>>>"sligo" <sligo@cox.net> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> me, regular oil changes are ESSENTIAL to avoid cam and cam follower
> problems.
Total BS. Toyota engineers the engine to tighter specs than
normal, which means:
- Clean, NON RECYCLED, NON-DRUM-IN-THE-CEILING-OF-THE-SHOP, Oil.
- Change 3000 miles religiously. Not 3 months OR 3000 Miles.
3000 miles, no ifs, ands, or buts.
Note - this is normal maintainence schedule for cars these days.
The problems came from people going to Jiffy-Lube(recycled oil!)
and waiting a typical slacker 5000+ miles, then whining that
their engine can't handle the abuse that their old cars could.
Properly maintained, it will never have this problem. Toyota
should, though, put a 2 months/2000 miles oil change schedule
on their cars. That will mean people actually get them in
at 3/3000 like normal.
> Rear suspension can also present problems with abnormal tire-wear caused by
> mis-alignment and or bad bushings.
That's very easy to check when you chance the oil every 2 months
or so. Get a lifetime alignment package at your favorite tire
store and checking bushings is almost idiot-proof.
> Could use more engine,
That's why you get the 5 speed.
> and some suspension softening, better placed heat
> ducting (at least up here in the Frozen North) and lessy crappy upholstery
> fabric.
Well, what do you want for $13K? Name me a Hyundai for this price
that gives you as much. Or just go spend $25K on a LeSabre and
get no problems. You get what you pay for, and with a $2500
rebate, you'll not find a better under $15K GM vehicle in their
entire lineup. Note, you CAN order it with leather seats in
2005 if you want. You might consider a 2006 with leather
and literally 1-2 options to make it more comfortable.
> Still we liked the car for what it was (until an aggressive
> cab-driver wrote it off on us a couple of weeks ago... and my wife won't buy
> another, based on the extensive damage encountered in a relatively low-speed
> incident)
Ah. That was YOU. Stop whining. Seriously. A 4000 pound
car hits yours at 25mph... That's almost exactly like taking
your car into a wall at 35-40mph in a crash test, due to the
weight difference.
Eugene Nine - 04 Jun 2005 19:39 GMT
>>>>"sligo" <sligo@cox.net> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> your car into a wall at 35-40mph in a crash test, due to the
> weight difference.
I had a rep at a contracting company who took his wife's toyota Camry to the
Toyota dealer every 3000 miles for oil changes and still ended up with a
dead engine at 30k and Toyota refused to warranty it denying any sludge
problem.
Chris - 04 Jun 2005 21:55 GMT
Oh, and btw, the police report on the accident suggest the Vibe was
travelling at under 10 k/mh (about 5-6 mph for you Americans - a brisk
walking speed) and was hit a "glancing" blow to the right front corner by
the cab at about 25-30 km/h (under 20 mph) I am well aware of the laws of
physics, and I wasn't "whining", but when YOU experience a "disposable"
auto, talk to me again. Other than that, thanks for sharing
C
> >>>>"sligo" <sligo@cox.net> wrote in message
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> dead engine at 30k and Toyota refused to warranty it denying any sludge
> problem.
Joseph Oberlander - 05 Jun 2005 10:33 GMT
> I had a rep at a contracting company who took his wife's toyota Camry to the
> Toyota dealer every 3000 miles for oil changes and still ended up with a
> dead engine at 30k and Toyota refused to warranty it denying any sludge
> problem.
And the drivetrain/engine warranty is??? 30K is a warranty claim,
pure and simple, unless they drove 5K a year.
Chris - 04 Jun 2005 21:47 GMT
I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.
C
> >>>"sligo" <sligo@cox.net> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> your car into a wall at 35-40mph in a crash test, due to the
> weight difference.
James C. Reeves - 04 Jun 2005 22:44 GMT
>I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
> somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.
I had to check myself...I had though for a moment that somehow I got into
the Toyota group (which I'm not even subscribed to)! ;-)
Joseph Oberlander - 05 Jun 2005 10:35 GMT
>>I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
>>somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.
>
> I had to check myself...I had though for a moment that somehow I got into
> the Toyota group (which I'm not even subscribed to)! ;-)
Well, the fact is that GM makes crap at the low end, like Ford and
Chrysler do, with a couple of notable exceptions. That the original
poster mentioned Hyundai told me that he was looking for a budget
ride. GM only makes one decent econobox these days, to be honest.
Everything else is SUVs or large cars. Of course, Honda is taking
a simmilar approach - their Civic isn't a compact car either.
sligo - 06 Jun 2005 21:26 GMT
Thank all respondents for the helpful advice. I will survey the Buick line.
Best,
Seamus J. Wilson
> >>I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
> >>somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Everything else is SUVs or large cars. Of course, Honda is taking
> a simmilar approach - their Civic isn't a compact car either.
Joseph Oberlander - 07 Jun 2005 08:47 GMT
> Thank all respondents for the helpful advice. I will survey the Buick line.
> Best,
> Seamus J. Wilson
The LeSabre is okay - decent all around but it feels heavy
and "retired person". The Impala, based off of the same
platform, sells for a bit less and has a bit better suspension.
It's a better car to drive in and out of traffic, and IMO,
looks better, too. With the 3.8 engine, it's a very nice
midsize sedan.
rudolph berthold - 28 Jul 2005 16:03 GMT
ive owned a malibu an impala and a hyundai and liked them all.. but you must
be kidding if you think they can run without oil.. you have to stay on top
of maintenance.. oil changes are essential for anything with an engine...
warranties were good on all of them and the hyundai accent was a great
starter car for my broke a.s back then gave me no trouble .. sucked on the
highway with road noise and a bit cramped for long drives but what did you
expect..but the front wheel drive was like a lil snow crawler and could
climb the slickest hills...now the impala.. you pay more you get more.. it
flies .. it costs more at the pumps.. but i love it might as well compare
boeing 747's to ultralights
>I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
> somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
>> your car into a wall at 35-40mph in a crash test, due to the
>> weight difference.