> It seems they are all going over to that type of setup on the new trucks.
> Chevy, Ford, Toyota, etc. You pretty much work on them just like any
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> compressor to do them. I'm sure some people may cheat and not use one,
> but I never would or recommend it.
>>>I want to replace the front shocks on my pu. Does anyone know how to do
>>>it? It looks like some kind of coil-over setup. What I really need to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> well...they are struts,well.....kinda :) It is actually a "coil-over"
>> setup.
>> It seems they are all going over to that type of setup on the new trucks.
>> Chevy, Ford, Toyota, etc. You pretty much work on them just like any
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Please don't recomend KYBs, they suck! Every pair I've put on have been
> worse than the worn out ones they replaced.
Well if your complaining about bounce I would have said KYB. The good
Monotube ones. Then again I think your choices on what your able to get
anyway will be limited on such a new truck with a newer type suspention
system. Personally I don't think Monroe shocks are all that good. They do
have good Name Reconetion, so the advertising is paying off. KYB it looks
like only have OE Replacment/Performance Skocks Available for your truck
anyway, none of the MonoMax. If not KYB, I'd take a look at Bilstein and
see if they make any for your truck. It would be a far better shock then a
Monroe. You may even want to look into seeing if Edelbrock make any
Performer ISA shocks for your truck. They are simular in how they work to
the Sensa Tracs, but again, a better shock.
I still don't see how KYB's are worse then warn out ones your replacing,
unless your installing their cheaper OE Replacement versions! I've
installed a few and had to take them off as they were just to stiff, one was
for a Corvette. Some of them can be a bear to install tying to compress
them to get them bolted up. Again though it all depends on how you want your
car/truck to handle.
ScottM - 12 Mar 2008 14:58 GMT
>>> It seems they are all going over to that type of setup on the new
>>> trucks. Chevy, Ford, Toyota, etc. You pretty much work on them just
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> compress them to get them bolted up. Again though it all depends on how
> you want your car/truck to handle.
I don't know what version the KYB's were, they just happened to have them at
the parts store. I do know they were white in color (red lettering I think)
I put them on mostly crown vics.
I don't care about name recognition, just performance.
Yes the KYB's were hard to compress when installing, but sure as hell
weren't too "stiff" when it came to controlling bounce. The only thing they
seemed to acomplish was raising the ride height a little on the car and
making it feel like its floating going down the road. The techs I worked
with agreed also.
Judging from experiance, the sensa trac was a far better shock. What was the
problem you had with them? I don't remember any problems at all.
I would have to say that the name recognition is paying off for KYBs, not
the other way around.
I put those crappy shocks on probably 100 or so cars, then switched to sensa
tracs when I was in the position to pick a brand.
I just happened to try them cause I wanted to try something better than the
KYB and they made the car handle and ride much better. After a few "test"
sets I got nothing but them.
Ashton Crusher - 13 Mar 2008 07:55 GMT
>>> It seems they are all going over to that type of setup on the new trucks.
>>> Chevy, Ford, Toyota, etc. You pretty much work on them just like any
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>Performer ISA shocks for your truck. They are simular in how they work to
>the Sensa Tracs, but again, a better shock.
Not in my experience. I put the Edelbrocks on my explorer and they
were great for about 5000 miles of easy use. Then they just went
permanently soft. I replaced them with Monroe Reflex and those are
MUCH better even after 15000 miles. Before I had either of those I
had Monroe Sensatraks on it and mainly replaced them with the
Edelbrooks because of early reports of the Edelbrocks being so good.
Edel's were a waste of money. Plus they don't honor their guarantee
unless the shock breaks. Just being worn out in 5000 miles is just
tough $#it.
>I still don't see how KYB's are worse then warn out ones your replacing,
>unless your installing their cheaper OE Replacement versions! I've
>installed a few and had to take them off as they were just to stiff, one was
>for a Corvette. Some of them can be a bear to install tying to compress
>them to get them bolted up. Again though it all depends on how you want your
>car/truck to handle.
ScottM - 14 Mar 2008 11:45 GMT
>>>> It seems they are all going over to that type of setup on the new
>>>> trucks.
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> unless the shock breaks. Just being worn out in 5000 miles is just
> tough $#it.
Well, 5k out of them is better than the KYBs being crap right out of the
box. Not much but a little.....
Ashton Crusher - 16 Mar 2008 08:42 GMT
>>>>> It seems they are all going over to that type of setup on the new
>>>>> trucks.
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>Well, 5k out of them is better than the KYBs being crap right out of the
>box. Not much but a little.....
I've heard a lot of people knock KYBs but it was after I put a set on
the front of my 89 S-10. I've probably put at least 15K on them and
they seem the same now as when I first put them on. And they are
definitely firmer then what was on it.