Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Trucks / August 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tire size vs. gas mileage

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
scrape - 28 Jul 2008 03:10 GMT
I've seen both sides of this argument, but am interested in what
folks here might have to say on the topic.  I've got a 2003
Silverado.  Stock tire size is 245/75/16.  If I go to a 265/75/16,
the tire diameter increases by about an inch giving me about 3%
less revolutions per mile.  On the surface, this would give me 3%
more mileage - BUT - how does the increased friction from the
additional tire width and the theoretical increased work the
engine must do play into the equation?

2nd scenario: I can go to a 265/70/16 and have virtually the same
diameter with 20mm more width.  How would this factor alone affect
mileage?
JR - 29 Jul 2008 06:50 GMT
I think you would have to do some pretty tight measuring to really see a
difference in your mileage.
It would LOOK a lot nicer with the bigger tires. I did it to my 97 Yukon and
was pleased with the new
look, and they didn't rub anyplace.
Regards,
 JR

> I've seen both sides of this argument, but am interested in what
> folks here might have to say on the topic.  I've got a 2003
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> diameter with 20mm more width.  How would this factor alone affect
> mileage?
Rick Cooper - 30 Jul 2008 03:12 GMT
tire size has nothing to do with gas mileage
scrape - 30 Jul 2008 03:45 GMT
>tire size has nothing to do with gas mileage

How can it not?  If a tire has a (extreme example) 30% larger
diameter, it's going to travel further given the same amount of
engine RPMs.  At some point there has to be diminishing returns
due to more effort being required.  My question has to do with
where that point is reached.
Rick Cooper - 30 Jul 2008 17:21 GMT
"scrape" <scrapeNOTHANKS@earthlink.net> wrote in message > How can it not?

basic physics.........you could run bicycle tires (if it were possible for
them to support the vehicle weight) and the vehicle would get the same gas
mileage
Craig M - 30 Jul 2008 17:32 GMT
I think you need to re-think that, if you loose 5 pounds of air in your
tires, you make the tire smaller, and thus will make your milage go down.
What changing tire sizes does, it will make your speedomter off, so you may
get a ticket, now that will cost you some money.
> "scrape" <scrapeNOTHANKS@earthlink.net> wrote in message > How can it not?
>
> basic physics.........you could run bicycle tires (if it were possible for
> them to support the vehicle weight) and the vehicle would get the same gas
> mileage
Rick Cooper - 30 Jul 2008 17:55 GMT
> I think you need to re-think that, if you loose 5 pounds of air in your
> tires, you make the tire smaller, and thus will make your milage go down.

Yeah, but I wasn't talking about "drag".  I was talking about tire size.
Steve - 30 Jul 2008 19:03 GMT
>> I think you need to re-think that, if you loose 5 pounds of air in your
>> tires, you make the tire smaller, and thus will make your milage go down.
>
> Yeah, but I wasn't talking about "drag".  I was talking about tire size.

A larger diameter tire has the effect of reducing the effective rear-end
ratio.  There is a well-known relationship between rear-end ratio and
gas mileage.  I expect that a 3% change in rear-end ratio would have a
small impact on gas mileage - and a 3% change in tire diameter should
have the same impact.

--Steve
scrape - 30 Jul 2008 23:32 GMT
>>> I think you need to re-think that, if you loose 5 pounds of air in your
>>> tires, you make the tire smaller, and thus will make your milage go down.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>small impact on gas mileage - and a 3% change in tire diameter should
>have the same impact.

Would, however a slightly fatter tire negate that difference due
to additional drag?

There has to be a "sweet spot" somewhere.
None4You - 22 Aug 2008 09:09 GMT
>I think you need to re-think that, if you loose 5 pounds of air in your
>tires, you make the tire smaller, and thus will make your milage go down.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> gas
>> mileage

No it wouldn't.  It would get  better mileage . The tire would have to be
super hard and the contact patch would be super small. Also air resistance
would be much reduced.  But don't try and turn it fast. It will slide .
That's why all high mileage experimental electric, or other vehicles have
skinny tires.  Less rolling resistance. Any wider  tire will get worse
mileage if everything else stays the same.  More road resistance and air
resistance.  If you could mount a razor blade ring  on a wheel . And it
could support the weight and the road could take it. It would get better
mileage then a bicycle tire.
scrape - 30 Jul 2008 23:31 GMT
>"scrape" <scrapeNOTHANKS@earthlink.net> wrote in message > How can it not?
>
>basic physics.........you could run bicycle tires (if it were possible for
>them to support the vehicle weight) and the vehicle would get the same gas
>mileage

I think you're assuming that the engine is doing the same work and
this may be the case if the final gearing is changed to give the
same ratio based on a different diameter tire, but a larger tire
is going to go further given the same number of engine
revolutions.  The engine may burn the same amount of fuel running
at 2500 RPMs for one hour regardless of tire size, but the vehicle
would have traveled a greater distance.  MPG would increase.

Basic math.
Steve W. - 31 Jul 2008 01:30 GMT
> "scrape" <scrapeNOTHANKS@earthlink.net> wrote in message > How can it not?
>
> basic physics.........you could run bicycle tires (if it were possible for
> them to support the vehicle weight) and the vehicle would get the same gas
> mileage

 Only if the tire was the same diameter as the old one. Also the
thinner tire would get better mileage due to the reduction in surface
friction. Has been proven many times.

It is FAR more than basic physics.

Signature

Steve W.
Near Cooperstown, New York

Stormin Mormon - 21 Aug 2008 23:30 GMT
about 30 miles west of Cleveland is that point.

More seriously, I don't know.

Signature

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
 www.lds.org
.

How can it not?  If a tire has a (extreme example) 30% larger
diameter, it's going to travel further given the same amount of
engine RPMs.  At some point there has to be diminishing returns
due to more effort being required.  My question has to do with
where that point is reached.
Stormin Mormon - 21 Aug 2008 23:30 GMT
Size matters. Especially to woman drivers.

Signature

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
 www.lds.org
.

tire size has nothing to do with gas mileage
None4You - 22 Aug 2008 08:59 GMT
> Size matters. Especially to woman drivers.
>
> tire size has nothing to do with gas mileage

I was under the impression for a long time that taller, skinnier tires
offered better gas mileage. Due too less rolling resistance , as the contact
patch is smaller. and less air resistance. And they travel farther for the
same amount of  revolutions. They also get better traction in the snow.
And those type of tires ( Old folgy tires) generally  have a harder rubber
compound  that creates less friction too.  Then wider lower aspect sporty
tires.  They are also cheaper to buy. That's my story and I,m sticking to
it.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.