Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Trucks / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

S10 experience

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jeff Williams - 18 Sep 2004 15:09 GMT
Hi All,

I bought a '99 S10 new - currently have 97,000 miles.  I'm not particularly
happy with this truck.  Replaced:

1. drivers door hinges
2. starter
3. thermostat
4. short exhaust pipe that connects directly to exhaust manifold
5. clutch master
6. rear view mirror fell off -- re-glued

The clutch master assy is an engineering design disaster.  What should have
taken max 20 minutes to replace and bleed took several hours.

What kind of experience have you folks have had with the S10?  Is my
experience typical?

 
Rita  ? Berkowitz - 18 Sep 2004 16:34 GMT
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> 5. clutch master
> 6. rear view mirror fell off -- re-glued

It sounds like you really didn't have anything but trivial problems.  What
are you going to do when you have a real problem?

> The clutch master assy is an engineering design disaster.  What should
> have
> taken max 20 minutes to replace and bleed took several hours.

This would be more attributed to improper installation and/or bleeding
techniques.

> What kind of experience have you folks have had with the S10?  Is my
> experience typical?

Yes, very typical.  You have a great little truck that is very hard to beat.
I'll bet you if properly taken care of you'll get 20-years out of that
truck.

Rita
Jeff Williams - 18 Sep 2004 17:09 GMT
Rita  Ä Berkowitz wrote:

>> Hi All,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> 5. clutch master
>> 6. rear view mirror fell off -- re-glued

Oh, forgot to mention - The air conditioner is intermittent.  Also, drivers
side windshield wiper arm went bad.  Spring tension was insufficient to
clear the glass.  First time in my history I've ever replaced a wiper arm.

> It sounds like you really didn't have anything but trivial problems.  What
> are you going to do when you have a real problem?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> This would be more attributed to improper installation and/or bleeding
> techniques.

I guess it depends on perspective.  I came from a toyota truck where I had
my first problem at 138K miles - bad thermostat.  As far as mechanical
technique, my first car had an oil bath air cleaner and 3-on-the-column
('54 chev).  I know utterly crap design when I see it.
Rita  ? Berkowitz - 18 Sep 2004 18:24 GMT
> Oh, forgot to mention - The air conditioner is intermittent.  Also,
> drivers
> side windshield wiper arm went bad.  Spring tension was insufficient to
> clear the glass.  First time in my history I've ever replaced a wiper arm.

Yes, that would definitely clinch it for me.  I would say you have a lemon.
I would sell it and get Tundra.

> I guess it depends on perspective.  I came from a toyota truck where I had
> my first problem at 138K miles - bad thermostat.  As far as mechanical
> technique, my first car had an oil bath air cleaner and 3-on-the-column
> ('54 chev).  I know utterly crap design when I see it.

Very true, it's all perspective.  I have beaten the hell out of S-10 trucks
were I severely overloaded them 2,000# plus payload many times and also
taken offroading in some of the harshest places and I have had no
complaints.

Toyota makes great reliable trucks if you could just keep the sheet metal on
them.

Rita
el Diablo - 18 Sep 2004 18:19 GMT
> > Hi All,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Rita

But in comparison I have a 1999 K1500 with a 5.7 liter and have done nothing
to it as far as repairs. It's on it's second set of tires, second set of
brakes, changed the cap, rotor and plugs once. Other than that just fluid,
filters, thermostat changes at required intervals. Nothing has ever broken
or failed to work as it should.

Oh yeah I put a CAT back exhaust system on because I wanted to. I still have
the original exhaust.

Brian
GMC Gremlin - 19 Sep 2004 01:16 GMT
I hate to sound like a dick, but the reason that S10 is going screwy is
because it's a mini-truck. I've never had good experiences with mini-trucks.

GMC Gremlin

> > > Hi All,
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Brian
el Diablo - 19 Sep 2004 01:42 GMT
Well there is some truth to what you say as I believe the same. The reason I
prefer to drive a full size truck over a car is they're built heavier than
cars or light trucks and seam to require less repairs. At least in my
experiences.

Brian

> I hate to sound like a dick, but the reason that S10 is going screwy is
> because it's a mini-truck. I've never had good experiences with mini-trucks.
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> >
> > Brian
Don - 18 Sep 2004 16:41 GMT
> Hi All,
> I bought a '99 S10 new - currently have 97,000 miles.  I'm not
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> What kind of experience have you folks have had with the S10?  Is my
> experience typical?

I bought a 91 S10 brand new in Oct 90, still have it, it has 117k miles
right now.
The best vehicle I ever owned.
I have used it mainly as a 1 person car, with occaisional light truck duty.
In 14 years I have put 4 sets of tires on it, an alternator, 2 batteries,
rebuilt the ac compressor, 2 sets of brakes, 1 muffler and pipe, 1 hubcap, 2
headlights, 2 brake lights, 1 headliner and about 50 oil changes.
I haven't been a slave to this truck maintenance wise and some would say
I've been downright negligent.
It has the small v6 and a 5 speed.
Low on power but very dependable, and it has consistently gotten 20 mpg.
When I bought the truck for $8800 cash I immediately had a bed liner
installed, a dash cover and window tint.
Now, the tint needs to be replaced, the window rubber needs to be replaced,
and the seat needs to be reupholstered.
Other than those few things I am still happy and comfortable with my S10.
I truly believe I got a reverse lemon with this truck.
I'd like to have a new truck but I just can't justify the enormous cost.
ZombyWoof - 18 Sep 2004 22:52 GMT
>Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>What kind of experience have you folks have had with the S10?  Is my
>experience typical?

I've own three S-10's.  All have been used primarily as commuters with
in bed hauling duty for my Harley.  My current `02 4.3 liter extended
cab LS has about 50K.  The only problem I've had is with wiper blades.
For some reason the dam thing eats wiper blades like crazy.  

My previous two were an `86 base truck with an  iron duke and no
options.  I ran it to 137k over the course of ten years with no major
issues other then normal maintenance stuff.  It was sold an I bought a
`96 LS regular cab which had just shy of 120k on it when some stupid
woman ran a stop sign, broadsides it and totaled it out.  The only
reason I would not buy another one is that they don't make em no more.
--

When dealing with propaganda terminology  one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.
Ron Miller - 18 Sep 2004 21:48 GMT
> I've own three S-10's.  All have been used primarily as commuters with
> in bed hauling duty for my Harley.  My current `02 4.3 liter extended
> cab LS has about 50K.  The only problem I've had is with wiper blades.
> For some reason the dam thing eats wiper blades like crazy.

I put my '78 FLH in the bed and my nose goes 20 degrees up.  No kiddin' -
handles like sh.t.
ZombyWoof - 19 Sep 2004 16:11 GMT
>> I've own three S-10's.  All have been used primarily as commuters with
>> in bed hauling duty for my Harley.  My current `02 4.3 liter extended
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I put my '78 FLH in the bed and my nose goes 20 degrees up.  No kiddin' -
>handles like sh.t.

Mine certainly does squat with my `99 FXSTC in it, but the handling
actually improves.  I really wanted to get one of the new style
F-150's, but I am a cheap bastard and will not pay 25k plus for a
truck with little to no options.

--

When dealing with propaganda terminology  one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.
JMagerl - 19 Sep 2004 00:13 GMT
my 96 has 167K on it. replaced:
water pump (once)
Ujoints (3 times)
Alternator (once)
Ball joints (numerous times-lost count)
4X4 servo/actuator (3 times)
refilled A/C (once)
battery (once)
drivers door hinge (once)
broken and not getting replaced - ABS
sepentine belt (twice)
belt tensioner (once)
fuel tank pressuer sensor (twice -going on three times)
fuel pump (once)
EGR valve (once)
VCM (once - in warrenty)
Tail gate cables (twice)

Still have not replaced: Oxygen sensors or shocks

It is beginning to rust thru on the bottom of the tail gate

THe transmission is giving me ttroubles now ( some slippage and jerkyness)

Luckly, the wipers have not acted up.

I believe this to be typical of an S10. Consumers reports rated it worst
than average on repairs (for a 96).
ALL in all, It's not the most reliable but I've had alot worse.

> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> What kind of experience have you folks have had with the S10?  Is my
> experience typical?
GMC Gremlin - 19 Sep 2004 01:19 GMT
This is so weird for a mini-truck. NO electrical problems mentioned. My '88
had nothin wrong but electrical issues!!!

GMC Gremlin

> my 96 has 167K on it. replaced:
> water pump (once)
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> > What kind of experience have you folks have had with the S10?  Is my
> > experience typical?
JRGage51 - 19 Sep 2004 04:09 GMT
I've been lurking here for a while, and thought I'd jump in on this topic.

I bought my first GMC S-15 (1988)  when it was 6 years old w/ 90k miles.  I did
normal maintenance with it, had some repairs, including freeze plugs, starter,
distributor cap, combination valve and the like.  Sold it to a friend w/ 155k
on it. (then the engine went a few months later...)

I then bought the 93 Sonoma I have now.  Bought it in 1999 w/ 44k miles.  Both
trucks are 2WD, w/ the 4.3L and AT.  The '93 has been much worse for repairs,
but it has the 4.3 high output engine - fuel injector alone was $1100 to
repair.  2 EGR valves, intake manifold, starter. But, I have to say, the '93 is
still on the original rear brakes and shocks at 107k.  It's used primarily for
commuting, but does get loaded up when we go camping, including a 1500-mile
road trip at 102k miles.  Fuel economy still running around 20 MPG.
Tony Kimmell - 19 Sep 2004 20:15 GMT
> it has the 4.3 high output engine - fuel injector alone was $1100 to
> repair.

Good lord... what's the difference between the high output and the
regular 4.3L engines?  I just replaced both injectors on the 4.3L in
my '93 C1500 fullsize, and they were $60 a piece.

-Tony
Mike Levy - 19 Sep 2004 20:26 GMT
>> it has the 4.3 high output engine - fuel injector alone was $1100 to
>> repair.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>-Tony

The HO was the CPI "W" engine.  Replacing mine cost me $300 in parts
and did my own labor, but it's a little more involved than replacing
TBI injectors.  The upper plenum has to come apart to get to the
injector...
Mike Levy - 19 Sep 2004 04:53 GMT
I'd say you're about average.  My opinions are under the items they
refer to.

>my 96 has 167K on it. replaced:
>water pump (once)

Sounds about right, was probably leaking, right?  Seals get old and
weak.

>Ujoints (3 times)
>Alternator (once)

Shocked it wasn't more than this, though my 94 Jimmy's alternator
didn't go till 110,000.

>Ball joints (numerous times-lost count)

Ball joints on these can be "checked" as worn and really not be.

>4X4 servo/actuator (3 times)

Common problem with the platform

>refilled A/C (once)
>battery (once)

Again, shocked it wasn't more than this.

>drivers door hinge (once)
>broken and not getting replaced - ABS
>sepentine belt (twice)

Should have been at least double, this is a maintenence item.

>belt tensioner (once)
>fuel tank pressuer sensor (twice -going on three times)
>fuel pump (once)

Got 110,000 on the aforementioned Jimmy's pump.  Not terrible, but
also not great.

>EGR valve (once)
>VCM (once - in warrenty)
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>than average on repairs (for a 96).
>ALL in all, It's not the most reliable but I've had alot worse.

Shall I list my 94's problems.  Keep in mind, this was only between
1998 and the end of 2003.  Between 61,000 and 115,000 miles.

Fuel tank rusted through
Fuel pump
Various rust spots
2 full tune-ups
Intake gaskets (once)
Alternator
Fuel injector (common problem, truck had the CPI motor, had the spider
injector)
Tires
Brakes, including one master cylinder
Heater core
Oil changes
Low-pressure switch on accumulator for A/C, caused intermittent
operation
4x4 vacuum switch
CV shaft
Shocks

That's all I paid out of pocket for.  I had other misc. items that
were covered by insurance due to a couple accidents.  U-joints never
failed, ball-joints were still good, steering linkage was still good,
all OE AFAIK.  My EGR was done at no cost to me, special policy
coverage that has since expired.  Covered replacing the EGR and the
PROM to prevent carbon blockages.

I went ahead and bought a 2000 S-10 in Dec.  I was happy with how the
old truck performed, how it held up to my abuse, was involved in TWO
accidents doing nearly $6,000 damage each time, I came out un-hurt and
the truck drove perfectly fine after repairs.  I also knew, after the
first truck, the basics of working on the platform.

Now, to start making more money so I can take advantage of the
aftermarket support this truck has for modifications.  Just simple,
such as exhaust, ignition and a re-programmed computer...

>> Hi All,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>> What kind of experience have you folks have had with the S10?  Is my
>> experience typical?
Ron Miller - 19 Sep 2004 08:59 GMT
>>drivers door hinge (once)
>>broken and not getting replaced - ABS
>>sepentine belt (twice)
>
> Should have been at least double, this is a maintenence item.

Drivers door hinge is a maintenance (wear) item???  This would be a new low
in the automotive world.
James Del Mul - 19 Sep 2004 14:06 GMT
>>>drivers door hinge (once)
>>>broken and not getting replaced - ABS
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> low
> in the automotive world.

Not the hinge, the belt
Mike Levy - 19 Sep 2004 20:24 GMT
>>>drivers door hinge (once)
>>>broken and not getting replaced - ABS
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Drivers door hinge is a maintenance (wear) item???  This would be a new low
>in the automotive world.

No, I was speaking to the serpentine, not the hinges.  Should have
separated them but it was late...
hotrod4000 - 31 May 2007 03:47 GMT
I cannot understand why some people complain about the S-10. I have a 89
extended cab with the 4.3 motor and 700R4 tranny and over 300,000 original
miles. I have never had any problems with the engine. I had the tranny
rebuilt and GM was surpized the tranny went 250,000+ miles before any problem
arose. Normally, the early R4's did not last very long, approx 100,000 miles
before rebuild. The only thing GM could contribute to my success was due to
regular maintence. I would change the filter and fluid on the tranny every
other oil change. The motor has just developed a small problem, the valve
seals. I will be replacing those soon, but am in no real hurry. I have seen
vehicles with similar problems go for several thousand miles with bad seals,
just have to deal with the smoke when cranking up a cold engine.

In any event, I am extreemly happy with my truck, and yes, there have been a
few small problems, but that will happen an any vehilce with as many miles as
mine has.

Thanks for taking the time to read this.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.