Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chevrolet / Chevrolet Trucks / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FYI: Colorado Recall

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Frank S. - 10 Dec 2006 02:22 GMT
I received a recall from Chevy today. It is for the brake light switch.
I have a '05 4 WD
Frank
shiden_kai - 10 Dec 2006 20:59 GMT
> I received a recall from Chevy today. It is for the brake light
> switch. I have a '05 4 WD

Yeah...just had to order one of those on Friday.

By the way, to all Colorado owners (4x4).  Just
a note of caution.....the spare tire on these vehicles
is a full size, but for some reason it is not the same
circumference as the regular tires on the vehicles.

We've seen 2 or 3 Colorado's come in the shop
with the front diffs basically melted because the
person had a flat tire, threw the spare tire on, and
then ran in 4hi with the spare tire.  Obviously, the
front diff is the weak point when it comes to
driveline binding.

So check your spare tire, if it doesn't match the
circumference of your regular tires, use it, just
don't use 4hi unless you are in low traction
conditions.  These other customers frankly
deserve what they got, as nobody should be
running a truck on high traction surfaces with
4hi engaged.

Ian
Commentator - 10 Dec 2006 21:39 GMT
>> I received a recall from Chevy today. It is for the brake light
>> switch. I have a '05 4 WD
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Ian

Yeah, my '06 has 285's with a 235 spare.
Sigwings - 10 Dec 2006 22:31 GMT
Well, since 285 tells you the width, we have no way of knowing if a 235 will
have the same CIRCUMFERENCE (which is the length around the tire and has
absolutely nothing to do with the width).

>>> I received a recall from Chevy today. It is for the brake light
>>> switch. I have a '05 4 WD
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Yeah, my '06 has 285's with a 235 spare.
Commentator - 10 Dec 2006 23:21 GMT
>>>> I received a recall from Chevy today. It is for the brake light
>>>> switch. I have a '05 4 WD
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Yeah, my '06 has 285's with a 235 spare.

<Top posting fixed>

> Well, since 285 tells you the width, we have no way of knowing if a
> 235 will have the same CIRCUMFERENCE (which is the length around the
> tire and has absolutely nothing to do with the width).

Sorry if I assumed a level of intelligence you are missing.

Both are /75R15.  Think you can manage to figure out the rest?

Smartass.
Topp@Work - 12 Dec 2006 15:37 GMT
> >>>> I received a recall from Chevy today. It is for the brake light
> >>>> switch. I have a '05 4 WD
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Smartass.

Then you have no issue with CIRCUMFERENCE...
George Jaynes - 12 Dec 2006 20:07 GMT
>> > "Commentator" <commentator@nospam.com> wrote in
>> >> Yeah, my '06 has 285's with a 235
>>
>> Both are /75R15.
> Then you have no issue with CIRCUMFERENCE...

the 75 refers to percentage of width added to the base diameter.  There is a
difference in circumference here.
jrk - 12 Dec 2006 22:17 GMT
>>> > "Commentator" <commentator@nospam.com> wrote in
>>> >> Yeah, my '06 has 285's with a 235
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the 75 refers to percentage of width added to the base diameter.  There is
> a difference in circumference here.

but 'circumference' doesn't matter... or so some say...
Commentator - 12 Dec 2006 22:36 GMT
>>>>>> I received a recall from Chevy today. It is for the brake light
>>>>>> switch. I have a '05 4 WD
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Then you have no issue with CIRCUMFERENCE...

Really?

Try the math.

(First, make the correction I made in another post, to 265's, not 285's.
And before you make a smartass comment, this shrinks the difference, but
most decidedly does not eliminate it)

Sidewall height: 265 * .75 = 198.75
To inches: 198.75 / 25.4 = 7.82
Total tire height: 15 + (2 * 7.82) = 30.65
Circumference: 30.65 * 3.14 = 96.24

And for the spare:

Sidewall height: 235 * .75 = 176.25
To inches: 176.25 / 25.4 = 6.94
Total tire height: 15 + (2 * 6.94) = 28.88
Circumference: 28.88 * 3.14 = 90.66

Thanks for playing.
Frank S. - 11 Dec 2006 01:16 GMT
I know about the tire, I found out when I had a flat! In the book, they
tell you to rotate the tires with the spare. Since it had a different
rim, I decided just to rotate the 4.
BTW, what pressure are the 4X4's running in the tires
Thanks
Frank

> I received a recall from Chevy today. It is for the brake light
> switch. I have a '05 4 WD
> Frank
Commentator - 11 Dec 2006 03:20 GMT
>> I received a recall from Chevy today. It is for the brake light
>> switch. I have a '05 4 WD
>> Frank

> I know about the tire, I found out when I had a flat! In the book,
> they tell you to rotate the tires with the spare. Since it had a
> different rim, I decided just to rotate the 4.
> BTW, what pressure are the 4X4's running in the tires
> Thanks
> Frank

The tires are running 30 psi.

And BTW, I made a typo - my '06 has 265's, not 285's.
shiden_kai - 11 Dec 2006 03:59 GMT
> BTW, what pressure are the 4X4's running in the tires
> Thanks

There is a sticker on the drivers door that tells you what
the factory wants in the tires.  It's a good place to
start.

Ian
Whitelightning - 11 Dec 2006 16:46 GMT
> There is a sticker on the drivers door that tells you what
> the factory wants in the tires.  It's a good place to
> start.
>
> Ian

Its the place to stay unless you change tires, ie load rating.  Not
following
the recommendations can cause issue.  Look at the first 4 years of Corvair.
Chevy said 19 psi for the front tires, but old timers in the field felt that
was too
low  Going to a higher pressure caused handling issues, that were corrected
when Chevy put a sway  bar on the front axle.  Chevy knew there could be
handling issues
because of suspension loading because of the light nose and rear suspension
design.
By recommending a lower tire pressure in the front, this off set the loading
issues, and handling wouldn't have been any more of a problem for the rear
engine corvair then it was for the early Porsches, VW's, or rear engine
Citroens, Fiats and Renaults of the same era.  Sometimes those engineers
really do know what the hell they are talking about.. Of course they ended
up adding a 6 dollar sway bar because people seldom follow the
recommendations.
It should be noted that the Cadillac Eldarodo used the same thinking only in
reverse, 19 psi in the rear tires to balance handling.

Whitelightning
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.