>It could be a bad connection at the sending unit.
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:28:09 -0400, The Nolalu Barn Owl
> <gordie@nolalu.on.ca>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
He said the resistance was correct. Look: I read an Alldata that the harness
wires #15 and 17 should read 0-88 ohms and it did." That is the check for
the sender. He has a different problem and I do not have a manual for a 90.
But I do have the factory service manual for a 91 if it's the same?? If it
has an Instrument Voltage Regulator (IVR) that's where I'd start.
LTK,
Didi you do the voltage checks? Or, are the voltage checks in the Alldata
info you have?
Al
SnoMan - 26 Sep 2006 20:25 GMT
>He said the resistance was correct. Look: I read an Alldata that the harness
>wires #15 and 17 should read 0-88 ohms and it did." That is the check for
>the sender. He has a different problem and I do not have a manual for a 90.
>But I do have the factory service manual for a 91 if it's the same?? If it
>has an Instrument Voltage Regulator (IVR) that's where I'd start.
The problem with restances and impedance is that it can vary with
circuit load particulalrly when a wiper contact is involved. It is
quite possibly that the connection breaks down at a certain current
level because the meter will present a different load than gage will.
This is not to say that it is bad for sure but I would not rule it out
because sending units fail far more often than gages do. I do agree
that he should check to see if proper voltage is being applied to
bridge circuit that the gage is connected to to display fuel level.
Very minute amouts of current are invovled here and it does not take
much to redure one inop
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com