Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Trucks / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New process 203 tech info needed

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bbrown64 - 28 Nov 2005 02:39 GMT
Does anyone know of a good source for technical info on transfer cases,
np203 specifically?

I'm looking for detailed info on rebuilding and repairing them.

The question I have at the moment is:

Is there a measurement to tell if the chain needs to be replaced? A play
over a given number of links or deflection of the free chain when
installed?

I don't want to be replacing perfectly good parts.
TheSnoMan - 28 Nov 2005 13:48 GMT
> Does anyone know of a good source for technical info on transfer cases,
> np203 specifically?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I don't want to be replacing perfectly good parts.

Geerally if you have much over 1.25 inches of deflection you should
change it and ideally you want less than 1 inch. Make sure you use 30w
non detergent oil in it and you can use 20w in winter if you want too
(non detergent oil foams less in a gear box)

Signature

-----------------
www.thesnoman.com

bbrown64 - 29 Nov 2005 03:34 GMT
Thanks for the info. The chain should be good then. Less than 1" of
deflection when installed.

Do you happen to know where I could find a good exploded diagram of the
NP203? My service manual has a pretty poor cut-away drawing. It's next to
worthless.
TheSnoMan - 29 Nov 2005 13:32 GMT
> Thanks for the info. The chain should be good then. Less than 1" of
> deflection when installed.
>
> Do you happen to know where I could find a good exploded diagram of the
> NP203? My service manual has a pretty poor cut-away drawing. It's next to
> worthless.

A older chiltons manual should have a good one (from the late 70's or
early 80'S) I plan to post some of them at a later date at my site when
I get some time to do it as I have manuals going back to 1961.

Signature

-----------------
www.thesnoman.com

bbrown64 - 29 Nov 2005 21:53 GMT
Hate to ask but...

If you have one could you possibly email me a scan of the diagram?

I've got a Haynes manual but it has a horrible diagram. It's the same one
at this link:

http://www.rsgear.com/NP203.htm
TheSnoMan - 29 Nov 2005 23:26 GMT
> Hate to ask but...
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.rsgear.com/NP203.htm

I will post a nice clear detailed one in my forum this evening under
"Tech Referance" in the new "Diagrams and Schmatics members only" area.

Signature

-----------------
www.thesnoman.com

bbrown64 - 30 Nov 2005 16:28 GMT
Thanks.

That's exactly what I was looking for. It was most appreciated.

BTW, I got the transfer case reassembled last night. Seems to be working
fine out of the truck. Have to wait awhile till I get all of the other
work I have to do on this truck done before I can put it back in. Should
know pretty quickly if I put it together correctly and if it leaks or
not.

Maybe next time I'll just swap in a NP205. Seems to be a much simpler
design. And in this stuff, simpler is usualy better :)
TheSnoMan - 30 Nov 2005 18:41 GMT
> Thanks.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Maybe next time I'll just swap in a NP205. Seems to be a much simpler
> design. And in this stuff, simpler is usualy better :)

Different spline count on input shaft for a 205. The 203 is a tuff case
and it only realy weakness is if it is not properly serviced and it
should have oil changed every 15 or 20k because it is a full time unit
and more ften if it is been weorked hard. Failure to do this, can
shorten life span a lot. Big tires with tall gears is kinda tuff on them
too.

Signature

-----------------
www.thesnoman.com

bbrown64 - 30 Nov 2005 19:31 GMT
Yeah, this was only a small part of a much larger project. Putting in a new
GM Performance Parts HO350, a TCI Truck Master TH350, rebuild the transfer
case, repair a lot of rust in the cab (firewall, rocker panels and cab
mounts, new urethane cab mounts, new shocks and lots of assorted parts to
make it all work.

So, this would have been as good a time as any to change transfer cases.
I'm running 33" mud tires with 4:10 gears and lockers now. 35" or 37"
tires are in the plans eventually. I run trails in Florida which means mud
so, the NP205 would probably be a good choice. Figured it was cheaper
(already into this project for enough $$$$) to just use as many of the
parts I already had.

I figure the t-case swap would have required new drive shafts, t-case
shifter, maybe modification to the floor of the cab and maybe modification
to the exhaust as well. So, it wasn't in the cards right now.

Thanks again for all the help.
TheSnoMan - 30 Nov 2005 20:35 GMT
> Yeah, this was only a small part of a much larger project. Putting in a new
> GM Performance Parts HO350, a TCI Truck Master TH350, rebuild the transfer
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks again for all the help.

Actually I disagree with your logic on Tcase choice. If you offroad a
lot the 203 is really a better chocie because it allows you to use 4wd
without locking the center diff which works about 90% of the time and
eliminates driveshaft torque bind in turns. I still have a old 79 J20
Jeep P/U wih a Quadratrac in it and it was one of the best offroad
trucks I ever had for handling and overall traction. I rarely needed to
lock it  and that helps limit steering wheel bind in a turn too. Also,
one quick note, I am not a fan of non selectable lockers in front axle
because the ujoints in front axle are not constant velocity in turns and
lockers shorten Ujoint and steering box life because of added torque
street. A good compromise is something like a true Trax gear based LSD
because it does give you more traction but plays really well in a front
axle. On final tip, you Tcase will hold up a lot better if you run
4.56's with 33's in mud and 5.13's with 35's or 37's to keep Tcase chain
loading to reasonable levels when playing really hard. I know that
sounds deep but it will really get with the program and you will have
very little driveline problems too because of lower torque loads and
better traction as well for reduced chassis and drive line wrap up. You
might check out this lnk if you have not already done so.

http://snoman.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=63
Signature


-----------------
www.thesnoman.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.