Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Malibu / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2500 for GM car

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
sligo - 02 Jun 2005 22:28 GMT
I use the GM credit card and have $2500 discount for a GM car, less some
restrictions.
I read this newsgroup and decide that Malibus are pretty junky cars.
I wonder if the others, Buick, Pontiac are any better.
I am impressed by the hyundai quality and warranty.
Best,
Seamus J. Wilson
Daniel G. - 02 Jun 2005 22:57 GMT
>I use the GM credit card and have $2500 discount for a GM car, less some
> restrictions.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Best,
> Seamus J. Wilson

I've known two people that bought Hyundai's and while both are covered under
a 100k mile warranty, they are also both in the shop at least once every 3
months for one problem or another.  I will not buy one for this reason.  The
only problem I have seen with the Malibu, not mine, but my neighbors is the
gaskets leaking and coolant gunking up in the tubes both were fixed with
aftermarket gaskets and by going from ornage to green coolant.  no more
problems there.  I would like to trade my Malibu in on an Impala though.
*sigh* maybe in four years.
James C. Reeves - 03 Jun 2005 02:10 GMT
>I use the GM credit card and have $2500 discount for a GM car, less some
> restrictions.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Best,
> Seamus J. Wilson

The Buick line rates quite highly in initial quality.  I've had a Malibu,
wouldn't touch another one.

Curious about the Hyundai reference if you have GM credit.  Does Hyundai
accept GM discounts?
Joseph Oberlander - 03 Jun 2005 06:37 GMT
>>I use the GM credit card and have $2500 discount for a GM car, less some
>>restrictions.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>Best,
>>Seamus J. Wilson

Vibe.  Toyota engineering and dirvetrain.  GM interior
and finish.  Best of both worlds and a cargo area that
is like a small pickup truck.

You can get a new base model(manual transmission) for
about $16,000 after rebates.  That's $13,500 after your
discount.  Quite a nice car for that price.

Now, of course, you should wait until the 2006 models
are out.  Then they will give you another $1500-2000
off of the price in inceitives and rebates, dropping the
price on a 2005 Vibe to about $11,000.

No way a Hyundai can beat this.

Another option would be to get the GT for about $19,000.
Add in the rebates that will appear in September, and
you are looking at about 13-14K for a car that will
blow the doors off of anything else in its price range,
thanks to your extra $2500 in dealer cash)
Chris - 04 Jun 2005 01:08 GMT
> >>I use the GM credit card and have $2500 discount for a GM car, less some
> >>restrictions.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> and finish.  Best of both worlds and a cargo area that
> is like a small pickup truck.

True, but the publicized Toyota "oil-gelling" comes with this engine.  Trust
me, regular oil changes are ESSENTIAL to avoid cam and cam follower
problems.

Rear suspension can also present problems with abnormal tire-wear caused by
mis-alignment and or bad bushings.

Could use more engine, and some suspension softening, better placed heat
ducting (at least up here in the Frozen North) and lessy crappy upholstery
fabric.  Still we liked the car for what it was (until an aggressive
cab-driver wrote it off on us a couple of weeks ago... and my wife won't buy
another, based on the extensive damage encountered in a relatively low-speed
incident)

Like everything, you pays yer money and takes yer chances

> You can get a new base model(manual transmission) for
> about $16,000 after rebates.  That's $13,500 after your
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> blow the doors off of anything else in its price range,
> thanks to your extra $2500 in dealer cash)
Joseph Oberlander - 04 Jun 2005 05:43 GMT
>>>"sligo" <sligo@cox.net> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> me, regular oil changes are ESSENTIAL to avoid cam and cam follower
> problems.

Total BS.   Toyota engineers the engine to tighter specs than
normal, which means:
- Clean, NON RECYCLED, NON-DRUM-IN-THE-CEILING-OF-THE-SHOP, Oil.
- Change 3000 miles religiously.  Not 3 months OR 3000 Miles.
  3000 miles, no ifs, ands, or buts.
Note - this is normal maintainence schedule for cars these days.
The problems came from people going to Jiffy-Lube(recycled oil!)
and waiting a typical slacker 5000+ miles, then whining that
their engine can't handle the abuse that their old cars could.

Properly maintained, it will never have this problem.  Toyota
should, though, put a 2 months/2000 miles oil change schedule
on their cars.  That will mean people actually get them in
at 3/3000 like normal.

> Rear suspension can also present problems with abnormal tire-wear caused by
> mis-alignment and or bad bushings.

That's very easy to check when you chance the oil every 2 months
or so.  Get a lifetime alignment package at your favorite tire
store and checking bushings is almost idiot-proof.

> Could use more engine,

That's why you get the 5 speed.

> and some suspension softening, better placed heat
> ducting (at least up here in the Frozen North) and lessy crappy upholstery
> fabric.  

Well, what do you want for $13K?  Name me a Hyundai for this price
that gives you as much.  Or just go spend $25K on a LeSabre and
get no problems.  You get what you pay for, and with a $2500
rebate, you'll not find a better under $15K GM vehicle in their
entire lineup.  Note, you CAN order it with leather seats in
2005 if you want.  You might consider a 2006 with leather
and literally 1-2 options to make it more comfortable.

> Still we liked the car for what it was (until an aggressive
> cab-driver wrote it off on us a couple of weeks ago... and my wife won't buy
> another, based on the extensive damage encountered in a relatively low-speed
> incident)

Ah.  That was YOU.  Stop whining.  Seriously.  A 4000 pound
car hits yours at 25mph... That's almost exactly like taking
your car into a wall at 35-40mph in a crash test, due to the
weight difference.
Eugene Nine - 04 Jun 2005 19:39 GMT
>>>>"sligo" <sligo@cox.net> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> your car into a wall at 35-40mph in a crash test, due to the
> weight difference.

I had a rep at a contracting company who took his wife's toyota Camry to the
Toyota dealer every 3000 miles for oil changes and still ended up with a
dead engine at 30k and Toyota refused to warranty it denying any sludge
problem.
Chris - 04 Jun 2005 21:55 GMT
Oh, and btw, the police report on the accident suggest the Vibe was
travelling at under 10 k/mh (about 5-6 mph for you Americans - a brisk
walking speed) and was hit a "glancing" blow to the right front corner by
the cab at about 25-30 km/h (under 20 mph)  I am well aware of the laws of
physics, and I wasn't "whining", but when YOU experience a "disposable"
auto, talk to me again.  Other than that, thanks for sharing

C

> >>>>"sligo" <sligo@cox.net> wrote in message
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> dead engine at 30k and Toyota refused to warranty it denying any sludge
> problem.
Joseph Oberlander - 05 Jun 2005 10:33 GMT
> I had a rep at a contracting company who took his wife's toyota Camry to the
> Toyota dealer every 3000 miles for oil changes and still ended up with a
> dead engine at 30k and Toyota refused to warranty it denying any sludge
> problem.

And the drivetrain/engine warranty is???  30K is a warranty claim,
pure and simple, unless they drove 5K a year.
Chris - 04 Jun 2005 21:47 GMT
I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.

C

> >>>"sligo" <sligo@cox.net> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> your car into a wall at 35-40mph in a crash test, due to the
> weight difference.
James C. Reeves - 04 Jun 2005 22:44 GMT
>I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
> somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.

I had to check myself...I had though for a moment that somehow I got into
the Toyota group (which I'm not even subscribed to)!  ;-)
Joseph Oberlander - 05 Jun 2005 10:35 GMT
>>I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
>>somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.
>
> I had to check myself...I had though for a moment that somehow I got into
> the Toyota group (which I'm not even subscribed to)!  ;-)

Well, the fact is that GM makes crap at the low end, like Ford and
Chrysler do, with a couple of notable exceptions.  That the original
poster mentioned Hyundai told me that he was looking for a budget
ride.  GM only makes one decent econobox these days, to be honest.
Everything else is SUVs or large cars.  Of course, Honda is taking
a simmilar approach - their Civic isn't a compact car either.
sligo - 06 Jun 2005 21:26 GMT
Thank all respondents for the helpful advice.  I will survey the Buick line.
Best,
Seamus J. Wilson

> >>I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
> >>somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Everything else is SUVs or large cars.  Of course, Honda is taking
> a simmilar approach - their Civic isn't a compact car either.
Joseph Oberlander - 07 Jun 2005 08:47 GMT
> Thank all respondents for the helpful advice.  I will survey the Buick line.
> Best,
> Seamus J. Wilson

The LeSabre is okay - decent all around but it feels heavy
and "retired person".  The Impala, based off of the same
platform, sells for a bit less and has a bit better suspension.
It's a better car to drive in and out of traffic, and IMO,
looks better, too.  With the 3.8 engine, it's a very nice
midsize sedan.
rudolph berthold - 28 Jul 2005 16:03 GMT
ive owned a malibu an impala and a hyundai and liked them all.. but you must
be kidding if you think they can run without oil.. you have to stay on top
of maintenance.. oil changes are essential for anything with an engine...
warranties were good on all of them and the hyundai accent was a great
starter car for my broke a.s back then gave me no trouble .. sucked on the
highway with road noise and a bit cramped for long drives but what did you
expect..but the front wheel drive was like a lil snow crawler and could
climb the slickest hills...now the impala.. you pay more you get more.. it
flies .. it costs more at the pumps.. but i love it might as well compare
boeing 747's to ultralights
>I was merely sharing my observations after 3 years of ownership, thought
> somehow it might be valuable to someone. Certainly appreciate your attack.
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
>> your car into a wall at 35-40mph in a crash test, due to the
>> weight difference.
sligo - 03 Jun 2005 17:48 GMT
Hyundai does not take GM discounts.  Might sound strange giving up the 2500
but must investigate further.  Unimpressed with GM line.

Seamus J.

> >I use the GM credit card and have $2500 discount for a GM car, less some
> > restrictions.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Curious about the Hyundai reference if you have GM credit.  Does Hyundai
> accept GM discounts?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.