I am patiently waiting for the fabled German engineers to catch up with
Burt Rutan and build a carbon fibre and aluminum car.
Get rid of the cast iron and steel, streamline the car and every other
component is lightened (wheels, tires, brakes....). Such a design would
approach modern aircraft's payload-to-vehicle weight ratio and yield
blazing performance too, in terms of terrific acceleration, top speed, hill
climbin, and low fuel consumption.
Has anybody notice gasoline is above $3.00 a gallon in California? The
days of traditional car constructions are numbered. The Big Three will
not agree, but once some Asian upstart lands on the scene with a 2000 pound
four-passenger sedan, they'll run for bankcrupcy court.
Sure, using modern materials and fabrication techniques may cost a little
more, but so what? What costs more new has greater value when later sold
used. Its a perfect balance. And what's more, when something costs a lot
because it contains so much value, the buyer appreciates it a lot more and
it isn't thrown out so soon. He gets more value out of it because he keeps
it longer. Its like a fine Leica camera. Back in '53 it cost $300, a
small fortune. Many such buyers still own the same camera after all these
years; those who decide to sell can get every nickel back and more.
Art - 24 Mar 2005 02:11 GMT
Chrysler has a plastic molded car with a body made out of 2 pieces of
plastic. Saw it on some show. Intended for poor areas in Africa. We may
need it here soon in the US. Probably won't meet safety standards. Looked
like a plastic golf cart.
>I am patiently waiting for the fabled German engineers to catch up with
> Burt Rutan and build a carbon fibre and aluminum car.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> small fortune. Many such buyers still own the same camera after all these
> years; those who decide to sell can get every nickel back and more.
SRG - 24 Mar 2005 03:53 GMT
Nomen, stop blathering again....
>I am patiently waiting for the fabled German engineers to catch up with
> Burt Rutan and build a carbon fibre and aluminum car.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> small fortune. Many such buyers still own the same camera after all these
> years; those who decide to sell can get every nickel back and more.
Dori A Schmetterling - 24 Mar 2005 14:41 GMT
Optimist. Fantasist.
A 1953 Leica camera is worth maybe 200 USD today (in Germany), a tiny
fraction of the original value.
DAS
For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---
[...]
> it longer. Its like a fine Leica camera. Back in '53 it cost $300, a
> small fortune. Many such buyers still own the same camera after all these
> years; those who decide to sell can get every nickel back and more.
Hank - 24 Mar 2005 19:00 GMT
I think my Leica IIIG Red Dial is worth a bit more than that. :-)
> Optimist. Fantasist.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> small fortune. Many such buyers still own the same camera after all these
>> years; those who decide to sell can get every nickel back and more.
Mike Behnke - 24 Mar 2005 19:42 GMT
It's called a McLaren F1.
tinyurl.com/gb2d
> I am patiently waiting for the fabled German engineers to catch up with
> Burt Rutan and build a carbon fibre and aluminum car.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> small fortune. Many such buyers still own the same camera after all these
> years; those who decide to sell can get every nickel back and more.
Richard - 25 Mar 2005 18:30 GMT
Many nations require the materials in a car to be recycled at the end of its
life. Carbon Fibre does not fit into that plan; although I guess you could
burn the stuff.
Richard.