>> It effected the 4.3 and 5.7 Vortec motors.
>
>The defect effects ALL GM V engines. 3.1, 3.4, 3.8, 4.3, 5.0, 5.7.
>> They said last repair had new gasket style. BTW truck only has a
>> little over 42K today
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Hey a.shole, where did I tell him not to verify that the heads were flat?
>(use all the screen space you need to show the citation)
> >The OP realizes that genius, that's why he stated in his first post that
> >he was going to take the heads to a machine shop and have them checked.
>
> You just like to be a troll and cause trouble. I was telling them SOP
> of gasket repair.
Uh-huh.. Seems he already had that figured out with out you reinforcing
it.
> >Do you not read what people post, or is it just a lack of comprehension?
>
> Yes I do think you lack reasoning and comprehension...
Parroting what someone else has already said shows reasoning and
comprehension, eh?
> >You going to deny the plausibility of the computer programmer had a
> >leaking intake gasket and ran the coolant low resulting in what is now
> >SUSPECTED to be a blown head gasket?
>
> Where are you going with this Troll??? I said overheating or low
> coolant earlier did I not?
The OP said he was having the heads checked earlier did he not?
> >> There was a design defect with Intake gasket that GM rediesigned in
> >> late 2005.
> >
> >GMs redesign sucks. The Fel-Pro gaskets are much better.
>
> New design is a lot better
By your own admission, the redesign failed in your truck after 9000
miles.
> >> It effected the 4.3 and 5.7 Vortec motors.
> >
> >The defect effects ALL GM V engines. 3.1, 3.4, 3.8, 4.3, 5.0, 5.7.
>
> Not really
Yes, really. Same gasket architecture, same reason for failure.
> but then a Troll would not likely know this.
I guess you wouldn't.
> The reason
> there was a big problem with 4.3 and 5.7
What about the 5.0, are you saying that that engine didn't suffer intake
gasket failures as the 4.3 and 5.7 did?
Or is this just your armchair expertise showing thru again?
> Vortec motors is because when
> GM went from TBI to MPI thay changed bolting of intake to engine
> (example on 5.7 they stopped using center 4 bolts to secure it)
Just like the Ford Windsor engines which strangely don't suffer intake
gasket failures any worse that the pre-Vortec Chevies.
> and the manifold flexed more in heating and cooling cycle and strained
> gaskets
Um, Mr. Genius, the coolant leaks are not in the center of the manifold
where the bolts were eliminated, they leak at the ends where there are
two (note spelling) bolts per coolant passage.
If (big if) your missing bolt, flexing manifold theory were correct,
these engines would have a history of driveability problems from vacuum
leaks into the lifter valley and oil consumption problems from the leaks
allowing oil to migrate into the intake manifold from the lifter valley.
> plus GM used a cheap plastic design
Bingo!
> for a while too. Intake
> gasket problems with TBI engines where of a different nature
Um, no. They leaked in the exact same place in the exact same manner.
Only differences were; it usually took longer before they began leaking
and the old gaskets were harder to scrape off.
> and 3.1,
> 3.4 and 3.8 where not as troublesome
They most certainly are.
> because they were not based on a
> modified 40 plus year old engine design.
The Buick 3.8/3800 isn't based on a modified 40 year old design?
You don't know your a.s from a hole in the ground.
Oh, FYI, Buick didn't eliminate any bolts from the center of the
manifold on the 3.8/3800 engines yet the gaskets still fail.
> >> I personall had
> >> one fail on my 2000 5.7 under warranty at 29K miles and again out of
> >> warranty at 38K miles.
Looks like your "a lot better" redesigned gaskets only last 9000 miles.
Why don't you give the OP a break and stop recommending parts that are
going to fail and cause him to do the job over again.
> They fixed it for free out of warranty and
> >> promised me that if it ever leaks again they will fix it for free.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Actuall I have rebuild a lot of engine and valve jobs and intake
> gasket changes but why change it when GM will pay to have it done??
Because better parts would be available, because someone isn't too lazy
to do it, because someone has the skill sets to do it, because self
respect prevents them from whining about an out of warranty failure.
> Is
> this a Troll thing?
Certainly not, it's a laugh at you thing.
> BTW, I was planning to change mine when GM offered
GM "offered?"
They have people that just call around and ask if people would like a
free set of defective intake manifold gaskets, huh?
> to do it for free and free repair if it ever leaks again and only a
> foolish troll would pass that one up.
You think "free" means good? <sheesh>
> >> They said last repair had new gasket style. BTW truck only has a
> >> little over 42K today
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> tisk tisk, Troll loosing temper. Remember you started this not me....
So, you can't provide a cite of me telling him not to verify that the
heads are flat. IOWs, more of your made up bull sh.t, which better fits
the definition of "troll" than anything I've posted.
> >> That head gasket is clamped between to big pieces
> >
> >You mean 'two' big pieces?
>
> I guess your troll brain get lost here and cannot rationalize that the
> block is a big piece of cast iron and so is head.
But where are these big pieces going [to]?
> >> of cast iron and the only way it is going to block is if one of the
> >> surfaces warps and changes pressure on it. (or you supercharge it on
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Another Troll responce, I was stating the reason why they fail in
> service.
How can that be a reason [they] fail when this truck doesn't have a
supercharger to begin with?
> I dod not say he had a super on his.
So why even bring it up other than your insane need to fill space with
meaningless and irrelevant tripe?
> I need to remember when
> you talk to a Troll you have to keep it simple sometimes.
No, you just need to remember to stick to the subject when you actually
have something useful to offer and resist the urge to add extraneous
filler material.
> >> SOme time they can warp with heat and
> >> straight out with they cool but NEVER change a head gasket on any
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Yes I am sure he sees who has a temper problem here.
That would be the guy posting non-relevant, inadequate filler material.
azwiley1 - 29 Oct 2007 16:33 GMT
<Great Big Snip>
Hey Neil, just wanted you to remember that you are only pissing in the
wind with this one.
Comboverfish - 29 Oct 2007 17:13 GMT
> In article <1vnbi3lrcohkni1ok45as4dvl30tb9s...@4ax.com>,
> > and 3.1,
> > 3.4 and 3.8 where not as troublesome
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> The Buick 3.8/3800 isn't based on a modified 40 year old design?
Jinx, You Owe Me A Coke!
Toyota MDT in MO
Neil Nelson - 30 Oct 2007 02:50 GMT
> > In article <1vnbi3lrcohkni1ok45as4dvl30tb9s...@4ax.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Jinx,
I beg to differ...
... just as I was reading this, Favre threw an incredible touchdown pass.
> You Owe Me A Coke!
Am I coming down there to buy you one or are you coming up here?
Take Paypal?
Comboverfish - 30 Oct 2007 13:47 GMT
> In article <1193674429.003337.200...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Take Paypal?
Heh heh, I've heard that Wisconsin is really wonderful... in the
summer. A trip is tentatively planned for somewhere around summer of
20??. I'll keep you posted :-)
Toyota MDT in MO