Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Trucks / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Chevy tracker?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Warren Oates - 29 Aug 2006 16:52 GMT
Is it okay if I ask about a 98 Tracker here? I know it's not _really_ a
truck, but it _is_ a Chevy and it _is_ a 4x4.

Anyway, how big is the gas tank? Can't find the info in the manual that
came with it.
Signature

W. Oates
Teal'c: He is concealing something.
O'Neil: Like what?
Teal'c: I am unsure, he is concealing it.

eagle0801 - 30 Aug 2006 04:11 GMT
>Is it okay if I ask about a 98 Tracker here? I know it's not _really_ a
>truck, but it _is_ a Chevy and it _is_ a 4x4.
>
>Anyway, how big is the gas tank? Can't find the info in the manual that
>came with it.
it should be a 20 or 25 gallon tank.
SnoMan - 30 Aug 2006 12:43 GMT
>it should be a 20 or 25 gallon tank.

Not in a tracker or any other Geo. Try 11 gallons and it is also built
with Suzuki parts with a chevy emblem. They changed the name of it
from Geo Tracker to Chevy Track in 97 but still the same vehicle.  
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Warren Oates - 30 Aug 2006 12:52 GMT
> Not in a tracker or any other Geo. Try 11 gallons and it is also built
> with Suzuki parts with a chevy emblem. They changed the name of it
> from Geo Tracker to Chevy Track in 97 but still the same vehicle.  
> -

Actually, a more careful reading of the manual provides me with the info
that it holds 11.5 gallons, or 55 litres. Hmm. My last car was a Suzuki
Swift.

I've seen a GMC Tracker around, as well as Suzuki, and there was
something called Asuna.

Thanks for the replies.
Signature

W. Oates
Teal'c: He is concealing something.
O'Neil: Like what?
Teal'c: I am unsure, he is concealing it.

SnoMan - 30 Aug 2006 15:56 GMT
>I've seen a GMC Tracker around, as well as Suzuki, and there was
>something called Asuna.

I comment for you. Several years ago I worked with a friend that
thought they would be a nice vehicle to drive to work. It scared him
to death in winter when he came in one day white as a sheet. That
short wheelbase and rear wheel drive can be a heart attack on icy
roads. He went out and bought some stuuded tires for it after that day
for winter usage and found it much improved.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Warren Oates - 30 Aug 2006 16:49 GMT
> I comment for you. Several years ago I worked with a friend that
> thought they would be a nice vehicle to drive to work. It scared him
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> for winter usage and found it much improved.
> -

Thanks for that. I'll look into a good set of winter tires for it. Right
now it's got Michelin X-one, about which I know nothing. The little
notice inside the door says the tires should be inflated to 23 psi,
which seems a bit soft to me, but my last two cars were much smaller and
lighter.
Signature

W. Oates
Teal'c: He is concealing something.
O'Neil: Like what?
Teal'c: I am unsure, he is concealing it.

SnoMan - 31 Aug 2006 12:18 GMT
>Thanks for that. I'll look into a good set of winter tires for it. Right
>now it's got Michelin X-one, about which I know nothing. The little
>notice inside the door says the tires should be inflated to 23 psi,
>which seems a bit soft to me, but my last two cars were much smaller and
>lighter.

That is because the tire are larger relative to vehicle size/weight so
they need less pressure for load on them. I would run at least 28
though as it will reduce rolling resistance, improve handling a bit
and MPG a bit too at the expense of just a little harsher ride at
times. Do look into some serious ice tires for rear, not just a all
season tire if you do not like surprizes. I put studded tires on the
rear of my wife 2000 cherokee because though I warned her (she had to
have it) that it would be nasty on ice she had to find out the hard
way. Before that the car was scary on icy roads but with studded rear
tires it is a stable little tank on ice and has never tried to even
think about swapping ends on ice with them . I have a extra set of
rims that I keep the tires mounted on and just swap out rear tires and
rims in winter.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Warren Oates - 31 Aug 2006 14:40 GMT
> That is because the tire are larger relative to vehicle size/weight so
> they need less pressure for load on them. I would run at least 28
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> rims that I keep the tires mounted on and just swap out rear tires and
> rims in winter.

What effect would having different tires front and rear have on the
4-wheel drive?
Signature

W. Oates

SnoMan - 31 Aug 2006 15:29 GMT
>What effect would having different tires front and rear have on the
>4-wheel drive?

You can stud all of them but the biggst problem with a rear wheel
drive car on ice in keeping the rear end behind you which studded
tires will do even on wet ice from freezing rain. You do not want to
really be running 4x4 to move on ice for a few big reasons, first, you
cannot steer out of a skid in 4x4 becuse the tires will need to turn
at different speeds in a skid to maintain contact traction for
directional control and 4x4 prevents this. When you get in a skid in
4x4 your only change to get control is to have presence of mind to
take it out of 4x4 and then try to get it under control. The next one
is if you have ABS, it will not work at all or properly in 4x4. i have
been plowing snow for over 20 years and I get out on roads when they
are at there worst a lot. I do run 4 studded tires on my plow trucks
in winter for safty and traction when working on ice but I always
transport from site to site in 2wd and the 4 studded tires give me
better braking and directional control when plowing on icy surfaces
with plow side forces on truck and with a working weight approaching 5
ton or more at times. I can go out to service clients even in a ice
storm without white knuckles with them and even my wifes 2wd Cherokee
with rear studs will shame a 4x4 one without them on ice. More than
once her coworkers have wondered how she gets around so well on ice
with her 2wd Jeep when others with 4x4 versions struggle and go in the
ditch sometimes. She had on friend by a Jeep grand cherokee one summer
in place of a FWD car and spent one winter with it on ice and a few
trips to the ditch and got rid of it the next summer.  Her studded 2wd
Jeep can take off on glare ice with little effort while 4x4's with all
season tires struggle. If you brake hard on lock front tires on ice
there is no tendancy to swap ends at all with studs on rear and
steering control resumes as soon as brakes are released some.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Warren Oates - 31 Aug 2006 20:53 GMT
> You can stud all of them but the biggst problem with a rear wheel
> drive car on ice in keeping the rear end behind you which studded
> [...]

Thanks again. I will definitely go see our local tire guy about studded
tires for the rear. There's probably some law about when you can put
them on (and when you have to take them off), if I know Ontario ...

Anyway, your information comes at a good time -- I've got about 2 months
before I have to start worrying about ice.
Signature

W. Oates

Warren Oates - 31 Aug 2006 20:59 GMT
> Thanks again. I will definitely go see our local tire guy about studded
> tires for the rear. There's probably some law about when you can put
> them on (and when you have to take them off), if I know Ontario ...

[replying to my own article]

That didn't take long to find, oh my Google. Studded tires are illegal
in the part of Ontario where I live (they're only legal in Northern
Ontario, which is a strictly defined area). What would be a good
substitute?
Signature

W. Oates

SnoMan - 31 Aug 2006 22:21 GMT
>That didn't take long to find, oh my Google. Studded tires are illegal
>in the part of Ontario where I live (they're only legal in Northern
>Ontario, which is a strictly defined area). What would be a good
>substitute?

Illegal all year long? that is strange. Try "Blizzak" tires as a
second choice. (search google using that term)
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
Dafey - 31 Aug 2006 01:05 GMT
LOL run it dry then fill it up and see how many gallons it takes.

--------------------------------------------------------------
When Religion ruled the world , they called it the dark ages...

Don Farr
Roswell NM 88203
D-farr AT cableone DOT net
--------------------------------------------------------------

 On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:52:41 -0400, Warren Oates
 <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote:

 >I've seen a GMC Tracker around, as well as Suzuki, and there was
 >something called Asuna.

 I comment for you. Several years ago I worked with a friend that
 thought they would be a nice vehicle to drive to work. It scared him
 to death in winter when he came in one day white as a sheet. That
 short wheelbase and rear wheel drive can be a heart attack on icy
 roads. He went out and bought some stuuded tires for it after that day
 for winter usage and found it much improved.
 -----------------
 TheSnoMan.com
Warren Oates - 31 Aug 2006 14:39 GMT
> LOL run it dry then fill it up and see how many gallons it takes.

Heh. Wouldn't be the first time.
Signature

W. Oates
Teal'c: He is concealing something.
O'Neil: Like what?
Teal'c: I am unsure, he is concealing it.

calhoun - 02 Sep 2006 11:36 GMT
I have a 94 geo tracker 4x4. about an 11 gal tank.
I would rather drive it on ice than my 2500HD plow trucks. It handles like a
jeep wrangler. It is light enough to regain control. I would stay away from
studs. They lessen traction on dry pavement. The first year I plowed I used
studs and had many complaints about the scratches left in the customers
driveways. Since then just non studded tires and have had no problems. We
only get 2-3 ice events, a year, hear but lots of snow. Ice only lasts till
the salt hits it so it is never a big driving issue for very long. I am
impressed with the abilities of this little car. It will pull though tough
conditions better than most vehicles on the road today.

> Is it okay if I ask about a 98 Tracker here? I know it's not _really_ a
> truck, but it _is_ a Chevy and it _is_ a 4x4.
>
> Anyway, how big is the gas tank? Can't find the info in the manual that
> came with it.
Warren Oates - 02 Sep 2006 11:46 GMT
> I have a 94 geo tracker 4x4. about an 11 gal tank.
> I would rather drive it on ice than my 2500HD plow trucks. It handles like a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> impressed with the abilities of this little car. It will pull though tough
> conditions better than most vehicles on the road today.

What tires are you running on it? We live in a pretty temperate area,
stuck out in the middle of Lake Ontario (opposite Oswego NY), winters
are mostly mild with quite a bit of wet snow; like you say, ice isn't
really a problem since the sand and salt trucks get out on it right away.
Signature

W. Oates

calhoun - 03 Sep 2006 11:56 GMT
Goodyear wrangler RT

>> I have a 94 geo tracker 4x4. about an 11 gal tank.
>> I would rather drive it on ice than my 2500HD plow trucks. It handles
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> are mostly mild with quite a bit of wet snow; like you say, ice isn't
> really a problem since the sand and salt trucks get out on it right away.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.