> Yes it was on outside air, I hardly ever use recirc.
I wonder, might it not be better to use recirculate with the AC removing
excesss moisture? Assuming the cabin is a closed system (not too far from
true, maybe) then removing moisture will eventually reduce the relative
humidity below a point that it will condense on the windows as frost or
mist. A closed cabin has a finite amount of water and removing it will
eventually accomplish the above, the question is: how closed is closed and
how long to reduce the RH low enough.
BF
> > Yes it was on outside air, I hardly ever use recirc.
>
> Well, even a tiny pinhole leak in the heater plumbing inside the car
> (core, pipes, possibly valve) can cause incredible amounts of very
> stubborn steam on the windows...
Matt Whiting - 26 Nov 2005 15:38 GMT
> I wonder, might it not be better to use recirculate with the AC removing
> excesss moisture? Assuming the cabin is a closed system (not too far from
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> eventually accomplish the above, the question is: how closed is closed and
> how long to reduce the RH low enough.
If you are in recirculate, where is the water going to go?
Matt
BF - 26 Nov 2005 15:52 GMT
AC on, out the drain tube.
BF
> > I wonder, might it not be better to use recirculate with the AC removing
> > excesss moisture? Assuming the cabin is a closed system (not too far from
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Matt
Daniel J. Stern - 26 Nov 2005 18:43 GMT
> I wonder, might it not be better to use recirculate with the AC removing
> excesss moisture?
NO!
Using recirculate will cause the air inside the car to become extremely
stale and wet.
> Assuming the cabin is a closed system (not too far from
> true, maybe) then removing moisture will eventually reduce the relative
> humidity below a point that it will condense on the windows as frost or
> mist.
Only if you stop breathing.