impression I have of that business is no good. I'm waiting
for the results and later I am going to write an extensive report for GM
president in Mexico. I cannot argue with the mechanic´s supervisor
without risking some further problems --you know-- and I don´t think
that the dealership owner would even take my call. In this country you
better go with with the boss. I'll take your advice and I will ask for
the codes. At least, it can send the signal that I am not completely
naif and that it's not as easy to fool me.
Just to give you the complete picture: in the owner´s manual you can
read that the radio system must be calibrated at the dealership in order
to function correctly. Well, every time I turn on the radio a message
appear in the screen: "calibrate". When I spoke with the supervisor at
the repair shop, he said: "I've been in this for years and I have never
heard about calibrating the radio, amigo. I think you are wrong", and I
have to show him the owner's manual. Incredible, ain't it? Finally he
said: "I asked the plant about the radio and they said that you just use
it, it calibrate by itself gradually". Absolutely shocking. Back home I
faced the mirror asking myself "do I really look so stupid".
I kept quiet, but once I have my car back they are going to have reasons
to remember me... This is the first Chevrolet in the family, and I guess
it´s going to be the last.
Salvador Sanchez
"S C" <The_Gear_Head@webtv.net> escribió en el mensaje
news:18345-4024E759-4@storefull-3352.bay.webtv.net...
Im kinda confused on what the problem really was....What light came on ?
And why so long for them to diagnose the problem? As far as you bing
upset ....yeah i would too..But the parts that you say they are
replaceing were not assembled in the unitedstates.....As far as Fairfax
does it say it was assembled in Fairfax on the driver door? All cars
import or not will have problems some more than others....I work at a
chevy/honda dealership in south texas near the mexican border...We get
just as many hondas in as we do gm cars....And to make matters worse
most were assembled in mexico and canada....You live near a assembly
plant...where they put them togeather not where they store parts to be
sold for repairs...This is why it will take so long but the dealership
could have it shipped overnight...Id have a talk with the owner of the
dealership ...Just to see what he can do for you...Sounds to me you
really dont have alot of problems as they are making it sound but are
changing out parts because they dont know what it is and they know
warrenty will cover it....ive seen them have probem out of the factory
but not this many....And ive been doing this for a long time....Ask them
for the codes they pulled when they diagnosed the car .....im just
having a hard time believeing there is this much wrong with your
car...This soon.....There are dealerships which run warrenty scams...Not
saying this one is but something dont sound right.... Steve C
Malibu 2004 low quality
Group: alt.autos.chevrolet.malibu Date: Fri, Feb 6, 2004, 10:56pm From:
srsg01@avantel.net (Salvador R. Sánchez Gutiérrez) I've got a Malibu
2004 and I'm quite dissapointed with the quality. Only two weeks and 300
miles after I bought it, a warning light turned on, so I went back to
the GM dealer and they spent four days only for the diagnosis. The
breaks interruptor seems to be the problem, but it takes three more days
to have the spare part from a plant 50 miles away. I also have a noise
in one wheel and the airbags module (whatever it means) have to be
replaced. I should buy a japanese car, a Honda or a Toyota, and not this
american low quality vehicle (assembled in Fairfax
- take care!)
Salvador Sanchez
sandy_fox@prodigy.net - 23 Feb 2004 02:02 GMT
Salvador's not the only one. I'm having the same problems, and the same
levels of non-information out of GM. I am not happy. The car has been at
the dealership now for well over fifteen days without a firm repair
date. I'm not happy and am considering returning the car.

WhiteFox

> Yeah they are trying to pull the blinds over your eyes.....You sometimes
> DO have to calibrate the radio...I know the message you talking about
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
> - take care!)
> Salvador Sanchez
James C. Reeves - 24 Feb 2004 00:02 GMT
| Salvador's not the only one. I'm having the same problems, and the same
| levels of non-information out of GM. I am not happy. The car has been at
| the dealership now for well over fifteen days without a firm repair
| date. I'm not happy and am considering returning the car.

Invoke the Lemon Law in your state, if the criteria covers it.

So the Malibu legacy appears to live on through it's so-called new and improved
model!  Glad I didn't buy one (not that I would after the 2003 LS I used to
have).  In all fairness though, 1st year model runs generally have the most
problems...best to avoid them and wait a couple of years.
sandy_fox@prodigy.net - 24 Feb 2004 01:04 GMT
> Invoke the Lemon Law in your state, if the criteria covers it.
>
> So the Malibu legacy appears to live on through it's so-called new and improved
> model!  Glad I didn't buy one (not that I would after the 2003 LS I used to
> have).  In all fairness though, 1st year model runs generally have the most
> problems...best to avoid them and wait a couple of years.

I looked into the Lemon Law. From what I understand the law to be, the
car should be fixed before the out of service time is up.

It is a shame, because I really do like the look of the new Malibu Maxx
LT. Unfortunately this is the first GM vehicle I have bought, and the
experience has not been great.

I wish say that the staff at the dealership has been very understanding,
and are going out of their way to try to make this up to me.

GM Corporate, on the other hand, will no longer take my calls - they
refer me to the regional manager, but will not give me his name/number.
Talk about customer service.

I never had these problems with the Volvo.

Thanks for Listening,

Fx
Salvador R. S?nchez Guti?rrez - 24 Feb 2004 06:05 GMT
Neither am I happy with my Malibu. I wanted to return it but in the
purchasing contract I signed it's stipulated that once you get the car the
only obligation of the dealership is to repair it.
Poor product quality and lousy service quality. Do not ask why american car
brands loose market share so fast. This is also my first Chevrolet and it is
going to be the last.
Salvador

> > Invoke the Lemon Law in your state, if the criteria covers it.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Fx
James C. Reeves - 25 Feb 2004 00:05 GMT
| Neither am I happy with my Malibu. I wanted to return it but in the
| purchasing contract I signed it's stipulated that once you get the car the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
| going to be the last.
| Salvador

Don't give up.  Check your state lemon laws...you usually have recourse under
consumer laws.
James C. Reeves - 25 Feb 2004 00:04 GMT
[SNIP]

| GM Corporate, on the other hand, will no longer take my calls - they
| refer me to the regional manager, but will not give me his name/number.
| Talk about customer service.

Yep, that's their normal MO...won't respond to email either, I bet. (did the
same to me with my 2003 Malibu LS...which I eventually got rid of after owning
it for 9-months)

| I never had these problems with the Volvo.

I'm sure.  Same here with 30+ years buying Chrysler products.  Rarely needed
service help, but whe I did, they even did some out-of-warranty "goodwill" work
with little prodding.

| Thanks for Listening,

I wish I could do more than just listen.  I wish GM would build better cars!

| Fx
James C. Reeves - 12 Feb 2004 00:46 GMT
| I've got a Malibu 2004 and I'm quite dissapointed with the quality. Only two
| weeks and 300 miles after I bought it, a warning light turned on, so I went
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
|
| Salvador Sanchez

A good rule of thumb...never-ever buy the 1st year model run of a redesigned
(or new badged) vehicle.  give it a couple years, at least,  before buying.
Tera News - 12 Feb 2004 01:49 GMT
Well the Malibu was reintroduced in 97 and it's still a pile of Crap so your
theory didn't pan out!

> | I've got a Malibu 2004 and I'm quite dissapointed with the quality. Only two
> | weeks and 300 miles after I bought it, a warning light turned on, so I went
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> A good rule of thumb...never-ever buy the 1st year model run of a redesigned
> (or new badged) vehicle.  give it a couple years, at least,  before buying.
S C - 12 Feb 2004 02:57 GMT

Re: Malibu 2004 low quality  

Group: alt.autos.chevrolet.malibu Date: Thu, Feb 12, 2004, 1:49am
(CST+6) From: NA@home.com (Tera News)
Well the Malibu was reintroduced in 97 and it's still a pile of Crap so
your theory didn't pan out!

If everyone read you previous post they will see how you have no idea
what your talking about...
Ive went agianst everything you've said because you were wrong..But in
this case your right to an extent...Yeah the Malibu is made cheaply in
my opinion but guess what that is how they got the price down so
low....Which is probly why you bought it in the first place because it
had a low price......Just like most of the cheap people in the
world...Oh WOW its cheap so ill buy it ...Then complaine how cheap it
really is......Isnt human nature wounderfull.....At least you stopped
giving people the wrong information on the engine you dont have in your
car... YA Seem to be just another unhappy TROLL..Who likes to get people
all fired up...
Steve C
Salvador R. S?nchez Guti?rrez - 12 Feb 2004 05:44 GMT
A Malibu is not particularly cheap in Mexico City.
Steve is right, we were not talking about the quality of the car, but about
the quality of the service in the dealership shop. In fact, tomorrow I will
have 9 days! with my car in the shop and I have no answers from the
dealership, not from the customer service people of GM Mexico. I am really
angry and I think I will have to call a lawyer to get things done. You
wouldn't believe the miserable service quality of GM. Things will have to be
totally different in the future to make me change my mind: I will never buy
another Chevrolet, noy even an Opel Vectra. Next time I will buy a japanese
car or a VW or Peugeot. GM, Chrysler and Ford workers need not to look to
far to find one of the reasons why they loose their jobs: service quality.
Salvador

Re: Malibu 2004 low quality

Group: alt.autos.chevrolet.malibu Date: Thu, Feb 12, 2004, 1:49am
(CST+6) From: NA@home.com (Tera News)
Well the Malibu was reintroduced in 97 and it's still a pile of Crap so
your theory didn't pan out!

If everyone read you previous post they will see how you have no idea
what your talking about...
Ive went agianst everything you've said because you were wrong..But in
this case your right to an extent...Yeah the Malibu is made cheaply in
my opinion but guess what that is how they got the price down so
low....Which is probly why you bought it in the first place because it
had a low price......Just like most of the cheap people in the
world...Oh WOW its cheap so ill buy it ...Then complaine how cheap it
really is......Isnt human nature wounderfull.....At least you stopped
giving people the wrong information on the engine you dont have in your
car... YA Seem to be just another unhappy TROLL..Who likes to get people
all fired up...
Steve C
James C. Reeves - 12 Feb 2004 23:28 GMT
| Well the Malibu was reintroduced in 97 and it's still a pile of Crap so your
| theory didn't pan out!

It was a general statement.  :-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.