
Signature
Don't ascribe to stupidity what can be adequately explained by ignorance.
>> Or would you call someone on that?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> fellow, who spends quite a bit of time and effort trying to help
> people here -- just like yourself.
WOW!!! that's all I can say.
>If and when he says something you
> believe is wrong, or even just that you have a better answer to,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> cheered his action, should be treated with caution, and their advice
> taken with a grain of salt.
Screw it Ian! Let these people police the idiot. When he hurts sombody or
screw's up they're car or truck, the people of this guy's ilk can try to
explain away the idiot's actions.
> -tih
> > Or would you call someone on that?
>
> Of course one should, but the way you, and a couple of others, do it,
> I'm starting to expect that if "Snoman" were to claim that 2+2=4, you
> guys would immediately be all over him, calling him a liar, and
> showering him with insults not suited for a family audience.
First of all, we haven't done anything remotely close to calling
him a liar when/if he's posted correct information.
He's been proven wrong on numerous inaccuracies but refuses to
put his ego aside and recant.
Then again, given his track record, him saying 2+2=4 would be
highly suspect just on principle.
> In my humble opinion, "Snoman" seems to be a pretty knowledgeable
> fellow, who spends quite a bit of time and effort trying to help
Time yes. Effort, no. Most is outdated by decades.
(re: relating his 18 year old pick up to a current post here
regarding a 99 Suburban)
> people here -- just like yourself. If and when he says something you
> believe is wrong, or even just that you have a better answer to,
> please speak out, in a civilized manner.
Been there, done that. Check the post by Doug a few days ago
regarding anti-rattle clips for a 1 ton Diesel G van with Bendix
brakes.
I posted a 100% correct answer with a link to a picture of the
clip orientation. Snoball wasted no time jumping all over it
claiming it was wrong information. Snoball fails in that he put
no effort into making himself aware of the various brake types
used by GM, he fails in not having read Doug's description of the
brakes he was working on, he fails in comprehension due to the
fact that I even mentioned in my reply to Doug that even though
the picture was that of a Ford brake pad with clip installed
correctly, that I was all wrong for showing a Ford brake pad. And
even though Snojob had previously answered Doug incorrectly, I
held my tongue in a civil mannner and simply provided Doug with
the information that he needed to fix his truck brakes correctly.
I say bullshit to the notion that he should be treated in a
civilized manner, his ego precedes everything that he does.
By his own admission today, he is a "hobbiest."
As a hobbiest, it would take him years, maybe decades to glean
the experience that myself and Ian and the other professionals
here see in one weeks time, and I mean that individually, not
collectively.
By his own admission, Snojob has admitted to resorting to
illegal, unsafe, dangerous backyard hack procedures to effect
certain repairs.
Being a hobbiest also tells me that Snojob has an emotional
attachment to the topics he posts most often about. Emotion
clouds judgment. When you mix ego, emotion and clouded judgment,
disaster is soon to follow.
> That idiotic rant that was
> just posted, about "the abominable Snoman", just serves the opposite
> purpose: it tells me that the person who posted it, and those who
> cheered his action, should be treated with caution, and their advice
> taken with a grain of salt.
When I was in school, the troublemakers, the loudmouths, the
disruptors were removed from the classroom, if they continued
their behavior, they were removed permanently. Naturally (due to
their behavior) their wrong/incomplete answers got them a failing
grade which either resulted in a repeat of the course or they
simply became dropouts.
Got no use for flunkers and dropouts.
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo - 29 Oct 2006 16:33 GMT
Thanks for the thoughtful, serious answer, "aarcuda69062". I
appreciate it, and see where you're coming from on this issue.
-tih

Signature
Don't ascribe to stupidity what can be adequately explained by ignorance.
> In my humble opinion, "Snoman" seems to be a pretty knowledgeable
> fellow, who spends quite a bit of time and effort trying to help
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> cheered his action, should be treated with caution, and their advice
> taken with a grain of salt.
I'll tell you what, Tom. Feel free to ignore anything that I post
here. I don't have a problem with that.
Ian