Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Trucks / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I-5

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bob La Londe - 24 Nov 2004 03:37 GMT
Does it really put out more power than the 4.3L V-6 in my S-10?

Well, I only have a little over 3000 miles on the I-5 so far.  It does seem
to perform well, but I'm not sure the transmission shifts at the best points
or firmly enough to take advantage of it.  It pulls my little boat just
fine.  I haven't put my big boat behind it yet.  Mostly becasue the truck is
just to darn close to the ground.  I may have to give it a couple inches of
lift.

Does it pull the little boat faster and/or in higher gears than the S-10?
Well, yes, but that isn't a fair comparison.  I have an extra tall Gemtop
work cap on the S-10 with several fiberglass ladders stacked ontop, and
several hundred pounds of tools and supplies inside the cap.  Basically an
extra 1000 to 1300 pounds in the bed everyday.

In all honesty I did add three leaf springs and run a Super Chips programmer
on the 4.3L S-10 so I suppose to run a fair comparison I need to run a
similar program on the I-5, and then get loaded fully down as a work truck.

It does sound funny when idling.

Signature

** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com

\ - 24 Nov 2004 04:02 GMT
> Does it really put out more power than the 4.3L V-6 in my S-10?
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> It does sound funny when idling.

Thanks for the update Bob, I've been looking at the Colorado Z71's and
wondering about that I-5 under the hood.  I'm an 8-cylinder guy and the
thought of driving something with less than 8 pistons makes me shudder, BUT
the Colorado is a damn fine looking truck and would suit my needs nicely.

Maybe it's time for a test drive eh?

If they put the baby 8 (4.8L) under the hood of one of those things I'd
already own one (maybe two as the wife really likes em' too).

Doc
Bob La Londe - 24 Nov 2004 20:49 GMT
> > Does it really put out more power than the 4.3L V-6 in my S-10?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Doc

Now the Z-71 version is a mighty fine looking truck  They remembered to
build that one with a little ground clearance.
frametype - 24 Nov 2004 20:53 GMT
> Does it really put out more power than the 4.3L V-6 in my S-10?
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> It does sound funny when idling.

How is the gas mileage?
I like Doc's idea of a 4.8 in a Colorado, but I am wondering how fuel
efficient the new I-4, I-5, and I-6 are.

I average about 19 mpg (give or take 1 mpg) with a 4.8 / 5-speed silverado
and around 16-17 with a ZR2 Blazer and an automatic, though the Blazer has
only 1300 miles on it, so it is too earlier to see what it will do once
broken in.

Bryan
Bob La Londe - 25 Nov 2004 00:34 GMT
I haven't really measure mileage, but I don't think it is any better than
that.  I checked it on one tank and I got about 18, but I was pulling a boat
for a hundred and fifty miles or so of that.

Signature

** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com

> > Does it really put out more power than the 4.3L V-6 in my S-10?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Bryan
KU - 05 Dec 2004 09:21 GMT
Someone told me that the Colorado doesn't have as much head room as an S-10,
is this true? They also said the engine is noisy during acceleration and
sounds like a 4 cylinder and has lack of power at anything over 80 mph
compared to a 4.3 Liter. I haven't had the chance to test drive one yet.
Waiting to see what problems people will have with theirs before I even
consider buying one. My neighbors all drive Chrysler Pacifica's, BMW, Lexus.
They work for the big three or have other high paying jobs, and here I just
prefer my Silverado and S-10 and my girlfriends grand prix.

>I haven't really measure mileage, but I don't think it is any better than
> that.  I checked it on one tank and I got about 18, but I was pulling a
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>>
>> Bryan
L. Anthony - 10 Dec 2004 04:55 GMT
I went from an S10 to a Colorado (Z71), and am quite happy and
satisfied.  There is plenty of headroom (I am 6'3").  Engine does roar
a tad during heavy acceleration, but it is a NICE roar.  It does NOT
sound like a 4-cylinder, and has plenty of power.  

>Someone told me that the Colorado doesn't have as much head room as an S-10,
>is this true? They also said the engine is noisy during acceleration and
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>>>
>>> Bryan
GMC Gremlin - 13 Dec 2004 02:00 GMT
Can never go wrong with an I engine in my opinion, a work horse plain and
simple.

GMC Gremlin

> I went from an S10 to a Colorado (Z71), and am quite happy and
> satisfied.  There is plenty of headroom (I am 6'3").  Engine does roar
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> >>>
> >>> Bryan
Bob La Londe - 13 Dec 2004 14:12 GMT
Head room seems ok to me.  I am 5'11".

The power is hard to figure becasue it doesn't jump like a 4.3, but it has
the power.  I pull a 16' Waco jon boat with outboard, fuel, three batteries,
and lots of gear.  Maybe 1000 or 1200 lbs total.  It doesn't leap like the
6.0 in my Silverado, but it pulls it in high gear at 65 mph without shifting
a lot on small grades like my S-10 with 4.3L.

It does have a funny sounding idle.  I would not confuse it for an inline 4.
The only thing that bothers me is it sounds rough when you are crankying it
for that split second from when the first cylinder fires until it is running
on its own.  Maybe only for a half a second.  The ones I started on the
dealer lot sounded the same way.

What I think makes it seem to not have as much power is the computer.  It is
programmed for soft shifts.  If you don't watch the tach you harldy notice
when it shifts at all.  I think it is also tuned to not allow hard
acceleration.  It has plenty of get up and go for passing, but it doesn't
have that sudden slam of a V-8 or a lightly loaded V-6 when you stomp on the
peddle.  Basically it feels like the computer won't allow that to happen.
It doesn't feel like it won't do it.  I say this because it will surprise
you.  Pulling the boat I mentioned earlier,a nd with some extra gear in the
bed I was decided to pass a line of boats on the way home from a torunament.
I put the peddle down and pulled out to pass. It shifted down, and it just
kept winding up and I kept gaining speed.  I just stayed on the throttle
until I was past the line of trucks and boat.  That's when it hit the rev
limitier at about 100MPH.  Oops.  Not bad considering it had a heavy load.
It was so smooth and pulled so steady throught he entire run that I would
have guessed my speed at about 85 until I looked at the speedo when it
stumbled on the rev limit.  I think the computer just keeps it very tame and
well mannered.

Signature

Spinner Baits Tips & Tricks Contest
                  featuring
        Secret Weapon Lures
               in December

** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com

> Someone told me that the Colorado doesn't have as much head room as an S-10,
> is this true? They also said the engine is noisy during acceleration and
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> >>
> >> Bryan
GMC Gremlin - 16 Dec 2004 02:27 GMT
They have the larger engines castrated, I don't see why they wouldn't do it
to the smaller ones.
I love how the liberal retards of the world hold car companies accountable
for their own stupidity. Why don't we just teach people not to rev their
engine to the moon, not to do brake stands??? DUH.....

GMC Gremlin

> Head room seems ok to me.  I am 5'11".
>
[quoted text clipped - 109 lines]
> > >>
> > >> Bryan
Trey - 16 Dec 2004 05:56 GMT
> They have the larger engines castrated, I don't see why they wouldn't
> do it to the smaller ones.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> GMC Gremlin

I just love the story about the guy that bought a Dodge Viper, got drunk,
went out and hit someone, this person, or their family, (cant remember) is
now sueing Dodge for making a car with "too much HP"

I can see limiting HP in lower gears to avoid  spinning the tires with low
traction, but regulating down acceleration it just lame.
GMC Gremlin - 02 Jan 2005 02:03 GMT
> > They have the larger engines castrated, I don't see why they wouldn't
> > do it to the smaller ones.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> went out and hit someone, this person, or their family, (cant remember) is
> now sueing Dodge for making a car with "too much HP"

Too bad the drunk didn't take them all out of the gene pool.

> I can see limiting HP in lower gears to avoid  spinning the tires with low
> traction, but regulating down acceleration it just lame.

I can't. Regulate it yerself you lazy bastard - I can. :-)

GMC Gremlin
Chevy Guy - 20 Dec 2004 05:01 GMT
You know, I didnt really pay attention to how the colorado accelerated,
although it wasnt g-force acceleration, I thought it was compareable with my
4.3 in my S-10. My Silverado sh.t's and gets, I havent driven a full size
4x4 pickup other than the Dodge 1/2 ton with a hemi. I like the feeling when
I stomp on a vehicle and it throws me into the seat. I am starting to like
the inline family more and more, and I'm considering either buying a
Colorado, Caynon, or a trailblazer or possibly even a Envoy. But I'll need
to test drive the Envoy/Trailblazer with the 5.3 Liter before i can make my
final decision. One more thing i hated about the colorado was the plastic
dash, it was foamy. Plastic scratches to easily

> Someone told me that the Colorado doesn't have as much head room as an
> S-10, is this true? They also said the engine is noisy during acceleration
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>>>
>>> Bryan
Chevy Guy - 20 Dec 2004 05:03 GMT
Correction, it wasn't foamy, from what I can remember anyway, my memory
stinks.

> You know, I didnt really pay attention to how the colorado accelerated,
> although it wasnt g-force acceleration, I thought it was compareable with
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Bryan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.