Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Trucks / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

89 K 2500 radiator shroud

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
crbearden@copper.net - 21 Jul 2006 01:32 GMT
I have a 89 k 2500 5.7 engine. It   is on the 4 th radiator.  I
replaced the one row core with a 3 or 4 row core 43-1290 National
radiator supercool or heatbuster series.  The fan shroud hits the cores
and has worn holes in each one.  The radiators seem to be about 3/4
inch too long between the tanks to really fit the insulators at the top
and bottom right.  I ordered a new shroud and it is nothing like the
original.  On this one the shroud also holds the top of the radiator
down.  It hs both oil and trans coolers in the radiator.  does anyone
have any part numbers for the correct one???

Thanks

crbearden@copper.net
SnoMan - 21 Jul 2006 01:51 GMT
>I have a 89 k 2500 5.7 engine. It   is on the 4 th radiator.  I
>replaced the one row core with a 3 or 4 row core 43-1290 National
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>crbearden@copper.net

What are you doing to them???  I have a 89 and a 79 with the orignal
radiators.
-----------------
The SnoMan
www.thesnoman.com
crbearden@copper.net - 21 Jul 2006 02:01 GMT
> What are you doing to them???  I have a 89 and a 79 with the orignal
> radiators.
> -----------------
> The SnoMan
> www.thesnoman.com

First one the plastic tank split.  the first two startd leaking at the
seams in about a week.  the third lasted 13 months before th shroud
wore a hole in the core.  the last one leaked within one day.  I need a
GM part number or somewhere to find the part number for the shroud.  I
ordered a new one yesterday received it today and it cannot work on
this truck.  It was bought new by my father in law.  I would bet that
the parts guy gave me one for a 99 instead of a 89

I would like to find a parts manual for this truck and eliminate this
BS, but have not been able to find one..
SnoMan - 21 Jul 2006 02:26 GMT
>> What are you doing to them???  I have a 89 and a 79 with the orignal
>> radiators.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>I would like to find a parts manual for this truck and eliminate this
>BS, but have not been able to find one..

The 89 thru 99 old style shroud should work because there was no real
changes. The problem with 99's is that there are two of the (old a
style and new) and some part numbers are confussing. Have you tried
going to a dealer just to get the part number?
-----------------
The SnoMan
www.thesnoman.com
Elbert - 21 Jul 2006 05:10 GMT
>>> What are you doing to them???  I have a 89 and a 79 with the orignal
>>> radiators.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>The SnoMan
>www.thesnoman.com

not sure if this applies but I say it anyway...

have a 92 k1500 with 350

initially truck had OEM radiator and OEM shroud (Where the shroud
holds the radiator)

Replaced radiator with "heat buster" radiator...had to trim shroud
along the edges on bottom half to keep shroud from rubbing the core.
THis should be obvious to you because you can't install the shroud
unless you get really rough with the radiator, which I'm guessing
caused your problems. I don't see how you could get the radiator to
fit right at all without trimming the shroud.

Later I replaced that setup with a large be-cool radiator (sized for
3/4 ton truck) and I had to change the shroud because the OEM shroud
whas too thin. I then changed the shrould to a 1998 version (based
upon my reivew of a friends truck) 1998 K1500 350. THe shrouds on the
1998 are indeed thicker and require two additional mounts that hold
the radiator.  THe OEM shroud would not work because the be-cool
radiator was too thick and too wide. Apparenlty the 98 year model
trucks have a core about 19*34.

If you are going with a larger radiator than stock I would tell the
parts guy you need a shroud for a 1998 K1500 and also the two top
radiator mounts.  Your radiator support already has the holes drilled
for this, and you might pick up the 4 botls you'll need too, that the
mounts attach to the core support with.

Maybe this will offer you a solution.
-----------
Elbert
ask@me.com
Elbert - 21 Jul 2006 05:17 GMT
>>>> What are you doing to them???  I have a 89 and a 79 with the orignal
>>>> radiators.
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>Elbert
>ask@me.com

when I say the shroud was too thin... I"m talking about where the OEM
shroud would not allow a "thicker" radiator to be installed becuase
the shroud would interfer. THe 1998 shroud is quite a bit thicker in
that it allows a larger radiator both in thickness and width to be
installed. SInce you can't add space fwd of the radiator due to the
condensor...you add space to the rear. So the 1998 shroud actually
extends farther to the rear of the core support than did the OEM.

I think the 3/4 trucks may have the same setup...but I was not abel to
look at a 3/4 truck at the time.  I do know there is a difference
between the shrouds that hold the radiator at the top mounts and the
shrouds that require the two additional mounts I'm referring to.

-----------
Elbert
ask@me.com
SnoMan - 21 Jul 2006 17:55 GMT
Lots of time people install a bigger raditor when improved airflow
would cure the problem. GM Clutch fans age and engage at higher temps
as they get older. Thye are easy to adjust though. I have a 89 4x4
burb that still has stock raditor and clutch fan 178K miles later. I
have had to tweak the fan a few times as the bimetal coil controlling
it does age but it still run cool and it never exceeds 210 in ANY
conditions and it has seen 105 plus many times with A/C chilling. Sure
a bigger raditor is nice but proper fan operation is important for
best overall cooling and lower under hood temps too.  
-----------------
The SnoMan
www.thesnoman.com
The Nolalu Barn Owl - 22 Jul 2006 02:02 GMT
>Lots of time people install a bigger raditor when improved airflow
>would cure the problem. GM Clutch fans age and engage at higher temps
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>The SnoMan
>www.thesnoman.com

You can get a better fan.  You can travel 100 mph (the air goes
through the rad at the speed you travel.

I had a truck with a 2 core rad and a three blade fan.  Replaced the
fan and the thermostat but the telling day was when it rained and then
stopped raining and I noticed a significant cooling effect with the
cool rain on the rad.
A three core rad fixed the problem for me.
We were towing and the small rad wouldn't cut it.  By the way, there
isn't a fan on God's green earth that can suck air faster than the
truck surging through the air at highway speeds.  Stop & go, yes,
highway NEVER.
-
Regards
Gordie
SnoMan - 22 Jul 2006 03:31 GMT
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:02:58 -0400, The Nolalu Barn Owl
<&#103&#111&#114&#100&#105&#101&#64&#110&#111&#108&#97&#108&#117&#46&#111&#110&#46&#99&#97>
wrote:

>isn't a fan on God's green earth that can suck air faster than the
>truck surging through the air at highway speeds.  Stop & go, yes,
>highway NEVER.

You are quite mistaken here. A good engine driven fan can cool a
engine better than ram air at highway speeds when needed. The air does
not flow through the way you think becuse the is backpressure caused
by the core stack and engine compartment too. I have a 2000 K3500 SRW
with stock factory cooling with a factory 10 bladed fan on clutch.
Recently when towing a loaded car hauler that weighed about 8K on a
day when it was 95+. My engine never even hit 210 and A/C was chilling
us and a few times on highway grades we could hear the fan engage for
a bit because ram air did not cut it even at highway speeds. A proper
engine fan will moved some serious air.  Even my old 89 4x4 burb that
I bought new will engage the fan sometime at highways speeds on really
hot days for a little bit and it to has never been above 210 in it
life and cooling system is stock towing package with aux tranny and
engine oil cooler. Ram air cannot always be relied on to do the job.
-----------------
The SnoMan
www.thesnoman.com
The Nolalu Barn Owl - 22 Jul 2006 13:44 GMT
>On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:02:58 -0400, The Nolalu Barn Owl
><&#103&#111&#114&#100&#105&#101&#64&#110&#111&#108&#97&#108&#117&#46&#111&#110&#46&#99&#97>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>engine oil cooler. Ram air cannot always be relied on to do the job.
>-----------------

Hotrodders have always known that you can remove the fan when you
race.  You only need it when the care isn't moving.
Put it in gear Snowman, the fan isn't going to pull it and all the
tweaking in the world isn't going to improve things.

Just look at what the factory does.  They do NOT tweak the fan to make
a heavy-duty truck.  They add cores to the rad.  I have never seen an
exception to this.

The wear on the rad even happens with the old trucks.  If you
lubricate the rubber mounts with dishwashing detergent they will
squeeze over the rad and allow you to mount it but over a short time
will wear through, causing a lead on the tank  I live in the Great
White North of Northwestern Ontario and can tell you that a 2-core rad
isn't enough unless it is just you and your lumch-pail, driving a few
miles to work.  Summer is much hatter in most any part of this
continent than I'll ever experience and I have already determined
this.
Fans, praying to MECCA, I don't care.  You literally HAVE to have
surface area on the rad cores to transfer heat to the air.  There is
no substitute for a properly sized rad if you work your truck at all.
If you tow, use overdrive for extended periods or haul heavy loads you
should have a 3 or 4-core fan.

One guy at work told me that when the truck starts to overheat, to
switch to second gear and watch the temp go down because the fan will
be running faster and the engine will be working less hard in that RPM
range.
I did that and watched the gauge climb to the top in a few short
miles, forcing me to pull over and idle it until cool.  This is after
changing the fan to a silicone nonsense fan with 5 blades and the
thermostat to 180ºF
Upon arriving home I searched the newsgroups and found that you need a
larger rad than 2-core to drag a trailer on the highway.  I bought a
brand new 3-core rad and NEVER had that problem again.

Ask yourself this.  Do you want to be at the side of the road, playing
mosquito bait in my neck of the woods, on some God forsaken road,
TWEAKING an old fan or do you want to be driving?

-
Regards
Gordie
SnoMan - 22 Jul 2006 14:41 GMT
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:44:37 -0400, The Nolalu Barn Owl
<&#103&#111&#114&#100&#105&#101&#64&#110&#111&#108&#97&#108&#117&#46&#111&#110&#46&#99&#97>
wrote:

>Hotrodders have always known that you can remove the fan when you
>race.  You only need it when the care isn't moving.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>a heavy-duty truck.  They add cores to the rad.  I have never seen an
>exception to this.

First hot rodders do not tow and keep heavy loads on engines for long
periods of time so they can get by without a fan sometimes. They aslo
do not use A/C generally which adds a lot of heat load to radiator
core stack. Also you are mistaken because they do tweak clutch fans
setting and the fans themselve with HD cooling systems (you have not
done your research here) and even semis have fans that can engage at
highway speeds because ram air does not always work plus when you are
drafting or traveling with wind the ram air is greatly reduced.
Postive forced airflow at times also lowers under hood temps which
reduced heat stress on under hood components too extending the life of
altenators and such.  Sure you can use a 5 core radiator and try to
get by on ram air but even if you did you under hood temps would be a
lot higher than with a smaller radiatro  core thickness and positive
airflow. I run 7 PSI caps for long cooling system life with 70/30
antifreeze and my vehicles never even think about over heating in the
worst of conditions with properly operating clutch fans. (my 89 with
178K has hoses that are still like new) Clutch fans also boost A/C
output on hot day because they force airflow through condensor that
cools refigerant more so that it can absorb more heat from cabin (this
is why cars with electric fan force them one when A/C is selected).
While you do not want too small a raditor for sure but nor do you want
to be nieve enough to believe that ram air along can do the job all
the time in a SUV and it will not do it towing on a hot day. GM had a
lot of problems with Dmax's not cooling properly on hot days towing
(no surprise given limited grill area and tight engine compartment
they restricts air flow though it) so for year the got buy by saying
temps of 230 or a bit more were "normal" towing with them and in 2006
they quietly greatly increased the size of the cooling fan and shroud
and changed the calibration of it too to try to better control the
problem.
-----------------
The SnoMan
www.thesnoman.com
Elbert - 23 Jul 2006 02:33 GMT
>Lots of time people install a bigger raditor when improved airflow
>would cure the problem. GM Clutch fans age and engage at higher temps
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>The SnoMan
>www.thesnoman.com

Yes I agree with what you are saying but I don't recal anywhere in the
OEM (GM) manuals where it talks about "adjusting" the fan clutch. At
least I've never seen that documented, outside of your web site. I'm
not saying you can't do it, I am saying that it  is general practice
to assume tha the fan clutch is either a pass or fail item, it either
works properly or it needs replacement.

The regular radiator on a 1/2 ton of that year model is a piece of
crap, and I'm guessing on the 3/4 tons too. The one I had was some 28
inches wide....compared to something like 34 inches wide for the heavy
duty models which require a different shroud.

If you want to stay with OEM products and you verfity operation of the
fan clutch and the cooling in inadaquate....if the shroud is fully
operational and not cracked and the water pump is working..... you
only really have one other items to look at, considering that the
engine has no mechanical issues.

Its also woth nothing that the 34 inch wide model radiators are also
thicker than the 28 inch wide modles. So in the end game you look for
a radiator that presents the most surface area and has the laregest
capactiy that your vehicle supports. Its obvious that on these
vehciles from the 1/2 ton to the 3/4 ton and maybe even the 1 ton
truck that they share the same front end, same radiator support and
generally the same radiators and cooling system depending on the
engine size and if it has HD cooling.

They only make one OEM fan for those year model trucks and the fan
clutchs are designated by the rear end gearing (GM). So if you can't
increase air flow you look to a larger capacity radiator or sometimes
a more efficient radiator given a fixed surface area..

In my case I went with a large capacity / effecient aftermarket
radiator that is roughly the same diminisons as the HD cooling model
for the 3/4 ton truck. IN order to do so I had to change the shroud
and also add the two top radiator mounts like the 3/4 trucks of that
year have. Upon observation of a friends turck I did change the fan
shroud to one like a 98 year model 1/2 ton because like i said
previously it allows for a wider and thicker radiator install.

Of course its a given that if your truck is a 3/4 ton and came with HD
cooling you most likely have all this in place to start with. But I'm
guessing that some of the 3/4 tons with 350 engines had the crappy
light duty 28 inch wide radiator, just like what was on my 1/2 ton.

I also think during this time some of the trucks had oil coolers built
in the radiators while others did not, which I'm sure adds to the
cooling issues.  

I do think that the cooling on some of these trucks is marginal
especially if you find yourself off road in 4 wheel drive where you
have a situation of (hot summer days) low rpms and thus low air flow
across the radiator. Situations where you are forced into moving slow.
The truck is moving slow, the rpms are low and the temp is hot.  A lot
of these trucks run right around 210 all day long and you stress them
much and they certainly will get aboove 210.  SOmething parallel to
heavy traffic on a hot summer day where you have a lot of idle time
and repeated stop and go situaions.  You can stress one oout on the
hilly or mountionious areas too, given a heavy load and repeated stops
up an extended grade (even on the pavement).

THe problems I've observed were most of the time situations where the
truck did not or was not able to pull a sufficient amount of air
across the radiator, due to the various situations you coud find
yourself at extended idle time right in parallel with heavy loads on
the engine.

I'm not talking about everyday driving on the interstate, or driving
across town in light traffic.

I think even GM made note of this issue when they had some of these
trucks with a auxillary  electric radiator fan that was mounted on the
front of the passenger side radiator and would come on and blow air
across the passenger side radiator when I think the temp rose aboove
approx 200. It may have come on in parallel with the A/C operation
too?
-----------
Elbert
ask@me.com
HDS - 23 Jul 2006 19:48 GMT
>I have a 89 k 2500 5.7 engine. It   is on the 4 th radiator.  I
> replaced the one row core with a 3 or 4 row core 43-1290 National
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> crbearden@copper.net

----------------------

Try This:

http://lmctruck.com/icatalog/cd/t104.html

HDS
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.