Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Trucks / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

thermostat and rad. cap

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gary - 31 Mar 2006 01:16 GMT
Has anyone changed their thermostat to a cooler one 195  to 180 for example
and  or has anyone changed their cap from 16 to 10/12 lbs  and what where
the results..Thanks.  97 5.7 auto
Shades - 31 Mar 2006 02:13 GMT
Going to a cooler thermostat with your OBD II system might not be the best
thing without a slight reprogramming. I definitely wouldn't go to a lower
pressure cap. Water in a pan boils at 212degrees, but the more pressure its
under, the higher temp it takes to make the water boil. The area where the
coolant contacts the cylinder can be like dumping water into an empty pan on
the stove that has been on a full up burner for 5 minutes...If the coolant
cant contact the metal, it cant cool it.

> Has anyone changed their thermostat to a cooler one 195  to 180 for
> example and  or has anyone changed their cap from 16 to 10/12 lbs  and
> what where the results..Thanks.  97 5.7 auto
Gary - 31 Mar 2006 03:11 GMT
thanks for the input however I want to know if anyone has actually done what
I wrote and what happened. Also do you know what temp coolant/water boils at
under 12lbs of pressure compared to 16. thanks
> Going to a cooler thermostat with your OBD II system might not be the best
> thing without a slight reprogramming. I definitely wouldn't go to a lower
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> example and  or has anyone changed their cap from 16 to 10/12 lbs  and
>> what where the results..Thanks.  97 5.7 auto
Whitelightning - 31 Mar 2006 05:18 GMT
> thanks for the input however I want to know if anyone has actually done what
> I wrote and what happened. Also do you know what temp coolant/water boils at
> under 12lbs of pressure compared to 16. thanks

you gain aprox 2.8 degrees for every pound of pressure, so a 15-16 pound cap
will raise the boiling point of the coolant 45 degrees  .  The computer
system expects to see a certain operating temperature.  If the vehicle does
not reach a high enough temp the computer assumes the engine is cold, and
the fuel management system runs on a preset set of parameters called open
loop, i.e. it doesn't read from knock sensor, it retards the timing, it
ignores other sensors.  Its basically like driving with the choke on on a
carb.  In the early days of replaceable prom chips, there were chips
designed to work at 180-190 degrees instead of 212.   Fuel mileage still
suffered.  The whole idea of running at higher temps is to get more
efficient burn of fuel.  The engineers would love to see 250, but pistons,
heads, and gaskets aren't there yet.
As stated in another post, there are surfaces internal to the engine that
exceed the temp you see on the gauge.  The boiling point for the coolant
must exceed these temps, or we have problems, remember early 400 small
blocks before they added steam ports to cylinder block decks and the heads?
(400 blocks the cylinders were siamesed, ie there was no clearance between
the cylinders in the cooling system)

Whitelightning
Shades - 31 Mar 2006 06:37 GMT
> you gain aprox 2.8 degrees for every pound of pressure, so a 15-16 pound
> cap
> will raise the boiling point of the coolant 45 degrees  .

I had a feeling you were gonna chime in with the right degree increase per
PSI...Thanx
Gordon - 31 Mar 2006 21:11 GMT
Another issue with a lower thermostat is the cooler water temp might 'fool'
the computer into thinking the engine is not up to temp and run richer as if
the engine was still in warm-up mode.

>G<

> Going to a cooler thermostat with your OBD II system might not be the best
> thing without a slight reprogramming. I definitely wouldn't go to a lower
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > example and  or has anyone changed their cap from 16 to 10/12 lbs  and
> > what where the results..Thanks.  97 5.7 auto
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.