Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chrysler Cars / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Crysler voyager -95 3.3l Backfiring in aircleaner ,New info!!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Janne S  Sweden - 22 Oct 2004 23:41 GMT
Today i discovered that i by pressing the throttle several times could
get the car to accelerate fully without bacfiring in the aircleaner.
It worked fine several times. If i press the trottle only one time it
still backfires.

Does that help anyone to get a bright solution to my problem???.
Janne S
maxpower - 23 Oct 2004 00:20 GMT
If you vehicle is due for plugs and wires do it now, that may take care of
your problem
> Today i discovered that i by pressing the throttle several times could
> get the car to accelerate fully without bacfiring in the aircleaner.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Does that help anyone to get a bright solution to my problem???.
> Janne S
Ted Mittelstaedt - 23 Oct 2004 09:59 GMT
> Today i discovered that i by pressing the throttle several times could
> get the car to accelerate fully without bacfiring in the aircleaner.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Does that help anyone to get a bright solution to my problem???.
> Janne S

Hey Janne,

 What you have described so far isn't possible.  Here's what I'm hearing
you say:

1) Backfiring at part throttle, not full throttle.

2) Ignition system completely checked out with a friend's scope and timing
is correct and all parts of ignition system have been replaced

3) Car completely within emissions.

In short, this isn't possible.

So, let's go back to the beginning and start over.

If this was a spark plug/secondary ignition problem (bad coil, crossed
wires, etc.) then
the misfiring/backfiring would get worse the higher the rpm.

If this was a spark primary ignition problem (ie: timing) then the friend
and his scope would have caught it.

If this was a restricted fuel filter or bad fuel pump then the higher the
rpm the
worse the problem.

If this was a compression problem it wouldn't be backfiring.

If this was a fuel problem then the emissions would be out of wack.

So I have to conclude that your testing methodology is flawed.  If you are
absolutely
positively positive that the timing is perfect and the ignition system is
perfect - which means your friend and his scope tested it out correctly -
then the problem is in the fuel system,
specifically the engine is running too lean - which means that the HC would
be high and
the CO way low - which means the emissions would be off.

In short, you cannot have it both ways.  You cannot have a perfect emissions
report
AND a perfect checkout with your friend and his scope, and still have this
problem.
One of them has to be wrong.

Off the cuff the most likely candidate is bad timing at part throttle, OR
too lean
condition at part throttle.  However both the timing and the mixture are
computer
controlled.  There is an old saying with computers, garbage-in, garbage-out.
I think
the likeliest problem here is you have one or more bad sensors feeding into
the computer.

The fact as you say that sometimes it runs fine is even more an indication
that it's
a sensor-to-computer problem.  Maybe a bad sensor that with the vibration
occasionally "heals"

Some would say that if it's a bad sensor that the computer would set a code.
Well I
have a '95 T&C with a 3.8 and when I bought it 3 years ago used, the EGR
valve was
shot, and the van wouldn't pass emissions, and there was NO CODE set.
PERIOD.
Replacing the EGR valve dropped the NoX down and it passed emissions.  So
don't
argue with me and tell me that the computer in these things is smart enough
to detect
if a sensor is shot.  I know from experience this is just wishful thinking.
Sometimes
sensors will fail in such a way that the computer cannot figure out that
they are bad.
For example, your TPS could have worn out the middle of it's slide and the
computer
not know where the throttle is, fuel mix is going to be wrong, then.  Car
computers
are notorious for saying one part is bad when it's another part entirely.

You say you have already shotgun the ignition system components.  Well fine,
great,
quite replacing them.  Or better yet keep replacing them and send me your
old ones
because they aren't broken.

It's time you put a scan tool on this vehicle, or pay someone to do it.  If
you really want
to do it yourself, you can buy an OTC Monitor 4000E off Ebay pretty cheap
that will do this.  You need to scan it and run the engine and make sure
your actually getting
valid inputs from all the sensors.  You need to check timing with a timing
light - yes I
know the factory manual says timing is non-adjustable, but a timing light
and degree wheel on the crank still work.  The cam chain could have jumped a
tooth and that is going to
shift timing out of wack.  You need to put a fuel pressure guage on the fuel
rail and test that.  In short, you are past the stage of being able to fix
it with a $39.99 on-sale Sears Craftsman wrench set, a Haynes manual, and a
bucket of miscellaneous screwdrivers.  You are either going to have to go
out and buy the tools (and documentation, like the Factory Service Manaul)
to troubleshoot it properly or pay someone who has the tools to do it
correctly.

Ted
maxpower - 23 Oct 2004 11:01 GMT
its an intermittent secondary misfire, plugs/wires/coil

> > Today i discovered that i by pressing the throttle several times could
> > get the car to accelerate fully without bacfiring in the aircleaner.
[quoted text clipped - 109 lines]
>
> Ted
Denny - 23 Oct 2004 11:25 GMT
This kind of reminds me of a weird one I had a few years ago. Intermit no
power, pops back thru intake, didn't run worth a sh.t at part throttle and
may even die at times. No codes were present. Finally caught it acting up
and it was the crank position sensor.  Never came back for that problem
after replacing it.

Denny

> its an intermittent secondary misfire, plugs/wires/coil
>>
[quoted text clipped - 132 lines]
>>
>> Ted
jdoe - 23 Oct 2004 11:44 GMT
THat's right. Damn near forgot I had the same thing happen to my 93 I had.
Engine would act nuts and the tach would go crazy too.
LArry
> This kind of reminds me of a weird one I had a few years ago. Intermit no
> power, pops back thru intake, didn't run worth a sh.t at part throttle and
[quoted text clipped - 155 lines]
>>>
>>> Ted
Janne S  Sweden - 24 Oct 2004 02:24 GMT
> THat's right. Damn near forgot I had the same thing happen to my 93 I had.
> Engine would act nuts and the tach would go crazy too.
[quoted text clipped - 158 lines]
> >>>
> >>> Ted

Hey Ted

That is what i call a answer!.

I have two problems, a car that dont work properly and the fact that i
dont know the English technical terms for everything in the car and a
lot of other words as well i´m sorry to say. How good is your
Swedish????.

You have missunderstood some things i´ve said i think.

> >>  ""What you have described so far isn't possible.  Here's what I'm hearing
you say:

1) Backfiring at part throttle, not full throttle.

2) Ignition system completely checked out with a friend's scope and
timing
is correct and all parts of ignition system have been replaced

3) Car completely within emissions.

In short, this isn't possible.""

1) If i press the throttle as slowly as i can in neutral it will run
perfectly up to 3780rpm and then start to miss slightly and the rpm
gauge will start to wiggle between 2000 and 7000 rpm´s, if i continue
to put more throttle on, it will missfire more and more until it
starts to blow back into the aircleaner.
It will do the same thing if i would press throttle right to the
floor, rev up and BOOM miss miss boom.
Sometimes it don´t backfires but just missfires and chokes.

I´ve said nothing about NOT backfiring at full throttle.

2) We tested the ingnition with a timing strobe and it´s behaves
correctly.
I have replaced the wires and plugs, not the ignition coils.We
measured them and they seems ok according to the values that i found
on Allpars.com.

3) The cars emissions is ok. I dont know how you are doing the test in
your country but here we test at idle and at what they call elevated
idle (about 2500-3000rpm) and it passes that test. I have a long sheet
of paper with the result of the tests we made but they are at my
friends workshop unfortunatley.

We also tested the fuelpressure (OK)and the vacuum (OK)and alot of
other things that were OK.

He dont have a scantool for Chrysler, but i will be able to borrow one
within a month time i hope.

As i described before i could fool the engine to go just right if i do
what i had to do with my old Chevy van with a bad acceleration pump in
the carb.
I go in about 35-40 mph thrusts the throttle to the floor and starts
to pump up and down about one third of the throttles total travelling
distance a couple of times and then floor it again and it accelerates
just fine.

I think just as you do it must be one of the sensors, probably the TPS
sensor that also works as a "acceleration pump" what i understand. I´m
not sure about that last thing, but you maybe know that Ted.
It seems to me that the engine suddenly dont get enough fuel, but why
always at that same rpm regardless of the load on the car, i dont
understand that. Could the TPS sensor give me this problem if it´s
worn out somewhere in it´s slide range?.
TPS=throttle position sensor ..right?
The throttle can´t be in the exact same position when i test it in
neutral as it will be when i test it on the road for example upphill
with a caravan or a trailer, but it will always start to mess around
at the same rpm.

As you said...it´s a impossible problem and i hope the scantool will
help me otherwise i have to throw my motto away and go to the local
Chrysler workshop with the tail between my legs....and i don´t like
that, i tell you that!.

And Ted
I have access to (almost)a fully equipped workshop with owner and that
hasen´t helped me so far unfortunatley, but my hope lays on the
scantool.
Thank you for your help in this matter, you put some new idéas into my
head to try if the scantool takes to long to get hold of.

Janne
Ted Mittelstaedt - 25 Oct 2004 07:35 GMT
> Hey Ted
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> I?ve said nothing about NOT backfiring at full throttle.

Then in that case, the symptoms are consistent with a intermittent secondary
misfire.
Since only the plug wires and the coil itself are part of this system, and
you said
you replaced the plug wires, then the next suspect is the coil.

I had thought in one of your prior posts you had said you replaced the
coils.

And I am positive in a prior post you said you had replaced the plug wires.

> 2) We tested the ingnition with a timing strobe and it?s behaves
> correctly.
> I have replaced the wires and plugs, not the ignition coils.We
> measured them and they seems ok according to the values that i found
> on Allpars.com.

A resistance measurement for a coil is useless.

> 3) The cars emissions is ok. I dont know how you are doing the test in
> your country but here we test at idle and at what they call elevated
> idle (about 2500-3000rpm) and it passes that test.

OK, well then that kind of testing is garbage.  Do you drive only at idle
speed and only at 2500-3000rpm when you are on the road?

I have a long sheet
> of paper with the result of the tests we made but they are at my
> friends workshop unfortunatley.

Here, 1995 and prior vehicles are tested on a dyno.  The car is run from
idle up to around 4000rpm in a gradual curve, then back down.  They have
to have the exact vehicle make/model/engine so I am of the opinion that
the curve used is different for each engine.  It is probably optimized to
try
to make the vehicle fail, at least that is how I'd program it if I wrote it.

> We also tested the fuelpressure (OK)and the vacuum (OK)and alot of
> other things that were OK.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> distance a couple of times and then floor it again and it accelerates
> just fine.

OK clarification then:, when you "floor it" your going at WOT right?

You see, this basically knocks out the intermittent secondary misfire
idea/coil failure diagnosis.

If it was a real ignition misfire such as coil or plug wires, it would do it
ALL the time
including the time that you are saying that it's "accellerating just fine"
regardless of
the pumping your doing.

> I think just as you do it must be one of the sensors, probably the TPS
> sensor that also works as a "acceleration pump" what i understand. I?m
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> with a caravan or a trailer, but it will always start to mess around
> at the same rpm.

could be.  I know what you want me to say, you want me to say it's the
TPS so you can go waste more money shotgunning.

> As you said...it?s a impossible problem and i hope the scantool will
> help me otherwise i have to throw my motto away and go to the local
> Chrysler workshop with the tail between my legs....and i don?t like
> that, i tell you that!.

It's not an impossible problem - this is why they make scantools.  This is
your own vehicle, right?  Why are you so resistant to buying a scantool?!
Here's an example of one that would have worked perfectly for you,
check out the price!!!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=2495352522&ca
tegory=43989&sspagename=WDVW


> And Ted
> I have access to (almost)a fully equipped workshop with owner and that
> hasen?t helped me so far unfortunatley, but my hope lays on the
> scantool.
> Thank you for your help in this matter, you put some new id?as into my
> head to try if the scantool takes to long to get hold of.

You really need a factory service manual if your trying to DIY.

Ted
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.