Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Chrysler Cars / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

3.5L Crankshaft Removal

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
crook999@hotmail.com - 17 Feb 2005 02:28 GMT
The crankshaft in my 94 Intrepid needs to be removed because of a spun
con rod bearing.  Is it possible to remove the crank without removing
the engine from the vehicle?
maxpower - 17 Feb 2005 09:31 GMT
Remove the engine, are the heads coming off too? did it ruin one of the rods
when it spun?
> The crankshaft in my 94 Intrepid needs to be removed because of a spun
> con rod bearing.  Is it possible to remove the crank without removing
> the engine from the vehicle?
crook999@hotmail.com - 17 Feb 2005 17:04 GMT
The rod will also be replaced.  I was just wondering if the crank could
be removed without removing the engine since the work is being done by
a local garage and of course time is money.  The mechanic says the
engine does have to be removed but then again he said my Chrysler
4-speed auto needed Dexron and not ATF +3.
Art - 17 Feb 2005 19:04 GMT
> The rod will also be replaced.  I was just wondering if the crank could
> be removed without removing the engine since the work is being done by
> a local garage and of course time is money.  The mechanic says the
> engine does have to be removed but then again he said my Chrysler
> 4-speed auto needed Dexron and not ATF +3.

And you are using him because?......
maxpower - 17 Feb 2005 19:45 GMT
> The rod will also be replaced.  I was just wondering if the crank could
> be removed without removing the engine since the work is being done by
> a local garage and of course time is money.  The mechanic says the
> engine does have to be removed but then again he said my Chrysler
> 4-speed auto needed Dexron and not ATF +3.

just because the book says one thing doesn't mean it has to be done that
way, I have not had to replace one yet, but seems to me if it needs rods, I
would have pulled the engine.

My opinion only

Glenn Beasley
Chrysler Tech
mic canic - 19 Feb 2005 14:35 GMT
i would do it so i could do all of them including mains and a valve job whil;e
it was apart spend a little now or a lot later

> > The rod will also be replaced.  I was just wondering if the crank could
> > be removed without removing the engine since the work is being done by
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Glenn Beasley
> Chrysler Tech
Steve - 17 Feb 2005 20:07 GMT
> The crankshaft in my 94 Intrepid needs to be removed because of a spun
> con rod bearing.  Is it possible to remove the crank without removing
> the engine from the vehicle?

I can't think of any way to remove the torque convertor drive plate from
the crank without pulling the engine that isn't more trouble than
pulling the engine. Pull the engine. For the amount of work that will
likely have to be done (probably needs a new connecting rod and
therefore a re-balance), its the only way to go.
mic canic - 19 Feb 2005 14:29 GMT
that would be way m,ore work than removing the engine and then you could
be sure it was done correctly

> The crankshaft in my 94 Intrepid needs to be removed because of a spun
> con rod bearing.  Is it possible to remove the crank without removing
> the engine from the vehicle?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.