> > Thats great!!! Im sure your kids will appreciate that in the yrs to
> > come..Dont forget , we didnt inherit this earth from our ansestors. we are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> monoxide, and hydrocarbons are reduced to CO2 in a few hours in the
> atmosphere.
Of course, you forgot that when hydrocarbons are reduced to CO2 in
the atmosphere, this happens by combination with NoX, which produces
ozone, which is a serious pollutant in the lower atmosphere.
> Oxides of nitrogen may be a little more durable but not
> much.
Not true. In fact NoX emissions are the worst of all. At lower levels
they combine with hydrocarbons to produce ozone. In fact, if enough
sunlight is available the chemical reaction continually breaks apart
and puts back together the NoX molecules, this process continues
indefinitely, consuming hydrocarbons and spewing out ozone. As plants
produce a large number of hydrocarbons, introducing NoX into the
mix will create large amounts of ozone.
At higher levels in the atmosphere where there is higher solar energy
available,
and fewer to no hydrocarbons, the reaction is quite different, instead what
is consumed is ozone itself.
NoX is mostly removed from the atmosphere by rain, creating acid
rain.
> Cat converters are a cancer on the a.s of America and produce
> only short term improvements, relevant only in cities like LA and
> Denver. Where I live emmissions control does nothing for average air
> quality except in a really bad traffic jam.
Not perhaps at ground level, however it does destroy the ozone layer in
the stratosphere. Why do you think incidence of skin cancer is so high
now?
> And I'm not worried about the federales whatsoever. The State guys
> could cause trouble but they have to prove I was the one who did it.
> Even so all they can do is make me fix it.
No, what they do is if your a shop and they think your doing this they
run a staged vehicle through your shop, and if it comes out with a punched
cat, then they give you a choice of either paying a fine or fixing it for
all
the customers they think you punched cats on.
If they keep getting reports that your still punching cats then the next
time
they run a staged vehicle through and it comes back punched, then they
don't bother giving you the option to fix the cats anymore, they just
fine you. And what your missing is that the very reason that this is an
administrative violation, is because the state doesen't have to meet the
burden of "beyond a reasonable doubt" if you try fighting it.
This is why speeding tickets aren't misdemeanors, didn't you know that?
The very reason that the states keep them administrative violations,
rather than actual criminal actions, is because as long as the ticket isn't
a crime, the accuser (the state) isn't legally required to prove anything.
You should talk to a few people someday that have been fined for
exceeding their fishing or hunting tags and see just how much the
state had to prove.
Also with the newer vehicles that have post-cat emissions sensors,
your never going to be able to get the check engine light to turn off,
which kind of limits your ability to resell the car.
Ted
so we should have these removable and only install them in traffic jams??
> > Thats great!!! Im sure your kids will appreciate that in the yrs to
> > come..Dont forget , we didnt inherit this earth from our ansestors. we are
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> could cause trouble but they have to prove I was the one who did it.
> Even so all they can do is make me fix it.
> Cat converters are a cancer on the a.s of America
How so? What do they do/cause/prevent that you object to?
> and produce only short term improvements, relevant only in cities like
> LA and Denver.
If that's the case, how come they've been adopted as the heart of emission
control systems worldwide?
Bob Lutz - 19 Oct 2004 18:30 GMT
> f that's the case, how come they've been adopted as the heart of emission
> control systems worldwide?
It would seem to me, mind you, I don't know my a.s from ice cream about
this sort of thing, but it seems to me that all it would do is dilute the
emissions, by making them hotter. Less particles of [whatever it is that
comes out]= lower emission count at the testing station.
I'm probably wrong, though.
Daniel J. Stern - 19 Oct 2004 19:06 GMT
> It would seem to me, mind you, I don't know my a.s from ice cream about
> this sort of thing, but it seems to me that all it would do is dilute
> the emissions, by making them hotter. Less particles of [whatever it is
> that comes out]= lower emission count at the testing station. I'm
> probably wrong, though.
Um...yeah. You're wrong. *VERY* wrong. That's not how a catalytic
converter works at all.
A catcon has two sections: a reducing section and an oxidizing section.
Reduction and oxidation are two opposite chemical processes. In oxidation,
Oxygen is combined with another element to create a compound called an
"oxide". In reduction, oxygen is removed from an oxide.
The reducing section of the catalytic converter is upstream of the
oxidizing section, and in some systems is housed separately. Its job is to
_reduce_ Nitrogen Oxides ("NOx") into Nitrogen and Oxygen.
The oxidizing section of the catalytic converter then oxidizes Carbon
Monoxide into Carbon Dioxide, and unburned hydrocarbons into Dihydrogen
Monoxide (water) and Carbon Dioxide.
DS
Ted Mittelstaedt - 20 Oct 2004 09:27 GMT
> > It would seem to me, mind you, I don't know my a.s from ice cream about
> > this sort of thing, but it seems to me that all it would do is dilute
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> A catcon has two sections: a reducing section and an oxidizing section.
Well, technically not all cats have a reducing section. The early ones
didn't.
Also I don't think the ones they use on wood stoves have the reducing
section
either.
Ted
Matt Whiting - 20 Oct 2004 12:41 GMT
>>>It would seem to me, mind you, I don't know my a.s from ice cream about
>>>this sort of thing, but it seems to me that all it would do is dilute
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Ted
I believe also that there isn't a reducing and oxidizing "section" per
se, as in front half is one and back half is the other, I believe that
this is accomplished with two layers of different catalyst coatings on
top of the washcoat. The layers are fairly porous and thus the exhaust
gas gets to both layers where the magic happens.
Matt
Bill Putney - 23 Oct 2004 03:53 GMT
> ...The oxidizing section of the catalytic converter then oxidizes Carbon
> Monoxide into Carbon Dioxide, and unburned hydrocarbons into Dihydrogen
> Monoxide (water) and Carbon Dioxide.
>
> DS
Be careful with that Dihydrogen Monoxide - it will kill you if inhaled. 8^)
Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')
Daniel J. Stern - 23 Oct 2004 14:51 GMT
> > ...The oxidizing section of the catalytic converter then oxidizes
> > Carbon Monoxide into Carbon Dioxide, and unburned hydrocarbons into
> > Dihydrogen Monoxide and Carbon Dioxide.
> Be careful with that Dihydrogen Monoxide - it will kill you if inhaled.
> 8^)
That's nothing compared to the expansive phase change that will occur if
it is not stored and transported below 373.15K at all times...!
Joe Pfeiffer - 19 Oct 2004 20:34 GMT
> > f that's the case, how come they've been adopted as the heart of emission
> > control systems worldwide?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I'm probably wrong, though.
Yes, you are. Completely wrong. It doesn't dilute the particles by
making them hotter, it finishes the combustion so the hydrocarbons
aren't particles at all (nor hydrocarbons, for that matter) and the
carbon monoxide is now carbon dioxide. They also break down NOx into
nitrogen and oxygen.

Signature
Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. Phone -- (505) 646-1605
Department of Computer Science FAX -- (505) 646-1002
New Mexico State University http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer